Alignment Disorders

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4351 times

Chapter 134

Alignment Disorders

Upper Extremities

Erb Palsy

Imaging: At birth, radiographs serve to exclude fractures of the clavicle and humerus. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been used to directly evaluate the brachial plexus;1,2 however, the primary goal of advanced imaging is to evaluate orthopedic anatomy to determine function and orthopedic treatment since primary repair of the brachial plexus injury is difficult.

Progressive deformity with secondary glenohumeral dysplasia manifests as a small, flattened humeral head, which may sublux, usually in the posterior direction relative to a small, shallow, abnormally retroverted glenoid (Fig. 134-1).3 In normal shoulders, the glenoid is mildly retroverted by approximately 5 degrees posteriorly relative to a line perpendicular to the axis of the scapular body.4 With Erb palsy, glenoid retroversion averages 25 degrees. The scapula is hypoplastic and elevated; the acromion is tapered and inferiorly directed, as is the coracoid; the clavicle is shortened.

Many of these findings are seen on radiography; however, computed tomography (CT) or MRI can be used to quantify the degree of glenoid retroversion, deformity of the glenoid and humeral head, glenoid–humeral head congruence, and relative muscle volume and quality of the affected shoulder.59 The glenoid normally has a concave shape. With glenohumeral dysplasia, the glenoid becomes progressively flat, convex, or biconvex with a pseudoarticulation with the humeral head. MRI is preferred in young children (<5 years old) (e-Fig. 134-2) and CT in older children. To determine glenoid version, the articular cartilage should be used when MRI is performed; the glenoid cortical bone should be used when CT is performed. In infants, ultrasonography may be used to assess instability of the glenohumeral joint.1012

Treatment: Microsurgery techniques may be attempted to address the underlying traumatic neural injury.13 Controversy exists as to their role and proper timing. The main focus of treatment is on the reconstructive surgical techniques of the shoulder, elbow and forearm, and hand and wrist, aimed at preserving joint integrity and maximizing function.13,14 Therefore, imaging optimization should be tailored for orthopedic anatomy rather than the brachial plexus.

Madelung Deformity

Etiologies, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Presentation: In Madelung deformity, the radius is short and its distal articular surface tilted toward to ulna.15 In most cases, the cause of Madelung deformity is unknown. Madelung deformity occurs more often in girls.16 Patients may have pain; however, treatment is more often sought because of deformity or limited range of motion. With an underlying syndrome, the deformity is more likely to be bilateral. Madelung deformity is occasionally seen with Turner syndrome and is a characteristic in dyschondrosteosis (Léri-Weill syndrome) (Fig. 134-3).15 Among these cases, 10% to 15% are familial. A Madelung-like deformity may also be seen in patients with hereditary osteochondromatosis or enchondromatosis, also suggesting a defect in normal distal radial maturation. Madelung deformity may occur as a complication of infection or trauma that results in medial and volar radial physeal growth disturbance.17

Imaging: The distal articular surface of the radius is tilted in an ulnar and volar direction.18,19 The radius is short and bowed dorsally and laterally (“bayonet deformity”). Secondary distortion of the carpus is observed with an abnormally narrow carpal angle and proximal lunate migration.18,19 The distal ulna is subluxed. The distal radial growth plate may prematurely fuse along its ulnar aspect. CT or MRI may be used to assess the extent of distal radial physeal fusion.20

Ulnar Variance

Imaging: At skeletal maturity, the distal radial and ulnar articular surfaces are nearly at the same level, and the radial styloid projects 9 to 12 mm distal to the ulnar articular surface.21,22 With negative ulnar variance, the ulna ends more proximally, and with positive ulnar variance, the ulna ends more distally (e-Fig. 134-5).21,23 Ulnar variance may be exaggerated with forearm pronation and decreased with forearm supination.

