Bronchiectasis

Published on 23/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 2100 times

Chapter 45 Bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis was first described by Laënnec in 1819 as irreversible dilation and destruction of airways associated with chronic bacterial infection. It is characterized by inflamed and dilated thick-walled bronchi. The clinical features of bronchiectasis include chronic production of often mucopurulent or purulent sputum, persistent bacterial colonization, and recurrent lower respiratory tract infection.

Pathology

The most comprehensive description of bronchiectasis pathology remains that of Whitwell, who examined 200 consecutive resected surgical specimens in 1952. The findings revealed dilated, thickened bronchi, often containing pus with distortion of the bronchial lumen. The inflammatory reaction, visible macroscopically, was shown often to cause complete occlusion of the smaller bronchioles. These findings may be widespread or localized depending on the cause. Microscopically, examination of the bronchial epithelium showed ulceration with granulation tissue in areas where healing had begun. Other specimens had evidence of infiltration of inflammatory cells in the subepithelial tissues and hyperplasia of mucous glands. Supporting connective “elastic” tissues may also be damaged to varying degrees. These features may all be present in varying degrees, in keeping with the varying clinical symptomatology and severity of the disease.

Whitwell classified bronchiectasis into three groups based on pathologic findings—saccular, atelectatic, and follicular—and although these terms may have changed, the descriptions remain the same. Cylindrical bronchiectasis is characterized by bronchi showing a regular outline, with dilated airways only and usually ending abruptly. Varicose bronchiectasis has similarities to the appearance of varicose veins, with dilation that is deformed by areas of relative constriction. These bronchi also have a distorted and bulbous end. Cystic (saccular) bronchiectasis is considered the most severe form of bronchiectasis; its most prominent feature is progressively increasing dilation as the bronchi progress toward the lung periphery and airways, ending in cystlike clusters. These three basic forms of bronchiectasis are demonstrated in Figure 45-1 by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scanning.

Pathogenesis

The cause of non-CF bronchiectasis may only be identifiable in up to 50% of patients. However, a number of recognized conditions and factors are associated with bronchiectasis, and an underlying cause should be assessed in all patients (Box 45-1).

The genetic influence on the development of non-CF bronchiectasis is the subject of ongoing research, often on the role of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. The most common mutation of this gene, ΔF508 (F508del), is associated with severe CF (see Chapter 44). Numerous other mutations have been identified and associated with a milder clinical phenotype. As a consequence, late first presentation of CF has been described in patients who would otherwise have been considered to have idiopathic non-CF bronchiectasis. It is now recognized that mutations of the CFTR gene are more frequently observed in patients with bronchiectasis and a normal sweat chloride test than in the general population. Studies show that the spectrum of CFTR genotypes is associated with a continuum of CFTR dysfunction in the airways. Phenotypes range from patients with bronchiectasis, normal sweat test, and no other features suggestive of CF to those with classic CF. Also, some evidence suggests the CFTR mutations are associated with non-CF bronchiectasis and rheumatoid arthritis. Therefore, CFTR dysfunction can be identified as a cause of bronchiectasis in patients previously diagnosed with idiopathic non-CF bronchiectasis, but without fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for CF. How this affects patient management is currently unknown.

Establishing a cause for bronchiectasis depends on an accurate recollection of events by patients, making it difficult to establish a direct cause and effect in most patients. Nonetheless, an infective insult undoubtedly plays a role in establishing and maintaining the pathologic changes seen in bronchiectasis. This is demonstrated by the falling incidence since the widespread use of antibiotic therapy and immunizations in childhood. The role of infection is further emphasized by the association between the immune defects, and therefore increased susceptibility to infection, and the development of bronchiectasis.

