Asthma

Published on 23/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2727 times

Asthma

Introduction

The burdens associated with asthma in the United States—and worldwide—are enormous. Although the precise annual numbers are not known, asthma is clearly linked to a multitude of lost school days, countless missed work days, numerous doctor visits, frequent hospital outpatient visits, and recurrent emergency department visits and hospitalizations. According to the Department of Health and Human Services’ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, within the United States in 2005 more than 22 million people were diagnosed with asthma, more than 12 million people had experienced an asthma episode in the previous year, and nearly 4000 Americans died of asthma.* The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that about 180,000 people worldwide die because of asthma each year. Clearly, asthma’s impact on health, quality of life, and the economy is substantial.

A relatively new role of the respiratory care practitioner is that of asthma educator. In this function, the practitioner’s goal is to be sure that the patient and the family are cognizant of their role and functions in the care of this usually chronic and often serious condition. The asthma educator must serve as a “change agent,” and his or her effect as a convincing, empathetic communicator will be tested. Toward this end, we have greatly expanded this chapter from previous editions.

Fortunately, over the past two decades several new and important gains have been made by expert panels in the development of evidence-based clinical guidelines directed toward the education, prevention, diagnosis, and management of asthma. These guidelines are based on an extensive scientific foundation that has provided our current understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and treatment recommendations used to control asthma. Updated clinical guidelines are developed and disseminated on a regular basis by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA).

National Asthma Education and Prevention Program

The first evidence-based asthma guidelines were published in 1991 by NAEPP, under the coordination of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). These guidelines were updated in 1997, 2002, and 2007. Today the guidelines are structured around the following four components of care: (1) assessment and monitoring of asthma, (2) patient education, (3) control of factors contributing to asthma severity, and (4) the pharmacologic treatments. The NAEPP “stepwise asthma management charts” have been widely used and now specify optimal treatment for specific age groups 0 to 4 years, 5 to 11 years, and 12 years and older.

Global Initiative for Asthma

GINA* was launched in 1993 in collaboration with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of NIH and WHO. GINA works with a network of asthma experts and researchers, health-care professionals, professional organizations, and public health-care officials from around the world. GINA gathers and disseminates asthma-related information while also ensuring that a system is in place to incorporate the results of scientific investigations into asthma care. GINA’s specific goals are the following:

Collectively, by using the evidence-based guidelines provided by NAEPP, along with the extensive information gathered worldwide from asthma experts and researchers, GINA now provides an outstanding—and user-friendly—evidence-based guideline program for the management of asthma. As of this writing, the GINA programs, which are freely available on the internet (www.ginasthma.org), include the following publications:

In this chapter, GINA’s five components of asthma care are presented under the general management of asthma section.

Anatomic Alterations of the Lungs

Asthma is described as a lung disorder characterized by (1) reversible bronchial airway smooth muscle constriction, (2) airway inflammation, and (3) increased airway responsiveness to an assortment of stimuli. During an asthma attack, the smooth muscles surrounding the small airways constrict. Over time the smooth muscle layers hypertrophy and can increase to three times their normal thickness. The airway mucosa becomes infiltrated with eosinophils and other inflammatory cells, which in turn causes airway inflammation and mucosal edema. The goblet cells proliferate, and the bronchial mucous glands enlarge. The airways become filled with thick, whitish, tenacious mucus. Extensive mucous plugging and atelectasis may develop. The cilia are damaged, and the basement membrane of the mucosa is thicker than normal. As a result of smooth muscle constriction, bronchial mucosal edema, and excessive bronchial secretions, air trapping and alveolar hyperinflation develop. If chronic inflammation develops over time, these anatomic alterations become irreversible, resulting in loss of airway caliber. A remarkable feature of bronchial asthma, however, is that many of the pathologic anatomic alterations of the lungs that occur during an asthmatic attack are completely absent between asthmatic episodes (Figure 12-1).

