Brain injury, neurological and neuromuscular problems

Published on 27/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1470 times

CHAPTER 11 BRAIN INJURY, NEUROLOGICAL AND NEUROMUSCULAR PROBLEMS

PATTERNS OF BRAIN INJURY

The brain is extremely susceptible to injury from a variety of causes, but particularly from the effects of trauma, hypoxia, and hypoperfusion. Typical causes and patterns of brain injury are shown in Table 11.1.

TABLE 11.1 Causes and patterns of brain injury

Traumatic brain injury Diffuse swelling
Diffuse axonal injury
Acute intracerebral haematoma
Acute subdural haematoma
Acute extradural haematoma
Contusions (bruising)
Chronic subdural haematoma
Spontaneous haemorrhage Subarachnoid haemorrhage
Intracerebral haemorrhage
Cerebrovascular disease (embolic) Stroke
Infection Meningitis, encephalitis, abscess
Hypoxic / ischaemic injury Watershed infarction
Global infarction
Hypoxic encephalopathy
Metabolic Encephalopathy

Unlike some other organs, the brain has very limited powers of regeneration. Functional recovery following injury often depends on neuroplasticity (existing pathways / brain regions taking over the functions of the damaged areas) rather than the effect of any regeneration. Key concepts in the management of brain injury are discussed below.

KEY CONCEPTS IN BRAIN INJURY

Following the initial insult, there is little that can be done to reverse the effects of the primary injury and management is largely centred on preventing secondary damage caused by swelling, ischaemia and infarction.

The principles of management are therefore to:

The prevention of secondary injury is mainly dependent on maintenance of adequate brain perfusion and oxygenation. There are a number of key concepts relating to brain perfusion that underpin the management of the brain-injured patient.

IMMEDIATE MANAGEMENT OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

The following notes relate to the management of traumatic brain injury. The principles apply equally well to the management of other forms of brain injury.

Depending on local policy, you may be required to assist with the management of head-injured patients in the resuscitation room. You should be familiar with Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols as well as the acute management of the brain-injured patient. (See Trauma, p. 309.)

Intubation/ventilation of brain-injured patients

(See Practical procedures: Intubation of the trachea, p. 398.)

Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are a major stimulus and may produce a significant elevation in blood pressure and ICP. Adequate anaesthesia and muscle relaxation must be provided in order to blunt this response and avoid potential worsening of the brain injury.

Establish intravenous access. Give volume loading, particularly if there is haemorrhage and other injuries. Blood, colloid or crystalloid is used as appropriate. If possible, establish direct arterial pressure monitoring.

The Glasgow Coma Scale

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), shown in Table 11.3, is a more comprehensive neurological assessment, which is universally used to describe conscious level and has prognostic value. It should be performed as soon as the patient is stabilized. It is repeated throughout the resuscitation process to identify any deterioration in the patient’s condition, which may suggest expanding intracerebral haematoma or brain swelling.

TABLE 11.3 Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

Eye opening Spontaneously
To speech
To pain
None
4
3
2
1
Best verbal response Orientated
Confused
Inappropriate words
Incomprehensible sounds
None
5
4
3
2
1
Best motor response (arms) Obeys commands
Localization to pain
Normal flexion to pain
Spastic flexion to pain
Extension to pain
None
6
5
4
3
2
1

Maximum score 15. Minimum score 3. (A modified GCS is used for children under 5 years)

INDICATIONS FOR CT SCAN

Plain skull X-rays may be useful in the initial evaluation of patients with mild head injuries, as the presence of a skull fracture greatly increases the risk of subsequent intracerebral haematoma. In the more severely head-injured patient, however, CT scans are required to:

CT scan should not be delayed by taking plain X-rays. Indications for CT scan are shown in Table 11.4.

TABLE 11.4 Indications for CT scan

All patients with moderate / severe injury plus any of the following: GCS < 13
Neurological signs
Inability to assess conscious level, e.g. due to anaesthetic drugs
Any patient with mild injury plus any of the following: High-risk mechanism of injury
GCS < 15 for more than 2 h
Skull fracture
Vomiting
Age > 60 years*

* High risk patient group for occult intracranial injury

Following CT scan and depending upon other injuries, options for the further management of the patient can be decided. These may include:

INDICATIONS FOR NEUROSURGICAL REFERRAL

The facilities available for dealing with the head-injured patient vary. Hospitals may have no CT scanner, a CT scanner but no neurosurgery, or all facilities. The decision to transfer a patient will therefore be influenced not only by the patient’s condition, but also by the local availability of resources. Indications for referral are summarized in Box 11.2.

