Anticonvulsants

Published on 26/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2331 times

172 Anticonvulsants

The treatment of seizures in the intensive care unit (ICU) involves two distinct elements: (1) acute termination of all clinical and electrographic seizure activity and (2) prevention of further seizures. Many seizures manifest as a single, self-limiting episode that alerts the ICU team to a metabolic or structural abnormality. Correcting the underlying pathology and initiating prophylaxis may prevent recurrence of the seizure(s). Thus, there are instances in the ICU when acute treatment of the seizure is not necessary. Prophylaxis against recurrence may not be warranted if the precipitating factors have been eliminated. However, owing to the potential for refractory seizures, it is common to place a patient in the ICU on seizure prophylaxis once a seizure has been documented. To optimally treat patients in the ICU who have seizures or are at risk for seizures, the risks and benefits of the anticonvulsant must be assessed prior to initiation of therapy.

image Anticonvulsants: General ICU Concerns

An ideal anticonvulsant for use in the ICU would have the following properties: the drug can be administered intravenously (IV); the drug does not irritate veins; the drug is lipophilic, enabling excellent penetration into the central nervous system (CNS); the drug does not cause sedation; the drug provides prolonged protection against seizures; the drug does not cause side effects and is not toxic; the metabolites of the drug are biologically inactive; and the drug (and its metabolites) are cleared via mechanisms that are not dependent upon normal hepatic or renal function. From a review of our drug armamentarium, it is obvious that none of the currently available anticonvulsants meet all of these criteria.

Specific anticonvulsant medications are selected based on several considerations such as the type of seizure activity being treated, the periodicity of the seizure activity, and the need for acute or emergency therapy versus chronic seizure prophylaxis. In the ICU, additional concerns arise secondary to the common observance of drug-induced side effects. Both idiosyncratic and dose-dependent complications can occur. Various factors are implicated in the development of anticonvulsant toxicity. The following are common metabolic and pharmacodynamic features of anticonvulsants that are important concerns in ICU practice.

Protein Binding

Drugs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, and valproic acid are extensively protein bound, but only the unbound drug in the plasma is biologically active. Critically ill patients are often catabolic and have abnormally low circulating protein levels; thus, the concentration of unbound drug can be greater than anticipated despite a total serum (or plasma) drug level that is within the normal target range for the medication.1 Patients with hepatic and/or renal dysfunction are prone to discordance between total and unbound (free) serum levels. Routine monitoring of free drug levels is expensive but warranted in these patients. Unfortunately, most hospital laboratories routinely offer unbound serum levels for only one commonly used anticonvulsant, phenytoin.

Metabolic Derangements

Hyponatremia has been reported in patients who have been treated with carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and (rarely) other anticonvulsants. Anticonvulsant-induced hyponatremia has been attributed to the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) (Table 172-1). Selected subgroups of patients are more at risk for anticonvulsant-induced hyponatremia, including elderly persons, menstruating women, patients who require administration of large fluid volumes, patients with renal failure, postoperative patients, and patients who are concurrently receiving other medications associated with hyponatremia.2

TABLE 172-1 Medications Associated with SIADH

Barbiturates Haloperidol
Carbamazepine Chlorpropamide
Oxcarbazepine Thioridazine
Thiazides Imipramine
Vincristine MAO inhibitors
Cyclophosphamide Bromocriptine
General anesthetics Oxytocin
Nicotine Acetamides
Clofibrate Tolbutamide
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs  

Adapted from Asconape J. Some common issues in the use of antiepileptic drugs. Semin Neurol 2002;22:27.

Drug Fever

Development of a fever coincident with initiation of an anticonvulsant in the ICU setting complicates patient management and is a serious potential concern. Drug fever is a particularly common occurrence with the two agents, phenytoin and fosphenytoin, but can occur with other anticonvulsants as well.1 Peripheral eosinophilia supports the diagnosis. However, it is frequently the case that the diagnosis of drug-induced fever is firmly established only when hyperthermia resolves after an alternative anticonvulsant is substituted for the original agent.