The major pathologic or structural changes observed during an asthmatic episode are as follows:

Etiology and Epidemiology

Asthma was first recognized by Hippocrates more than 2000 years ago. It remains one of the most common diseases encountered in clinical medicine. In fact, over the past decade the incidence of asthma has increased dramatically. Today, it is estimated that more than 25 million Americans have asthma. About 500,000 Americans are hospitalized annually for severe asthma, and about 4000 die as a result of asthma annually. According to WHO, about 180,000 people worldwide die because of asthma each year. In the United States, asthma is found in 3% to 5% of adults and 7% to 10% of children. Approximately 50% of people with asthma develop it before age 10. Asthma is the most common chronic illness of childhood. Among young children, asthma is about two times more prevalent in boys than in girls. After puberty, however, asthma is more common in girls.

Risk Factors

Many asthma experts divide asthma into two major types according to its precipitating risk factors: extrinsic asthma, or asthma caused by external or environmental agents, and intrinsic asthma, or asthma that occurs in the absence of (or without clear evidence of) an antigen-antibody reaction. Although some authorities believe that the distinction between these terms is of minimal clinical value, the terms are nevertheless widely used.

According to GINA, the risk factors for asthma can be divided into (1) the risk factors with which one is born that cause the development of asthma (e.g., genetic factors or sex), and (2) the risk factors that trigger asthma symptoms (e.g., domestic mites, furred animals, cockroach allergen, fungi, molds, infections, tobacco smoke). The risk factors for asthma with which the individual is born are primarily genetic in nature; the risk factors that trigger asthma symptoms are usually environmental factors. Regardless of the fact that the various asthma authorities are not in full agreement as to how asthma should be categorized, they are—for the most part—in agreement regarding the following causes, or risk factors, of asthma.

Extrinsic Asthma (Allergic or Atopic Asthma)

When an asthmatic episode can clearly be linked to exposure to a specific allergen (antigen), the patient is said to have extrinsic asthma (also called allergic or atopic asthma). Common indoor allergens include house dust, mites, furred animal dander (e.g., dogs, cats, and mice), cockroach allergen, fungi, molds, and yeast. Outdoor allergens include pollens, fungi, molds, and yeast. In addition, there are a number of occupational substances associated with asthma (see next section).

Extrinsic asthma is an immediate (Type I) anaphylactic hypersensitivity reaction. It occurs in individuals who have atopy, a hypersensitivity condition associated with genetic predisposition and an excessive amount of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody production in response to a variety of antigens. From 10% to 20% of the general population are atopic and therefore have a tendency to develop an IgE-mediated allergic reaction such as asthma, hay fever, allergic rhinitis, and eczema. Such individuals develop a wheal-and-flare reaction to a variety of skin test allergens, called a positive skin test result. Extrinsic asthma is family-related and usually appears in children and in adults younger than 30 years old. It often disappears after puberty.

Because extrinsic asthma is associated with an antigen-antibody–induced bronchospasm, an immunologic mechanism plays an important role. As with other organs, the lungs are protected against injury by certain immunologic mechanisms. Under normal circumstances these mechanisms function without any apparent clinical evidence of their activity. In patients susceptible to extrinsic or allergic asthma, however, the hypersensitive immune response actually creates the disease by causing acute and chronic inflammation.

Immunologic mechanism

1. When a susceptible individual is exposed to a certain antigen, lymphoid tissue cells form specific IgE (reaginic) antibodies. The IgE antibodies attach themselves to the surface of mast cells in the bronchial walls (Figure 12-2, A).

2. Reexposure or continued exposure to the same antigen creates an antigen-antibody reaction on the surface of the mast cell, which in turn causes the mast cell to degranulate and release chemical mediators such as histamine, eosinophil chemotactic factor of anaphylaxis (ECF-A), neutrophil chemotactic factors (NCFs), leukotrienes (formerly known as slow-reacting substances of anaphylaxis [SRS-A]), prostaglandins, and platelet-activating factor ([PAP]; Figure 12-2, B).