Identification of a vacant ICU bed space should not delay transfer of patients, who require an urgent CT scan or craniotomy for evacuation of a haematoma. Most neurosurgical units try to adopt an open admission policy, taking all seriously injured patients who have not had a CT scan and those who require operative intervention, regardless of the availability of ICU beds. Once appropriate interventions have been performed, any delay in finding an intensive care bed will not place the patient at further significant risk. Patients can if necessary be transferred back to the referring hospital once the need for further intervention has been excluded.

Indications for less urgent transfer include:

ICU MANAGEMENT OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

The ICU management of brain injury is based upon maintenance of adequate cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in order to prevent secondary brain damage. Limitation of cerebral oedema and surges in ICP may help to prevent brain herniation. Other general principles of management are the same as for any patient:

There is little evidence that specific regimens designed to produce cerebral protection, e.g. the use of barbiturates, or steroids, alter the outcome of brain-injured patients. Hypothermia is known to produce cerebral protection in some settings, e.g. near drowning, but studies of induced hypothermia in traumatic brain injury have failed to show any benefit beyond that afforded by maintaining normothermia (i.e. preventing pyrexia). (See Management of patients post-cardiac arrest, p. 109.)

Control of intracranial pressure (ICP)

The measurement of ICP is now routine practice in the management of head injury. It may also be used in other conditions where there is likely to be raised ICP, e.g. the management of metabolic conditions such as liver failure. It is used to give an indication of increasing cerebral oedema, the re-accumulation of haematoma, and to calculate CPP.

Normal ICP is less than 10 mmHg and a sustained pressure higher than 20 mmHg is associated with poorer outcomes. If ICP is greater than 20–30 mmHg then intervention may be necessary, particularly in the first 24–48 h following injury. Table 11.5 provides a checklist of causes of a raised ICP. Exclude measurement errors and avoidable rises before starting treatment.

TABLE 11.5 Checklist for management of raised ICP

Problem Action
Accuracy of measurement Reposition, flush and recalibrate device.
Inadequate sedation or paralysis Give a bolus of sedation, analgesia and / or relaxants. Increase infusion rates.
Hypoxia or hypercapnia Check Et CO2 / blood gases. Adjust FiO2 and / or ventilation as necessary.
Inadequate CPP Consider additional i.v. fluids. Increase vasopressors / inotropes.
Impaired venous drainage from head and neck Head turned (occluding neck veins).
Endotracheal tube tapes too tight.
Nurse 15–20° head up.
Seizures May be masked by muscle relaxants.
Check CFM trace or EEG. Treat appropriately.
Pyrexia Give antipyretics. Consider surface cooling.

If all factors are optimized, exclude the development or re-accumulation of haematoma. Consider repeat CT scan to exclude evolving intracranial pathology (e.g. expanding haematoma) and seek neurosurgical opinion. Correct any coagulation defects. Other measures to control ICP include the following.

COMMON PROBLEMS IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

Seizures

Generalized or focal seizures are common with brain injury from any cause. In the complicated ICU patient the distinction between focal and generalized seizures is indistinct and usually of little relevance. Continued seizure activity increases the oxygen requirement of the brain and worsens brain injury, therefore seizures should be treated promptly

Acutely brain injured patients at risk of repeated seizures will usually be ventilated. The use of muscle relaxants blocks the peripheral manifestations of seizure activity making clinical detection more difficult. Seizure activity may be accompanied by changes in blood pressure / heart rate and pupils but these signs are unreliable.

Cerebral function monitors (CFM) or cerebral function analysing monitors (CFAM) are frequently used to detect abnormal seizure activity in paralysed patients. The simplest of these displays two channels, base line activity (to detect artifacts) and global cerebral electrical activity. Seizures are indicated by an abrupt elevation of the cerebral activity level. A saw tooth pattern is typical of recurrent short seizures.

More advanced CFAMs display the electrical activity of each cerebral hemisphere separately and have multiple channels able to display separately the various frequencies that make up global cerebral activity (alpha, beta, theta delta activity). You should seek advice on the interpretation of the output of these monitors.

If in doubt about the presence or absence of seizure activity in the paralysed patient request a formal EEG. Alternatively, there is usually little harm in temporarily reducing / stopping muscle relaxants to assess seizure activity; ensure adequate doses of sedative / analgesic drugs first!