The “vicious cycle” hypothesis of bronchiectasis suggests an initial failure or overwhelmed host defenses, leading to a host-mediated chronic inflammatory response, which in turn causes new or further impairment of mucociliary clearance and defenses, amplifying the problem. This interaction between chronic infection and excessive inflammation, which is predominantly neutrophilic, ensures ongoing damage to the airways and the development and maintenance of the features seen in bronchiectasis. Inflammatory mediators such as the neutrophil chemoattractant interleukin-8 (IL-8) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) are found in bronchial mucosal biopsies and secretions from bronchiectatic airways, in addition to tissue neutrophilia. This initiation of the inflammatory reaction results in the recruitment of phagocytes, dendritic cells, and lymphocytes, which contribute to the adaptive response (Figure 45-2).

Clinical Features

The severity of clinicopathologic events varies widely in patients with bronchiectasis. At the milder end of the spectrum, patients may have occasional exacerbations, with little or no intervening sputum production. Others have frequent exacerbations with chronic production of purulent sputum, even in the stable state. Symptoms can include hemoptysis, especially during exacerbations, and breathlessness, characterized by mild to moderate airflow obstruction, lethargy, and reduced health status. Hemoptysis may be only a minor problem, although erosion of mucosal neovascular arterioles during an acute exacerbation can result in massive hemoptysis. Quantitative analysis of HRCT scanning in bronchiectasis shows that the airflow obstruction is primarily linked to disease of small and medium-sized airways and not to bronchiectatic abnormalities in large airways, emphysema, or retained endobronchial secretions. Nonspecific chest pain varying in severity is also reported with increased frequency in bronchiectatic patients.

Clinical Signs

Finger (digital) clubbing has long been recognized as a sign of chronic suppurative lung disease. Despite previous reports of being frequently encountered in bronchiectasis, clubbing is much less common in more recent studies, perhaps because of a lower threshold for diagnosis of bronchiectasis. Studies report that the prevalence of clubbing is 1% to 2%, both in patients who develop symptoms as adults or in childhood and in adult patients. Overall, this suggests that finger clubbing is now seen only in a minority of patients with non-CF bronchiectasis.

The characteristic clinical finding in bronchiectasis is coarse crackles heard on auscultation, consistently reported in up to 73% of patients in more recent studies. Interestingly, an in-depth study of the phenotypes of bronchiectasis found the frequency of crackles to be much less in patients with adult onset of the symptom of chronic productive cough than in those with childhood onset of symptoms (20% vs. 64%). This difference was also associated with a greater amount of sputum production in the childhood-onset group. The crackles typically heard in bronchiectasis occur in the early and middle phases of inspiration, fading by the end of inspiration. Crackles also are usually present at expiration, which differentiates these from the finer crackles in alveolitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although crackles are profuse, this may be reduced with coughing and expectoration. The location and extent of the crackles on physical examination, however, does not necessarily relate to the extent or area of distribution of bronchiectasis on the CT scan.

Diagnosis and patient assessment

Radiology

Chest radiography is often the first imaging modality used to investigate patients with suspected bronchiectasis. However, radiographs are insensitive as a diagnostic tool for bronchiectasis and suggest the diagnosis in less than 50% of cases in some studies. There is also little evidence for the use of chest radiographs in monitoring patients with bronchiectasis with no change in symptoms.

HRCT is the radiologic modality of choice for establishing the diagnosis of bronchiectasis, although its reported sensitivity and specificity vary. It is difficult to assess fully the accuracy of HRCT in diagnosing all patients with bronchiectasis, but it is believed to be highly specific for the diagnosis of moderate or severe disease. However, the features of early bronchiectasis with bronchial wall thickening are also seen in other conditions (e.g., COPD, asthma), suggesting its specificity is less for frank bronchiectasis. Furthermore, a comparison of thin-section CT with bronchography demonstrated that although bronchial wall thickening is often seen, bronchography shows this is not always bronchiectatic in origin. The increasing use of multi-detector CT scanners, which allow for greater variance in section thickness compared to standard HRCT (sections obtained only at 10-mm intervals), may lead to improved detection of bronchiectasis, although this has yet to be assessed for early disease. However, this must be weighed against an increased radiation burden, and at present, standard HRCT remains the recommended investigation for the diagnosis of bronchiectasis.

