Angiography for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Published on 21/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3166 times

3 Angiography for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions image

Angiography for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) requires establishing the precise lesion length, morphology and degree of calcification (or thrombus), as well as the relationship to side branches and their associated ostial involvement with coronary artery disease (CAD). Before PCI, the angiographer should acquire the following additional angiographic detail:

Optimal definition of ostial and proximal coronary segment is critical to guide PCI catheter selection. Assessment of calcium from angiography is less reliable than intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging but still serves a useful purpose in assessing need for rotational atherectomy and risks associated with the procedure.

Classical terminology for angiographic projections with regard to left and right anterior oblique, cranial and caudal angulation, and lateral projections remains as defined in previous discussions of diagnostic coronary angiography (see The Cardiac Catheterization Handbook, 5th edition, Chapter 4).

Visualization of vessel bifurcations, origin of side branches, the portion of the vessel proximal to a significant lesion, and previously “unimportant” lesion characteristics (length, eccentricity, calcium, and the like) will assist in device selection and identifying potential procedural risk. For total chronic vessel occlusions, the distal vessel should be visualized as clearly as possible by injecting the coronary arteries that supply collaterals and taking cineangiograms with panning long enough to visualize late collateral vessel filling and the length of the occluded segment.

Optimal radiographic imaging is also critical to determining a successful intervention, enhancing accurate interpretation of procedure results. Modification of panning technique to reduce motion artifact during imaging, optimal use of beam restrictors (collimation) to reduce scatter, and improved contrast media delivery can enhance clinical results. A working knowledge of the principles of radiographic imaging permits the interventionalist to improve imaging outcomes.

Radiation exposure is higher in PCI than diagnostic procedures. Continued awareness of the inverse square law of radiation propagation will reduce the exposure to patient, operators, and the catheter lab team. Obtaining quality images should not necessitate increasing the ordinary procedural radiation exposure to either the patient or catheterization personnel.

Common Angiographic Views for Angioplasty

The routine coronary angiographic views described below should include those that best visualize the origin and course of the major vessels and their branches in at least two different (preferably orthogonal) projections. Naturally, there is a wide variation in coronary anatomy, and appropriately modified views will need to be individualized. The nomenclature for angiographic views is described in Chapter 4 of The Cardiac Catheterization Handbook, 5th edition, but will be reviewed briefly here, emphasizing the interventionalist’s thinking.

Position for Anteroposterior Imaging

The image intensifier is directly over the patient, with the beam perpendicular to the patient lying flat on the x-ray table (Figs. 3-1, 3-2). The anteroposterior (AP) view or shallow right anterior oblique (RAO) displays the left main coronary artery in its entire perpendicular length. In this view, the branches of the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex coronary arteries branches overlap. Slight RAO or left anterior oblique (LAO) angulation may be necessary to clear the density of the vertebrae and the catheter shaft in the thoracic descending aorta. In patients with acute coronary syndromes, this view will exclude left main stenosis, which can preclude or complicate PCI. The AP cranial view is excellent for visualizing the LAD with septals moving to the left (on screen) and diagonals to the right, helping wire placement.

image

Figure 3-1 Nomenclature for angiographic views.

(Modified from Paulin S. Terminology for radiographic projections in cardiac angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1981;7:341.)

image

Figure 3-2 Nomenclature for angiographic views. CR, cranial; CA, caudal; A, anterior; R, right; AO, anterior oblique.

(Modified from Paulin S. Terminology for radiographic projections in cardiac angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1981;7:341.)

Position for Left Anterior Oblique Imaging

In the LAO position, the image intensifier is to the left side of the patient. The LAO/cranial view also shows the left main coronary artery (slightly foreshortened), LAD, and diagonal branches. Septal and diagonal branches are separated clearly. The circumflex and marginals are foreshortened and overlapped. Deep inspiration will move the density of the diaphragm out of the field. The LAO angle should be set so that the course of the LAD is parallel to the spine and stays in the “lucent wedge” bordered by the spine and the curve of the diaphragm. Cranial angulation tilts the left main coronary artery down and permits view of the LAD/circumflex bifurcation (Fig. 3-3). Too steep an LAO/cranial angulation or shallow inspiration produces considerable overlapping with the diaphragm and liver, degrading the image.