3. The release of these chemical mediators stimulates parasympathetic nerve endings in the bronchial airways, leading to reflex bronchoconstriction and mucous hypersecretion. Moreover, these chemical mediators increase the permeability of capillaries, which results in the dilation of blood vessels and tissue edema (Figure 12-2, C).

The patient with extrinsic asthma may demonstrate an early asthmatic (allergic) response, a late asthmatic response, or a biphasic asthmatic response. The early asthmatic response begins within minutes of exposure to an inhaled antigen and resolves in approximately 1 hour. A late asthmatic response begins several hours after exposure to an inhaled antigen but lasts much longer. The late asthmatic response may or may not follow an early asthmatic response. An early asthmatic response followed by a late asthmatic response is called a biphasic response.

Occupational sensitizers (occupational asthma)

Occupational asthma is defined as asthma caused by exposure to an agent encountered in the work environment. More than 300 different substances have been associated with occupational asthma. Occupational asthma is seen predominantly in adults. It is estimated that occupational sensitizers cause about 1 in 10 cases of asthma among adults of working age. High-risk work environments for occupational asthma include farming and agricultural work, painting (including spray painting), cleaning work, and plastic manufacturing. Most occupational asthma is immunologically mediated and has a latency period of months to years after the onset of exposure. Although the cause is not fully understood, it is known that an IgE-mediated allergic reaction and cell-mediated allergic reactions are often involved. Box 12-1 shows additional agents known to cause occupational asthma.

Intrinsic Asthma (Nonallergic or Nonatopic Asthma)

When an asthmatic episode cannot be directly linked to a specific antigen or extrinsic inciting factor, it is referred to as intrinsic asthma (also called nonallergic or nonatopic asthma) (Figure 12-3). The etiologic factors responsible for intrinsic asthma are elusive. Individuals with intrinsic asthma are not hypersensitive or atopic to environmental antigens and have a normal serum IgE level. The onset of intrinsic asthma usually occurs after the age of 40 years, and typically there is no strong family history of allergy.

In spite of the general distinctions between extrinsic and intrinsic asthma, a significant overlap exists. Distinguishing between the two is often impossible in a clinical setting. Precipitating factors known to cause intrinsic asthma are referred to as nonspecific stimuli. Some of the more common nonspecific stimuli associated with intrinsic asthma are discussed in the following paragraphs.

Other Risk Factors

Drugs, food additives, and food preservatives

Asthma is associated with the ingestion of aspirin and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). As much as 20% of the asthmatic population may be sensitive to aspirin and NSAIDs. Various beta-adrenergic blocking agents used to treat hypertension and some cardiac disorders (e.g., propranolol, metoprolol) also may provoke an asthmatic episode. The yellow food-coloring agent tartrazine may provoke an asthmatic episode. The ingestion of tartrazine especially is contraindicated in patients sensitive to aspirin. Bisulfites and metabisulfites, commonly used as preservatives and antioxidants in restaurant food (e.g., salad bars, certain wines, beers, dried fruits), are known to provoke bronchoconstriction. About 5% of the asthmatic population is sensitive to foods and drinks that contain sulfites.

Diagnosis of Asthma

The diagnosis of asthma can often be challenging. For example, the diagnosis of asthma in early childhood is based primarily on the assessment of the child’s symptoms and physical findings—and good clinical judgment. In the older child and the adult, a complete history and physical examination—along with the demonstration of reversible and variable airflow obstruction—will in most cases confirm the diagnosis of asthma. In the elderly patient, asthma is often undiagnosed because of the presence of comorbid diseases that complicate the diagnosis.

Furthermore, the diagnosis of asthma is often missed in the patient who acquires asthma in the workplace. This form of asthma is called occupational asthma (see Box 12-1). Because occupational asthma usually has a slow and insidious onset, the patient’s asthma is often misdiagnosed as chronic bronchitis or COPD. As a result, the asthma is either not treated at all or treated inappropriately. Finally, even though asthma can usually be distinguished from COPD, in some patients—those who have chronic respiratory clinical manifestations and fixed airflow limitations—it is often very difficult to differentiate between the two disorders—that is, asthma or COPD.