Drug Interactions

Many anticonvulsants can affect metabolism and or protein binding of other agents. Phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital are all potent inducers of the hepatic P450 enzyme systems (Tables 172-2 and 172-3), and treatment with these anticonvulsants can affect the circulating concentrations of other medications (Tables 172-4 and 172-5) including concomitantly administered anticonvulsant drugs (see Table 172-5). Phenytoin can reduce the plasma concentrations of carbamazepine and valproic acid, whereas interaction with phenobarbital is variable. Phenytoin decreases the effectiveness of warfarin and theophylline. Valproic acid inhibits the metabolism of phenobarbital and carbamazepine (including its 10,11-epoxide metabolite), which can result in increased serum levels. Carbamazepine increases the hepatic metabolism of diazepam and valproic acid. Phenobarbital results in decreased circulating levels of warfarin, theophylline, and cimetidine.3 Cimetidine, amiodarone, isoniazid (INH), and chlorpromazine all decrease hepatic metabolism of many drugs including phenytoin (Table 172-6). Drugs that commonly decrease circulating phenytoin levels include digoxin, cyclosporine, corticosteroids, warfarin, and theophylline. Aluminum hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, and calcium-containing antacids decrease the absorption of enterally administered phenytoin. Some of the newer anticonvulsants such as levetiracetam and lacosamide are excreted via the kidneys for the most part, and their circulating levels are unaffected by hepatic metabolism. In addition, drug-drug interactions are not a major concern with these newer agents, and they do not affect the levels of other anticonvulsants.

TABLE 172-3 Anticonvulsant Induction of Hepatic Metabolic Enzymes

Inducers Inhibitors No or Minimal Effect
Carbamazepine Valproate Gabapentin
Phenytoin Felbamate Lamotrigine
Phenobarbital   Topiramate
Primidone   Tiagabine
    Oxcarbazepine
    Levetiracetam
    Zonisamide

Adapted from Asconape J. Some common issues in the use of antiepileptic drugs: Semin Neurol 2002;22:27.

TABLE 172-6 Common Drug Interactions of Anticonvulsants

Phenytoin and Carbamazepine
Added Drug Phenytoin Carbamazepine
Salicylates  
Erythromycin   ↑↑
Chloramphenicol  
Trimethoprim  
Isoniazid
Propoxyphene
Amiodarone  
Diltiazem, verapamil  
Cimetidine
Ethanol  
Rifampin  
Digitoxin  
Cyclosporine  
Warfarin  
Theophylline  
Glucocorticoids  

↓, decrease in plasma levels; ↑, increase in plasma levels.

Idiosyncratic Reactions

Hypersensitivity reactions are common with phenytoin and carbamazepine and can be manifested by fever, rash, and/or eosinophilia.1 Drugs associated with a high risk for the development of rash include phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and zonisamide4 (Table 172-7). Transient leukopenia and thrombocytopenia are commonly seen with carbamazepine and valproate. Other less common drug-related effects include hepatic failure, pancreatitis (valproic acid), agranulocytosis, aplastic anemia, megaloblastic anemia (phenytoin), Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and lupus-like syndromes. Although rare, severe hepatic dysfunction secondary to formation of a toxic metabolite can occur with valproic acid therapy. This potentially fatal reaction most often occurs in children younger than 2 years of age who are also receiving aspirin and other drugs for control of seizures.

TABLE 172-7 Antiepileptic Drugs and Risk of Skin Rash

High Risk Low Risk
Phenytoin Valproate
Phenobarbital Topiramate
Primidone Gabapentin
Carbamazepine Tiagabine
Oxcarbazepine Levetiracetam
Lamotrigine Lacosamide
Zonisamide  

Data from Asconape J. Some common issues in the use of antiepileptic drugs: Semin Neurol 2002;22:27.

Management Of Anticonvulsant Toxicity

Management of patients suffering from severe toxicity requires comprehensive supportive therapy including airway management, hemodynamic support, and oral administration of activated charcoal. Charcoal has been especially useful for managing cases of acute valproate acid intoxication.5 In cases of valproic acid or carbamazepine poisoning, concurrent hemoperfusion and hemodialysis to enhance elimination of the anticonvulsant can be useful when patients are hemodynamically unstable and the clinical condition is worsening despite aggressive supportive care.6

image Specific Anticonvulsant Properties by Class

Benzodiazepines

For immediate therapy, benzodiazepines are still considered first-line treatment for most seizures. These drugs are highly lipophilic, are potent γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-activated agonists, and serve to improve local inhibition of signal transmission. The most commonly used benzodiazepines in the ICU are diazepam, lorazepam, and midazolam. In the case of hepatic failure, oxazepam may be preferred because it is the only benzodiazepine not metabolized by the liver.7

There are instances where short-acting benzodiazepines (e.g., midazolam or diazepam) may be preferable; anticonvulsants that offer prolonged sedation may interfere with reliable neurologic assessment and management. When such concerns exist, it may be preferable to initiate treatment of seizures using a short-acting benzodiazepine, followed immediately by a loading dose of a less-sedating medication such as phenytoin or other maintenance anticonvulsant.

