Assessing the Skin

Published on 10/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1641 times

chapter 19 Assessing the Skin

Problems of the skin or its appendages are very common in children, and it is therefore important to be able to assess the skin in a logical and organized manner. In fact, a skin condition is the chief complaint for approximately 15% of patients in a family doctor’s or pediatrician’s office and is a secondary concern for other patients. A number of cutaneous conditions occur almost exclusively in infants and children, and most dermatoses (skin conditions) that are seen in adults are also seen in children. There are many hereditary and congenital skin conditions (genodermatoses). Most of the common infectious diseases of childhood have cutaneous manifestations, and skin involvement is a major feature of several multisystem disorders.

A child’s skin is more reactive than that of an adult. It is more likely to blister and is more susceptible to warts and certain other infections. When children are ill, they are more likely than adults to have multisystem manifestations of illness. For example, they may demonstrate a complex of symptoms that could include rash, fever, anorexia, lethargy, and diarrhea. Paradoxically, physicians often regard skin diseases as relatively trivial (i.e., the least of the patient’s problems) in the vast scope of medicine, but the patient may be more concerned about cutaneous problems than about a more serious internal problem that is not visible to others. For example, a teenager with psoriasis and cystic fibrosis may consider the psoriasis the more difficult of the two to accept.

Some physicians consider skin diseases difficult to diagnose for a variety of reasons. Because skin has a limited repertoire of reaction patterns, several disease processes may cause similar rashes. In addition, there are many variations in the appearance, location, and severity of both common and rare diseases of the skin, so a condition may look quite different in different patients. Finally, many skin conditions have one or more unhelpful protracted Latin names that are difficult to remember.

Despite these factors, it is possible to develop a simple, practical approach to most dermatologic problems. If you can assign a skin condition to a broad morphologic group on the basis of its appearance, you can learn or refer to lists of the conditions within the group. After a time, you will find it easier to recognize the primary lesions that identify the morphologic groups and the variations in common skin conditions in each group. Table 19–1 lists the most common skin problems seen in children and classifies them by morphologic appearance.

TABLE 19–1 Morphologic Classification of Common Pediatric Skin Conditions

Skin Lesion Examples
Macules Freckles, junctional nevi, tinea versicolor
Patches Café au lait spots port-wine stains, vitiligo
Maculopapular rashes Viral exanthems, drug eruptions
Papules Warts, molluscum contagiosum, insect bites, compound nevi
Papules with burrows Scabies
Papules with comedones Acne
Plaques (nonscaly) Mastocytomas, sebaceous nevus
Papulosquamous eruptions Psoriasis, pityriasis rosea, lichen planus, fungal infections
Vesiculobullous eruptions Friction blisters, acute contact dermatitis, herpes infections, bullous impetigo, staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome
Eczematous eruptions Atopic dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, diaper dermatitis
Nodules or tumors Epidermoid or pilar cysts, neurofibromas, lipomas
Alopecia Alopecia areata, trichotillomania, tinea capitis

This chapter reviews the history and physical examination of the skin and illustrates the approach to diagnosis through case history examples. Color plates illustrate many of the problems discussed and some nevi commonly seen by pediatricians. Details and photographs of most pediatric dermatologic conditions can be found in the works cited in the Suggested Readings.

Obtaining the History of Skin Problems

As always, a detailed history is fundamental in assessing each child’s problem. Clues from casual inspection may direct your line of questioning and make the interview more efficient; but even if the diagnosis is obvious from a single glance, take the time to obtain a thorough history.

When children are too young to give a history firsthand, you can generally rely on the parents’ interpretations. A baby who scratches constantly is almost certainly experiencing pruritus, although some itchy infants are irritable and sleep poorly but scratch very little, and very young infants are not developmentally able to scratch. Children are suggestible; a 7-year-old who is asked, “Does your rash itch?” will almost certainly answer, “Yes.” Instead, ask the child whether the rash bothers him or her in any way, and ask the parent whether the child sleeps well at night or is scratching frequently. Pruritus from any cause is always worse at night because

Some skin conditions, such as poison ivy, dermatitis, and lichen planus, are intensely itchy, and relieving the pruritus may be more important than improving the rash.

Remember that you are seeing the child’s skin problem at a particular moment in its evolution. The parents’ description of its appearance at the onset and careful documentation of its evolution are therefore very important. Acute skin eruptions are usually dynamic, and the distribution or morphology may change rapidly. By contrast, chronic eruptions are more likely to have a stable appearance.

