Basic Approach to Ultrasound of Other Structures in the Extremities

Published on 06/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Last modified 06/06/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2602 times

Chapter 4 Basic Approach to Ultrasound of Other Structures in the Extremities

One of the critical functions of the peripheral nerve ultrasonographer is to not only study the structure of interest (i.e., peripheral nerve) for potential pathology, but to also be sure that incidental findings within the field of view of the ultrasound probe are examined. Although these incidental findings may or may not be related to the patient’s chief complaint and the reason for the examination, their significance should not be overlooked. They are important for examination completion and documentation and can be crucial findings to signal systemic disease or potentially life-threatening conditions that must be recognized. With the improvement in memory and the ability for longer “clip-stores,” these findings are often able to be reviewed retrospectively at a later date should their presence go unnoticed on the initial examination, leading to the possibility of increased liability.

This chapter examines some of the more common incidental findings that can be seen as well as a few rare entities, which are of such importance when seen that their presence should not be overlooked. As with most things in medicine, it is helpful to have a framework in which to put findings. This chapter, although certainly not all-inclusive, attempts to provide the neuromusular ultrasonagrapher with a system for describing and diagnosing other processes in the extremity that are not directly related to the peripheral nerve but that may be of equal, or perhaps greater, importance. In addition, this chapter provides a basic framework for communication of these results so as to guide the referring physician in the next step of the workup.

In an effort to do all this in a logical fashion, the chapter is divided into (1) cystic soft-tissue masses, (2) solid soft-tissue masses, (3) abnormalities related to the veins and arteries, and (4) common artifacts that can mimic or obscure disease.

Cystic or Partially Cystic Soft-Tissue Masses

Before discussing individual disease processes, it is necessary to understand the ultrasonographic definition of a simple cyst. This is important in terms of accurate diagnosis and to allow the peripheral nerve ultrasonographer to communicate in commonly understood terms in the report to other clinicians and imagers.

Abscess, Cellulitis, and Foreign Body

One of the more unexpected findings for the peripheral nerve ultrasonographer can be an occult abscess. Patients who have these are often referred for limb pain and may have focal tenderness and erythema. Although systemic septicemia can hematogenously seed the soft tissues and set up the necessary components for an abscess, these patients frequently have a history of prior instrumentation (i.e., biopsy or surgery) or trauma at the site of the abscess.2,3 Careful examination to exclude the presence of a foreign body is critical because this can change management. Even without the presence of cellulitis or abscess, the most sensitive method for detection of a foreign body in an extremity is an ultrasound.

In general, foreign bodies should be seen as hyperechoic reflectors. Depending on the composition of the foreign body, this reflector may or may not have posterior acoustic shadowing. Identification of the foreign body and marking its location on the overlying skin can be invaluable to the surgeon in terms of limiting the exposure required for its removal.4 Given the high spatial resolution of ultrasonography, as well as the fact that the majority of foreign bodies are not radiopaque (i.e., wood), ultrasound is the modality of choice the majority of time for imaging small superficial foreign bodies as opposed to fluoroscopy, conventional radiographs, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Cellulitis and abscess can be viewed as similar processes along a spectrum of organization. Cellulitis typically appears ultrasonographically as edema in the subcutaneous tissues with a characteristic “marbled” appearance. Although the soft tissues in cellulitis may be hyperemic on Doppler, this can be difficult to quantify and less useful than the gray scale appearance and appropriate clinical setting.

In contrast, an abscess, either with or without associated cellulitis, has a different ultrasonographic appearance. Unlike cellulitis, an abscess is typically well formed, and as a result a discrete measurement of the size and extent can be made. Usually complex in appearance, the typical abscess has a thick wall, which may have increased Doppler flow. Internally, there may be some low level echoes representing complex fluid within the abscess. Again, careful examination is necessary to exclude a foreign body because the presence of a foreign body most often necessitates surgical drainage and removal as opposed to percutaneous drainage alone (Fig. 4.2).2,57

Popliteal (or Baker’s) Cysts

A popliteal, or Baker’s cyst, arises on the posteromedial aspect of the knee within the popliteal fossa. Often a marker for degenerative changes in the knee joint, the popliteal cyst arises between the semimembranosus and medial head of the gastrocnemius.16,17 Patients can present with a palpable mass, swelling, and knee effusion, or they may be asymptomatic.18,19 In addition, given that they have a valve-like mechanism because the cyst neck is trapped between the two muscles, popliteal cysts can wax and wane both in terms of size and degree of symptoms.

On ultrasound, popliteal cysts are typically purely cystic. The larger they get, the more likely they are to be complex and can even be multiloculated. Internal echoes can be seen, especially in the setting of hemorrhage into the cyst or joint space. Often the neck of the cyst can be identified tapering to dive between the medial head of the gastrocnemius and semimembranosus. Perhaps the most important thing to exclude when imaging a potential popliteal cyst is a popliteal arterial aneurysm. The main way to do this is with color Doppler demonstrating no flow within a popliteal cyst or arterial flow within an aneurysm. This differentiation, obviously, becomes absolutely critical prior to pondering an intervention (Fig. 4.4). In patients with more acute pain with a known popliteal cyst, examination for fluid around and tracking to the cyst can signify recent rupture, which may account for the patient’s symptoms.9,16,19

Treatment includes reassurance and observation, intracystic ultrasound-guided steroid injection, and surgical resection. Unfortunately, as with ganglion cysts in the wrist, recurrence rates regardless of treatment modality are high.19,20

Tenosynovitis

Tenosynovitis is an inflammatory process involving the tendons, either single or multiple, that typically manifests with pain, swelling, and tenderness of the involved tendons.21 Because tenosynovitis can only involve tendons that are encased with synovium, this condition involves primarily the wrists and, to a lesser extent, the ankles. Unfortunately, in some patients the manifesting symptoms can mimic carpal tunnel syndrome and can lead to inappropriate treatment, including surgery.