If the seizure(s) have not been controlled following therapeutic doses of benzodiazepines, treatment with additional medications is warranted. Tachyphylaxis rapidly develops with the use of benzodiazepines, and these agents are not indicated for prophylaxis or maintenance therapy. Common secondary agents which are efficacious in the acute setting and are available for IV administration include phenytoin, fosphenytoin, carbamazepine, and valproic acid. Levetiracetam and lacosamide are newly developed agents that can be administered IV and are often used as second-line agents in the setting of uncontrolled seizures in the ICU.

Diazepam

Diazepam (Valium) has been available for many years, and most clinicians have considerable experience with this drug. Its use has been declining in recent years due to the availability of more effective agents such as midazolam and lorazepam. Following administration, the highly lipophilic drug, diazepam, rapidly redistributes from plasma into tissue. Because of this, the anticonvulsant duration is just a few minutes. Diazepam is not water soluble and requires emulsification with a vehicle (propylene glycol) for IV administration. Diazepam can induce phlebitis and should be administered slowly and preferably into a large vein.

Midazolam

When a short-acting benzodiazepine is needed, most clinicians now employ midazolam instead of diazepam. Midazolam is highly lipophilic, and the onset of its effects occur very rapidly following IV administration.13 Midazolam is marketed as a water-soluble prodrug. Following IV administration, the drug is transformed into a lipophilic compound by virtue of rapid closure of the diazepine ring. Thus the drug is less irritating to veins than diazepam.

Lorazepam

Lorazepam is the least lipid-soluble agent among the three commonly used benzodiazepines. As a consequence, the pharmacologic effects of lorazepam are delayed in onset and prolonged in duration.15 Lorazepam is ideally suited for acute therapy, together with longer prophylaxis against recurrence of seizures. In a 5-year randomized double-blind multicenter trial of four IV regimens for the treatment of generalized status epilepticus, Treiman et al. found that treatment with lorazepam (0.1 mg/kg) was successful in 64.9% of patients and significantly superior to phenytoin (P = 0.002) in a pairwise comparison.16 It is important to note that lorazepam’s longer duration of action can adversely impact the neurologic examination for several hours, potentially complicating medical management.

Phenytoin

Phenytoin has been and remains the drug most commonly used in the ICU for prophylaxis against seizures. Several reasons for the continued popularity of phenytoin include its ease of administration, its availability in formulations suitable for either IV or enteral administration, its relative safety (severe toxic reactions are uncommon), and its efficacy against many seizure syndromes that occur in the ICU setting, including status epilepticus. Temkin et al. reported that prophylactic administration of phenytoin decreased the incidence of seizures during the first week following traumatic head injury by 73% compared to placebo.18 In light of its non-GABA-agonist action, phenytoin is not particularly effective against most drug-induced convulsions, especially those triggered by β-lactam antibiotics. Phenytoin is indicated for use against generalized tonic/clonic seizures and focal and complex-partial seizures. Phenytoin also is indicated for prevention of seizures following head trauma or elective neurosurgical procedures.

Pharmacokinetics

Drug interactions: as isolated phenomena, phenytoin can enhance the hepatotoxic potential of acetaminophen, blunt the diuretic effect of furosemide, increase the metabolism of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, decrease the duration of effect of neuromuscular blocking agents, and reduce the metabolism of thyroid hormones.3,10 Antacids can decrease absorption of phenytoin, whereas amiodarone can increase circulating concentrations. The sedative effects of phenytoin can be additive with other CNS depressants.

As a known inducing agent for hepatic metabolism, phenytoin increases the clearance of corticosteroids and many anticonvulsants (barbiturates, carbamazepine, ethosuximide, felbamate, lamotrigine, tiagabine, topiramate, and zonisamide).3 Thus, anticonvulsant polypharmacy can be frustrated by the addition of phenytoin. However, phenytoin does not affect gabapentin or levetiracetam levels. As would be expected, circulating levels of phenytoin can be decreased by concomitant use of other “hepatic enzyme inducers” (e.g., barbiturates, carbamazepine, chronic ethanol, dexamethasone, rifampin). Because it can precipitate acute attacks, use of phenytoin should be avoided if possible in patients with hepatic forms of porphyria.

In contrast, inhibitors of the hepatic enzymes, CYP28/C9 (e.g., amiodarone, cimetidine, fluvoxamine, some nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, metronidazole, ritonavir, sulfonamides, troglitazone, valproic acid) and CYP2C19 (e.g., felbamate, fluconazole, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, omeprazole) can increase circulating phenytoin levels.4

Adverse reactions/toxicities: phenytoin is associated with thrombophlebitis and toxic epidermal necrolysis.20,21 Administration of the drug can induce hypotension, bradycardia, and bundle branch block, especially if the drug is administered rapidly (>50 mg/min). A phenytoin-induced rash is quite common (20%).4 Hyperglycemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia are reported complications of therapy with phenytoin. Skin necrosis related to extravasation of phenytoin can occur at the site for IV infusion of the drug. For this reason, fosphenytoin is a preferable agent, particularly when completely reliable venous access is unavailable. Small veins can develop phlebitis and cause transient discomfort during infusion even if no extravasation occurs.
Side effects: with long-term use of phenytoin include gingival hypertrophy, cerebellar atrophy, coarsening of facial features, osteoporosis, vitamin D deficiency, and peripheral neuropathy.1,4,10 In high doses or concentrations, administration of phenytoin can be associated with nystagmus, diplopia, ataxia, slurred speech, drowsiness, and coma.