Some patients and parents are incredibly observant when it comes to skin, and others notice no details at all. Let both the patient and the parents give their descriptions, then ask for clarification. Use terms they will understand, such as those suggested in Table 19–2.

TABLE 19–2 Examples of Terminology Most Parents Understand

Medical Term Lay Term
Macule Dot
Papule Little bump
Nodule Big bump
Plaque Raised or thickened area
Vesicle Little blister
Bulla Big blister
Pustule Pus pocket, pimple
Desquamation Scaling, flaking
Crusts Scabs
Excoriations Scratch marks
Comedones Blackheads, whiteheads

History of present illness

Your questions should cover the following points:

Some words used to describe skin eruptions are nonspecific and are often used improperly by patients or physicians. An example of such nonspecificity is the word blister. It is important to confirm that they are referring to true vesicles or bullae because that will narrow your differential diagnosis. If a child presents with a blistering eruption, in addition to the described history, you should ask the following questions (in words that the parents can understand):

For a rash, ask what the child and parents think caused it. Their suspicions may turn out to be correct, or they may have an unfounded fear (e.g., skin cancer) that can be put to rest.

Ask for details of exacerbating or relieving factors and of seasonal influences on the course of the skin problem. Some types of dermatitis become worse in the winter because of the lower humidity. The influence of sun exposure is an important factor. Conditions, such as lupus erythematosus, are exacerbated by sun exposure, whereas psoriasis usually improves significantly with sun exposure. In some cases, it is important to have a history of recent travel and exposures to wooded areas, animals, and insects.

Skin care regime, topical treatments, and medication history

Often, you need to find out what routine care is given to the skin and the clothing that is in contact with it. For instance, in eczematous eruptions, you must learn how often the child is bathed, what kind of soap and detergent are used, and what moisture creams or other preparations have been applied to the skin.

Frequently, several topical agents have been applied before the child visits a physician, and it is important to find out what has been used before and after the problem began.

Some proprietary medications may be bland and soothing and provide symptomatic relief. Others may contain active ingredients that are inappropriate for the child’s problem or are in the wrong concentration. Some may contain ingredients that are common topical sensitizers and may aggravate the skin problem. Ask about any prescribed topical medications used before the current assessment of the child. Often, parents may not remember the names of topical preparations. If necessary, call the pharmacist to find out what was prescribed.

Obtain a detailed history of all prescribed or over-the-counter oral medications, including doses and duration of administration. Ask specifically about nonprescription medications, such as acetylsalicylic acid, acetaminophen, and cold remedies. Drugs can cause rashes of all descriptions, although the most common are maculopapular eruptions, urticaria, and erythema multiforme. Ask about any previous reactions to medications, and document the type and severity of each.

Family history

Obtaining a family history is important, because numerous skin conditions are genetically determined, and many chronic dermatoses are considered hereditary, although they may be polygenic or exhibit incomplete penetrance. Sometimes an environmental trigger may unmask a disease in an individual who is genetically predisposed. For example, a streptococcal sore throat commonly precedes the development of guttate psoriasis.

A patient presenting with a genodermatosis or a neurocutaneous syndrome may or may not have a known family history of the disorder. Absence of a family history may be due to the following factors:

At times, the family history is not as important for diagnosis as for prognosis. For example, a teenager with multiple large and irregular nevi who has a family history of malignant melanoma is at significant risk for development of a melanoma; therefore, advise him or her about sun protection, regular self-examinations, and periodic professional examination to prevent melanoma or detect it in an early, curable stage. The positive family history is a significant risk factor in this case.

Approach to the Physical Examination

When you begin the physical examination of the child’s skin, you should have in mind a general differential diagnosis based on the details of the history. Sometimes, after examining the skin, you will find that additional history is required. For example, if the history suggests an exacerbation of atopic dermatitis and you note multiple crusted vesicles on examination, you need to ask about the patient’s contact with people who have cold sores because eczema herpeticum is a likely cause of this flare-up.

Good light is essential to adequate examination of the skin. Its importance is often overlooked. Natural light is best, and it may help to move the patient near a window. However, natural light is not always available in clinics and hospital rooms, and fluorescent light may distort colors and minimize subtle skin changes. For the examination of localized lesions, using a spotlight can help. Also, a magnifying glass helps you appreciate details.