Immunoglobulins

Immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, and IgM) are often elevated in a significant proportion of patients with bronchiectasis, which reflects chronic bronchial infection. Hypogammaglobulinemia as a recognized cause of bronchiectasis and antibody deficiency or an inadequate antibody response has been reported in 8% of patients in a large study into causative factors in bronchiectasis. This supports the need for antibody levels (IgA, IgG, IgM) to be checked in patients because they may influence treatment. The role of IgG subclasses is less clear because normal ranges for each subclass have been difficult to establish, and absence or deficiency of a subclass can be found in otherwise healthy individuals, as can IgA deficiency. The inability to produce a response to immunization with a polysaccharide antigen despite normal levels of serum immunoglobulin also suggests a causative but specific immunodeficiency.

Current guidelines recommend that evaluation of antibody deficiency in bronchiectasis should include a universal or targeted assessment of a specific baseline antibody response to peptide and polysaccharide antigens. Routinely, tetanus toxoid, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type B are used. If these are low, immunization should occur with the appropriate antigen and levels should be remeasured approximately 21 days later. Whether a response affects the subsequent clinical course remains unknown, and in some cases seems illogical, especially as the H. influenzae lung infections are nontypeable H. influenzae, not type B.

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) has been recognized as a cause of bronchiectasis, usually affecting atopic patients and caused by an allergy to Aspergillus species. The proximal bronchiectasis, usually affecting the upper lobes, associated with Aspergillus is IgG and type 3 immune reaction–related. When ABPA is clinically suspected, elevated total blood eosinophils and IgE suggest an allergic response. Specific IgE in addition to precipitating IgG to Aspergillus should be checked.

Rheumatoid factor (RF) is also found to be elevated in some patients in isolation and is a nonspecific finding. However, high RF values can be important in some patients, related to a true arthritic etiology and small airways disease. Nonspecific arthralgia can also be a feature of the exuberant inflammatory reaction related to airway colonization. Treatment of the arthritis or bacterial load can lead to improvement in the related feature.

Alpha1-antitrypsin levels should be guided by clinical suspicion of bronchiectasis, as should genetic testing for CF or its variants (Box 45-2).

Neutrophil Function

Neutrophil-dominant inflammation is a central feature in bronchiectasis. Neutrophils aggregate quickly at the site of infection. Phagocytosis occurs when the neutrophil moves in response to chemotactic stimuli to the site of bacterial colonization or infection. In particular, leukotriene B4 (LTB4) and IL-8 are major chemoattractants identified, with IL-8 playing a crucial role during acute exacerbations.

The granule proteins of the neutrophil release antibacterial proteins and cytolytic enzymes on activation. Excessive degranulation and activity of cytolytic enzymes such as myeloperoxidase and elastase have been implicated most in host tissue damage and thus may be central to the establishment or amplification of the vicious cycle. The neutrophils also produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) directed at bacterial killing. The release of uncontrolled ROS by neutrophils, however, may also lead to damage to the surrounding tissues, again exacerbating the lung-destructive process. With the genetic defect of chronic granulomatous disease, patients develop a variety of inflammatory complications, including bronchiectasis, as a result of an exaggerated inflammatory response; are unable to produce ROS; and manifest recurrent life-threatening bacterial infections and granuloma formation.

Tests of neutrophil function are not routinely performed in patients with bronchiectasis. However, some studies of immune function have shown oxidative burst to be lower in patients with bronchiectasis. The significance of this abnormality remains to be identified.

Sputum Microbiology

An assessment of lower respiratory tract microbiology is imperative in the investigation and management of bronchiectasis. Table 45-1 summarizes the most common organisms isolated from the respiratory tract and their frequency in adults with bronchiectasis.