Fosphenytoin

Fosphenytoin (Cerebyx) is a phosphate ester prodrug of phenytoin. It is highly water soluble. When administered parenterally (IV or IM), fosphenytoin is rapidly metabolized into phenytoin. It can be infused up to three times faster than phenytoin (i.e., maximal rate of infusion, 150 mg/min).22 The times to peak effect are similar for phenytoin and fosphenytoin, because enzymatic conversion of the prodrug occurs rapidly. Kugler et al. suggested that fosphenytoin and phenytoin are likely to control status epilepticus with similar rapidity.23 The benefits of fosphenytoin compared to phenytoin are faster safe rate of administration and lower likelihood for certain adverse effects (e.g., hypotension, phlebitis, and soft-tissue injury from extravasation). Although fosphenytoin is more expensive than phenytoin, the costs associated with treating complications from the use of IV phenytoin can be substantially greater; accordingly, fosphenytoin may be advantageous on a pharmaco-economic basis.20

Pharmacokinetics

Absorption: the rise in serum concentration of fosphenytoin may be faster compared to phenytoin when administered IV, because of the higher maximal recommended infusion rate for the prodrug (150 mg/min versus 50 mg/min, respectively). However, owing to the necessary biotransformation (conversion to phenytoin after IV administration is approximately 15 minutes), the resulting time-to-peak serum levels of phenytoin are similar for the two agents.22 Bioavailability of each approaches 100%.

Adverse reactions/toxicities: most important with IV use of fosphenytoin (or phenytoin) are cardiovascular collapse and/or CNS depression. Paresthesias and pruritus are more common with fosphenytoin than phenytoin and occur more often with IV than IM adminisitration.4,10 The drug is contraindicated for patients with sinus bradycardia, sinoatrial block, second- or third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, or Stokes-Adams syndrome. As with phenytoin, it is important to monitor hematologic and liver function tests. Other side effects include gingival hyperplasia, gynecomastia, bone marrow suppression, and vermian cerebellar atrophy.4,10 Venous irritation is less common with fosphenytoin compared to phenytoin.25

Carbamazepine

Carbamazepine (Tegretol) is indicated for partial seizures with complex symptomatology (psychomotor, temporal lobe), generalized tonic/clonic (grand mal) seizures, and mixed seizure patterns. The drug is not available for IV administration and is rarely used for acute termination of seizures or as standard prophylaxis in the ICU. When using carbamazepine, it is recommended (see later) to monitor complete blood count, reticulocyte count, serum iron concentration, liver function tests, urinalysis, serum electrolytes, serum drug levels, and thyroid function tests.

Pharmacokinetics

Drug interactions: oral carbamazepine suspension should not be administered at the same time as other liquid medicinal agents, as it can form a precipitate when combined with chlorpromazine or thioridazine. Barbiturates, benzodiazepines, and phenytoin can decrease plasma carbamazepine levels, owing to induction of hepatic metabolism.3,10 Conversely, isoniazid, felbamate, danazol, diltiazem, and verapamil can increase plasma carbamazepine levels. Carbamazepine itself can increase the metabolism of warfarin, valproic acid, tricyclic antidepressants (particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]), thyroxine, theophylline, oral contraceptives, methadone, doxycycline, corticosteroids, calcium channel blockers (except diltiazem and verapamil), cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and ethosuximide.10
Adverse reactions/toxicities: like phenytoin, carbamazepine can induce AV block and other dysrhythmias.28 Carbamazepine can promote sedation, dizziness, ataxia, and rash, although less commonly than phenytoin. Severe hyponatremia secondary to SIADH is a relatively common adverse effect of carbamazepine.2 Nausea, aplastic anemia, agranulocytosis, thrombocytopenia, bone marrow suppression, and hepatic failure all have been reported. Pregnancy category D.

Valproic Acid

Valproic acid is indicated as monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of almost all seizures types, including complex partial seizures, absence seizures, generalized tonic/clonic seizures, myoclonic seizures, and other partial seizures. In two European studies, IV valproate was shown to be effective for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.29,30 Because of the recent availability of an IV formulation, valproic acid is now used relatively commonly in the ICU setting and as a treatment for acute seizures including status epilepticus.

