ASSESSING CARDINAL MUSCULOSKELETAL SYMPTOMS AND SIGNS

Published on 16/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1688 times

CHAPTER TWO ASSESSING CARDINAL MUSCULOSKELETAL SYMPTOMS AND SIGNS

INTRODUCTION

The actual technique of examination varies according to individual preference. Nevertheless, developing and adhering to a particular routine can be useful. Familiarity with such a routine ensures that an examiner does not overlook any step in the examination.

The part or region under evaluation must be adequately exposed and in good lighting. Many mistakes are made simply because the examiner does not insist on removing enough of the patient’s clothing to allow proper evaluation and inspection (Fig. 2-1). When examining the involved extremity, the uninvolved extremity is always used for comparison.

CARDINAL SYMPTOMS

Pain and Sensibility

Among presenting symptoms, pain is usually most important for the patient. Among presenting signs, swelling of a joint or periarticular tissue is important. With regard to pain, the examiner must be certain of the site of origin and distribution. The patient’s verbal description may be misleading. The patient should be able to point to or define the site of maximal intensity and map out the area over which pain is experienced.

Factors that exacerbate or ameliorate the pain are important. Pain during an activity suggests a mechanical problem, particularly if it worsens during use and quickly improves when resting. Pain while at rest, and pain that is worse at the beginning rather than at the end of use, implies a marked inflammatory component. Night pain is a distressing symptom that reflects intraosseous hypertension and accompanies serious problems, such as avascular necrosis, bone neoplastic activity, or bone collapse adjacent to a severely arthritic joint. Persistent bony pain is characteristic of neoplastic invasion. The activities that create a mechanical pain may provide clues as to the appropriate diagnosis. Periarticular problems are often induced by a specific type of activity but are also divided by region (Table 2-1).

TABLE 2-1 REGIONAL PERIARTICULAR SYNDROMES

Region Periarticular Syndrome
Jaw Temporomandibular joint dysfunction (myofascial pain syndrome)
Shoulder

Elbow

Wrist Hand Hip Knee Ankle Foot

Adapted from Kelley WN, et al: Textbook of rheumatology, ed 5, Philadelphia, 1997, WB Saunders.

Disability and Handicap

Disability is present when a tissue, organ, or system cannot function adequately. A handicap exists when disability interferes with a patient’s daily activities or social or occupational performance. A marked disability does not necessarily cause a handicap. Conversely, minor disability may produce a major handicap. Both states of disability and handicap require separate assessment, with the evaluation of disability being a purely medical activity, whereas handicap assessment is often a medicolegal function. Patients’ perceptions of their problems is a product of their adaptation to the depreciated tissue, as well as aspirations for recovery (Box 2-1).

ORTHOPEDIC GAMUT 2-5 SPECIFIC ELEMENTS TO CONSIDER IN ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING ASSESSMENT

SYSTEMIC ILLNESS

Inflammatory musculoskeletal disease may trigger a marked acute-phase response and cause nonspecific symptoms of systemic upset. Symptoms may include fever, reduced appetite, weight loss, fatigue, lethargy, and irritability. The patient might not volunteer specific complaints but might report feeling ill. Florid, acute inflammation may cause confusion, especially in older adults.

Referred Symptoms

When the source of the symptom is still in doubt after thorough examination of the part, attention must be directed to possible extrinsic disorders. Determination of extrinsic disorders requires examination of other regions of the body that might be responsible. For instance, in a case of pain in the shoulder, examining the neck might be necessary for evidence of a lesion interfering with the brachial plexus. For pain in the thigh, the examination often includes a study of the spine, abdomen, pelvis, and genitourinary system, as well as the local examination of the hip and thigh.

The afferent pain fibers originating from the same area demonstrate extensive convergence onto the dorsal horn relay cells. In certain cases, the convergence may take place by fibers from different areas, causing relay cell activation by pain originating in different body parts. This mechanism underlies the phenomenon of referred pain (e.g., pain originating in the heart is often felt at the inner aspects of the left arm). Referred pain is either caused by convergence of pain fibers from both zones onto the same spinal relay cell or caused by facilitation of somatic signals during excessive pain traffic from a visceral source. Classic examples of this phenomenon include the referral of neck or shoulder pain to the upper arm (Table 2-2).

TABLE 2-2 CERVICAL SPINE SYNDROMES REFERRING PAIN TO THE UPPER EXTREMITY

Lesions Producing Neck and Shoulder Pain Lesions Producing Predominantly Shoulder Pain

Modified from Kelley WN, et al: Textbook of rheumatology, ed 5, Philadelphia, 1997, WB Saunders.

CARDINAL SIGNS

Diffuse Joint Swelling

Soft-tissue swelling is pathognomonic of inflammation (Table 2-3). Joint, bursal, or tenosynovial inflammation is almost invariably accompanied by the presence of an inflammatory exudate. An important step in confirming inflammation is the detection of effusion. In small joints, cross-fluctuation is applied with the examiner’s index finger pressing dorsally while the joint is gently squeezed from the sides between the examiner’s index finger and thumb.