Table 45-1 Organisms Isolated in Bronchiectasis

Organism Frequency
Haemophilus influenzae 14%-35%
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 9%-31%
Staphylococcus aureus 0%-14%
Streptococcus pneumoniae 2%-13%
Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis 0%-20%
Possibly “nonpathogenic organisms” Corynebacterium spp., Neisseria spp., coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, β-hemolytic Streptococcus 5%-60%

Bronchiectasis is associated with frequent bacterial colonization of the airway. As such, patients, even in the stable state, often produce sputum daily as part of the host defense response. Sputum may be mucopurulent to purulent in appearance, dependent on the neutrophil content. Development or increasing purulence of sputum is often indicative of a bacterial exacerbation. Purulent sputum color can be graded visually and is associated with activity of the underlying markers of bronchial inflammation, such as myeloperoxidase, IL-8, and leukocyte elastase. These factors are central in the ongoing neutrophil-derived inflammation, which, when overexuberant or ineffective, can impair even the competence of lung defenses. Patients with purulent sputum are more frequently found to be colonized than those with persistently mucoid sputum.

The role of quantitative bacterial culture has been important in establishing increased airway inflammation and exacerbation in patients with chronic sputum production. An increase in the bacterial load of more than 106 colony forming units (CFUs) is associated with increasing airway neutrophils and inflammation, with a reduction in bacterial load as the exacerbation resolves. Similarly, even in the presence of a background of 106 organisms, a further increase in the load may be confirmatory of a change in the bronchiectatic patient’s clinical status, requiring intervention even in the absence of other clinical or biochemical markers.

Therefore, identification of colonizing organism is important in patients with bronchiectasis, but quantitative microbiology remains a vital tool for identifying exacerbation status and is a surrogate marker of inflammation that correlates with degree of sputum purulence. Although clinically useful, this is not routinely employed and requires further study and validation.

exacerbations

Recurrent Exacerbation

Patients with frequent exacerbations may require longer-term antibiotic therapy. The principle of treatment is to reduce the microbial load and thereby modulate the persistent inflammation characteristic of bronchiectasis, that is, an attempt to break the vicious cycle of bronchiectasis previously described. The aim is to improve the symptoms and subsequent poor health status and quality of life for these patients and reduce the number of exacerbations. The generally accepted cutoff for considering long-term antibiotic therapy is more than three exacerbations in 1 year. This particularly applies to patients colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which is associated with more hospital admissions, poorer quality of life, and more rapidly declining lung function.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa frequently persists in the airways of patients with bronchiectasis after its initial isolation. One feature of P. aeruginosa that enhances its ability to colonize the lungs is its ability to form biofilms. A biofilm is a community of bacterial cells irreversibly attached to a surface or each other and embedded in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). Existing in biofilms enhances the ability of bacteria to colonize and to evade antimicrobial therapies, thus making it difficult to eradicate these organisms from the lungs of chronically infected patients. The formation of biofilms is multifactorial, but one influential bacterial behavior is quorum sensing, a complex cell-to-cell signaling mechanism well characterized in P. aeruginosa that modulates bacterial functions, including metabolism, expression of virulence factors, and biofilm formation. This ability to regulate bacterial behavior also enhances the ability of P. aeruginosa to invade and colonize the host. Because this pathogen frequently colonizes the lungs of patients with bronchiectasis, its significance in this condition merits further investigation.

Furthermore, the clinical problems associated with P. aeruginosa may be further exacerbated by the development of antibodies that reduce bacterial killing. Studies in the 1970s and 1980s of CF patients colonized with P. aeruginosa identified a blocking factor in serum that inhibited killing of Pseudomonas, subsequently shown to be an IgG2 subclass. Recent work supports the role of inhibitory antibodies in the ability of other bacteria to establish infection within the host. This may partly contribute to the failure of the host to control infection, and although the role of this mechanism has yet to be established in bronchiectasis, it is worthy of study. However, this ability of organisms to survive will establish ongoing inflammation as a frustrated attempt by the host to eradicate them, leading to proteolytic damage and perpetuation of the vicious cycle illustrated in Figure 45-2. For these reasons, patients should receive longer-term antibiotic therapy as appropriate, if the cycle can be broken (i.e., sputum purulence disappears).

Antibiotic Therapy

Figure 45-3 provides a decision-making algorithm for antibiotic therapy of the patient with bronchiectasis.