For the RCA, the LAO/cranial view shows the origin of the artery, its entire length, and the posterior descending artery bifurcation (crux). Cranial angulation tilts the posterior descending artery down to show vessel contour and reduces foreshortening. Deep inspiration clears the diaphragm. The posterior descending artery and posterolateral branches are foreshortened.

The LAO/caudal view (“spider” view; Fig. 3-3) shows a foreshortened left main coronary artery and the bifurcation of the circumflex and LAD. Proximal and mid portions of the circumflex and the origins of obtuse marginal branches are usually seen excellently. Poor image quality may be due to overlapping of diaphragm and spine. The LAD is considerably foreshortened in this view.

A left lateral view shows the mid and distal LAD best. The LAD and circumflex are well separated. Diagonals usually overlap. The course of the (ramus) intermediate branch is well visualized. This view is best to see coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) conduit anastomosis to the LAD. For the RCA, the lateral view also shows the origin (especially in those with more anteriorly oriented orifices) and the mid RCA well. The posterior descending artery and posterolateral branches are foreshortened.

Angulations for Saphenous Bypass Grafts

Coronary artery saphenous vein grafts are visualized in at least two views (LAO and RAO). It is important to show the aortic anastomosis, the body of the graft, and the distal anastomosis. The distal runoff and continued flow or collateral channels are also critical. The graft vessel anastomosis is best seen in the view that depicts the native vessel best. A general strategy for graft angiography is to perform the standard views while assessing the vessel key views for specific coronary artery segments (Table 3-1) to determine the need for contingency views or an alteration/addition of special views. Therefore, the graft views can be summarized as follows:

Table 3-1 Recommended “Key” Angiographic Views for Specific Coronary Artery Segments

Coronary Segment Origin/Bifurcation Course/Body
Left main AP AP
  LAO cranial LAO cranial
  LAO caudal*  
Proximal LAD LAO cranial LAO cranial
  RAO caudal RAO caudal
Mid LAD LAD cranial  
  RAO cranial  
  Lateral  
Distal LAD AP  
  RAO cranial  
  Lateral  
Diagonal LAO cranial
RAO cranial
RAO cranial, caudal, or straight
Proximal circumflex RAO caudal LAO caudal
  LAO caudal  
Intermediate RAO caudal RAO caudal
  LAO caudal Lateral
Obtuse marginal RAO caudal RAO caudal
  LAO caudal  
  RAO cranial (distal marginals)  
Proximal RCA LAO  
  Lateral  
Mid RCA LAO LAO
  Lateral Lateral
  RAO RAO
Distal RCA LAO cranial LAO cranial
  Lateral Lateral
PDA LAO cranial RAO
Posterolateral LAO cranial RAO cranial
  RAO cranial RAO cranial

AP, anteroposterior; LAD, left anterior descending; LAO, left anterior oblique; PDA, posterior descending artery (from RCA); RAO, right anterior oblique; RCA, right coronary artery.

* Horizontal hearts.

From Kern MJ, ed. The cardiac catheterization handbook, 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 1995: 286.

Techniques for Coronary Arteriography

Angiographic TIMI Classification of Blood Flow

Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grading has been used to assess, in a qualitative fashion, the degree of restored perfusion achieved after thrombolysis or angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Table 3-2 provides descriptions used to assign TIMI flow grades.

Table 3-2 Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow: Grade and Blush Scores

TIMI Flow Grade Description
Grade 3 (complete reperfusion) Anterograde flow into the terminal coronary artery segment through a stenosis is as prompt as anterograde flow into a comparable segment proximal to the stenosis. Contrast material clears as rapidly from the distal segment as from an uninvolved, more proximal segment.
Grade 2 (partial reperfusion) Contrast material flows through the stenosis to opacify the terminal artery segment. However, contrast enters the terminal segment perceptibly more slowly than more proximal segments. Alternatively, contrast material clears from a segment distal to a stenosis noticeably more slowly than from a comparable segment not preceded by a significant stenosis.
Grade 1 (penetration with minimal perfusion) A small amount of contrast flows through the stenosis but fails to fully opacify the artery beyond.
Grade 0 (no perfusion) There is no contrast flow through the stenosis.
Myocardial Blush Grade

Modified from Sheehan F, Braunwald E, Canner P, et al. The effect of intravenous thrombolytic therapy on left ventricular function: a report on tissue-type plasminogen activator and streptokinase from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Phase I Trial. Circulation 1987;72:817–829.