TABLE 2-3 JOINT AND SOFT-TISSUE EDEMA

Tissue Indicative of
Joint synovium/effusion Inflammatory joint diseases
Subcutaneous tissue Inflammatory joint disease
Bursa/tendon sheath Inflammation of structure
Articular ends of bone Osteoarthritis

Erythema

Redness is uncommon but is encountered in gout, especially around the big toe, and sepsis in any joint. The primary lesion of erythema migrans, which is nearly pathognomonic of acute Lyme disease, is usually found at the site of the tick bite.

Discoid lupus has a virtually diagnostic appearance and distribution (Table 2-4) but may require histopathologic and immunofluorescence studies. Misdiagnosis of acute lupus can occur in patients expressing other photosensitive eruptions and in patients with conditions that produce vascular dilation (Table 2-5). A clinical history and examination are usually sufficient to discriminate acute lupus from other photosensitive eruptions.

TABLE 2-4 FACIAL DISEASES CONFUSED WITH LUPUS

TABLE 2-5 REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (1982)

Criterion Definition
1. Malar rash Fixed erythema, flat or raised, over the eminences, tending to spare the nasolabial folds
2. Discoid rash Erythematous raised patches with adherent keratotic scaling and follicular plugging; atrophic scarring may occur in older lesions
3. Photosensitivity Skin rash as a result of unusual reaction to sunlight, revealed by patient history or physician observation
4. Oral ulcers Oral or nasopharyngeal ulceration, usually painless, observed by a physician
5. Arthritis Nonerosive arthritis involving two or more peripheral joints, characterized by tenderness, swelling, or effusion
6. Serositis

7. Renal disorder 8. Neurologic disorder 9. Hematologic disorders 10. Immunologic disorder 11. Antinuclear antibody An abnormal titer of antinuclear antibody by immunofluorescence or an equivalent assay at any point in time and in the absence of drugs known to be associated with drug-induced lupus syndrome

ECG, Electrocardiogram; LE, lupus erythematosus.

From Tan EM, et al: The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of SLE, Arthritis Rheum 25:1271, 1982.

Features of dermatomyositis rash allow discrimination from lupus. These features include occasional nasolabial fold involvement, prominent heliotrope and extrafacial involvement, erythema following the course of extensor tendons, and scaling and fissuring of lateral aspects of the fingers (mechanic’s hands). A heliotrope rash and Gottron papules are characteristic and possibly pathognomonic cutaneous features of dermatomyositis. The heliotrope rash consists of a violaceous to dusky erythematous rash, with or without edema, in a symmetrical distribution involving periorbital skin.

Tenderness

Precise localization of tenderness is the most useful sign in determining the cause of the problem. Joint line or capsular tenderness signifies arthropathy or capsular disease around the whole margin. Localized joint line tenderness suggests intracapsular pathologic processes. Periarticular point tenderness, away from the joint line, usually signifies bursitis or enthesopathy.

The only reliable finding on examination in fibromyalgia is the presence of multiple tender points. The diagnostic utility of a tender point evaluation has been objectively documented with the use of a dolorimeter or algometer, pressure-loaded gauges that accurately measure force per area, and with manual palpation. The criteria of at least 11 of 18 tender points are recommended for classification purposes but should not be considered essential in individual patient diagnoses. Patients with fewer than 11 tender points can be diagnosed with fibromyalgia, provided other symptoms and signs are present. An investigation must be made to determine whether the fibromyalgia is primary or secondary. The Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs helps differentiate neuropathic pain and fibromyalgic pain (Box 2-2).

BOX 2-2 LEEDS ASSESSMENT OF NEUROPATHIC SYMPTOMS AND SIGNS (THE LANSS PAIN SCALE)

Adapted from Kaki AM, El-Yaski AZ, Youseif E: Identifying neuropathic pain among patients with chronic low-back pain: use of the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale, Reg Anesth Pain Med 30(5):422.e1-422.e9, 2005.

This pain scale can help determine whether the nerves that are carrying the patient’s pain signals are working normally. The examiner should know this information in case different treatments are needed to control the patient’s pain.

Fixed Deformity

Although articular deformity may be observed at rest, most become more apparent when the limb is bearing weight or being used. The examiner should determine whether the deformity is correctable or noncorrectable. Many conditions are associated with characteristic deformities, but no deformity is pathognomonic of any single disease (Table 2-7). Shorthand terms are used for combined deformities, such as swan-neck finger deformity for hyperextension at the proximal and fixed flexion at the distal interphalangeal joints.

TABLE 2-7 SPECIFIC MUSCULOSKELETAL DEFORMITIES

Lower Limb Upper Limb

DIPs, Distal interphalangeal joints; MCPs, metacarpophalangeal joints; PIP, proximal interphalangeal joints.