Lower Extremities

Hip/Femur

Coxa Vara

Etiologies, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Presentation: The normal neck-shaft angle of the proximal femur is approximately 150 degrees at birth and decreases to 120 to 130 degrees in adulthood.25 External or internal rotation of the hip or femoral anteversion may affect measurement.26

Functional coxa vara occurs with disorders that result in femoral neck shortening, as in trauma, infection, or epiphyseal osteonecrosis.27 True coxa vara occurs as a congenital anomaly that is caused by bone softening (e.g., rickets, osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrous dysplasia) or to abnormal growth (e.g., spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita, spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia, cleidocranial dysplasia).28,29 Children with developmental coxa vara present with a limp (unilateral deformity) or a waddling gate (bilateral deformities). Coxa vara may occur as the result of abnormal growth at the proximal femoral physis that results in abnormal angulation of the physis. Congenital coxa vara occurs with a congenital short femur (i.e., proximal focal femoral deficiency) and does not spontaneously resolve.28 With infantile or developmental coxa vara, the hip is normal at birth, and deformity is noted when the child begins to walk.28,30 Infantile coxa vara may be self-limited. Acquired coxa vara is caused by another process such as trauma.28

Imaging: In coxa vara, the femoral neck-shaft angle is decreased from normal. A measurement below 110 degrees is considered coxa vara.31 Fragmentation and sclerosis may be seen at the medial margin of the proximal femoral metaphysis (Fig. 134-7).30 The Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angle is the angle between the Hilgenreiner line and a line drawn through the physis (e-Fig. 134-8).28,31 If it is less than 45 degrees, progression is unlikely. If over 60 degrees, progression is likely. If 45 to 60 degrees, prognosis is less predictable.

Treatment: Surgical management may be warranted for progressive disease, especially if asymmetric or associated with pain, leg length discrepancy, or both.28 Valgus osteotomy is performed, and physeal fixation or tendon transfers may also be performed to deter progression and improve mechanical function.

Coxa Valga

Imaging: The femoral neck-shaft angle is measured on radiographs. External rotation may mimic coxa valga and can be differentiated through the positioning of the greater trochanter.26 With external rotation, the greater trochanter projects through the femur, whereas with true coxa valga, it is located laterally. Increased femoral anteversion may cause the femoral neck-shaft angle to be overestimated.32 Acetabular dysplasia and femoral subluxation are frequently concomitant findings.32

Femoral Anteversion

Etiologies, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Presentation: Increased femoral anteversion may hinder proper localization of the femoral head relative to the acetabulum. Increased femoral anteversion is seen in hip deformity caused by developmental dysplasia of the hip, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, and cerebral palsy.32 With increased anteversion, in-toeing of feet is noted.

Femoral version is the angulation of the femoral neck in the transverse plane measured relative to the femoral condyles distally (Fig. 134-10). If the femoral neck is anteriorly angulated with respect to the femoral condyles, the femur is anteverted. If the femoral neck is posterior with respect to the femoral condyles, the femur is retroverted. Normal femoral anteversion is 35 to 50 degrees at birth, decreasing steadily to 10 to 15 degrees in adulthood (Fig. 134-11).27

Leg

Tibial Torsion

Imaging: Assessment of tibial torsion is often performed with assessment of femoral version. Limited axial low-dose CT images are obtained through the proximal and distal tibias.41 Tibial torsion is best measured as the angle between the posterior epiphyseal cortical margin of the tibia proximally and a bimalleolar line distally. Normal values are 5 degrees of external rotation in a newborn, which progresses to 15 to 20 degrees of external rotation in an adult.40,42

Bowleg (Genu Varum)

Etiologies, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Presentation: Bowleg deformity manifests as separation of the knees, with the legs in anatomic position. Pathologic causes include rickets, osteogenesis imperfecta, neurofibromatosis, skeletal dysplasias (i.e., campomelic dysplasia, achondroplasia), focal fibrocartilaginous dysplasia, congenital bowing, Blount disease, and, occasionally, growth plate trauma.4346 Recently, greater prevalence of bowleg and tibia vara has been noted in some adolescent athletes, most notably soccer players.4749 Repetitive stress on the proximal tibial physis may play a role in this.48 Most lateral bowing in otherwise normal infants and children younger than 2 years of age is normal and developmental (“physiologic”) and resolves without treatment.44,5052 Similar to Blount disease, exaggerated physiologic bowing is seen in early walkers, African Americans, and heavier children.44

Imaging: Ozonoff described the following findings as characteristic of physiologic lower extremity bowing: (1) The tibia is abducted relative to the femur, and both bones are intrinsically bowed laterally; relative tibial torsion produces external rotation of the upper tibia relative to the distal tibia; (2) margins of the distal femoral and proximal tibial metaphyses are mildly accentuated with small beaks; (3) medial cortices of the tibia and femur are thickened; (4) distal femoral and proximal tibial epiphyses are not well ossified medially and are wedge shaped; (5) the distal tibial growth plate may be tilted lateral.53