TIMI Frame Count

Contrast runoff is now performed quantitatively by using cine frame counts from the first frame of the filled catheter tip to the frame where contrast is seen filling a predetermined distal arterial end point. Myocardial blood flow has been assessed angiographically using the TIMI score for qualitative grading of coronary flow. TIMI flow grades 0 to 3 have become a standard description of coronary blood flow in clinical trials. TIMI grade 3 flows have been associated with improved clinical outcomes.

The method uses cineangiography with 6 F catheters and filming at 30 frames per second. The number of cine frames from the introduction of dye in the coronary artery to a predetermined distal landmark is counted. The TIMI frame count for each major vessel is thus standardized according to specific distal land marks. The first frame used for TIMI frame counting is that in which the dye fully opacifies the origin of the artery and in which the dye extends across the width of the artery touching both borders with antegrade motion of the dye. The last frame counted is when dye enters the first distal landmark branch. Full opacification of the distal branch segment is not required. Distal landmarks used commonly in analysis are listed here:

Typically a normal contrast frame count reflecting normal flow is 24 ±10 frames. The TIMI frame count (TFC) can further be corrected for the length of the LAD. The TFC in the LAD requires normalization or correction for comparison to the two other major arteries. This is called corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC). The average LAD is 14.7 cm long, the right 9.8 cm, and the circumflex 9.3 cm, according to Gibson et al. CTFC accounts for the distance the dye has to travel in the LAD relative to the other arteries. CTFC divides the absolute frame count in the LAD by 1.7 to standardize the distance of dye travel in all three arteries. Normal TFC for the LAD is 36 ± 3, and CTFC 21 ± 2; for the circumflex artery TFC = 22 ± 4; for the RCA TFC = 20 ± 3. TIMI flow grades do not correspond to measured Doppler flow velocity or CTFC. High TFC may be associated with microvascular dysfunction despite an open artery. A CTFC of less than 20 frames was associated with low risk for adverse events in patients following myocardial infarction. A contrast injection rate increase of more than 1 mL/sec by hand injection can decrease the TFC by two frames. The TFC method provides valuable information relative to clinical response after coronary intervention.

Assessment of Coronary Stenoses

The degree of an angiographic narrowing (stenosis) is reported as the estimated percentage lumen reduction of the most severely narrowed segment compared to the adjacent angiographically normal vessel segment, seen in the worst x-ray projection. Because the operator uses visual estimations, an exact evaluation is impossible. There is a ± 20% variation between readings of two or more experienced angiographers. Stenosis severity alone should not always be assumed to be associated with abnormal physiology (flow) and ischemia. Moreover, CAD is a diffuse process, and thus minimal luminal irregularities on angiography may represent significant albeit non-obstructive CAD at the time of angiography. The stenotic segment lumen is compared with a nearby lumen that does not appear to be obstructed but that may have diffuse atherosclerotic disease. This explains why postmortem examinations and IVUS imaging describe much more plaque than is seen on angiography. The percent diameter is estimated from the angiographically normal adjacent segment. Because coronary arteries normally taper as they travel to the apex, proximal segments are always larger than distal segments, often explaining the large disparity between several observers’ estimates of stenosis severity. Area stenosis is always greater than diameter stenosis and assumes the lumen is circular, whereas the lumen is usually eccentric. In general, four categories of lesion severity can be assigned:

Technical note: Stenosis anatomy should not be confused with abnormal physiology (flow) and ischemia, especially for lesions 40% to 70% narrowed. For nonquantitative reports, the length of a stenosis is simply mentioned (e.g., LAD proximal segment stenosis diameter 25%, long or short). Other features of the coronary lesion may not be appreciated by angiography and require IVUS imaging. Anatomic factors producing resistance to coronary flow include factors producing resistance to flow across a coronary stenosis, such as entrance angle, length of disease, length of stenosis, minimal lumen diameter, minimal lumen area, eccentricity of lumen, area of reference vessel segment, and viscosity (Fig. 3-3B).

