Avoidance, Recognition, and Treatment of Complications in Cranial Neuromodulation for Pain

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 27/02/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1281 times

Chapter 4 Avoidance, Recognition, and Treatment of Complications in Cranial Neuromodulation for Pain

Deep Brain Stimulation for Pain

Deep brain stimulation for medically refractory pain was the first application of chronic intracranial DBS. In 1973 Hosobuchi et al2 implanted a stimulating electrode into the ventroposteromedial (VPM) thalamus to treat facial pain. Chronic stimulation was attempted after the observation by Hosobuchi and others that acute stimulation before lesion placement resulted in pain improvement. Today, DBS for medically intractable pain typically targets two regions, the sensory ventroposterolateral (VPL)/VPM thalamus and the periaqueductal/periventricular (PAG/PVG) grey matter. Common indications for DBS for pain include chronic poststroke pain syndromes and chronic facial pain syndromes. Rates of reported efficacy for these procedures vary widely, ranging from 12% to 60%. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initially approved and then rescinded the approval of DBS for pain.

The clinically significant complications of DBS take the form of surgical complications, hardware-related complications, and stimulation-dependent complications.3 Surgical complications of DBS surgery include intracranial hemorrhage and electrode misplacement. Hardware-related complications include electrode fracture, electrode erosion, and infection. Stimulation-dependent complications are the effect of undesired modulation of neural circuits adjacent to the targets of neuromodulation.

Surgical Complications and Avoidance

Intracranial Hemorrhage

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage is the most feared complication of DBS surgery, with an incidence of approximately 1% of patients undergoing DBS surgery. A number of source factors may influence hemorrhage rates. Bleeding may occur because of direct trauma at the brain surface; injury to vessels in cortical sulci; or injury to deeper vascular-rich structures such as the ependymal surface, the choroid plexus, or friable target regions.

During surgery, careful planning is performed to avoid traversing cortical sulci because of the presence of vessels in the subarachnoid space. If the planned trajectory traverses the ventricles, the surgeon is obliged to determine that the electrode path does not pass through the location of large veins, such as the thalamostriate veins, which are located along the caudate head, or through well-vascularized structures such as the choroid plexus. Disruption of the ependymal surface through a trajectory that skims the surface of the ventricle over a distance may also be a source of intraventricular hemorrhage.

In the author’s center, multiple steps are taken to minimize the risk of hemorrhage. Meticulous surgical planning is performed to plan both entry points and trajectories for DBS placement, as outlined above. Verification of positioning is performed with the minimum number of microelectrode passages, as rates of hemorrhage are believed to scale with approximately 0.2% per electrode track. Systolic blood pressure is carefully monitored and routinely maintained below 150 mm Hg. For patients taking chronic antithrombolytic therapies, aspirin and Coumadin are halted 1 week before DBS lead placement and remain off until 1 week after DBS placement.