Bone Marrow Stimulating Techniques: TRUFIT Plugs

Published on 11/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2566 times

Chapter 4D Bone Marrow Stimulating Techniques

TRUFIT Plugs

Introduction and Background

This chapter details the surgical technique for the implantation of TRUFIT CB plugs. This process involves creating perpendicular access to the articular surface via an arthroscopic or open approach, thereby creating a flush surface with one or two plugs. The technique can be expanded to allow implantation of multiple plugs.

The TRUFIT plug (Smith & Nephew, Andover, Massachusetts, United States) has been designed as a multiphase implant with tailored degradation (Fig. 4D-1). The implant is composed of a polylactic acid (PLA), polylactic glycolide (PLG), and polyglycolic acid (PGA) copolymer, with calcium sulphate, PGA fibers, and surfactant.1,2,3 The bilayer design provides cartilage and bone phases, and initially the cartilage phase is softer and malleable enough to be physically contoured to joint curvature. The plug acts as a porous scaffold that provides structural support while allowing the growth of new healing tissue. The calcium sulphate resorbs in the first several months, and the remaining polymer dissolves over a 12- to 36-month period, allowing for complete filling of the defect by repair tissue.3

Surgical Approach

Regarding the surgical approach, a decision has to be made as to where the lesion is and whether the surgeon is choosing an arthroscopic or a mini-open approach. When considering arthroscopic or a mini-open approach, there are various scenarios that make it more difficult for an arthroscopic technique. It may be quicker to make a small open arthrotomy rather than persevere arthroscopically, and it is certainly easier to visualize the surface to obtain a perpendicular approach.

Arthroscopic surgery, however, allows much better postoperative comfort for the patient and will produce a more cosmetic scar. A mini-open approach should be considered when there have been multiple previous operations, as this will create a more rigid envelope around the knee, restricting movement of the instruments. Space to approach the lateral femoral condyle with the knee in flexion is much tighter than on the medial side, and this makes it much more difficult when inserting two or more plugs.

The central trochlea is also more difficult to approach arthroscopically and again takes a fair amount of levering on the patella. In addition, some knees are simply tight and do not allow easy access. Arthroscopic portals are established to optimize the approach for arthroscopic repair, remembering that the overriding principle is to obtain perpendicular access for the TRUKOR instruments:

Surgical Technique

The technique for implanting the TRUFIT plugs is illustrated and detailed in Figures 4D-5 through 4D-14. The instrumentation comes in three parts. The reusable drill bits and sizing instruments are presented in a sterile box (Fig. 4D-4, A). All that is needed beyond these items and the standard arthroscopic instruments is a mallet. The sizers are used to determine the defect size and are matched to the size of the disposable TRUKOR drill sleeve (Fig. 4D-4, B) and TRUFIT CB plug kit (Fig. 4D-4,C).

The initial part of the operation is to explore the defect and then map the sizes of the required plugs.

It is important to remove excessive synovium and the prominent areas of the fat pad, as this will make it much easier to insert the instrumentation later.

With good fluid input, it is possible to distend the joint enough to maintain the clear view and keep clear access for the instruments.

A full diagnostic arthroscopy needs to be performed, and the true edge of the defect is probed with the hook to ensure there is no remaining unstable cartilage. Once a plan of the plug insertions has been made, the chosen drill sleeve and plug kit are opened.

The main principles of the technique are to do the following:

It is not necessary to fully cover the whole defect, and the area surrounding the plugs can fill in with fibrocartilage.

Specific Steps of the Technique

Step 4

To check the alignment of the drill sleeve, it must be checked from at least two angles. Figure 4D-8, A, initial view of the cartilage damage. Figure 4D-8, B, mapping defect with a 9-mm sizer. Figure 4D-8, C, checking that the 9-mm sizer covers most of the area. Figure 4D-8, D, the sleeve is gently impacted to the 2-mm line, and this line is then viewed from two or three directions to confirm perpendicular entry. Figure 4D-8, E, the final depth is at 12 mm maximum. (Fig. 4D-8, A-E)

Step 11

In Figure 4D-15, A-C, Photographs of the same operation as in Figure 4D-8 show insertion of the plug and final impaction into place using the plastic tamp and the metal sizing rod. Note that the arthroscope is oriented more tangentially along the articular surface than the more usual view of looking down onto it.

image

FIGURE 4D-15 A to C Photographs of the same operation as in Figure 4D-8 showing insertion of the plug and final impaction into place using the plastic tamp and the metal sizing rod.

Final positioning is checked by orienting the scope in a different direction to ensure that no edge has lifted up. The knee is cycled and again checked for any impingement from the edge.

Pearls and Pitfalls

The assistant has a key role in helping to orient the arthroscope, (Fig. 4D-16, A-C) so that a good perpendicular view is obtained, while the surgeon holds the coring device steady in the knee (a), during assessment of the depth (b), and on implantation (c).

Results

It has been shown that functional scores improved over 12 to 18 months after implantation in a small series of 24 patients.4 Analysis of sequential MRI imaging has shown recovery of the subchondral laminar and gradual remodeling of the bone while the thickness of the articular cartilage is maintained during the differentiation with no or minimal loss of thickness.4