Exclude any treatable precipitating cause such as hypoxia, hypercapnia, hyperthermia or electrolyte disturbance.

MONITORING MODALITIES IN BRAIN INJURY

You may encounter a number of monitoring modalities that are currently either routinely used or under evaluation in brain injury. Most are intended to provide additional information regarding perfusion, oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption in the brain. The majority of these techniques are limited either by technical difficulties or by inability to detect small, critically ischaemic areas within the brain. The overall outcome benefit is still debated.

OUTCOME FOLLOWING BRAIN INJURY

Following severe brain injury, patients typically require tracheal intubation, assisted ventilation and sedation / paralysis. Cerebral perfusion pressure and other parameters are optimized for a period of 48–72 h in the hope of minimizing secondary brain injury. If after this they remain unstable, have raised ICP or other ongoing system failure, further time will be required to allow for the patient’s condition to improve. Otherwise, a decision is usually made to stop sedatives and to allow patients to waken, so that their neurological status can be assessed.

If such patients respond purposefully to commands, move both sides normally and are haemodynamically stable, a trial of weaning and extubation can be commenced. If, however, they fail to waken, to obey commands, have a hemiparesis, abnormal flexion or extensor posturing, then rapid weaning and extubation is unlikely to be successful. Consideration should be given to tracheostomy as an aid to weaning.

Once weaned from mechanical ventilation the neurologically damaged patient can usually be managed on a high dependency unit. Tube feeding will usually be required initially via a fine bore nasogastric tube or gastrostomy (PEG). Neurological improvement may occur over time and long-term rehabilitation is important.

Outcome following brain injury depends on a number of factors, including the mechanism and severity of the initial injury, subsequent episodes of hypotension, hypoxia or hypercapnia, adequacy of resuscitation, and the presence of other injuries. Age is important, young patients have a substantially better outcome than elderly patients for a given injury. In particular, young children may make a good recovery from an apparently devastating injury. There is a wide spectrum from mild to devastating injury. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (Table 11.6) can be used to classify outcomes.

TABLE 11.6 Glasgow Outcome Scale for brain-injured patients

Description Classification
Return to pre-injury levels of function Good recovery
Neurological deficit but self-caring Moderately disabled
Unable to self care Severely disabled
No higher mental function Vegetative
Dead  

It is relatively easy to predict outcomes at either end of the spectrum but not in between. The passage of time (weeks / months) is essential to assess potential for recovery. Clinicians learn from experience that it is often impossible to predict longer-term outcome in any individual patient. Furthermore, even apparently good physical recovery may mask subtle underlying cognitive deficits or psychological impairment and these problems may be manifest even after apparently trivial injuries.

STROKE AND INTRACRANIAL HAEMORRHAGE

The sudden onset of acute neurological deficit associated with cerebral vascular occlusion / haemorrhage is commonly referred to as a stroke. There have been significant improvements in the care of patients with stroke in recent years. Increasingly stroke patients will now receive an urgent CT scan to determine the nature of the injury and dictate subsequent treatment. Those with occlusive disease may receive thrombolysis if presenting early enough. Those with haemorrhage are likely to be managed conservatively in the first instance. A recent international study showed no overall benefit from surgical intervention in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, although there is some evidence that early haemostatic treatment might improve outcome. Subarachnoid haemorrhage is distinct in that there is an established benefit in early surgical or radiological intervention (see below).

Patients may require intensive care following a stroke to protect the airway, support ventilation or because of complications of treatment. It can sometimes be difficult to know how aggressive intensive care management should be, in this predominantly elderly group of patients who often have significant co-morbidity. As with most situations, unless palliative care is obviously the most appropriate option, it is better to instigate intensive care and then revaluate the situation later. The outcome will depend upon the site and nature of the stroke (infarct or haemorrhage), the patient’s neurological state and conscious level, age and coexisting medical problems.

SUBARACHNOID HAEMORRHAGE

Patients present with sudden onset of headache, neurological deficit and collapse. Subarachnoid haemorrhage is confirmed by CT scan and / or lumbar puncture. The site and appearance of bleeding may suggest an aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation. There are associations with other diseases, e.g. atheromatous vascular disease, polycystic kidney disease, collagen / connective tissue disease and other congenital malformations.

Management and outcome is determined by grading. Two common grading systems are shown in Table 11.7 and Table 11.8. Grading is difficult once the patient is sedated / ventilated. Rebleeding or vasospasm may rapidly worsen neurological state.

