Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: Quality Assurance of Cells for Chondrogenic Implantation

Published on 11/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1226 times

Chapter 9B Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation

Quality Assurance of Cells for Chondrogenic Implantation

Quality Assessment of Chondrocytes

Viability

Viability is defined as the percentage of live cells in the product. Viability is easily measured for cells in suspension using trypan blue or other well-established assays.

The measurement of viable cells in a matrix or on a membrane requires a customized approach. For example, Wang et al.3 developed a novel assay to accurately and precisely measure viability in matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implanation (MACI) implants because the collagen membrane caused interference in all conventional assay techniques that were tested.

Identity

The purpose of an identity assay is to confirm the identity of a culture as consisting of chondrocytes and to assess heterogeneity, if any. Historically this has been done by assessing cell morphology. Recently, two novel assays that can distinguish cultured chondrocytes from closely related synoviocytes on the basis of genetic markers have been described.5,6 The assay developed by Rapko and colleagues has been validated as a chondrocyte identity assay and approved by the F&A as a Carticel lot release assay.5 This is the first genetic marker-based chondrocyte identity assay approved for use in the United States.

Potency

Potency assays are meant to measure the functional potential of cultured chondrocytes. This is an active area of investigation, and several approaches have been described.7,8,9 Although the potency assay requirement is relatively new, it is likely that potency assays will be used to evaluate chondrocytes produced for clinical use in the near future.

Quality Verification in the Operating Theater

References

1. Kielpinski G., Kehinde O., Kaplan B.M., et al. Quality control for ex vivo cell therapy. Bio Pharm. 1997;10:34-40.

2. Mayhew T., Williams G.R., Senica M.A., et al. Validation of a quality assurance program for autologous cultured chondrocyte implantation. Tissue Eng. 1998;4:325-334.

3. Wang Y., Dono D., Duguid J., et al. A new method to evaluate viability of advanced cell therapy and tissue engineering products. International Cartilage Repair Society meeting. Miami: FL: Poster presentation; 2009. May 24 – 26

4. Kielpinski G., Prinzi S., Duguid J., et al. Roadmap to approval: use of an automated sterility test method as a lot release test for Carticel, autologous cultured chondrocytes. Cytotherapy. 2005;7:531-541.

5. Rapko S, Zhang M, Richards B, et al. Identification of the chondrocyte lineage using microfibril-associated glycoprotein-2, a novel marker which distinguishes chondrocytes from synovial cells. Tissue Eng, in press.

6. Rapko S., Baron U., Hoffmüller U., et al. DNA methylation analysis as novel tool for quality control in regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:2271-2280.

7. Dell’Accio F., De Bari C., Luyten F.P. Molecular markers predictive of the capacity of expanded human articular chondrocytes to form stable cartilage in vivo. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:1608-1619.

8. Pelttari K., Lorenz H., Boeuf S., et al. Secretion of matrix mellatoproteinase 3 by articular chondrocytes as a predictor of ectopic cartilage formation capacity in vivo. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:467-474.

9. Parker A., Rapko S., Duguay S.J. Evaluation of gene markers to predict the potential for chondrogenesis of cells in MACI® implants. International Cartilage Repair Society meeting. Miami: FL: Poster presentation; 2009. May 24 – 26