GINA provides a general guideline to help in the clinical diagnosis of asthma, which is based on the patient’s symptoms and medical history. There are many signs and symptoms that should increase the suspicion of asthma. This includes wheezing and a history of any of the following:

Other indicators are if the symptoms occur or worsen at night or in a seasonal pattern. The presence of eczema, hay fever or a family history of asthma or atopic disease may also be an indicator. Another sign is if an individual has colds that “go to the chest” or that take more than 10 days to clear up. There are also situations in which asthma related symptoms may worsen, such as exposure to:

These symptoms often respond to appropriate antiasthma therapy.

Diagnostic and Monitoring Test for Asthma

There are several tests used to diagnose and monitor asthma. These tests measure the severity, reversibility, and variability of airflow limitations. Common tests used to for diagnostic and monitoring asthma include the following:

Spirometry measures airflow limitation and its reversibility. An increase in FEV1 of ≥ 12% (or ≥ 200 ml) after administration of a bronchodilator indicates reversible airflow limitation consistent with asthma.

Peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements are used to diagnose and monitor asthma. An improvement of 60 L/min (or ≥ 20% of the prebronchodilator [PEF] after inhalation of a bronchodilator), or diurnal variation in PEF of more than 20% (with twice-daily readings, more than 10%), suggests a diagnosis of asthma.

Other tests include measurements of airway responsiveness to methacholine, histamine, mannitol, or exercise in order to diagnose. The presence of allergies (including a positive skin test with allergens or measurement of specific IgE in serum) increases the probability of a diagnosis of asthma, and can help identify risk factors that cause asthma symptoms in individual patients.

Classification of Asthma Severity

GINA provides a general classification of asthma severity based on the clinical features before treatment. The four categories of symptoms include intermittent, mild persistent, moderate persistent, and severe persistent.

• Intermittent symptoms are described as those that occur less than once a week and possible brief exacerbations. They may also include nocturnal symptoms not more than twice a month. (Forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] or peak expiratory flow [PEF] ≥ 80% predicted; PEF or FEV1 variability < 20%.)

• Mild persistent symptoms occur more than once a week, but less than once a day and exacerbations may affect activity and sleep. Nocturnal symptoms also occur more than twice a month. (FEV1 or PEF ≥ 80% predicted; PEF or FEV1 variability < 20% to 30%.)

• Moderate persistent symptoms occur daily and exacerbations effect activity and sleep. Nocturnal symptoms occur more than once a week and an individual uses an inhaled short-acting beta2-agonist. (FEV1 or PEF 60% to 80% predicted; PEF or FEV1 variability > 30%.)

• Severe persistent symptoms occur daily along with frequent nocturnal symptoms. There are also limitations on physical activity. (FEV1 or PEF ≤ 60% predicted; PEF or FEV1 variability > 30%.)

Although the classification of asthma based on severity is useful when decisions are being made about treatment plans during the initial assessment of the patient, GINA points out that this classification model has the following limitations:

• It is important to recognize that asthma severity involves both the severity of the underlying disease and its responsiveness to treatment. For example, asthma can cause severe symptoms and airflow obstruction and be classified as “severe persistent” on initial presentation, but respond fully to treatment and then be classified as moderate persistent” asthma.

• In addition, severity is not an unvarying feature of an individual patient’s asthma, but may change over months or years.

• Because of these considerations, the classification of asthma severity provided in Table 12-3, which is based on expert opinion rather than evidence, is no longer recommended as the basis for ongoing treatment decisions.

• Its main limitation is its poor value in predicting what treatment will be required and what a patient’s response to that treatment might be.

• For this purpose, a periodic assessment of asthma control is more relevant and useful.

image OVERVIEW of the Cardiopulmonary Clinical Manifestations Associated with Asthma

The following clinical manifestations result from the pathophysiologic mechanisms caused (or activated) by Bronchospasm (see Figure 9-11) and Excessive Bronchial Secretions (see Figure 9-12)—the major anatomic alterations of the lungs associated with an asthmatic episode (see Figure 12-1).

