1.1 Approach to the paediatric patient
Introduction
Who sees paediatric emergencies?
Some critically ill children will arrive in a more predictable fashion via ambulance and some preparation can occur to plan for their initial treatment. On the other hand, a child in extremis may well be rushed in from a family car, without any prior warning of their arrival. Systems of preparedness for these situations are critical for the immediate assessment and optimal early management of children by emergency department staff (see Chapter 2).
Identifying the potentially sick child
Of the vast number of children attending emergency departments, approximately 2–5% are classified as immediate emergencies (Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) 1 and 2) that require urgent assessment and management.1 Importantly, children can present with a less urgent triage category, but may rapidly deteriorate from evolving sepsis or airway compromise. The majority of paediatric presentations consist of less emergent problems involving a wide spectrum of injuries and illness. Of this group of paediatric patients there is a subset where the diagnosis is not immediately apparent. Thus, paediatric patients can generally be divided into three broad groups: the obviously well, the obviously sick or the potentially sick child. One of the major tasks for the emergency physician is to identify the ‘sick child’ from a large undifferentiated group of children who may present as potentially sick. It is by a ‘filtering process’ via history, examination, observation, investigation and consultation that one identifies the potentially sick child (Fig. 1.1.1). This group of patients includes: those children who have progressed to a severe form of a usually benign illness; those with early, subtle signs of a serious disease; or those who on initial assessment appear unwell, but require investigation to help rule out serious disease. It is often through observation of a child, that one is able to more accurately assess each of these possibilities.2 With experience, the ability to appreciate a ‘sick child’ improves; however, a good rule, particularly in the younger child, is, if in doubt, investigate, admit for a longer period of observation or seek the second opinion of a colleague.
Evolving illness in children
Due to differences in anatomy, physiology, development and psychology, children’s diseases are age specific, with serious illness often taking time to evolve.3 Many children present to an emergency department in the early stage of an illness and making a definitive diagnosis may require time. The clinical status of paediatric patients may also change rapidly. This can occur in response to prior trauma, evolving sepsis, toxin absorption or a seizure, and necessitate a change in the initial priority to receive treatment. The younger the child, the greater the potential for rapid deterioration as the early manifestations of a serious illness may be subtle and non-specific. One must be vigilant for the early signs of compensated shock such as tachycardia, decreased capillary refill, mottled skin, cool peripheries, decreased urine output, or drowsiness. Early detection and fluid resuscitation at this point may prevent hypotension in a child with evolving sepsis. Children with severe and deteriorating respiratory illness will manifest fatigue. It is the early recognition of children with serious illness or the potential to deteriorate that is critical to the timely initiation of effective treatment.2 An important principle in emergency paediatrics is to be proactive. One must be aware of the importance of regularly reviewing a child’s response to a given therapy, escalate treatment if required and be vigilant for subtle signs of deterioration.
Triage
Paediatric patients arriving in the emergency department should undergo triage according to standardised Australasian Triage Scale (ATS 1–5) so that they are seen in a prioritised fashion according to acuity. In mixed emergency departments where triage nurses may have had less paediatric experience, there has been a tendency to up-triage paediatric patients.1 The use of scoring systems for specific conditions or a Triage Observation Tool may be helpful in improving the reliability of triage in young children, who may present with non-specific symptomatology.4 A secondary nursing assessment should occur when the child is admitted to a cubicle, with further observations performed at the bedside, so that any change in condition can be detected early and acted on promptly. The senior doctor in the department should immediately be informed of children triaged as ATS 1 or 2 to direct timely management. In times of high workload, children with an ATS 3 may not be definitively assessed within 30 minutes and should have a senior doctor rapidly assess status and initiate therapy, if required. It may be necessary to modify normal triage systems when emergency department numbers are affected by surges in demand when significant influenza outbreaks or the like occur.
Fast tracking
Some initiation of treatment is appropriate during the triage process, such as the provision of analgesia for pain or an antipyretic in a child symptomatic of fever. It is important that children with pain are given early and appropriate analgesia or have injuries splinted when required. This will facilitate a more comfortable, reliable and expeditious assessment. The use of opiates, when required, will only enhance, rather than detract from the subsequent physician’s physical examination.5 The use of visual analogue scales such as the Wong–Baker faces may assist the assessment of a child’s response to analgesia. A process of fast tracking appropriate children with single limb injuries for an X-ray prior to definitive medical review may improve efficiency through the department. Febrile children who present with a rash, not clearly due to a viral exanthema or benign phenomena, should be fast tracked to be seen by a senior doctor to consider the possibility of meningococcaemia. It is useful to have documented management plans for children who may recurrently present to the department. This includes conditions such as complex children, brittle asthma, cyclical vomiting or recalcitrant seizures where a clear plan of management can expedite care by ED staff.
The paediatric approach
Age appropriate
The approach to any child in the emergency department is dictated by the child’s age and developmental level. It is useful to have a modified approach to suit newborns, infants, toddlers, preschoolers, school children and adolescents. An understanding of the concept of ‘the fourth trimester’ is useful in dealing with crying phenomena in the first months of life, which will often precipitate emergency department visits (see Chapter 1.2). A preverbal or developmentally delayed child won’t tell you of pain which has shifted to the right iliac fossa. An unwell 14-month-old clinging to mother may actively resist the initial attempts to be examined by a stranger. The absence of familiarity with a family or child that their family doctor may have may further impede the assessment of anxious children. When explaining procedures to children it is important to be age appropriate and above all honest. Never tell a child ‘you won’t feel a thing!’ prior to plunging a cannula through an EMLA anaesthetised cubital fossa. Rather, explain in age-appropriate terms what it may feel like and that it’s OK to cry.
Development appropriate
Infants particularly benefit from the constant presence of their parent in their visual field in order to avoid stranger distress and are often best examined in the parent’s arms. Neonates can be examined on the examination bed as long as they are kept warm. Toddlers, despite their evolving autonomy, will usually be less fretful if examined on a parent’s lap. It is a useful sign of illness or other cause to note when young children do not exhibit these normal stranger anxieties. The preschooler who enjoys a sense of play and imagination can usually be relaxed during an examination or procedure by storytelling or engaging in play with a toy. An anxious early school-aged child may respond to participation in the examination or being asked about school or other more favoured activities. Adolescents, on the other hand, need to be approached in a more adult fashion and should be offered confidentiality and the opportunity to choose whether their parents are present (see Chapter 30.1).
History
Children-specific issues
In younger children, certain symptoms are less specific. The report of vomiting in an infant may be due to meningitis, pneumonia, tonsillitis or urinary sepsis rather than gastroenteritis. The assessment of wellness or otherwise in infants can be more challenging due to their limited psychomotor activities. Indeed, their spectrum of normal behaviours involves sleeping, waking to cry or demand a feed, followed by a return to sleep. Hence, it is important to enquire into their feeding status and sleep/activity pattern as an indicator of compromise due to illness. One needs to carefully clarify what their current intake is compared to their normal breast- or bottle-feeding. An infant who is feeding less than 50% of normal has significant compromise. It is important to note the report of a young febrile child who remains lethargic and fails to smile or interact with parents. In the otherwise well-looking infant, who appears mottled, clarify with parents whether this may be usual for their child (i.e. physiological cutis marmoratum versus sepsis). In assessing young children with trauma, a thorough history of the timing and mechanism of injury, noting the child’s developmental capabilities, is paramount to detecting possible non-accidental injuries (see Chapter 18.2 on NAI).
Other useful information to cover in the paediatric patient history is shown in Tables 1.1.1 and 1.1.2.