Radiographically, the femur and the tibia are also mildly bowed anteriorly, with beaking occurring posteriorly (Fig. 134-13). Physiologic bowing is usually more marked in the tibias. Occasionally, lateral bowing may almost exclusively be seen in the distal femur (e-Fig. 134-14). The varus deformity is common in normal infants and converts to valgus between 18 and 36 months of age. Degree of valgus reduces spontaneously by 6 to 7 years of age to a mild degree that remains throughout life. Approximate normal angles are 17 degrees varus in a newborn, 9 degrees varus at 1 year, 2 degrees valgus at 2 years, 11 degrees valgus at 3 years, and 5 to 6 degrees valgus at 13 years (e-Fig. 134-15).52,54,55

Radiographs should be taken with the patient bearing weight as soon as he or she is able to stand (Fig. 134-16). The radiographs may suggest an underlying disorder such as rickets or a dysplasia.

Treatment: Persistent varus with delayed conversion to valgus may indicate a higher likelihood of Blount disease (tibia vara). In the second year, it may be difficult to distinguish normal physiologic bowing from Blount disease.56 Exaggerated varus during the second year is likely developmental or physiologic and does not require treatment.50,51,54 Any varus at the knee after 2 years of age should raise concern. Such patients must be monitored to exclude progression to Blount disease.55,57 Realignment surgery is rarely needed in isolated bowleg without underlying dysplasia, metabolic bone disease, or Blount disease.

Blount Disease (Tibia Vara)

Etiologies, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Presentation: Blount disease (tibia vara; osteochondrosis deformans tibiae) is a progressive deformity affecting the proximal tibia (Fig. 134-17).5860 It is theorized that stress on the posteromedial proximal tibial physis causes growth suppression.

The infantile form of Blount disease, which develops in children between 1 and 3 years of age, must be differentiated from developmental bowing.61 Infantile Blount disease may represent normal developmental bowing that fails to correct and progresses. The diagnosis is made when progressive clinical bowing is seen in the presence of characteristic radiographic changes in the proximal tibia.61 The disease is typically bilateral (60% to 80%) but often asymmetric and occasionally unilateral (Fig. 134-18). A family history is often reported. The disorder is more common in early walkers, African Americans, and obese children.44,60,62

Adolescent or late-onset tibia vara is a separate entity from the infantile form. It occurs in children 8 to 14 years of age; obese African American males of normal height are at particular risk (Fig. 134-19).43 Adolescent tibia vara is commonly unilateral but may be bilateral. Adolescent Blount disease is slowly progressive and probably results from the repetitive trauma of weight bearing on the medial physis of the proximal tibia.43 Patients often present with knee pain.

Imaging: The characteristic radiographic feature of infantile Blount disease is deformity of the medial metaphysis of the proximal tibia (Fig. 134-20).44 Irregularity with a more vertically oriented growth plate creates a beaked appearance. The severity of radiographic changes has been described by the six-stage Langenskiöld classification (e-Fig. 134-21).63 Higher stage denotes greater abnormality; bone bridging between the diaphysis and the metaphysis is seen with stage IV and higher. The medial portion of the epiphyseal ossification center is often smaller than the lateral portion. The tibia may subluxate laterally.

The metaphyseal–diaphyseal angle is measured by drawing a single line through the widest portion of the proximal tibial metaphysis (between the medial and lateral beaks) and another line perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia.51 With physiologic bowing, this angle measures approximately 5 degrees, whereas with Blount disease, average angle measurement is 16 degrees (e-Fig. 134-22). A metaphyseal–diaphyseal angle greater than 11 degrees suggests Blount disease.4451 However, several studies have questioned the validity of the metaphyseal–diaphyseal angle, and measurement may be affected by tibial rotation.

Changes related to infantile Blount disease should be distinguished from those of adolescent Blount disease (see Figure 134-19). The metaphyseal angular deformities, diminished medial epiphyseal height, and degree of tibia vara are less severe with adolescent Blount disease.