TABLE 11.7 Hunt and Hess grading system for subarachnoid haemorrhage

Description Grade
Unruptured aneurysm 0
Asymptomatic, minimal headache or nuchal rigidity 1
Moderate headache or nuchal rigidity 2
Moderate headache or nuchal rigidity 2
No neurological defi cit except cranial nerves. Drowsiness, confusion or mild focal deficit 3
Stupor, hemiparesis 4
Deep coma, decerebrate rigidity, moribund appearance 5

TABLE 11.8 World Federation of Neurological Surgeons scale

Glasgow Coma Scale Motor deficit Grade
15 No 1
13–14 No 2
13–14 Yes 3
7–12 Yes or no 4
3–6 Yes or no 5

HYPOXIC BRAIN INJURY

Hypoxic brain injury is most commonly seen following prolonged resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Other causes include:

Patients who are resuscitated following cardiac arrest are usually referred for intensive care because of a failure to regain consciousness, haemodynamic instability or inadequate respiratory effort. There is little evidence that a period of elective ventilation, or the use of so-called cerebral protection agents (e.g. barbiturates / steroids), affect neurological outcome. Recent guidelines however, support the provision of moderate hypothermia in the management of the post-arrest situation, and this requires a period of artificial ventilation. Limited trials have shown encouraging results, but the optimum duration or degree of cooling is not yet known.

The emphasis should be on prevention of secondary insults.

(See Management of patients following cardiac arrest, p. 109.)

Infection

SEIZURES

Seizures are common in the critically ill, either as a presenting diagnosis of epilepsy or as a secondary complication of other disorders. Some of the more common predisposing factors are listed in Box 11.3.

BRAINSTEM DEATH

Brainstem death is caused by irreversible damage to the brainstem, which is the control centre for the autonomic functions of the brain. Its description in 1959 followed the introduction of assisted ventilation in brain-injured patients. Criteria for the diagnosis of brainstem death were first proposed in the UK in 1976 and an updated code of practice for the diagnosis and confirmation of death (including brainstem death) has recently been produced by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (A Code of Practice for the Diagnosis and Confirmation of Death, 2008).

It is usually clear from clinical bedside observations when brainstem death is impending or has occurred. The typical features of brainstem herniation are tachycardia and hypertension, followed by bradycardia, hypotension and pupil dilatation. A lack of response to endotracheal suctioning, turning and mouth care, with fixed dilated pupils, suggests the diagnosis of actual or impending brainstem death. All are performed routinely during nursing care. Formal brainstem death tests are then used to confirm that brainstem death has already occurred. It looks unprofessional to do formal tests and then find that the patient is not brain dead after all!

Preconditions

Before brainstem tests are performed, there are a number of preconditions that must be satisfied in order to exclude potentially reversible causes of brainstem dysfunction. These are shown in Box 11.4.

Active measures to maintain blood pressure, temperature and normal electrolytes may be required if the patient is to fulfil preconditions, and to be potentially suitable for organ donation. This may require fluids, inotropes, vasopressors and DDAVP in the hours prior to tests (often overnight). Replacement of the large urine volumes seen with diabetes insipidus with isotonic saline or synthetic colloid solutions will lead to progressive hypernatraemia. Use DDAVP and fluid replacement with dextrose solutions (with added K+) to avoid this. (See Diabetes insipidus, p. 286, Practicalities of donor management, p. 438.)

Before performing tests ensure that all preconditions are satisfied. Always confirm the integrity of the neuromuscular junction and exclude the effects of muscle relaxants by use of a nerve stimulator (see p. 43). Scrutinize the drug chart and intensive care chart to ensure that sufficient time has elapsed for any centrally acting drugs to have been metabolized and eliminated. Beware of active metabolites, which may have long half-lives. If in doubt, drug levels can be measured. Check the patient’s core temperature and recent biochemistry results.

NEUROMUSCULAR CONDITIONS

Both acute and chronic neuromuscular conditions are important in intensive care practice. The characteristics of the various conditions vary in detail and many patients will never have a definitive diagnosis made. However, you should consider all such patients to be at risk from the following:

Although increasingly patients with neuromuscular disorders are managed in the community with non-invasive forms of respiratory support, they may require intensive care either as part of their first presentation or for subsequent intercurrent illness. Occasionally patients who have difficulty with weaning from assisted ventilation may be found to have a previously undiagnosed neuromuscular disease. Treatment is primarily supportive, with assisted ventilation, (invasive / non-invasive), tracheostomy to aid weaning, physiotherapy etc.