Bone Neoplasms

Published on 06/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1551 times

60 Bone Neoplasms

Osteosarcoma

Clinical Presentation

The most common clinical symptom at presentation is pain, often described as dull and aching, and typically of several months’ duration. Other complaints include a palpable mass with or without swelling. Systemic complaints such as fevers, weight loss, and decreased appetite are rare. Eighty percent of OS occur in the extremities, and on examination, a mass (tender or nontender) may be noted (Figure 60-1). The examination may also reveal decreased range of motion or muscle atrophy. Regional lymphadenopathy is rare. The most common sites of disease include the distal femur, proximal tibia, and proximal humerus, although OS may occur in any bone. Involvement of the axial skeleton can occur but is less common. Eighty percent of patients with OS have localized disease at the time of diagnosis. The lung is the most common site of detectable metastatic disease at diagnosis, although patients may present with multifocal bone disease without pulmonary involvement.

The differential diagnosis includes benign bone tumors, infections, and other malignant disorders. Benign tumors to be considered in the differential diagnosis include unicameral bone cysts, osteoblastomas, eosinophilic granulomas, giant cell tumors, aneurysmal bone cysts, osteochondromas, and fibrous dysplasia. Infections that may present in similar manner to OS include osteomyelitis and septic arthritis. Other malignancies must also be considered, including ESFT, chondrosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, leukemia, and metastatic lesions of other solid tumors.

Evaluation

Imaging studies are more helpful in making the diagnosis of OS than are laboratory tests. A plain radiograph will often reveal a lytic or blastic lesion of the bone with poorly defined borders (see Figure 60-1). Other findings include periosteal elevation adjacent to the primary lesion, a sunburst appearance, or a pathologic fracture. If OS is suspected, chest computed tomography (CT) and bone scan can be used to assess for pulmonary and bone metastases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be performed to better evaluate the extent of the tumor and should include the joint above and below the involved area so that skip lesions are not missed (see Figure 60-1). In addition to delineating the intra- and extraosseous extent of the tumor, the MRI may provide information regarding tumor effects on critical neurovascular structures.

The diagnosis of OS can only be made by biopsy. Biopsies should be performed by an experienced orthopedic oncologist. The surgical approach at the time of biopsy may have an impact on the feasibility of future limb-sparing surgeries, which are necessary for local control of the tumor. In some situations, interventional radiologists are able to obtain the necessary biopsies with active participation by orthopedic oncologists. Involvement of the surgeon who will eventually perform the definitive surgical resection is preferable.

Under the microscope, OS classically appears to be composed of spindle cells associated with malignant osteoid (see Figure 60-1). The extent of osteoid production may vary among the osteoblastic, chondroblastic, fibroblastic, telangiectatic, and small cell subtypes; however, the presence of tumor osteoid is the key pathologic feature of this disease.

Management

Advances in chemotherapy over the past 30 years have resulted in higher overall survival rates and improved rates of limb salvage for patients with OS. Chemotherapy is used initially both to treat pulmonary micrometastases and to decrease the size of the primary tumor mass to facilitate surgical resection. Current treatment protocols for OS typically include preoperative (induction) and postoperative (adjuvant) chemotherapy. The total duration of treatment is approximately 8 to 12 months. Drugs that have been shown to be effective against OS include cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate. North American and European investigators are currently evaluating the role of ifosfamide and etoposide in OS therapy through an international clinical trial.

Complete surgical resection with wide margins is necessary for cure. Modern approaches to limb salvage surgery have resulted in local recurrence rates that are similar to those achieved with amputation. Limb salvage has therefore become the standard of care except when limb preservation would compromise disease control. Decision making with regard to approach to limb reconstruction is complex, particularly in patients who have not reached skeletal maturity. OS is not considered a radiosensitive tumor, although high-dose radiation may be considered for local control in rare cases in which tumor location precludes surgical resection. Surgery also remains the key therapeutic modality for macroscopic pulmonary metastases.

Ewing’s Sarcoma Family of Tumors

Evaluation

Radiography is typically the first imaging modality used to evaluate the primary site of disease (see Figure 60-2). Bony destruction with “onion skinning” of the periosteum may be seen. Tumor growth may lead to elevation of the periosteum and the formation of a triangular interface between the tumor and normal bone known as Codman’s triangle. MRI of the primary site is critical in determining the extent and size of an ESFT involving bone, and the relevant bone or compartment should be imaged in its entirety.

Biopsies of suspected ESFT should be performed with the same care used for biopsies of other suspected bony malignancies. Because there may be extensive necrosis within a ESFT at the time of presentation, frozen sections are often necessary to confirm the presence of adequate diagnostic material within a biopsy sample. Importantly, biopsy samples should provide sufficient material for microscopy, immunohistochemical studies, and molecular diagnostic studies and should ideally be performed at a center that has a pathologist experienced in interpreting these diagnostic tests.

Under the microscope, ESFT appear to be composed of sheets of small, round, blue cells with scant cytoplasms (see Figure 60-2). The peripheral primitive neuroectodermal variant of ESFT may appear to contain aggregates of cells known as Homer-Wright rosettes. ESFT cells will frequently demonstrate membranous CD99 (cluster of differentiation molecule) positivity with immunohistochemical staining. CD99 staining is helpful in making the diagnosis of ESFT, but CD99 positivity can be seen in cells other than ESFT cells, including lymphoblasts. For this reason, molecular diagnostic studies are of critical importance in the ES tumor setting. In 95% of cases, a rearrangement involving the EWS (ES) gene is detected. Most occur via a t(11,22) translocation, which results in production of the EWS-FLI1 fusion protein. In approximately 10% of cases, other members of the ETS transcription factor family, including ERG, ETV1, or E1AF, are involved in gene rearrangements in ESFT. EWS rearrangements can be detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction or by fluorescent in situ hybridization.

After confirmation of the diagnosis of ESFT, a staging evaluation must be performed. The most common sites of metastatic disease at diagnosis are lung, bone, and bone marrow. CT of the chest and bone scintography are used for detection of metastatic pulmonary and skeletal disease (see Figure 60-2). Bilateral bone marrow aspirates and biopsies are performed to detect marrow involvement. Functional imaging such as FDG (fluorodeoxy-D-glucose) positron emission tomography is being increasingly used in the staging and follow-up of patients with ESFT.

Suggested Readings

Bacci G, Bertoni F, Longhi A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade central osteosarcoma of the extremity. Histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with histologic subtype of the tumor. Cancer. 2003;97(12):3068-3075.

Bernstein M, Kovar H, Paulussen M, et al. Ewing sarcoma family of tumors: Ewing sarcoma of bone and soft tissue and the peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, editors. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. ed 5. Philadelphia, Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins; 2006:1002-1032.

de Alava E, Gerald WL. Molecular biology of the Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor family. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(1):204-213.

Grier HE, Krailo MD, Tarbell NJ, et al. Addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to standard chemotherapy for Ewing’s sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(8):694-701.

Gurney JG, Swensen AR, Bulterys M. Malignant bone tumors. NIH Pub. No 99-4649. Ries LAG, Smith MA, Gurney JG, et al, editors. Cancer Incidence and Survival Among Children and Adolescents: United States SEER Program 1975-1995. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, SEER Program, 1999.

Link ML, Gebhardt MC, Meyers PA. Osteosarcoma. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, editors. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. ed 5. Philadelphia, Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins; 2006:1074-1115.

Mirabello L, Troisi RJ Savage SA. Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer. 2009;115(7):1531-1543.