CT or MRI can assess the degree of proximal tibial growth plate fusion and epiphyseal cartilage abnormalities (e-Fig. 134-23).64,65 Cartilage-sensitive MRI sequences display the cartilage model of the proximal tibial epiphysis.65

Knock-Knee (Genu Valgum)

Etiologies, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Presentation: Genu valgum is a normal developmental phase that lasts from 2 to 12 years of age and is most apparent at 3 to 4 years of age in normal children.52,54,55,66 Persistent knock-knee can be related to pathologic causes such as trauma, skeletal dysplasia, obesity, metabolic disease, or laxity of muscles and ligaments.

Leg Length Discrepancy

Imaging: Radiographic techniques seek to determine bone lengths in a manner that minimizes magnification and other technical factors. Orthoroentgenography (“scanogram”) uses three separate exposures collimated to the hip, knee, and ankle with a radiopaque ruler.67 CT digital scout images may be used to measure bone length.68,69 It is preferable to quantify length and alignment abnormalities with standing radiographs.

In addition to determining quantitative length and discrepancies in length of the lower extremities, leg-length studies should also be evaluated and comments should be made with regard to the alignment of the hips, knees, and ankles. Any underlying cause of the leg length discrepancy such as physeal growth disturbance or abnormal nonosteoarticular bowing deformities should also be discussed.

Feet

Overview: Alignment disorders of the feet may be idiopathic or caused by an underlying disorder. The standard method of radiologic evaluation of the foot involves weight bearing or simulated weight bearing anteroposterior (dorsoventral) and lateral views. Diagnosing alignment abnormalities of the feet should be approached with caution when non-weightbearing radiographs are obtained.

The talus is more proximal and is considered fixed at the ankle because it has no musculotendinous attachments of its own. The calcaneus is linked to the midfoot and forefoot and moves as a unit with these structures relative to the talus. In a normal foot, on the anteroposterior view, the axis of the talus extends through the base of the first metatarsal (Fig. 134-25). With hindfoot varus, the more distal calcaneus is angulated inward, and the axis of the talus passes lateral to the base of the first metatarsal. With hindfoot valgus, the more distal calcaneus is angulated outward, and the axis of the talus passes medial to the base of the first metatarsal.81 The normal lateral talocalcaneal angle is approximately 45 degrees, decreasing to 30 degrees in older children and adults.7173 With hindfoot varus, the lateral talocalcaneal angle is decreased, whereas with hindfoot valgus, the angle is increased.

Normal elevation of the middle metatarsals relative to the fifth metatarsal reflects the transverse arch of the foot. The anterior calcaneus is slightly inclined upward. Accentuation of this upward inclination is called “calcaneus” position of the hindfoot. Equinus is downward inclination of the distal calcaneus. Normal calcaneal tilt and normal slight downward tilt of the distal metatarsals create slight longitudinal concavity in the osseous contour of the bottom of the foot.

Clubfoot

Etiologies, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Presentation: Talipes (“talus” = ankle; “pes” = foot) equinovarus, or clubfoot, is a common congenital anomaly that is clinically obvious at birth. The principal components of clubfoot deformity include plantar flexion of the ankle (equinus), inversion of the heel (varus), and adduction of the forefoot (varus) (Fig. 134-26). Abnormal intrauterine pressures contribute to the development of clubfoot.74 Genetics also appear to play a role.74

Imaging: Radiographs are obtained with true or simulated weight bearing, as this is the position of best correction.74 An anteroposterior radiograph shows superimposition and parallelism of the talus on the calcaneus with the talar axis directed lateral to the first metatarsal (hindfoot varus). Parallelism of the talus and calcaneus is also seen on a lateral view. The lateral view shows plantar flexion of the calcaneus (equinus) and a step-ladder arrangement of the metatarsals, with the first metatarsal highest and the fifth metatarsal at the weight-bearing surface of the foot. Ultrasonography has been used in select centers to assess the flexibility of clubfoot and to guide therapeutic decision making (e-Fig. 134-27).7578

Treatment: Approaches to treatment include serial casting for supple clubfoot deformity, and casting followed by surgical correction for rigid clubfoot deformity.74,79,80 Anatomic deformities persist after treatment of clubfoot and should be recognized as children grow. Many treated clubfeet have small, squared tali with flattened heads, decreased talocalcaneal angles, subtalar joint changes, and medial displacement of the navicular. Valgus deformity may result from overcorrection.

