Contraindications to surgery

The only absolute contraindication to any major body-contouring procedure is the presence of systemic medical disease that precludes safe general anesthesia and significant surgical trauma. The authors consider tobacco use a strong relative contraindication, and make all patients stop use of tobacco products at least 1 month prior to surgery. Other relative contraindications include active intertrigo at the operative site, high BMI (over 35 kg/m²), coagulopathies, collagen diseases and other disorders that would interfere with wound healing, and severe pulmonary, cardiac, or renal dysfunction.

Variations of abdominoplasty for the weight-loss patient

The abdomen is perhaps the area of most concern for patients who seek body contouring. While a thorough discussion of abdominoplasty is presented in Chapter 20, we will cover some variants of the procedure relevant to the MWL patient. As early as 1899 and again in 1910, Dr Kelly described his experience with the transverse resection of the pendulous abdomen.¹³ This work led to the modern abdominoplasty as we know it today,^14,15 which has been largely considered to be a cosmetic operation. For the MWL patient, however, the abdominal pannus is often the source of functional problems, with difficulty ambulating or intertrigo. In this patient population, abdominal contouring has both cosmetic and functional components. The degree of cosmetic impact will depend primarily on the ability to perform additional undermining, plication, and umbilical transposition safely. In general, patients with a higher BMI and/or patients with higher medical risk will undergo a functional panniculectomy. In its simplest form, an elliptical excision of the pannus is performed with little or no undermining outside the area of resection. The umbilicus is usually sacrificed, and no plication is performed. At least two Jackson-Pratt drains are placed. The authors prefer a closure consisting of interrupted 2–0 polypropylene vertical mattress sutures with the knots placed superiorly. The sutures are spaced every 1–2 cm to ensure eversion of the wound edges and add strength to the closure, and skin staples are placed to approximate the skin edges. This closure technique has proven very secure, with a low rate of wound dehiscence. If there is active panniculitis, the staples are left out and gauze wicks are inserted between the mattress sutures. These are removed in 48 hours.

A variant of the functional panniculectomy is management of the ‘giant pannus’. This condition involves a pannus so large that ambulation and activities of daily living are severely hampered. A true giant pannus is not a very common entity, and is most often seen in patients who start the bariatric surgery process at an extremely high BMI and, despite significant weight loss, may still have a BMI that is in the severely obese range. While most severely obese patients are best treated with panniculectomy when their BMI is much lower, the functional impairment of the giant pannus can warrant the risk of surgery. To facilitate the operation, the pannus is suspended from ceiling bars or hydrolic lift using orthopedic pins and traction bows (Fig. 21.1). This allows venous blood to drain from the pannus prior to the procedure, prevents the pannus from resting on the patient’s chest during the procedure (which can impair ventilation), and enables better exposure and control of the impressively large blood vessels that will be encoun-tered. The wound closure is as described above for the functional panniculectomy.

Fig. 21.1 42 year old male with giant pannus (A and B). He had decreased his weight from 352 kg to 236 kg after gastric banding, but had tremendous functional impairment from his pannus. Orthopedic pins are inserted through the edge of the pannus, held with traction bows, and used to suspend the pannus above the patient (C and D). Large blood vessels are encountered and ligated (E). The pannus weighed 61 kg.

Another variant of the functional panniculectomy is correction of the buried penis (Fig. 21.2). In this syndrome, the penis is invaginated within the pannus. It may be possible to manually extract the penis, or there may be a tight cicatrix on the pannus that prevents this maneuver. In the latter case, it is useful to have an urologist available when the scar tissue is released in case there is unexpected pathology and/or difficulty releasing the contracted penis and scrotum. Once the penis is manually extracted from within the pannus, the panniculectomy can be commenced superior to the genital region. It is usually necessary to secure the tissues above the genital region to the abdominal wall in a manner similar to the mons-plasty described below.

Fig. 21.2 53 year old male with buried penis. The penis is retracted within his large pannus (A and B), but can be manually extracted (C). Post-operative view demonstrates exposed genetalia (D).

An evolution of the abdominoplasty procedure includes the addition of a vertical scar to eliminate horizontal excess, which is often necessary in the MWL patient.^16,17 Patients with significant epigastric skin excess are willing to accept a new vertical midline scar in exchange for improved contour. Although a less desirable approach, patients reluctant to commit to the vertical scar can still have the vertical resection done in a second stage if they are not satisfied with the results of a transverse only abdominoplasty. The key to performing this procedure safely is to limit undermining of the tissues outside of the area of resection (Figs 21.3–21.5). Specifically, the authors advocate not undermining to the costal margin. We have found that preservation of these perforating vessels in the upper abdomen will decrease the risk of wound complications. Patients are advised that there is a higher risk of wound-healing problems compared with a standard abdominoplasty. Additionally, great care is taken to avoid excessive tension on the ‘triple point’, or confluence of scars on the lower abdomen. This is best accomplished by first resecting tissue in a horizontal axis as with the standard abdominoplasty procedure. The horizontal wound is then approximated with sharp towel clips. Next, the vertical resection is marked with the transverse wound approximated. When insetting the umbilicus in a vertical abdominoplasty incision, minimal if any cutout should be created for the umbilicus. With lateral tension and time, this will naturally widen to good shape. If a circular incision is made at the site of the umbilicus inset at the time of initial operation, this will widen to an undesirable horizontally elongated shape.