Although tenosynovitis can manifest acutely and be infectious, most often this condition is due to a chronic inflammatory process. Potential etiologies include chronic inflammatory arthritides such as psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis, overuse injury, and rarely gout. The classic ultrasound picture is that of fluid accumulation with hyperemia within the tendon sheath (Fig. 4.5). The tendon itself is often normal in thickness without hyperemia, which helps distinguish tenosynovitis from tendinosis. MRI is probably more sensitive for the detection of this condition; however, ultrasound can be invaluable in diagnosing tenosynovitis, especially in unsuspected clinical situations such as carpal tunnel syndrome evaluations. Finally, ultrasound is certainly the modality of choice for fluid aspiration for analysis in tenosynovitis.2123

Joint Effusions

A frequent cause and marker of joint pathology is a large joint effusion. Although a nonspecific finding that can be seen in joints with an underlying infectious/inflammatory process, posttraumatic, or other degenerative process, a significant joint effusion is an important observation in a patient with limb pain. The effusion itself can cause capsular distention and pain directly or be a marker of an underlying internal derangement of the joint, which can prompt further evaluation with additional clinical and/or imaging examinations.

Typically, when evaluating joint effusions, the ultrasonographer examines large joints such as the shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, and ankle.17,24,25 Although the distribution of the effusion varies depending on the shape of the joint and capsule, some rules for the appearance of the effusions can be made. In general, reactive effusions from associated inflammatory, degenerative, or posttraumatic causes should be relatively anechoic with few, if any, internal echoes. The more complex the appearance with internal echoes the effusion becomes, especially in the acute setting, the more one needs to worry about a potentially septic joint. The septic joint is an orthopedic emergency and needs immediate referral with consideration of ultrasound-guided aspiration for diagnosis. When suspicion is high, especially in deeper joints such as the hip, a lower-frequency transducer should be used to penetrate and better visualize the joint capsule.

Solid Soft-Tissue Masses of the Extremities

When evaluating solid soft tissue masses of the extremities, especially in the context of just having discussed cystic masses, it may seem intuitive that solid masses possess the features that cystic lesions do not. Although this may be true for the majority of these masses, be wary of the partially cystic mass, which has a prominent soft tissue component. For the most part, especially in the setting of peripheral nerve ultrasound in a clinical neurophysiology laboratory, these masses should be thought of as primarily solid and caution should be shown prior to assigning a benign label to them. In general, when in doubt about the nature of a solid soft-tissue mass, these should be referred on for additional imaging (i.e., MRI or computed tomography [CT]).

Normal Lymph Nodes

One of the most commonly encountered soft-tissue masses during peripheral ultrasound is not a true mass at all, but a normal structure. Lymph nodes are commonly encountered, especially when scanning proximally within the extremities. Normal lymph nodes are ubiquitous, but especially distally, may be too small to appreciate unless they are pathologically enlarged. As with many aspects of imaging though, it is necessary to have a firm grasp on the spectrum of normal in order to not over- or underdiagnose pathology.

The macroscopic structure of a normal lymph node frequently can be seen with ultrasound. The typical structure includes an outer cortex of lymphoid follicles with a central medulla and a hilum composed of follicles, fat, and vessels. When examining a lymph node with ultrasound and trying to determine whether it is normal, trying to identify these two components can be invaluable. Because the central medulla is largely composed of fat, it should be hyperechoic. In addition, with the use of color Doppler, the hilar feeding vessels can be identified. The peripheral cortex gives definition and shape to the normal lymph node. Typically reniform in shape, a normal lymph node’s greatest dimension is often oriented in a craniocaudal direction with the axial dimension being the shortest dimension. The cortex should be relatively symmetric in thickness as well (Fig. 4.6).26

Pathologic Lymph Nodes

In addition to understanding the previously described features of normal lymph nodes, knowing the patient’s clinical history can also be critical. A history of prior malignancy or systemic inflammatory process can often be added to the suspected abnormal ultrasound features to make a stronger case for further evaluation and possible biopsy. Especially in the setting of a clinical neurophysiology laboratory, where the physician is often the primary ultrasound operator, this crucial clinical history is usually readily available from the patient or medical record.

The major hallmark of pathology in a lymph node is architectural distortion. Typically this is most readily appreciated in terms of increased size. An absolute number for abnormal size is difficult to provide. Instead, a ratio of long axis to short axis of greater than 1.5 has been suggested as a potential marker for pathology. Especially in cases of suspected neoplastic disease, normal adjacent lymph nodes may be visible (especially in the neck and axilla) that can provide an internal control for what is normal and what is not. Beside overall increased size, another key feature can be asymmetric growth and enlargement of the cortex. Any nodular appearance, especially if it is more hypoechoic, should be looked upon suspiciously. This feature is typically seen in neoplastic processes rather than inflammatory/reactive nodal disease. In abnormal lymph nodes, architectural distortion can also be seen in the central medulla with obliteration of the normal fatty hilum and a loss of the normal hyperechoic appearance. Normal lymph nodes should also not have cystic areas, which will appear as anechoic areas without internal flow on Doppler, or calcifications, which will appear as areas of acoustic shadowing. Both of these features are again suspicious for malignancy with nodal involvement (Fig. 4.7). In general, when faced with a possibly abnormal lymph node, it is probably best to err on the side of describing it and suggesting further workup, short-interval follow-up, or ultrasound-guided biopsy or fine-needle aspiration.27,28

Buy Membership for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Category to continue reading. Learn more here