Coronary Lesion Descriptions for Angioplasty

There are at least three major classifications of lesion severity (Table 3-3). These classifications were derived from large studies in which the characteristics of the lesions were associated with different clinical outcomes of the techniques and times of the study. These are helpful to assess risk for adverse cardiac events in the performance of PCI.

General characteristics of the artery proximal to the lesion dilated are as follows:

Angiographic characteristics of the dilated target lesion are as follows:

Use of the SYNTAX Score to Describe PCI Risk Versus CABG

In 2009, the SYNTAX trial compared multivessel PCI (including patients with left main narrowings) to CABG. The angiograms of the patients were analyzed and given SYNTAX scores. The SYNTAX score is an angiographic grading tool to determine the complexity of CAD. The results of this randomized study demonstrated that patients who had high SYNTAX scores (> 34) did better with CABG compared to PCI than those with lower SYNTAX scores, in whom PCI had similar major adverse cardiac events with lower stroke rates.

The SYNTAX score was derived from preexisting lesion classifications, which included the American Heart Association (AHA) classification of coronary artery tree segments modified for the arts study, the Leaman score, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) lesion classification system, the total occlusion classification system, the Duke and International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS) classification system for bifurcation lesions, and a consensus opinion from among the world’s experts.

The SYNTAX score is the sum of the points assigned to each individual lesion identified in the coronary tree with >50% diameter narrowing in vessels >1.5 mm diameter. The coronary tree is divided into 16 segments according to the AHA classification (Fig. 3-4). Each segment is given a score of 1 or 2 based on the presence of disease; this score is then weighted based on a chart, with values ranging from 3.5 for the proximal LAD to 5.0 for left main, and 0.5 for smaller branches. The branches <1.5 mm in diameter, despite having severe lesions, are not included in the SYNTAX score. The percent diameter stenosis is not a consideration in the SYNTAX score—only the presence of a stenosis from 50% to 99% diameter, < 50% diameter narrowing, or the total occlusion. A multiplication factor of 2 is used for non-occlusive lesions and 5 is used for occlusive lesions, reflecting the difficulty of PCI.

image

Figure 3-4 SYNTAX diagram. Definition of the coronary tree segments.

1. RCA proximal: From the ostium to one half the distance to the acute margin of the heart.

2. RCA mid: From the end of first segment to acute margin of heart.

3. RCA distal: From the acute margin of the heart to the origin of the posterior descending artery.

4. Posterior descending artery: Running in the posterior interventricular groove.

16. Posterolateral branch from RCA: Posterolateral branch originating from the distal coronary artery distal to the crux.

16a. Posterolateral branch from RCA: First posterolateral branch from segment 16.

16b. Posterolateral branch from RCA: Second posterolateral branch from segment 16.

16c. Posterolateral branch from RCA: Third posterolateral branch from segment 16.

5. Left main: From the ostium of the LCA through bifurcation into left anterior descending and left circumflex branches.

6. LAD proximal: Proximal to and including first major septal branch.

7. LAD mid: LAD immediately distal to origin of first septal branch and extending to the point where LAD forms an angle (RAO view). If this angle is not identifiable, this segment ends at one half the distance from the first septal to the apex of the heart.

8. LAD apical: Terminal portion of LAD, beginning at the end of previous segment and extending to or beyond the apex.

9. First diagonal: The first diagonal originating from segment 6 or 7.

9a. First diagonal a: Additional first diagonal originating from segment 6 or 7, before segment 8.

10. Second diagonal: Originating from segment 8 or the transition between segments 7 and 8.

10a. Second diagonal a: Additional second diagonal originating from segment 8.

11. Proximal circumflex artery: Main stem of circumflex from its origin of left main and including origin of first obtuse marginal branch.

12. Intermediate/anterolateral artery: Branch from trifurcating left main other than proximal LAD or LCX. It belongs to the circumflex territory.

12a. Obtuse marginal a: First side branch of circumflex running in general to the area of obtuse margin of the heart.

12b. Obtuse marginal b: Second additional branch of circumflex running in the same direction as 12.

13. Distal circumflex artery: The stem of the circumflex distal to the origin of the most distal obtuse marginal branch, and running along the posterior left atrioventricular groove. Caliber may be small or artery absent.

