Brain Metastases and Neoplastic Meningitis

Published on 04/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1241 times

Chapter 50

Brain Metastases and Neoplastic Meningitis

Summary of Key Points

Treatment

• The most standard treatment for brain metastases is whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT).

• Patients with a good prognosis and a limited number of brain metastases may benefit from more aggressive therapy such as surgery (especially for a single brain metastasis) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), with or without adjuvant WBRT.

• After WBRT alone, the following observations have been made:

• Among patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases selected for surgery or SRS with or without WBRT, the following observations have been made:

• Intrathecal chemotherapy plays a major role in the management of neoplastic meningitis, alone or in combination with radiotherapy.

• Craniospinal radiotherapy causes significant acute toxicity and long-lasting myelosuppression.

• Accordingly, neoplastic meningitis may be managed with use of intrathecal chemotherapy combined with more limited radiotherapy.

• Examples of limited radiotherapy include the following:

Self-Assessment Questions

1. In the randomized trial of surgical resection of a single brain metastasis followed by whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) versus observation reported by Patchell et al., which of the following end points was significantly improved in the WBRT arm?

(See Answer 1)

2. In a large radiosurgery series for brain metastases, which pairs of percentages below best describe the local control rate and necrosis risk?

(See Answer 2)

3. In the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group randomized trial of WBRT ± stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) reported by Andrews et al., which end point was not significantly improved in the SRS arm (except on subset analysis)?

(See Answer 3)

4. In the Japanese randomized trial of SRS ± WBRT reported by Aoyama et al., which of the following end points was significantly worse in the SRS-alone arm?

(See Answer 4)

Answers

1. Answer: A. Intracranial control was significantly improved in the WBRT arm, with less risk of local failure (10% for WBRT vs. 46% for observation), distant brain failure (14% vs. 37%), and any brain failure (18% vs 70%; P < .001). However, duration of functional independence was similar for the WBRT versus observation arms (37 weeks [8.5 months] vs. 35 weeks [8.0 months], respectively), as was survival time (48 weeks [11.0 months] vs. 43 weeks [9.9 months]; P = .39). Karnofsky performance status and steroid requirement at 6 months were not end points of this trial.

2. Answer: D. See Table 50-4. Representative references include References 91 and 95.

3. Answer: D. Survival was not significantly improved overall (5.7 months for WBRT vs. 6.5 months for WBRT + SRS; P = .136), although survival time was longer in the SRS arm among patients with a single brain metastasis (4.9 months for WBRT vs. 6.5 months for WBRT + SRS; P = .039). The following end points were all significantly better in the SRS arm: local control (P = .013), Karnofsky performance status at 6 months (P = .033), and steroid requirement at 6 months (P = .016).

4. Answer: A. Significantly poorer intracranial control was found in the SRS-alone arm (with 1-year brain freedom from progression probabilities of 24% for SRS alone vs. 53% for SRS + WBRT; P < .001) and more frequent brain salvage therapy (29 SRS-alone patients vs. 10 SRS + WBRT patients). The two arms had an equivalent 1-year neurologic preservation rate (70% for SRS alone vs. 72% for SRS + WBRT; P = .99), 1-year functional independent survival (27% vs. 34%; P = .53), and overall survival time (8.0 vs. 7.5 months; P = .42). Leukoencephalopathy occurred in two SRS-alone patients versus seven SRS + WBRT patients.

SEE CHAPTER 50 QUESTIONS