Fig. 21.3 Surgical technique for Fleur-di-Lis (FDL) abdominoplasty.

Estimated resection is marked, and undermining commenced only to those lines (A). Tissue is resected first in the transverse axis, then the vertical axis (B). Key is to preserve abdominal wall perforating vessels and minimize undermining of abdominal flaps (C).

Fig. 21.4 38-year-old woman following 50 kg weight loss. Pre and postoperative views 12 months s/p FDL abdominoplasty, including plication. An “hour glass” shape is achieved.

Fig. 21.5 44-year-old woman following 59 kg weight loss. Pre and postoperative views 6 months s/p FDL abdominoplasty, including moderate plication. Epigastric skin laxity has been eliminated.

Monsplasty

Correction of mons ptosis and fullness is a necessary adjunct to abdominal contouring in a high percentage of MWL patients. The mons can be thinned to match the upper abdominal flap and elevated using suture to restore a youthful contour. Failure to correct the mons during an abdominoplasty or lower body lift can lead to an unsatisfactory result, despite adequate correction of the abdomen, thighs, or buttocks. During the abdominal-contouring procedure, the incision for the lower margin of resection should be placed 6 cm above the anterior vulvar commissure with the tissues on upward stretch (the line of incision should come just above the pubic symphysis, and may need to be marked slightly higher than 6 cm). This will help restore the proper proportions for the pubic hairline. In order to properly reshape this region, two specific steps are contemplated. One consideration is for the suspension of tissues to the abdominal fascia. The second consideration is reduction of the thickness of the mons. The authors have found that liposuction, when used to thin the tissue of the mons, results in prolonged edema and an unpredictable result. We have had good success with direct defatting of the tissue of the mons. The thickness of adipose tissue to be resected is estimated and marked. This is based on the thickness of the abdominal flap in relation to the desired thickness of the mons region. Next, the deep adipose tissue is retracted with three Allis clamps and skin retractors placed on the anterior surface. Using the electric cautery, a wedge resection of the adipose tissue is performed with the dissection terminated at the pubic symphysis. Great care is taken to avoid entering the vaginal vault. This technique results in a uniform thinning of the mons region. With or without this initial reduction in thickness, the mons can then be suspended to the abdominal wall fascia. Three to five sutures are placed from the deep layers of the mons superficial fascial system (SFS) into the abdominal wall fascia using either 2–0 or 0-braided nylon. This technique has resulted in durable results with a high degree of patient satisfaction (Figs 21.6 & 21.7). We have encountered no incidences of sexual dysfunction; quite the opposite in fact, patients are so pleased to have this region rejuvenated that they report an improvement in their sexual function. Patients are warned that the angle of the urine stream may be changed temporarily because of the pull on the mons tissues.

Fig. 21.6 Surgical technique for mons correction. Patient is marked for abdominoplasty with incision at 6 cm above the anterior vulvar commissure (A). After fascial plication, a resection of the deep adipose tissue beneath the mons is marked to match the thickness of the abdominoplasty flap and dissected with the cautery (B-D). This resection is wedge-shaped, extending to the pubic symphysis and avoiding the vaginal vault. The deep surface of the mons is then suspended and secured to the abdominal wall fascia with 3-5 either 2-0 or 0 braided nylon sutures (E,F). This results in reduction of the mons fullness and elimination of ptosis (G,H).

Fig. 21.7 49-year-old woman with significant mons ptosis. Pre and postoperative views 6 months s/p abdominoplasty with mons suspension.

Lower-body lift

Correction of the abdomen alone is often not enough to restore appropriate contour for many MWL patients. Procedures have been devised to correct the entire lower-body unit, including the lower-body lift, belt lipectomy, and circumferential torsoplasty.^18–21 Although the names are different, the principle in theory is similar; to affect a circumferential correction of laxity in the buttocks, lateral thighs, and abdomen with elimination of rolls and festoons.²² Lockwood popularized the lower-body lift, and made many important contributions to this field including the repair of the superficial fascial system.²³ Further enhancements of outcomes have resulted from autologous augmentation of the buttocks with lower-body lift procedures.^24,25 Fat can be preserved from the posterior resection based on gluteal artery perforators, deepithelialized, and rotated into pockets over the gluteal muscles to give shape to a region that otherwise becomes flattened with routine lift procedures. For the abdomen, the fleur-de-lis can be added concomitantly if laxity remains in the horizontal vector.

The circumferential body lift is a very powerful operation, allowing correction of the abdomen, lateral thighs, and buttocks in a single stage. The original description by Lockwood involved a correction of the buttocks and lateral thighs with the anterior scars merging into the groin crease. This procedure was later modified by Lockwood to be a combination of a thigh/buttock lift and an abdominoplasty. He then referred to the earlier design as a Type I lift, and the circumferential approach as a Type II lift. The latter version is used more commonly, but one can still find utility for the Type I lift. While Lockwood described this operation as a three-position procedure (lateral decubitus, contralateral decubitus, and then supine), the authors advocate a two-position procedure. This operation starts with the patient in the prone position and then turned to the supine position. While the advantage of the original three positions of Lockwood’s operation was that the hip could be flexed to reduce tension on the closure, this maneuver can also be accomplished with the patient in the prone position.