14. Left posterolateral: Running to the posterolateral surface of the left ventricle. May be absent or a division of obtuse marginal branch.

14a. Left posterolateral a: Distal from 14 and running in the same direction.

14b. Left posterolateral b: Distal from 14 and 14 a and running in the same direction.

15. Posterior descending: Most distal part of dominant left circumflex when present. It gives origin to septal branches. When this artery is present, segment 4 is usually absent.

(Adapted from Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al. The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005;1:219–227.) LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex; RAO, right anterior oblique; RCA, right coronary artery.

Further characterization of the lesions adds points. For example, a total occlusion duration >3 months, a blunt stump, a bridging collateral image, the first segment visible beyond the total occlusion, and a side branch >1.5 diameter all receive 1 point. For trifurcations, one diseased segment gets 3 points, two diseased segments get 4 points, three diseased segments get 5 points, and four disease segments get 6 points. For bifurcation lesions, 1 point is given for types a, b, and c; 2 points are given for types d, e, f, and g; and 1 point is given for an angulation >70 degrees. Additionally, an aorto-ostial lesion is worth 1 point, severe tortuosity of vessel is worth 2 points, lesion length >20 mm is worth 1 point, heavy calcification is worth 2 points, thrombus is worth 1 point, and diffuse disease or small vessel is at 1 point per segment involvement. For multiple lesions, less than three reference vessel diameters apart, these are scored as a single lesion. However, at distance greater than three vessel diameters, these are considered separate lesions. The types of bifurcations are shown in Figure 3-5. Segments in which bifurcations are evaluated are those involving the proximal LAD and left main, the mid LAD, the proximal circumflex, mid circumflex, and crux of the RCA. With regard to trifurcation lesions, these also are additive in number of segments involved. The SYNTAX score algorithm then sums each of these features for a total SYNTAX score. Table 3-4 summarizes the SYNTAX grade categories. A computer algorithm is then queried and a summed value is produced.

Table 3-4 The SYNTAX Score Algorithm

The SYNTAX score was validated using a series of patients undergoing three-vessel PCI, such as the ARTS II trial. The variables were then associated with outcome events in the PCI studies. Low SYNTAX scores are <18, intermediate SYNTAX scores range from 18 to 27, and high SYNTAX scores are >27. High scores are associated with increasing cardiac mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and a specific, predefined combination of end points. The SYNTAX angiographic grading system was used alone to identify potential risk for revascularization. When comparing all clinical and angiographic factors, it turns out that the SYNTAX score—in addition to age, gender, smoking, diabetes, and acute coronary syndromes—is one of the highest predictors of cardiac mortality and major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing multivessel and, specifically, unprotected left main PCI. A SYNTAX score of >34 also identifies a subgroup with a particularly high risk of cardiac death independent of age, gender, acute coronary syndrome, ejection fraction, euro SCORE, and degree of revascularization.

The SYNTAX score is a useful differentiator for the outcome of patients undergoing three-vessel PCI. In Figure 3-5, examples of the types of SYNTAX score are provided on figures from the original paper. The patients with the highest scores have the highest risk and the lowest scores, the lowest risk. The SYNTAX scores can be divided into three tertiles. The high scores indicate complex conditions and represent greatest risks to patients undergoing PCI. High scores have the worst prognosis for revascularization with PCI compared to CABG surgery. Equivalent or superior outcomes for percutaneous intervention were noted in comparison to CABG surgery for patients in the lowest two tertiles (Fig. 3-6). The best discriminating feature of the SYNTAX score was between the lowest and highest tertiles of grading.

Problems and Solutions in the Interpretation of Coronary Angiograms

The basic issues regarding angiography are described in detail in Chapter 4 of The Cardiac Catheterization Handbook, 5th edition. This section briefly directs our attention to these same issues specifically directed at the PCI procedure.

Coronary target lesions may be obscured by vessel overlap. This may be the most common problem preventing accurate assessment of lesion length, especially for the proximal segments with large vessel and branches coursing across one another. Because a clear view of the target vessel and its stenosis is needed, multiple angles are required to reveal the proximal and distal extent of the lesions under consideration.