Examine the entire skin surface

Always look at the entire skin surface, even if the history suggests a localized problem. The dermatologic examination includes the entire skin, the visible mucous membranes, and the skin appendages (hair, nails, and sweat glands), for the following reasons:

The extent, distribution, and severity of a skin problem are best appreciated by undressing the child and viewing most of the skin at once. You can, however, perform this step after the child is more comfortable with the examination procedure. Older children feel more self-conscious about being unclothed for a skin examination than they are by the same extent of undress for a chest or neurologic examination. Give the child a gown, and leave the room while he or she changes into it. It is acceptable to uncover and examine one area at a time in a gowned patient, but do not try to peek under tight clothing. For children younger than 2 years, a gown is unnecessary. The toddler’s sense of modesty is relatively undeveloped, and it is much easier to examine the child properly when he or she is wearing nothing more than a diaper or underpants.

Wear examining gloves if the child has eroded or oozing lesions, when you examine the mucous membranes, and if you suspect a contagious condition such as scabies. Generally, however, gloves are not necessary and tend to make the youngster feel uncomfortable.

Primary lesions

A lesion is referred to as primary if it is the first change to occur in the skin because of the disease. Secondary lesions can be caused by external factors, such as scratching and secondary infection, or may evolve from the primary lesion. Proper assessment of the type of primary lesions present is essential. The patient may have just one type of primary lesion or a variety of primary and secondary lesions.

Nodules and Tumors

Nodules and tumors are circumscribed and elevated lesions that are larger than papules. Nodules arise from deeper structures, therefore displaying depth as well as elevation (Plate 19–4). Tumors can arise from deep structures, the dermis, or the epidermis. As with papules, describe the shape, outline, elevation, depth, surface characteristics, firmness of a nodule or tumor, and its mobility on palpation.

Vesicles and Bullae

A vesicle is a small (less than 1 cm) raised cavity containing fluid. A bulla is a larger, fluid-filled lesion (more than 1 cm). Both are called blisters by lay persons. Look at the distribution and arrangement, which may be important for diagnostic purposes. For example, the blisters in poison ivy contact dermatitis are commonly linear in arrangement (Plate 19–5), whereas those of herpes simplex are clustered closely together. Note whether the blisters arise on erythematous skin, such as in a blistering contact dermatitis, or on apparently normal skin, such as with friction blisters. Describe the color of fluid within the lesions—serous, hemorrhagic, or a combination.

Noting whether the vesicles and bullae are tense or flaccid provides clues to the layers of skin in which they arise. Blisters that are more superficial, such as those of bullous impetigo, are more flaccid because fewer layers of cells make up the roof of the lesion, whereas those arising from deeper layers tend to be tense. The pathologic process is also likely to be more superficial if there are multiple erosions present because these blisters rupture easily, and the roof of the lesion is no longer present. Often, a small peripheral rim of epidermis is still adherent around the periphery of an erosion, indicating that this eruption is vesiculobullous (see later discussion) even though no blisters remain intact.

Check for the Nikolsky sign in vesiculobullous conditions. The Nikolsky sign exists if the layers of skin can be easily separated with a gentle rubbing or shearing force (Plate 19–6). This phenomenon is seen in staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, pemphigus, and some forms of epidermolysis bullosa.

Search for any vesicles or erosions on the visible mucosa. It is unusual to see blisters in the intact state in the mouth because there is so much friction and trauma from eating and talking.

The group of disorders in which blisters are the primary lesions is called vesiculobullous eruptions. There are many causes of vesiculobullous eruptions in children. Some are rare hereditary blistering disorders, such as epidermolysis bullosa. Common infectious diseases, such as varicella (Plate 19–7), bullous impetigo, and herpes simplex, produce vesiculobullous eruptions. Skin conditions due to exogenous factors, such as friction and sunburn, frequently cause blistering. A vesicular reaction may be caused by various types of contact dermatitis, either irritant or allergic in origin. (A prime example of allergic contact dermatitis is that caused by poison ivy, shown in Plate 19–5.) Vascular reactions, such as erythema multiforme and some forms of vasculitis, may cause vesicles.

Finally, there is a rare group of primary vesiculobullous disorders in children, including chronic bullous dermatosis of childhood, pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, and dermatitis herpetiformis.

Secondary lesions

Secondary lesions can evolve from primary lesions or can arise from external factors, such as scratching.