Dosing

Hepatic impairment: dosage reduction is necessary with hepatic failure, as the clearance of valproic acid is decreased in patients with impaired liver funciton.1,31 Decreased plasma albumin concentration in hepatic disease is associated with a 2- to 2.6-fold increase in the unbound fraction of the drug. Therefore, free concentrations of valproate can be elevated even when the total concentration of drug is within the therapeutic range.

Pharmacokinetics

Drug interactions: serum levels of valproic acid can be reduced by acyclovir, whereas lamotrigine and phenytoin can induce metabolism of the drug.3,10 Valproic acid can increase circulating diazepam, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine concentrations.32 Macrolide antibiotics and nimodipine can decrease metabolism of valproic acid. Metabolism of phenobarbital is inhibited by valproic acid.
Adverse reactions/toxicities: potential side effects of valproic acid include somnolence, dizziness, insomnia, alopecia, pancreatitis,33 thrombocytopenia, tremor, weight gain, rash, bone marrow suppression,34 decreased carnitine, hyperammonemia, and SIADH. Additionally, the anticonvulsant has been reported to cause frank hepatic failure. Developmentally, neural tube defects are a recognized toxicity. Valproic acid can stimulate the replication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) in infected patients.

Acute valproic acid intoxication induces mild to moderate lethargy at lower doses and coma or fatal cerebral edema at higher, more toxic doses.35 In contrast to either phenytoin or carbamazepine, nystagmus, dysarthria, and ataxia are rarely noted following valproic acid overdose. Valproic acid can increase serum ammonia levels through interaction with carnitine. In the management of valproic acid intoxication, naloxone occasionally is effective for reversing symptoms.

Propofol

Typically used for induction and/or maintenance of anesthesia, propofol occasionally is used for the acute termination of seizures and for treatment of status epilepticus. Propofol is not a true “anticonvulsant,” as seizures are terminated only by virtue of the induction of general anesthesia. The drug must be used in association with continuous cardiac and blood pressure monitoring, and the patient prepared for mechanical ventilation.

Pharmacokinetics

Adverse reactions/toxicities: common side effects include burning discomfort at the injection site, hypotension, and apnea. Propofol can promote respiratory acidosis as patients are weaned from mechanical ventilation. The use of propofol may have more severe cardiovascular consequences in patients with severe cardiac disease (ejection fraction < 50%). The emulsion promoted development of hypozincemia due to the chelating action of the additive, ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA). Because the drug is insoluble in aqueous solvents, it is formulated as an emulsion that is a potential growth medium for bacteria.38 Thus, EDTA is added as a bacteriostatic agent, but the risk of contamination with bacteria remains a concern. Strict aseptic technique must be observed with its use, and IV delivery lines should be changed routinely.

A “propofol infusion syndrome” has been described, and common clinical features can include hyperkalemia, hepatomegaly, lipemia, metabolic acidosis, myocardial failure, and rhabdomyolysis.39 This syndrome was initially described in children who were cared for in an ICU for prolonged periods, using high doses of propofol for sedation.4042 Propofol-induced lactic acidosis and myocardial dysfunction also can occur in adults.39 Administration of propofol in the ICU should be restricted to doses ≤ 5 mg/kg/h, and infusion of propofol for the purpose of sedating critically ill adults should be limited to 48 hours, especially if high (general anesthesia level) doses are being used.

Phenobarbital

Phenobarbital remains a mainstay of anticonvulsant therapy. As a potent GABA agonist, phenobarbital is an effective anticonvulsant against a broad range of seizure types, The drug is used most commonly to treat or prevent generalized motor seizures. A favorable feature is its relative lack of serious toxic effects. Additional desirable characteristics of the drug which recommend it for use in the ICU include its broad efficacy, its availability for IV administration, ability to titrate the dose of the drug to burst suppression on the EEG,4345 and ease of transition to PO dosing if desired. Its chief negative attributes include its long half-life and its tendency to induce hepatic enzyme expression.