Congenital Vertical Talus

Imaging: The talus is almost completely vertical in this condition (parallel with the longitudinal axis of the tibia), and the calcaneus is fixed in plantar flexion (equinus) (Fig. 134-28). In the anteroposterior projection, the talar axis is medial to the base of the first metatarsal (valgus). The navicular dislocates dorsally, and clinically, a pronated rocker-bottom foot is present. After the navicular ossifies, its abnormal position helps to distinguish congenital vertical talus from severe planovalgus or flatfoot deformity. Prior to ossification, the position of the navicular can be determined by ultrasonography.83

Skewfoot

Flatfoot (Pes Planus)

Etiologies, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Presentation: Flatfoot (pes planus) is a descriptive term. The differential diagnosis of pes planus includes flexible planovalgus foot, peroneal spastic (rigid) flatfoot related to tarsal coalition, congenital vertical talus (congenital rigid flatfoot), and congenital calcaneovalgus (congenital flexible flatfoot).81,8688 Tarsal coalition is discussed in Chapter 128.

The common flatfoot is a painless, flexible planovalgus foot.91 Variable degrees of hindfoot valgus, plantar arch flattening, and forefoot pronation occur. Pathology is thought to involve excess ligamentous laxity, which allows the calcaneus to shift into a valgus position under the talus. Abduction and eversion result from loss of calcaneal support. Patients may develop peroneal muscle spasm and pain caused by irritation.

Imaging: With flexible planovalgus foot, the anteroposterior projection shows hindfoot valgus with an increased talocalcaneal angle and the midtalar line passing medial to the first metatarsal. On the lateral projection, hindfoot valgus causes the talus to be more vertical than normal. The navicular subluxes dorsally and laterally with respect to the talar head. The calcaneus and metatarsals are horizontal longitudinally, and loss of the plantar arch is noted.81 Similar deformity may occur in some children with cerebral palsy (e-Fig. 134-30). With a rigid or painful flatfoot (peroneal spastic flatfoot), CT may be performed to detect an underlying subtalar coalition.

Treatment: Therapy for pes planus depends on the etiology and type of deformity.86 Flexible planovalgus deformity is managed conservatively.88 Rigid (spastic) flat foot with tarsal coalition requires surgery.87

Cavus Foot

Hallux Valgus

Etiologies, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Presentation: Hallux valgus deformity begins to develop and may occasionally present in childhood.91 Hallux valgus affects females ten times as frequently as males. Patients present with pain and deformity which may interfere with proper shoe fitting.

Generalized Disorders

Cerebral Palsy

Overview: Children with cerebral palsy are afflicted with multiple orthopedic disorders requiring radiographic investigation and surveillance.102,103 Variable manifestations of cerebral palsy are caused by variation in severity and location of the original insult.102 In most cases, cerebral palsy is the consequence of fetal or perinatal insult to the brain, usually hypoxic–ischemic or hemorrhagic in nature. Cerebral palsy also occurs as the result of injury to the brain matter that occurs during early childhood.

Imaging: About 25% of cerebral palsy patients have scoliosis.32,104 Scoliosis is more prevalent and severe with greater neurologic deficit. Scoliosis occurs as the result of imbalanced forces on the two sides of the spinal column. As opposed to the S-shaped curves of idiopathic scoliosis, curves in cerebral palsy often have a long C-shaped contour, and the curves may progress after skeletal maturation.32,94 Associated findings may include accentuated thoracic kyphosis or lumbar lordosis, spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis, and pelvic obliquity. Nonambulatory patients also show caninization of the vertebral bodies (narrow anteroposterior diameter) caused by lack of weightbearing forces during development.

Upper extremity defects include radial head dislocation (Fig. 134-33) and contractures at the elbow, wrist, and fingers.95,96 Kienböck disease and negative ulnar variance are of increased incidence in cerebral palsy, but a link between the two findings has not been shown in these patients.97 Accelerated degenerative changes in the elbow and wrist are common in older patients with cerebral palsy.95

Abnormalities at the hip include coxa valga caused by lack of weightbearing, increased femoral anteversion, prominence of the lesser trochanter caused by external rotation forces by the iliopsoas tendon, femoral head subluxation or dislocation, acetabular hypoplasia and dysplasia, and flattening of the femoral head (see Fig. 134-9).32,98 Posterior and superior acetabular deficiency is seen. Patients may experience pain with progressive hip subluxation, which progresses to dislocation. The “windswept” pelvis is seen when one hip has an adductor contracture and the other hip has an abductor contracture, reflecting the asymmetric neuromuscular defects often seen in nonambulatory patients with severe spasticity. Older patients with cerebral palsy show evidence of superimposed degenerative disease at the hips.