Patient with Acute Exacerbation

Prompt antimicrobial therapy is required once an acute exacerbation is identified, guided by the most up-to-date microbiology results and local guidelines. There are not randomized, placebo controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of antibiotics in exacerbations in bronchiectasis, but in general high-dose, targeted antibiotics are required for effective treatment. The British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend that many patients with bronchiectasis should receive 14 days of antibiotics rather than the conventional dose. The antibiotics most often used for exacerbations have a broad spectrum of activity. Amoxicillin remains the initial choice for many organisms, especially in the UK, but patterns of resistance need to be recognized and management adapted appropriately. H. influenzae is usually sensitive to amoxicillin, but the production of β-lactamase or changes in penicillin-binding proteins increase resistance, and the presence of resistant strains varies from country to country. Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis also produces β-lactamase. Antibiotic choices based on current UK guidelines are shown in Table 45-2, but local guidelines should be considered.

Table 45-2 Antibiotic Guidelines for Bronchiectasis Exacerbation

Organism Antiobiotic/Dose
Streptococcus pneumoniae  
β-lactamase −ve Haemophilus influenzae

β-lactamase +ve organisms   Moraxella catarrhalis
H. influenzae

Staphylococcus aureus   Methicillin sensitive
Methicillin resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The decision to give high-dose antibiotics instead of conventional doses is based on clinical judgment and the patient’s usual stable state. Those who usually produce purulent sputum in the stable state will often require a higher dose to elicit a clinical response. Furthermore, patients who fail to respond to a conventional dose of antibiotic with an apparently fully sensitive organism may respond only to a higher dose. The failure of sputum to clear (become mucoid) or the occurrence of rapid relapses (within days) indicates a need to consider longer-term therapy. However, the antibiotic regimen should be reviewed early (within 7 days) in patients receiving antibiotics who appear to be failing to respond and in whom sputum remains purulent.

Long-Term Therapy

Long-term antibiotic therapy, either oral or nebulized (inhalational), are considered in patients who exacerbate frequently or have considerable morbidity as a result of their condition. A systematic review of long-term oral antibiotics failed to demonstrate an effect on lung function or exacerbation frequency, although symptoms were improved. Oral antibiotic therapy after detailed assessment of microbiology results most often uses amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate (co-amoxiclav), and flucloxacillin. These are used at lower than the standard dose for an acute exacerbation and only with caution. Long-term quinolones alone are not used because of the high risk of resistance in patients colonized with P. aeruginosa.

Long-term inhalational (nebulized) antibiotics are used more often because of the low risk of systemic side effects, most frequently in patients chronically colonized with P. aeruginosa. Bacterial sensitivities should be assessed before initiation of long-term therapy. Nebulized colistin is often used in patients with P. aeruginosa colonization and has been associated with increased quality of life and slower decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). However, there remains a paucity of specifically designed studies of colistin in patients with bronchiectasis. Gentamicin and tobramycin are associated with reduced microbial load, and in some cases, tobramycin has been shown to eradicate P. aeruginosa. In other patients, however, tobramycin has been associated with significant side effects, precluding its continued use.

Alternative Therapy

As discussed, the role of the neutrophil in bronchiectasis is central to maintaining the inflammation and continued destructive processes of bronchiectasis. Therefore, therapies targeting the actions of the neutrophil provide a potential alternative to conventional therapies. Chemoattractants are required to enable migration of the neutrophil in the airways, and IL-8 is particularly important during exacerbations. The increased activity of IL-8 is associated with increasingly purulent sputum, suggesting cause and effect. With antibiotic therapy, the chemotactic activity decreases as the purulence resolves. However, although targeting this process may be a potential therapeutic option in reducing neutrophilic lung damage, neutrophil recruitment clearly is also necessary as a component of the normal response to infection.

Therefore, modulating this process requires further careful investigation, as would abrogation of the other chemoattractants (e.g., LTB4). Neutrophil-derived proteinase activity, particularly that of neutrophil elastase, is also crucial in maintenance of inflammation in chronic lung disease and the ongoing destructive process. This is normally counteracted by the actions of antiproteinases (SLPI, α1-antitrypsin), but overwhelming this central mechanism leads to the ongoing lung destruction. Sputum elastase activity appears to correlate with disease activity, severity, and other inflammatory markers, even in stable-state bronchiectasis. Antielastase therapy may therefore also provide a theoretic disease-modifying therapy for this condition. Indeed, studies of such an approach in CF patients show potential beneficial effects (see Chapter 44).