Pharmacokinetics

Drug interactions: barbiturates are enzyme inducers and thus can reduce the half-life of many agents, as well as increase toxicity of those drugs having toxic intermediates as a result of hepatic metabolism.1,10 Thus, barbiturates can enhance the hepatotoxicity of acetaminophen. Phenobarbital increases the metabolism of antiarrhythmics (disopyramide, propafenone, and quinidine), anticonvulsants (ethosuximide, lamotrigine, phenytoin, tiagabine, topiramate, and zonisamide, but not levetiracetam or gabapentin), beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, chloramphenicol, cimetidine, corticosteroids, cyclosporine, doxycycline, estrogens, furosemide, methadone, oral contraceptives, tricyclic antidepressants, and warfarin.3,10 Conversely, the metabolism of barbiturates is inhibited by MAO inhibitors and valproic acid. Barbiturates can decrease vitamin D levels.
Adverse reactions/toxicities: phenobarbital, like all barbiturates, retards cerebral excitation and can lead to cognitive dysfunction, sedation, lethargy, ataxia, nystagmus, and (in large doses) coma and respiratory depression.4345 Although uncommon, hematologic disturbances can occur and include agranulocytosis, thrombocytopenia, and megaloblastic anemia.1 Administration of activated charcoal and hemoperfusion are therapeutic interventions which have been implemented in cases of acute massive phenobarbital poisoning.4648

Newer Anticonvulsants

Several newer anticonvulsants have been introduced into the market during the past 15 years. However, the lack of available IV preparations severely limits their use in treating seizures in the ICU. The agents typically used are initiated when enteral therapy is suitable. Some studies have demonstrated that the oral preparations of some of these agents can still be of some benefit. Topiramate tablets, for example, have been administered when crushed to a powder and mixed with water and administered via nasogastric tube and have been shown to be effective in refractory status epilepticus. Agents like gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, and vigabatrin are often considered more suitable for adjunctive therapy than for monotherapy. Lamotrigine is the only agent approved for monotherapy, but gabapentin and oxcarbazepine also soon may have such an indication.8,49

Gabapentin and vigabatrin are excreted unchanged in the urine and are useful for treating patients with hepatic failure. In patients with renal failure, vigabatrin, gabapentin, and topiramate should be used cautiously and in reduced dosages. The pharmacokinetics of tiagabine are not affected by either renal or hepatic dysfunction. The possibility of drug interaction is important to know as well. Combination therapy with lamotrigine and carbamazepine can increase the risk of carbamazepine-induced toxic effects. Other anticonvulsant drugs have little effect on gabapentin; it also has no substantial influence on the pharmacokinetics and serum concentrations of other seizure medications.8,49

Levetiracetam (Keppra)

Levetiracetam is currently recommended for use as adjunctive therapy against partial-onset seizures. There is, nonetheless, increasing interest in this drug for use in the ICU setting because of its very low toxicity and relatively low tendency to promote drug-drug interactions. It is now available in an IV preparation and is frequently used to aid in the treatment of new-onset seizures.

Lacosamide (Vimpat)

Lacosamide (previously known as harkoseride) is indicated as adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures. It comes in both a PO and IV formulation and is hence an alternative agent for those patients unable to take oral preparations.50

Gabapentin (Neurontin)

Gabapentin is indicated as adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures. It is also widely prescribed for the treatment of neurogenic or neuropathic pain.

Annotated References

Dreifuss FE. Toxic effects of drugs used in the ICU. Anticonvulsant agents. Crit Care Clin. 1991;7:521-532.

This is an excellent review of the most common anticonvulsants used in the ICU. Despite its age, the information remains highly useful, especially in light of the fact that most medications used for the treatment of seizures in the ICU setting are the older, IV-available preparations (except valproic acid, which is more recent).

Cramer JA, Fisher R, Ben-Menachem E, et al. New antiepileptic drugs: comparison of key clinical trials. Epilepsia. 1999;40:590-600.

A good review of data accrued from clinical trials of five new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The efficacy in reducing seizures and self-reported adverse events are incorporated here as a basis of selection among new AEDs. Drawbacks to use of these data also are demonstrated.

Treiman DM, Meyers PD, Walton NY, et al. A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Veterans Affairs Status Epilepticus Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:792-798.

This represents the largest controlled drug trial (384 patients) for the treatment of status epilepticus: a 5-year randomized, double blind, multicenter trial of four IV regimens: diazepam followed by phenytoin, lorazepam, phenobarbital, and phenytoin. The study concluded that lorazepam was superior to phenytoin alone (P < 0.02), and phenobarbital and phenytoin/diazepam were similar in efficacy to lorazepam.

Mirski MA, Williams MA, Hanley DF. Prolonged pentobarbital and phenobarbitone coma for refractory generalized status epilepticus. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:400-404.

A case report of a particularly difficult and refractory case of status epilepticus that describes the difficulties of adequacy of control and treatment with the adverse actions of the anticonvulsant therapeutics. Included are clearly presented problematic issues relating to hepatic enzyme induction, polypharmacy, induced “burst-suppression” coma, hemodynamic and respiratory decompensation, and emergence with control of the primary seizure state. This describes the longest duration of barbiturate coma for the treatment of seizures that has been reported, 53 days, with good outcome.