Poor contrast opacification of the vessel may lead to a false impression of an angiographically significant lesion or lucency that could be considered a clot. Inadequate mixing of contrast and blood presents as a luminal irregularity. A satisfactory bolus injection of contrast must be delivered. Large intravascular equipment may not permit this to occur, and the operator must consider whether a larger guide catheter is needed to see the lesion better. Enhanced contrast delivery can be achieved by obtaining better coaxial engagement of the guiding catheter or using a larger catheter, injecting during Valsalva maneuver phase III, or using a power injector.

Catheter-induced spasm may appear as a fixed stenotic lesion, mistaken for a true organic lesion. This has been observed in both right and left (and left main) coronary arteries. These spastic segments may be single and proximal or may be multiple and located some distance from the ostium. Nitroglycerin should be administered in every case prior to initiating intervention, especially if there is any possibility of catheter-induced spasm. Repositioning of the catheter and administration of nitroglycerin (100–200 mcg through the catheter) may clarify if the presumed lesion is structural and not spastic. Often a change to a smaller diameter (6 F or 5 F) catheter, or catheters that do not seat deeply, may help.

Angiography for PCI of the left main coronary artery is straightforward for aorto-ostial and mid-body left main lesions but requires demonstration of the LAD/CFX ostia in cases of distal left main stenosis. Optimal views to identify the left main coronary artery remain the same as for those during diagnostic studies, with a shallow RAO with cranial or caudal angulation often providing an excellent view. In addition, complementary LAO caudal view (spider view) will display the left main artery in an orthogonal projection. An additional problem is the appreciation of the hemodynamically significance of the left main stenosis especially when the angiographic narrowing is of questionable severity. For this situation, fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement can provide the hemodynamic severity with a value of > 0.80 having a low 5-year major adverse cardiac event rate. Some operators prefer IVUS before performing revascularization (see Chapter 13).

Another common problem for PCI is the negotiation of a tortuous left circumflex coronary artery. The origin of the CFX and its angle of departure from the left main should be shown in several projections to demonstrate whether it is steeply angled cranially or caudally. Guide catheter selection for the circumflex artery often requires longer guides (i.e., 4.0 JL4 guides, left Amplatz, or Voda) with special tips.

A discussion of the angiography of anomalous coronary arteries is provided in Chapter 4 of The Cardiac Catheterization Handbook, 5th edition. PCI for these arteries is performed in a routine fashion once stable guide catheter position is achieved.

Radiation Exposure During PCI

Coronary angioplasty will deliver greater x-ray exposure than diagnostic studies because of the more complicated and time-consuming nature of the procedure. Previous studies have demonstrated that operator exposure is 93% greater for angioplasty than for routine diagnostic coronary angiography. This increase is due to longer fluoroscopy times in angioplasty without corresponding longer cineradiography times. Because of the angled projections used in coronary angioplasty, increased x-ray exposure may be present. The scattered x-ray dose has been reported to be four times higher with angioplasty than with diagnostic cardiac catheterization (Fig. 3-7).

image

Figure 3-7 Radiation exposure rates for two operators during coronary angioplasty. DC, Diagnostic catheterization; V-PTCA, double-vessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; XA, x-ray amplifier in plane A; XB, x-ray amplifier in plane B.

(Modified from Finci L, Meier B, Steffenino G, et al. Radiation exposure during diagnostic catheterization and single- and double-vessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:1401–1403.)

Fluoroscopy Times

A study by Pattee et al. (1993) of radiation risk to patients from coronary angioplasty indicated that radiation doses varied considerably during the procedure because of large differences in exposure times. Skin exposures estimated for PCI are, on average, higher than for other x-ray procedures and the cancer mortality risk does not exceed the mortality risk of bypass surgery (Table 3-5). Good professional practice requires maximal benefit-to-risk ratio for angioplasty procedures employing high-dose fluoroscopy or cineradiography. Device specific procedure times may be longer than routine stent placement (Table 3-6).

Table 3-5 Organ Doses and Risks of Cancer Mortality for an Average Coronary Angioplasty Procedure

Organ Organ Dose (cGy)* Cancer Risk Mortality (× 10− 6)
Red bone marrow 2.29  92
Bone (surfaces) 2.29  9.2
Lung 9.35 636
Thyroid 0.99  5.9
Breast (women) 4.89 157
Total risk    
Men   743
Women   899

* 1 Gy = 1 J/kg = 1 rad.