CLINICAL DATA OBTAINED AT THE PATIENT’S BEDSIDE

The Physical Examination

Pulsus Paradoxus

When an asthmatic episode produces severe alveolar air trapping and hyperinflation, pulsus paradoxus is a classic clinical manifestation. Pulsus paradoxus is defined as systolic blood pressure that is more than 10 mm Hg lower on inspiration than on expiration. This exaggerated waxing and waning of arterial blood pressure can be detected by using a blood pressure cuff or, in severe cases, by palpating the strength of the pulse. Pulsus paradoxus during an asthmatic attack is believed to be caused by the major intrapleural pressure swings that occur during inspiration and expiration.

CLINICAL DATA OBTAINED FROM LABORATORY AND SPECIAL PROCEDURES

Pulmonary Function Test Findings

Moderate to Severe Asthmatic Episode (Obstructive Lung Pathology)

FORCED EXPIRATORY FLOW RATE FINDINGS

FVC FEVT FEV1/FVC ratio FEF25%-75%
FEF50% FEF200-1200 PEFR MVV

image

LUNG VOLUME AND CAPACITY FINDINGS

VT IRV ERV RV  
N or ↑ N or ↓ N or ↓  
VC IC FRC TLC RV/TLC ratio
N or ↓ N or ↑ N or ↑

image

General Management of Asthma

Using the scientific evidence-based information developed by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), and the extensive research and input provided by leading asthma experts from around the world, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) now provides an excellent—and user friendly—clinical guideline program for the management and prevention of asthma. The complete GINA documents are available at the following web site: http://www.ginasthma.org. The five major components of asthma care described by GINA are:

Component 3: Assess, Treat, and Monitor Asthma

Evaluating a patient is necessary before successful treatment can begin. Once a patient has been assessed and the level of control has been established, a patient can be properly treated. Many drugs can be used in the treatment of asthma. The following is a list of inhaled glucocorticosteroids commonly used in the treatment of asthma:

Common controller medications used in the treatment of asthma are presented in Table 12-1. Table 12-2 provides an overview of common reliever medications used to manage acute exacerbations of asthma.

Table 12-1

Controller Medications Commonly Used to Treat Asthma

Generic Name Brand Name Dose and Administration
Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICSs)
Beclomethasone dipropionate QVAR MDI: 2 puffs, 40 µg/puff or 80 µg/puff, bid
Triamcinolone acetonide Azmacort MDI: 2 puffs, 100 µg/puff, tid, qid
Flunisolide Aerobid, Aerobid-M MDI: 2 puffs, 250 µg/puff, bid
Flunisolide hemihydrate Aerospan MDI: 2 puffs, 80 µg/puff, bid
Fluticasone propionate

Ciclesonide Alvesco MDI: 1-2 puffs, 80 µg/puff abd 160 µg/puff, daily Budesonide Mometasone furoate Asmanex Twisthaler DPI: 220 µg/actuation, 220-880 µg, q day Systemic Corticosteroids Prednisone Deltasone Tablets and syrups: For acute attacks 40-60 mg daily in 1 or 2 divided doses for adults or 1-2 mg/kg daily in children Methylprednisolone Hydrocortisone Solu-Cortef Prednisolone Orapred Long-Acting Beta2 Agents (LABAs) Salmeterol Serevent DPI: 50 µg/inhalation, bid Formoterol Foradil DPI: 12 µg/inhalation, bid Arformoterol Brovana SVN: 15 µg/2 mL unite dose, bid Inhaled Corticosteroids and Long-Acting Beta2 Agents Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol Budesonide and formoterol fumarate Symbicort MDI: 80 µg and 160 µg budesonide with 4.5 µg formoterol, 1-2 inhalations bid Mast Cell–Stabilizing Agents Cromolyn sodium Intal Nedocromil sodium Tilade MDI: 2 puffs, 1.75 mg/puff, qid Leukotriene Inhibitors (Antileukotrienes) Zafirlukast Accolate Montelukast Singulair Zileuton Zyflo Monoclonal Anti–Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Antibody Omalizumab Xolair Adults and children ≥12 yr: Subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks; dose dependent on weight and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) level Xanthine Derivatives Theophylline Slo-phyllin, Theolair, Quibron-T/SR Dividose, Bronkodyl, Elixophyllin, Theo-Dur, Uniphyl Oxtriphylline Choledyl SA Aminophylline Aminophylline Dyphylline Dylix, Lufyllin