Crusts

Crusting results from the accumulation of dried exudates or transudates on the skin (Plate 19–10). A crust from dried serous fluid is honey-colored and easily dislodged; a crust from purulent material is brown and tightly adherent; and a crust from sanguineous or bloody fluid is red-brown to black and tightly adherent. Crusts are seen on any oozing eruption, such as infected eczema or a vesiculobullous eruption.

Color changes

Normal skin color is mostly determined by a combination of the individual’s constitutional level of melanization (determined by hereditary or racial background) and the blood vessels underneath. Note the color of the child’s uninvolved skin and compare it with the color of the skin problem. Many skin eruptions are erythematous, and the erythema can be from inflammation, vasodilation of blood vessels, or blood that has extravasated out of the vessels (purpura). Diascopy (observing for blanching through a glass slide pressed on the skin) may be helpful. Erythema due to vasodilation blanches when the vessels are compressed; purpura, by contrast, does not blanch because the blood is in the tissue and not the vessel.

In dark-skinned races, it is more challenging to assess color changes in the skin. Erythema may be difficult to detect, especially for the inexperienced examiner. Hypopigmentation, however, is more prominent in a darker skinned patient because of the greater contrast with the normal skin color.

Secondary changes, such as scaling or crusting, may significantly alter the underlying color of an eruption, such as when the erythema of a psoriatic plaque is obscured by thick silver scales.

The increased brown color of the skin is usually due to higher amounts of melanin. Hemosiderin deposits caused by chronic extravasation of small amounts of blood that is taken up by tissue macrophages also produce a brown color, but the shade is usually tanner or yellowish.

White discoloration can result from the following:

Examination of the skin with a Wood lamp is useful in pigment abnormalities. The emitted light from this lamp is in the ultraviolet A (UVA) range, with a narrow spectrum around 366 nm, because the other wavelengths are filtered out by a special filter. The Wood lamp allows much clearer visualization of hypopigmented conditions. Because there is less pigment to absorb the light, more light is reflected back, so you can see it better. Completely depigmented conditions, such as vitiligo, show stark contrast and appear bright white under a Wood lamp examination. The lamp is also useful for detecting certain types of fungal infection, because some fungi elaborate a pigment that fluoresces when exposed to the lamp’s wavelength of light.

A blue-gray color is usually caused by the presence of elongated melanocytes deep within the dermis, as in Mongolian spots on the lower back of dark-skinned infants. More of the blue wavelength of light is reflected back from the surface, thus giving this color. Occasionally, a gray color develops from deposition of a drug-pigment complex or from ingestion of metallic substances, such as silver compounds.

Yellowish discoloration of the skin can be due to lipid deposition, to pigments such as carotene or bilirubin, or to pigments from degenerating red blood cells, as seen in the resolving stages of purpura.

Approach to the Examination of Mucosa and Skin Appendages

Scalp and hair

Many cutaneous disorders have scalp or hair manifestations that are easily overlooked. Check the scalp for areas of inflammation, scaling, and hair loss. If inflammation is present, be specific as to the morphology of the lesions: Are they erythematosus plaques with silvery scales, as in psoriasis, or scaly plaques with follicular keratotic plugging, scarring, and hair loss, as in discoid lupus erythematosus?

If alopecia is the presenting problem, decide whether it is diffuse or patchy, inflammatory or noninflammatory, and scarring or nonscarring. Assignment of the alopecia to one of these broad groups simplifies the differential diagnosis. For example, if an alopecia is patchy, nonscarring, and noninflammatory, it is probably either alopecia areata (Plate 19–14) or trichotillomania (hair pulling). The bald patch is smooth in alopecia areata, but broken-off hairs are seen in trichotillomania. In alopecia areata, look for so-called exclamation mark hairs, which are 1 to 2 mm in length, tapered at the attached end, and seen around the periphery of developing bald patches (Fig. 19–2).

With a hand lens, examine the character of the hair shafts and the presence or absence of a telogen (resting phase) bulb at the end of easily pulled hairs. Telogen hairs, which have a small hypopigmented bulb at the root end, are the hairs that come out daily with normal brushing and washing. In telogen effluvium, which can be precipitated by pregnancy, fever, or surgery, a higher percentage of hairs are in the telogen phase, and the patient experiences a temporary diffuse loss of hair.

Several types of hair shaft defect may lead to alopecia or breakage of hairs. To detect structural abnormalities, it is necessary to examine several hairs with a light microscope or electron microscope.