Varelas P, Mirski MA. Seizures in the ICU. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2001;13:163-175.

A recent comprehensive review of seizures occurring in the ICU setting; it includes etiology of seizures (including a review of the ICU iatrogenic causes), diagnosis algorithm, and treatment. Numerous tables of anticonvulsant drug mechanisms, toxicity, and drug-drug interactions are included.

Asconape J. Some common issues in the use of antiepileptic drugs. Semin Neurol. 2002;22:27-39.

In this article, several common clinical situations in the management of patients with epilepsy are presented in the form of case studies. These cases illustrate current aspects of the use of the anticonvulsants and will give some guidelines to help the treating physician in the increasingly complex process of seizure therapy.

References

1 Dreifuss FE. Toxic effects of drugs used in the ICU. Anticonvulsant agents. Crit Care Clin. 1991;7:521.

2 Wasserstein A. Antiepileptic drug-induced hyponatremia: a reference guide. Medical Education Resources, Inc.; July 2001.

3 Leppik IE, Wolff DL. Antiepileptic medication interactions. Neurol Clin. 1993;11:905.

4 Asconape J. Some common issues in the use of antiepileptic drugs. Semin Neurol. 2002;22:27.

5 Farrar HC, Herold DA, Reed MD. Acute valproic acid intoxication: enhanced drug clearance with oral-activated charcoal. Crit Care Med.. 1993;21:299.

6 Fernandez MC, Walter FG, Kloster JC, et al. Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion for treatment of valproic acid and gabapentin poisoning. Vet Hum Toxicol.. 1996;38:438.

7 Willmore LJ. New antiepileptic drugs; basic science and clinical use in children and adults. Epilepsia. 1999;40(Suppl 5):S1.

8 Klotz U, Avant GR, Hoyumpa A, et al. The effects of age and liver disease on the disposition and elimination of diazepam in adult man. J Clin Invest. 1975;55:347.

9 Pomara N, Stanley B, Block R, et al. Increased sensitivity of the elderly to the central depressant effects of diazepam. J Clin Psychiatry. 1985;46:185.

10 Varelas PN, Mirski MA. Seizures in the adult intensive care unit. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol.. 2001;13:163.

11 Allikmets E, et al. Long-term use of benzodiazepines: abrupt withdrawal versus withdrawal under nifedipine cover. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1995;76(Suppl. 3):Abstr 8.

12 Votey SR, Bosse GM, Bayer MJ, et al. Flumazenil: A new benzodiazepine antagonist. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:181.

13 Allonen H, Ziegler G, Klotz U. Midazolam kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30:653.

14 Kanto J, Aaltonen L, Himberg JJ, et al. Midazolam as an intravenous induction agent in the elderly: a clinical and pharmacokinetic study. Anesth Analg. 1986;65:15.

15 Ameer B, Greenblatt DJ. Lorazepam: a review of its clinical pharmacological properties and therapeutic uses. Drugs. 1981;21:162.

16 David M, Treiman, et al. A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. New Engl J Med. 1998;339:792.

17 Laine GA, Hossain SM, Solis RT, et al. Polyethylene glycol nephrotoxicity secondary to prolonged high-dose intravenous lorazepam. Ann Pharmacother. 1995;29:1110.

18 Temkin NR, Dikmen SS, Wilensky AJ, Keihm J, Chabal S, Winn HR. A randomized, double-blind study of phenytoin for the prevention of post-traumatic seizures [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:497.

19 Markowsky SJ, Skaar DJ, Christie JM, Eyer SD, Ehresman DJ. Phenytoin protein binding and dosage requirements during acute and convalescent phases following brain injury. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30:443.

20 Obrein TJ, Cascino GD, So EL, Hanna DR. Incidence and clinical consequence of the purple glove syndrome in patients receiving intravenous phenytoin. Neurology. 1998;51:1034.

21 Wolfram Schummer, Claudia Schummer, Christoph Kuwert. Toxic epidermal necrolysis after phenytoin usage in a brain trauma patient. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2002;14:229.

22 Boucher BA, Feler CA, Dean JC, et al. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of fosphenytoin after intramuscular and intravenous administration in neurosurgery patients. Pharmacotherapy. 1996;16:638.

23 Kugler AR, Knapp LE, Eldon MA. Attainment of therapeutic phenytoin concentrations following administration of loading doses of fosphenytoin: A metaanalysis. Neurology. 1996;46:A176.

24 Wilder BJ, Campbell K, Ramsay RE, et al. Safety and tolerance of multiple doses of intramuscular fosphenytoin substituted for oral phenytoin in epilepsy or neurosurgery. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:764.

25 Jamerson BD, Dukes GE, Brouwer KL, et al. Venous irritation related to intravenous administration of phenytoin versus fosphenytoin. Pharmacotherapy. 1994;14:47.