From Pattee PL, Johns PC, Chambers RJ. Radiation risk to patients from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1044–1051.

Table 3-6 Estimated Radiation Entrance Exposure of Patients Using Phantom Model Data

Procedure Fluoroscopy (R) Cine (R)
Isolated balloon angioplasty 43 25
Isolated directional coronary atherectomy 32 23
Directional coronary atherectomy + balloon angioplasty 66 29
Isolated laser coronary angioplasty 45 18
Laser coronary angioplasty + balloon angioplasty 57 27
Elective stenting 52 27
Emergency stenting 96 41

R, RAD.

From Federman J, Bell MR, Wondrow MA, et al. Does the use of new intracoronary interventional devices prolong radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory? J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:347–357.

Angulated views increase radiation exposure. Left anterior oblique views produce 2.6 to 6.1 times the dose of radiation for the operator of equivalently angled RAO views (Table 3-7). Steeper LAO views also increased operator dose. LAO 90 degrees produces 8 times the dose of LAO 60 degrees and 3 times the dose of LAO 30 degrees. Fluoroscopy produced more radiation than cine during angioplasty, by a factor of 6:1. Reducing the steepness of angulation reduces operator radiation dosage.

Table 3-7 Radiation Dose and Angulation

View Dose (Relative Increase)
Image Intensifier Position
RAO 30–60 degrees 1
LAO 30–60 degrees 2.6–6.1
Increasing Angulation
LAO 30 degrees 1
LAO 60 degrees 3
LAO 90 degrees 9

LAO, left anterior oblique; RAO, right anterior oblique.

Peripheral Vascular Angiography (See also Chapter 14)

Renal Arteriography

Selective renal arteriography or arteriography obtained from aortic flush is used to evaluate the renal artery origins and vasculature. Remember, for renal artery identification during aortography, the origins of the arteries usually arise at the L1 vertebra (just below the T12 ribs). Selective renal arterial injections provide the most detail. The LAO projection often provides the best view of the renal artery ostia in a majority of patients. Acute angled takeoffs of the renal artery may require specially shaped catheters or a brachial arterial approach from above. Atherosclerotic disease of the renal artery usually involves the proximal one-third of the renal artery and is seldom present without abdominal atherosclerotic plaques. A renal artery stenosis artery is rarely the sole determinant for surgery or angioplasty. Refractory hypertension and determination of the renin-angiotensin levels are usually the indicators for an interventional (angioplasty or stent) procedure. Renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia may occur and appear as atherosclerotic disease. This finding is often present in middle-aged women in whom other vessels are involved, most commonly cerebral or visceral arteries. In contrast to atherosclerotic narrowing, the proximal one-third of the main renal artery is usually free of disease.

Aortography of the thoracic and abdominal aorta is used to assess disease, dissections, and course of the vessel to perform and plan interventions. In high-risk PCI, abdominal aortographic is useful prior to insertion of IABP or LV support devices.

Lower Extremity Angiography

Angiography of the lower extremities is part of peripheral vascular interventions, discussed in Chapter 11. Based on clinical signs and symptoms of arterial insufficiency to the legs, suspected obstructions of the vessel are initially screened with noninvasive studies (i.e., ankle brachial index). Angiography is performed with small-diameter (5 F) catheters and reduced contrast volumes (10–20 mL over 1–2 sec) which are injected, panning down and following the artery course to the most distal locations. Angulated views may be necessary to open bifurcations and overlying vessels that obscure the vessel origin. Panning down to the ankle must be tested before obtaining final views. Digital subtraction techniques are commonly available in modern laboratories. Nonionic contrast agents are less painful than ionic media for peripheral angiography.

One major challenge encountered with femoral-iliac angiography is the contralateral (opposite leg) approach, crossing over the aortic bifurcation of the iliac vessels, especially in patients with high bifurcation or prior aorto-bifurcation graft. To enter the opposite iliac artery, a right Judkins or internal mammary artery graft catheter or other special catheters (crossover, Simmons catheter, etc.) is advanced with a guidewire over the bifurcation and down into the opposite femoral artery. The wire is passed into the selected artery. The catheter may be advanced and exchanged (over a long 300-cm wire) for an appropriate angiographic or balloon dilatation catheter, as required.