Wood light examination (see earlier in the chapter) has been used traditionally as a screening examination for tinea capitis. Some types of fungal infection of the scalp fluoresce under the UVA light, particularly those caused by the Microsporum genus. Fluorescence under Wood light examination confirms the diagnosis. Absence of fluorescence under Wood light examination does not, however, exclude the possibility of tinea capitis because several cutaneous fungal infections do not fluoresce.

Case Histories

Case History 1

History. Robert, age 15 years, comes to your office with the complaint of a relatively sudden onset of an extensive scaly skin eruption.

What questions are important to establish a differential diagnosis? You obtain the following pertinent history: The rash began 3 weeks ago with the appearance of a solitary, raised scaly plaque, which is oval and about 3 cm wide, on his left upper chest. Over the next week, numerous smaller scaly thin plaques developed, mostly on the trunk. The rash has not changed much since then. It is not symptomatic. There has been no involvement of the scalp or mucous membranes.

Functional inquiry is normal, except that Robert had a sore throat a few weeks ago. He has been taking no prescribed or over-the-counter medications. He showers daily with a mild soap and does not apply any other preparations to his skin. He has never been sexually active and has no past history of skin problems. There is no family history of psoriasis or other skin diseases. At this point, you suspect that Robert has pityriasis rosea, on the basis of the history of the larger lesion (the herald patch) that preceded the more extensive asymptomatic eruption. With this background information, you have also considered guttate psoriasis, nummular or contact dermatitis, drug eruption, and secondary syphilis (which, although rare, must be considered in an adolescent with this history), and you have asked specific questions to help rule out or further consider those disorders.

What do you expect the physical examination to show? Robert has an extensive papulosquamous eruption most prominent on the trunk, with slight involvement of the proximal limbs and neck. There is sparing of the scalp, face, mucous membranes, palms, and soles. Oval, salmon-pink plaques are arranged parallel to the lines of skin cleavage on his trunk (Christmas tree distribution). The individual plaques are thin and just palpable above the skin surface; most measure about 1 cm, except for a 3-cm-diameter plaque on the left side of his chest (see Plate 19–3). There is scaling around the periphery of most of the plaques, with the free edge of the scale facing toward the center of the lesion (a toeing-in). His fingernails are normal.

What is your conclusion? It is now obvious that Robert has both the classic history and typical clinical appearance of pityriasis rosea. You therefore reassure him that he has a self-limited viral condition that will resolve without treatment in about 6 weeks.

Robert’s story illustrates how knowledge of the classic features of common skin problems can make the diagnosis easy.

Case History 2

History. Joanne, who is 8 years old, is brought in from a rural area with a preliminary diagnosis of early-onset acne. A few small red bumps were noticed around her nose when she was 4 years old. More of these lesions have developed gradually, and the original papules are still present. They have never had pus within them, and Joanne does not have comedones (blackheads or whiteheads). Joanne’s parents have been helping her apply an acne gel containing 5% benzoyl peroxide for 6 months, with no improvement.

What is your line of thinking at this point? Several factors in the history so far make you question the presumptive diagnosis of acne. Age 4 years is very young for the onset of acne. Joanne has had no pustules or comedones, both of which are hallmarks of acne, and there has been no improvement with treatment. You decide that a detailed history is needed.

Joanne’s past medical history reveals that she had a seizure 2 months ago, which was never investigated because it did not recur, and it is difficult for the family to travel to the city. Joanne is not taking any medications. Functional inquiry reveals that she has failed two grades in school and is much slower to learn than her sibling. She has a few light-colored birthmarks. Her mother has a few red papules around the nose and gets large hangnails around her fingernails and toenails.

During the interview, Joanne does not contribute to her history when asked questions; she is restless and behaves like a younger child.

What physical signs are you specifically looking for on the physical examination? Examination of Joanne’s skin reveals approximately two dozen erythematous papules on her face, mostly around the nasolabial folds. These are 2 to 3 mm, bright red, firm, and smooth on top. These papules are not associated with a hair follicle, as one would expect in acne, and there are no comedones or pustules.