image

DPI, Dry powder inhaler; MDI, metered dose inhaler; SVN, small-volume nebulizer.

Data from Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA): Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, updated 2008. Available at: www.goldcopd.org; and Gardenshire DS: Rau’s repiratory care pharmacology, ed 7, St. Louis, 2008, Elsevier.

Table 12-2

Reliever Medications (Rescue Medications) Commonly Used to Treat Asthma

Medication Trade Name Adult Dosage
Ultra-Short–Acting Bronchodilator Agents
Epinephrine Adrenaline CL, Epinephrine Mist, Primatene Mist
Racemic epinephrine MicroNefrin, Nephron, S2 SVN: 2.25% solution, 0.25-0.5 mL (5.63-11.25 mg) qid
Isoetharine Isoetharine (HCL) SVN: 1% solution, 0.5 mL (5.0 mg) q4h
Short-Acting Adrenergic Bronchodilator Agents (SABAs) (Beta2 Agents)
Metaproterenol Alupent
Albuterol
Pirbuterol Maxair Autohaler MDI: 200 µg/puff, 2 puffs q4-6h
Levalbuterol
Anticholinergics (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD])
Ipratropium bromide
Tiotropium Spiriva DPI: 18 µg/inhalation, 1 inhalation daily (one capsule)
Beta2 Agents and Anticholinergic Agents
Ipratropium and albuterol

image

COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DPI, dry powder inhaler; MDI, metered dose inhaler; SVN, small volume nebulizer.

Data from Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA): Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, updated 2008. Available at: www.goldcopd.org; and Gardenshire DS: Rau’s repiratory care pharmacology, ed 7, St. Louis, 2008, Elsevier.

Component 4: Manage Asthma Exacerbations

Asthma exacerbation (also called an asthma attack or asthma episode) is defined as a progressive increase in shortness of breath, cough, wheezing, or chest tightness or a combination of these symptoms. A severe asthma exacerbation is life threatening. Table 12-3 provides a clinical scale to classify the severity of asthma exacerbations. The table categorizes the signs, symptoms and assessment into four categories: mild, moderate, severe and respiratory arrest imminent.

Table 12-3

Classification of Severity of Acute Asthma Exacerbations

  Mild Moderate Severe Respiratory Arrest Imminent
Symptoms
Breathlessness While walking While talking (infant: softer, shorter cry; difficulty feeding) While at rest (infant: stops feeding)  
  Can lie down Prefers sitting Sits upright  
Talks in Sentences Phrases Words  
Alertness May be agitated Usually agitated Usually agitated Drowsy or confused
Signs
Respiratory rate Increased Increased Often >30/min  
    Guide on rates of breathing in awake children:  
    Age Normal Rate  
    <2 mo <60/min  
    2-12 mo <50/min  
    1-5 yr <40/min  
    6-8 yr <30/min  
Use of accessory muscles; suprasternal retractions Usually not Commonly Usually Paradoxical thoraco-abdominal movement
Wheeze Moderate, often only end expiratory Loud; throughout exhalation Usually loud; throughout inhalation and exhalation Absence of wheeze
Pulse/min <100 100-120 >120 Bradycardia
    Guide to normal pulse rates in children:  
    Age Normal Rate  
    2-12 mo <160/min  
    1-2 yr <120/min  
    2-8 yr <110/min  
Pulsus paradoxus Absent <10 mm Hg May be present
10-25 mm Hg
Often present