26 Liu H, Delgado MR. Influence of sex, age, weight, and carbamazepine dose on serum concentrations, concentration ratios, and level/dose ratios of carbamazepine and its metabolites. Ther Drug Monit. 1994;16:469.

27 Tomson T, Bertilsson L. Kinetics, metabolism and effects of carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide in man. Epilepsy Res Suppl. 1991;3:177.

28 Apfelbaum JD, Caravati EM, Kerns WP2nd, et al. Cardiovascular effects of carbamazepine toxicity. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25:631.

29 Giroud M, Gras D, Escousse A, et al. Use of injectable valproic acid in status epilepticus. A pilot study. Drug Invest. 1993;5:154.

30 Price DJ. Intravenous valproate: experience in neurosurgery. Fourth Int Symp Sodium Valproate and Epilepsy. Roy Soc Med Int Congr Sympt Ser. 1989;152:197.

31 Dreifuss FE, Santilli N, Langer DH, et al. Valproic acid hepatic fatalities: a retrospective review. Neurology. 1987;37:379.

32 Kerrick JM, Wolff DL, Graves NM. Predicting unbound phenytoin concentrations in patients receiving valproic acid: a comparison of two prediction methods. Ann Pharmacother. 1995;29:470.

33 Evans RJ, Miranda RN, Jordan J, et al. Fatal acute pancreatitis caused by valproic acid. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1995;16:62.

34 Tohen M, Castillo J, Baldessarini RJ, et al. Blood dyscrasias with carbamazepine and valproate: a pharmacoepidemiological study of 2,228 patients at risk. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:413.

35 Alberto G, Erickson T, Popiel R, et al. Central nervous system manifestation of a valproic acid overdose responsive to naloxone. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18:889.

36 Stecker MM, Kramer TH, Raps EC, et al. Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with propofol: clinical and pharmacological findings. Epilepsia. 1998;39:18.

37 Langley MS, Heel RC. Propofol: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and use as an intravenous anaesthetic. Drugs. 1988;35:334.

38 Bennett SN, McNeil MM, Bland LA, et al. Postoperative infections traced to contamination of an intravenous anesthetic, propofol. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:147.

39 Kang TM. Propofol infusion syndrome in critically ill patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:1453.

40 Bray RJ. Fatal myocardial failure associated with a propofol infusion in a child. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:94.

41 Mirenda J. Prolonged propofol sedation in the critical care unit. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1304.

42 Strickland RA, Murray MJ. Fatal metabolic acidosis in a pediatric patient receiving an infusion of propofol in the intensive care unit: is there a relationship. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:405.

43 Mirski MA, Williams MA, Hanley DF. Prolonged pentobarbital and phenobarbitone coma for refractory generalized status epilepticus. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:400.

44 Mirski MA. Rapid treatment of status epilepticus with low dose phenobarbital. Crit Care Report. 1989;1:150.

45 Lowenstein DH, Aminoroff MJ, Simon RP. Barbiturate anesthesia in the treatment of status epilepticus: clinical experience with 14 patients. Neurology. 1988;38:395.

46 Amitai Y, Degani Y. Treatment of phenobarbital poisoning with multiple dose of activated charcoal in an infant. J Emerg Med. 1990;8:449.

47 Jacobsen D, Wiik-Larsen E, Dahl T, et al. pharmacokinetic evaluation of haemoperfusion in phenobarbital poisoning. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;26:109.

48 Lin JL, Jeng LB, Critical. Acutely poisoned patients treated with continuous arteriovenous hemoperfusion in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25:75.

49 Cramer JA, Fisher R, Ben-Menachem E, et al. New antiepileptic drugs: comparison of key clinical trials. Epilepsia. 1999;40:590.

50 Beydoun A, D’Souza J, Hebert D, Doty P. American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut. Lacosamide: pharmacology, mechanisms of action and pooled efficacy and safety data in partial-onset seizures. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009;9:33.

51 Schiltmeyer B, Cawello W, Kropeit D, Hammes W, Horstman R. Pharmacokinetics of the new antiepileptic drug SPM 927 in human subjects with different age and gender. Epilepsia. 2004;45(Suppl. 7):313.

52 Ben-Menachem E, Biton V, Jatuzis D, Abou-Khalil B, Doty P, Rudd GD. Efficacy and safety of oral lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures. Epilepsia. 2007;48:1308.

53 Thomas D, Scharfenecker U, Nickel B, Doty P, Cawello W, Horstmann R. Lacosamide has low potential for drug–drug interaction. Presented at: 8th European Congress on Epileptology. Berlin, Germany, 21-25 September 2008.