Complications

Respiratory Failure

Respiratory failure and cor pulmonale still occur in severe bronchiectasis. These patients should be treated conventionally, including long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) and diuretics, in accordance with guidelines.

There is little information on the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) either in the acute setting or in the longer term for bronchiectatic patients in respiratory failure. A study of survival in 48 patients admitted to the intensive care unit included those receiving NIV (13) and those who required intubation (26). There was a 19% mortality associated with the first episode of respiratory failure in patients with bilateral bronchiectasis, with mortality of 40% at 1 year, similar to that with COPD. The population studied was at an advanced stage of bronchiectasis, with severe impairment of lung function, frequent use of LTOT, and a high rate of colonization with P. aeruginosa, although this alone was not associated with reduced survival. There is a possible overlap with COPD in this group, and although intubation may have been associated with a reduced survival, this likely represented a more severely affected group, making interpretation of the success of NIV in the acute setting less clear. Age and LTOT were also associated with decreased survival.

Comparison of LTOT alone versus that with home nasal mask ventilation in patients with diffuse bronchiectasis and chronic respiratory failure failed to demonstrate an additional benefit on arterial blood gases and survival, although it did reduce hospitalization and improve functional status. Other studies, however, have failed to demonstrate this decrease in hospitalization.

Suggested Readings

Asad S, Opal S. Bench-to-bedside review: quorum sensing and the role of cell-to-cell communication during invasive bacterial infection. Crit Care. 2008;12:236.

British Thoracic Society Bronchiectasis (non-CF) Guideline Group Guideline for non-CF bronchiectasis. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 1). www.brit-thoracic.org.uk.

Cymbala AA, Edmonds LC, Bauer MA, et al. The disease modifying effects of twice weekly azithromycin in patients with bronchiectasis. Treat Respir Med. 2005;4:117–122.

Dupont M, Gacouin A, Lena H, et al. Survival of patients with bronchiectasis after the first ICU stay for respiratory failure. Chest. 2004;125:1815–1820.

Finklea JD, Khan G, Thomas S. Predictors of mortality in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Respir Med. 2010;104:816–821.

Hill AT, Campbell EJ, Hill SL, et al. Association between airway bacterial load and markers of airway inflammation in patients with stable chronic bronchitis. Am J Med. 2000;109:288–295.

Hornick DB, Fick RB. The immunoglobulin G subclass composition of immune complexes in cystic fibrosis: implications for the pathogenesis of the Pseudomonas lung lesion. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:185–192.

Jean-Baptiste E. Clinical assessment and management of massive hemoptysis (review). Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1642–1647.

Keistenan T, Saynajakangas O, Tuuponen T, et al. Bronchiectasis: an orphan disease with a poorly understood prognosis. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:2784–2787.

King PT, Holdsworth SR, Farmer M, et al. Phenotypes of adult bronchiectasis: onset of productive cough in childhood and adulthood. J COPD. 2009;6:130–136.

Martinez-Garcia MA, Perpina-Tordera M, Roman-Sanchez P, et al. Quality of life determinants in patients with clinically stable bronchiectasis. Chest. 2005;128:739–745.

Martinez Garcia MA, Soler-Cataluna JJ, Perpino-Tordera M. Factors associated with lung function decline in adult patients with non–cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Chest. 2007;132:1565–1572.

Mikami M, Llewellyn-Jones CG, Bayley D, et al. The chemotactic activity of sputum from patients with bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:723.

Pasteur M, Helliwell SM, Houghton SJ, et al. An investigation into causative factors in patients with bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;162:1277–1284.

Tsang KW, Chan K, Ho P, et al. Sputum elastase in steady-state bronchiectasis. Chest. 2000;117:420–426.