At the knee, flexion contractures may be present. The patella is often high (patella alta) and elongated.32,99 Tug lesions are common at the lower pole of the patella, producing a fragmented appearance.32,100 The tibial tuberosity may appear elevated and irregular. Genu recurvatum may be seen with rectus femoris contracture. Valgus is seen at the ankle, and equinus and hindfoot valgus are common in the foot (see e-Fig. 134-30).32,101 Osteopenia predisposes patients with cerebral palsy to fracture.102

Myelomeningocele

Overview: Children with myelomeningocele and related spinal disorders may be afflicted with multiple orthopedic disorders of the spine and lower extremity requiring radiographic investigation and surveillance.103,104 Variable manifestations of myelomeningocele relate to the level of the defect. Children with other spinal pathologies, including those suffering injury to the spinal cord at a young age, may develop orthopedic disorders similar to those with myelomeningocele.

Imaging: Scoliosis in patients with myelomeningocele may be congenital or developmental and progressive.104 In 20% of patients with myelomeningocele, congenital scoliosis is often caused by vertebral segmentation errors. Congenital kyphosis is most common at L1-L2. Kyphosis may also be acquired.104 Lumbar lordosis is commonly accentuated.

One third to one half of patients with myelomeningocele have hip dysplasia. The hips are occasionally dislocated at birth; however, more often, dysplasia develops over time as the result of paralysis of the hip extensors and abductors with unopposed hip flexors and adductors (e-Fig. 134-34).104 Coxa valga and increased femoral anteversion are common.104 Excessive external tibial torsion with out-toeing or internal tibial torsion with in-toeing may be seen. In all, 80% to 95% of patients have foot deformities. Equinovarus (clubfoot), congenital vertical talus, and other foot deformities may also be seen in these patients.104

Infants with myelomeningocele have an increased incidence of fracture of a lower extremity during birth.105 A higher incidence of fracture is seen with contractures and higher levels of spinal defect. Patients with myelomeningocele may develop neuropathic injuries as the result of osteoporosis and lack of sensation.104,106,107 Fractures are most commonly metaphyseal or diaphyseal, but they may occur through a physis. Periosteal new bone and callous may be exuberant because of delayed diagnosis without immobilization and abundant subperiosteal hemorrhage.104,106 Such injuries may be mistaken for tumor or infection.

Treatment: Treatment of orthopedic conditions in patients with myelomeningocele is aimed at maximizing function and limiting the progression of deformity.

References

1. Martinoli, C, Bianchi, S, Santacroce, E, et al. Brachial plexus sonography: a technique for assessing the root level. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:699–702.

2. Martinoli, C, Valle, M, Malattia, C, et al. Paediatric musculoskeletal US beyond the hip joint. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41(suppl 1):S113–S124.

3. Pollock, AN, Reed, MH. Shoulder deformities from obstetrical brachial plexus paralysis. Skeletal Radiol. 1989;18:295–297.

4. Mintzer, CM, Waters, PM, Brown, DJ. Glenoid version in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16:563–566.

5. Pöyhiä, TH, Nietosvaara, YA, Remes, VM, et al. MRI of rotator cuff muscle atrophy in relation to glenohumeral joint incongruence in brachial plexus birth injury. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35:402–409.

6. Waters, PM, Smith, GR, Jaramillo, D. Glenohumeral deformity secondary to brachial plexus birth palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:668–677.

7. Hernandez, RJ, Dias, L. CT evaluation of the shoulder in children with Erb’s palsy. Pediatr Radiol. 1988;18:333–336.

8. Gudinchet, F, Maeder, P, Oberson, JC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder in children with brachial plexus birth palsy. Pediatr Radiol. 1995;25:S125–S128.

9. Pöyhiä, TH, Nietosvaara, YA, Remes, VM, et al. MRI of rotator cuff muscle atrophy in relation to glenohumeral joint incongruence in brachial plexus birth injury. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35:402–409.