The area most frequently involved in peripheral atherosclerotic disease is the distal superficial femoral artery at the abductor canal (Fig. 3-7). The calf (tibial), and knee (popliteal) arteries are the next most commonly involved vessels after the superficial femoral artery. Disease in the deep femoral artery (femoral profunda) is rare. Pathways of collateralization are often rich and varied in patients with chronic distal femoral artery disease, especially in total occlusion of the superficial femoral artery that reconstitutes at or below the knee, close to the branching trifurcation of the tibial and deep peroneal arteries. Determining the level of reconstitution of collateralized vessels and distal runoff is crucial in determining the feasibility of revascularization. Magnified images focusing on the area of interest are frequently needed.

Diagrams and nomenclature for additional angiographic studies are shown in Figures 3-8 through 3-12; see also Chapter 11.

image

Figure 3-8 Pelvic and proximal femoral arterial branches.

(From Johnsrude IS, Jackson DC, Dunnick NR. A practical approach to angiography, 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 1987.)

image

Figure 3-9 Lower extremity vascular anatomy.

(From Medical Learning Incorporated, with permission.)

image

Figure 3-10 Ascending aorta and head and neck vessels.

(From Medical Learning Incorporated, with permission.)

image

Figure 3-11 Commonly accessed arteries of the abdomen.

(From Medical Learning Incorporated, with permission.)

image

Figure 3-12 Vascular anatomy of the upper extremity.

(From Medical Learning Incorporated, with permission.)

Pacemakers During PCI

The routine use of pacemakers for PCI is not required. Cardiac pacemakers may be used prophylactically during PCI to reduce the hemodynamic compromise of heart block and are needed to rescue patients after the development of conduction abnormalities associated with hypotension. External pacing patches are useful for emergency pacing when a temporary pacing wire cannot be immediately positioned. When using pacing patches, sedate the patient, since each electrical stimulation cause contraction of chest muscles as well as heart muscle and may be painful.

Suggested Readings

Balter S., Moses J. Managing patient dose in interventional cardiology. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:244–249.

Chida K., Fuda K., Saito H., et al. Patient skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures: conventional fluoroscopy versus pulsed fluoroscopy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:115–121.

Gibson C.M., Cannon C.P., Daley W.L., et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation. 1996;93:879–888.

Green N.E., Chen S.Y.J., Hansgen A.R., et al. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;64:451–459.

Hirshfeld J.W.Jr, Balter S., Brinker J.A., et al. ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures, A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2259–2282.

Katritsis D., Efstathopoulos E., Betsou S., et al. Radiation exposure of patients and coronary arteries in the stent era: a prospective study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;51:259–264.

Kaul P., Medvedev S., Hohmann S.F., et al. Ionizing radiation exposure to patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction in the United States. Circulation. 2010;122:2160–2169.

Kern M. The cardiac catheterization handbook, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2011.

Koenig T.R., Wolff D., Metter F.A., et al. Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part I, characteristics of radiation injury. AJR. 2001;177:3–11.

Mahesh M. Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. Radiographics. 2001;21:1033–1045.

Pattee P.L., Johns P.C., Chamber R.J. Radiation risk to patients from percutaneous coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1044–1051.

Serruys P.W., Morice M.C., Kappetein A.P., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. (The SYNTAX Trial). N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961–972.

Sianos G., Morel M.A., Kappetein A.P., et al. The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. 2005;1:219–227.

Suzuki S., Furui S., Isshiki T., et al. Methods to reduce patients’ maximum skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;71:792–798.

Tobis J., Azarbal B., Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:839–848.

Valgimigli M., Serruys P.W., Tsuchida K., et al. Cyphering the complexity of coronary artery disease using the SYNTAX score to predict clinical outcome in patients with three vessel lumen obstruction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2001;99(8):1072–1081.

White C.J., Jaff M.R., Haskal Z.J., et al. Indications for renal angiography at the time of coronary angiography: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention and on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation. 2006;114:1892–1895.