At this point, your presumptive diagnosis is that these papules represent angiofibromas, a hallmark of tuberous sclerosis. The history of a seizure and mental slowness is also in keeping with this disorder. You continue the examination, looking particularly for other cutaneous manifestations of this syndrome. There are five faint hypopigmented patches on the trunk and limbs (birthmarks), so you shine a Wood light on the skin, which makes them more obvious. Each is 2 to 3 cm in diameter, oval, and not raised or scaly (Plate 19–15). These patches are called ash leaf macules or patches because of their shape. Joanne also has two firm pink polypoid papules along the lateral aspects of her toenails (periungual fibromas; Plate 19–16). There is a localized leathery-looking plaque on her lower back, a shagreen plaque that represents a fibrous hamartoma.

These skin findings are pathognomonic of tuberous sclerosis and confirm the diagnosis. You now proceed to a full physical examination because many organ systems can be involved in this disease. It is also important to ask further focused questions about the family history, asking specifically whether family members have had the neurological, cutaneous, or renal manifestations of tuberous sclerosis. Joanne requires more specific neurological, developmental, renal, and cardiac investigation, and the parents should undergo genetic counseling.

Case History 3

History. Six-month-old David’s parents are concerned about a very itchy rash that he has had for a month. Because there is a family history of atopic dermatitis, they have assumed that David has this form of eczema. They are frustrated because David is scratching his skin day and night, and a nonprescription-strength topical corticosteroid cream has not helped at all.

What important questions do you have for David’s parents? You ask further questions appropriate for a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis, such as the onset and progression of the rash, what seems to exacerbate or relieve it, what his skin comes in contact with, and whether his skin is generally dry and sensitive. However, when you ask about contact with others who may be itchy, you learn that David’s uncle, who was visiting 6 weeks ago, had a rash on his trunk and limbs, and David’s mother noted a few itchy bumps around her wrists just yesterday.

What specific clinical signs are you now looking for? You suspect that David has contracted a scabies infestation. On examination, you find several small pustules on the palms and soles (a common sign of scabies in an infant). David has an extensive eruption of excoriated papules on his trunk and limbs, and a few on his neck. On careful examination, you find a few 3- to 5-mm linear burrows around his wrists and ankles (see Fig. 19–1). David does not have the typical dry skin of atopic dermatitis.

How do you make the definitive diagnosis of scabies? At the end of one burrow, there is a tiny black dot. With a hand lens, you are able to lift the dot out with a needle tip without hurting the child. Microscopic examination clearly shows a mite (Sarcoptes scabiei). You can now reassure his parents that David does not have eczema but does have scabies. You reassure them that this is a common, treatable infectious condition which anyone can contract and not the result of poor hygiene. You give them exact written and verbal instructions on how to treat scabies topically with permethrin and how to prevent reinfestation by washing personal clothing and linens. You also emphasize that household contacts must also be treated, even if they are asymptomatic.

Case History 4

History. Two-year-old Maria is brought to the emergency department by her parents in the late evening. She has been perfectly well until 24 hours earlier, when erythema developed in the diaper area and around her mouth. She became febrile (39.5° C), and oral acetaminophen relieved the fever for a few hours only. Gradually, Maria became irritable and anorexic, and she cried frequently, even when she was picked up. Her skin had become generally red, and her parents noted the development of some blistering and crusting on her buttocks, lower back, and face. They have given her no medications other than acetaminophen.

What clinical signs are you likely to note on examination? Maria is irritable and cries when handled, even by her mother. Her core temperature is 39.5° C. A generalized, bright red, blanching erythema of the skin is most noticeable around the lower trunk. There is superficial radial fissuring and crusting around her mouth and under her eyes. Some erosions are present on her buttocks, perianal area, and back, and there are several intact flaccid vesicles containing serous fluid arising on erythematous skin over pressure points. You apply a gentle lateral shearing or slow rubbing force on the erythematous skin, which results in detachment of the epidermal layer, leaving an erosion, the Nikolsky sign.

Can you now make a clinical diagnosis? Maria has the typical manifestations of staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, caused by a localized infection with Staphylococcus aureus phage type 71. This organism elaborates a systemic epidermolytic toxin that separates the layers of the epidermis and produces an acute, generalized superficial bullous disorder. People older than 8 years are able to neutralize the toxin and therefore rarely manifest the disease. Although the condition is self-limited, the affected child may experience significant secondary fluid and electrolyte abnormalities because of loss of the skin barrier. You therefore admit Maria to the hospital and begin treatment with intravenous anti-staphylococcal antibiotics and fluid replacement. She recovers quickly and completely, with no residual scarring.