Absence suggests respiratory muscle fatigue Functional Assessment PEF (% predicted or % personal best) 80% ~50%-80% <50% predicted or personal best or response lasts <2 h   Pao2 (on air) Normal (test not usually necessary) >60 mm Hg (test not usually necessary) <60 mm Hg: possible cyanosis   and/or Pco2 <42 mm Hg (test not usually necessary) <42 mm Hg (test not usually necessary) ≥42 mm Hg: possible respiratory failure   Sao2 % (on air) at sea level >95% (test not usually necessary) 91%-95% <91%     Hypercapnia (hypoventilation) develops more readily in young children than in adults and adolescents.

image

Note: The presence of several parameters, but not necessarily all, indicates the general classification of the exacerbation. Many of these parameters have note been systematically studied, so they serve only as general guides.

From National Asthma Education and Prevention Program, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma, NIH Pub No. 97, July 1997.

Respiratory Care Treatment Protocols

Oxygen Therapy Protocol

Oxygen therapy is used to treat hypoxemia, decrease the work of breathing, and decrease myocardial work. The hypoxemia that develops in asthma is usually caused by the hypoventilation and shuntlike effect associated with bronchospasm and increased airway secretions. Hypoxemia caused by a shuntlike effect can at least partly be corrected by oxygen therapy (see Oxygen Therapy Protocol, Protocol 9-1).

CASE STUDY

Asthma

Admitting History and Physical Examination

A 8-year-old girl was admitted to the emergency department (ED) in severe respiratory distress. Her respiratory symptoms dated to age 6 months, when she first developed wheezing. She was hospitalized in different hospitals on a number of occasions and was usually managed satisfactorily with aerosolized albuterol, intravenous (IV) steroids, and aminophylline. She developed a cough and wheezing the night before admission and became progressively worse during the night. Her cough was nonproductive. At 8 am, she was brought to the ED.

Physical examination revealed an extremely anxious, well-developed female child in acute respiratory distress. She stated, “It is very hard for me to breathe.” Her vital signs were as follows: blood pressure 152/115, pulse 220/min, and respiratory rate 62/min. Her temperature was 100° F. Her extremities appeared cyanotic, and her tonsils were enlarged. She was using her accessory muscles of respiration. On auscultation, rhonchi and wheezing could be heard throughout both lung fields. Her PEFR was 70 L/min. (Her personal best was about 200 to 250 L/min.) Arterial blood gases on 2 L/min nasal cannula oxygen were pH 7.17, Paco2 71, image 22, and Pao2 47. A chest x-ray examination was ordered but not performed. The physician ordered a respiratory care consultation and stated that she did not want to commit the patient to a ventilator at this time if possible. The physician asked that aggressive noninvasive pulmonary care be tried first. At this time the respiratory care practitioner documented the following.

Respiratory Assessment and Plan

S Patient stated, “It is very hard for me to breathe”

O Vital signs: BP 152/115, HR 220, RR 62, T 100°. Cyanotic and using accessory muscles. Wheezing and rhonchi over both lungs. PEFR: 70 L/min. ABGs pH 7.17, Paco2 71, image 22, and Pao2 47. No CXR yet.

A

P Oxygen Therapy Protocol (Fio2 80%-100% via oxygen nonrebreather mask). Monitor Spo2 with oximeter. Aerosolized Medication Therapy Protocol (med. neb. every 30 minutes with albuterol 0.15 mL in 2.0 mL normal saline via nebulizer). Monitor PEFR and breath sounds. Bronchopulmonary Hygiene Therapy Protocol (cough and deep breathe as tolerated). Monitor breath sounds. Place endotracheal tube and mechanical ventilator on standby. Repeat ABG in 30 minutes. Respiratory care practitioner to remain in ED.

In addition to this plan, the patient was treated vigorously with IV aminophylline, steroids, and a beclomethasone inhaler (2 puffs every 30 minutes × 4 per emergency room standing orders for asthma) over the next 2 hours. After 2 hours of therapy, her aminophylline blood level was therapeutic at 12 mg/L. Although the patient seemed to improve slightly, her next arterial blood gas reading showed that her Paco2 had increased slightly to 79.