Movement

Every joint has a normal range of motion. The range of motion for any joint varies with age, gender, and ethnic origin. A range of movement that is beyond the upper limit represents hypermobility. Ranges below the lower limit represent hypomobility. The normal joint range of motion is diminished by joint inflammation or by irreversible damage to the joint structures. In trauma or disease, movement is first lost from the extreme end ranges. Increasing joint damage results in more profound loss of range of motion. The complete loss of movement of a joint is known as fixation ankylosis or joint ankylosis, depending on soft-tissue versus bony involvement, respectively. Fixation or joint ankylosis is further complicated by the involvement or loss of multiple planes of motion (Table 2-8).

TABLE 2-8 JOINT PLANE MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Type Planes Joints
Hinge One Elbow, knee, ankle, MCP, PIP, DIP, MTP
Two-way hinge Two (circumduction) Wrist, trapeziometacarpal
Ball and socket All planes Shoulder, hip

DIP, Distal interphalangeal; MCP, metacarpophalangeal; MTP, metatarsophalangeal; PIP, proximal interphalangeal.

Hypermobility is recognized by a series of passive maneuvers collectively known as the 9-point scale of Beighton (Box 2-3). The Beighton modification of the Carter and Wilkinson scoring system has been used for many years as an indicator of widespread hypermobility. A high Beighton score by itself does not mean that an individual has HMS. It simply means that the individual has widespread hypermobility. Diagnosis of Hypermobility Syndrome or HMS should be made using the Brighton Criteria. The Beighton score is an easy to administer 9-point scale where points are given for the performance of five maneuvers. It is generally considered that hypermobility is present if 4 out of 9 points are scored. The scale was not designed for clinical use and has been criticized because it only samples a few joints and gives no indication of the degree of hypermobility.

ORTHOPEDIC GAMUT 2-11 BRIGHTON CRITERIA (DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR HYPERMOBILITY SYNDROME)

From R. Grahame, Pain distress and joint hyperlaxity, Joint Bone Spine 67 (2000), pp. 157–163

Muscular Atrophy

Muscle atrophy is a common sign but can be difficult to detect, particularly in older adults. Synovitis quickly produces local spinal reflex inhibition of muscles acting across the joint. Atrophy can be rapid (within several days) in septic arthritis. Severe arthropathy produces widespread periarticular wasting. Localized atrophy is more characteristic of a mechanical tendon or muscle problem or nerve entrapment. Disuse atrophy is complex and highly regulated biochemical process (Table 2-11).

TABLE 2-11 SIGNALS INVOLVED IN DISUSE-INDUCED MUSCLE ATROPHY

Signals Finding Function
PI3K, Akt Decreased

FOXO1, FOXO3 Increased mTOR, p70S6K, eIF4B Decreased Inhibits protein synthesis PHAS-I Increased Inhibits protein synthesis p50, c-Rel, Bcl-3 Increased Promotes protein degradation Myostatin, ActIIB Increased Inhibits protein synthesis? p38 Increased Promotes protein degradation Erk Increased Promotes glucose uptake? JNK Increased Increases insulin resistance Calcineurin Increased Compensatory mechanism? ROS Increased Promotes protein degradation MAFbx, MuRF1 Increased Promotes protein degradation

Signal abbreviations: ACTIIB, Myostatin receptor; Akt, serine/threonine kinase; Bcl-3, transcriptional coactivtor; Calcineurin, serine/threonine phosphatase; c-REL, NF-kB family transcription factor; E1F4B, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B (homo sapiens); ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FOXO, Forkhead family of transcription factor; JNK, c-JUN N-terminal kinase; MAFbx, muscle atrophy f-box ubiquitin ligase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; MuRF1, muscle ring finger 1 ubiquitin ligase; Myostatin, inhibitor of skeletal muscle mass; p38, p38 isoform mitogen activated protein; p50, NF-kB family transcription factor; p70S6K, 70-kDa ribosomal protein s6 kinase; PHAS-I, eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-OH kinase; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Adapted from Zhang P, Chen X, Fan M: Signaling mechanisms involved in disuse muscle atrophy, Med Hypoth 70(2):314–316, 2008.

Cramps and Spasm

Muscular spasm, or tremor (Table 2-12), may occur at rest or with movement. Spasms and tremors occur in the normal individual with metabolic and electrolyte alterations. Cramping is a common complaint after excessive sweating and subsequent hyponatremia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, or hyperuricemia (electrolyte imbalance).

TABLE 2-12 TREMOR CLASSIFICATION

Cause Type and Rate of Movement Description
Anxiety Fine, rapid, 10 to 12/sec

Parkinsonism Fine, regular, or coarse, 2 to 5/sec Cerebellar tremor Variable rate Essential or senile Coarse, 3 to 7/sec Involves the jaw, sometimes the tongue, and sometimes the entire head Metabolic  

From Barkauskas VH et al: Health & physical assessment, ed 2, St Louis, 1998, Mosby.