The respiratory therapist notified the doctor immediately. After this, the patient was lightly sedated, paralyzed (with vecuronium [Norcuron]), intubated, and placed on a mechanical ventilator. The ventilator parameters were set per the Mechanical Ventilation Protocol. The next morning, on an Fio2 of 0.4 and a mechanical ventilator in SIMV mode at a backup rate of 12 breaths per minute, her arterial blood gases were pH 7.38, Paco2 37, image 23, and Pao2 124. Her vital signs were blood pressure 122/87, heart rate 93, temperature 98.8° F. Her wheezes and rhonchi had diminished but were still present. At this point, the following information was recorded.

Respiratory Assessment and Plan

The patient remained intubated for another 24 hours, at which time her lungs were clear and when suctioned returned scant but clear secretions. She was weaned from the ventilator with ease and was extubated shortly thereafter. The patient was discharged the following day, after review of the Asthma Action Plan with her parents.

Discussion

Asthma is a potentially fatal disease—largely because its severity is often unrecognized in the home or outpatient setting. The clinical manifestations presented in this case can all be easily traced back through the Bronchospasm clinical scenario (see Figure 9-11) and Excessive Airway Secretions clinical scenario (see Figure 9-12). For example, the patient’s increased blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate can all be followed back to the hypoxemia caused by the decreased image ratio, pulmonary shunting, and venous admixture activated by bronchospasm and Excessive Bronchial Secretions (see Figure 9-11 and 9-12). The patient’s anxiety and previous use of beta2-agonists also may have contributed to her abnormal vital signs (tachycardia).

In addition, the decreased PEFR, use of accessory muscles, diminished breath sounds, rhonchi, and wheezing reflect the increased airway resistance and air trapping caused by the Bronchospasm (see Figure 9-11) and Excessive Airway Secretions (see Figure 9-12). The fact that the patient’s arterial blood gas values showed acute ventilatory failure confirmed that the patient was in the severe stages of an asthmatic episode and that mechanical ventilation was justified, although vigorous routine respiratory care was first tried to prevent this.

After the initial assessment, the respiratory care practitioner chose a fairly aggressive approach to both the Oxygen Therapy Protocol (Protocol 9-1) and the Aerosolized Medication Therapy Protocol (Protocol 9-4). Use of a nonrebreather oxygen therapy mask at initially high Fio2 levels (0.8 to 1.0) allowed him to adjust the Fio2 in small, precise concentration changes while not risking rebreathing of expired air. Frequent monitoring of ABGs and Spo2 levels was appropriate. Note also the frequency with which he chose to administer inhaled bronchodilators (every 30 minutes) in the Aerosolized Medication Therapy Protocol. An alternative approach, often used in pediatric patients, would be to use continuous bronchodilator or aerosol therapy.

The manner in which any therapy modality is up-regulated may be (1) a different aerosolized drug or procedure, (2) a larger dose of a drug or therapy, or (3) more frequent use of such drugs or therapy. In this case, he chose the last course, only to see it fail (the patient required intubation).

Among the lessons to be learned here is that some asthmatic episodes worsen despite vigorous therapy. This patient received optimal emergent treatment of her resistant asthma but required intubation and mechanical ventilation nonetheless. Almost continuous assessment by the respiratory care practitioner is necessary if more aggressive therapy (including induced sedation, paralysis, and mechanical ventilation) is to be effective.

The use of IV aminophylline in the emergency treatment of acute asthma in the emergency department is controversial. Care must be taken to avoid theophylline toxicity, and symptoms of toxicity often do not reflect serum concentrations of the drug. The acutely ill asthmatic requires almost continuous monitoring and frequent SOAP notes if the patient care team is to be constantly apprised of the patient’s progress. The two such notes recorded here are but a small portion of the more than 14 notes that we found on analysis of the patient’s medical record after her ED discharge alone.