10. Hunter, JD, Franklin, K, Hughes, PM. The ultrasound diagnosis of posterior shoulder dislocation associated with Erb’s palsy. Pediatr Radiol. 1998;28:510–511.

11. Saifuddin, A, Heffernan, G, Birch, R. Ultrasound diagnosis of shoulder congruity in chronic obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:100–103.

12. Pöyhiä, TH, Lamminen, AE, Peltonen, JI, et al. Brachial plexus birth injury: US screening for glenohumeral joint instability. Radiology. 2010;254:253–260.

13. Waters, PM. Update on management of pediatric brachial plexus palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:116–126.

14. Pearl, ML. Shoulder problems in children with brachial plexus birth palsy: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17:242–254.

15. Zebala, LP, Manske, PR, Goldfarb, CA. Madelung’s deformity: a spectrum of presentation. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:1393–1401.

16. Arora, AS, Chung KC. Otto, W. Madelung and the recognition of Madelung’s deformity. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31:177–182.

17. Schmidt-Rohlfing, B, Schwöbel, B, Pauschert, R, et al. Madelung deformity: clinical features, therapy and results. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001;10:344–348.

18. Tuder, D, Frome, B, Green, DP. Radiographic spectrum of severity in Madelung’s deformity. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:900–904.

19. McCarroll, HR, Jr., James, MA, Newmeyer, WL, 3rd., et al. Madelung’s deformity: quantitative assessment of x-ray deformity. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30:1211–1220.

20. Cook, PA, Yu, JS, Wiand, W, et al. Madelung deformity in skeletally immature patients: morphologic assessment using radiography, CT, and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:505–511.

21. Hafner, R, Poznanski, AK, Donovan, JM. Ulnar variance in children—standard measurements for evaluation of ulnar shortening in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, hereditary multiple exostosis and other bone or joint disorders in childhood. Skeletal Radiol. 1989;18:513–516.

22. Goldfarb, CA, Strauss, NL, Wall, LB, et al. Defining ulnar variance in the adolescent wrist: measurement technique and interobserver reliability. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36:272–277.

23. Palmer, AK, Glisson, RR, Werner, FW. Ulnar variance determination. J Hand Surg Am. 1982;7:376–379.

24. Goeminne, S, Degreef, I, De Smet, L. Negative ulnar variance has prognostic value in progression of Kienböck’s disease. Acta Orthop Bel. 2010;76:38–41.

25. Zippel, H. Normal development of the structural elements of the hip joint in adolescence. Beitr Orthop Traumatol. 1971;18:255–270.

26. Robin, J, Kerr Graham, H, Selber, P, et al. Proximal femoral geometry in cerebral palsy: a population-based cross-sectional study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1372–1379.

27. Fabry, G, MacEwen, GD, Shands, AR, Jr. Torsion of the femur. A follow-up study in normal and abnormal conditions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1726–1738.

28. Beals, RK. Coxa vara in childhood: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6:93–99.

29. Aarabi, M, Rauch, F, Hamdy, RC, et al. High prevalence of coxa vara in patients with severe osteogenesis imperfecta. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26:24–28.

30. Pavlov, H, Goldman, AB, Freiberger, RH. Infantile coxa vara. Radiology. 1980;135:631–640.

31. Oh, C-W, Thacker, MM, Mackenzie, WG, et al. Coxa vara: a novel measurement technique in skeletal dysplasias. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:125–134.

32. Morrell, DS, Pearson, JM, Sauser, DD. Progressive bone and joint abnormalities of the spine and lower extremities in cerebral palsy. Radiographics. 2002;22:257–268.

33. Bobroff, ED, Chambers, HG, Sartoris, DJ, et al. Femoral anteversion and neck-shaft angle in children with cerebral palsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;364:194–204.

34. Gose, S, Sakai, T, Shibata, T, et al. Morphometric analysis of the femur in cerebral palsy: 3-dimensional CT study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30:568–574.

35. Davids, JR, Marshall, AD, Blocker, ER, et al. Femoral anteversion in children with cerebral palsy: assessment with two and three-dimensional computed tomography scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:481–488.

36. Hernandez, RJ, Tachdjian, MO, Poznanski, AK, et al. CT determination of femoral torsion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;137:97–101.

37. Jarrett, DY, Oliveira, AM, Zou, KH, et al. Axial oblique CT to assess femoral anteversion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1230–1233.

38. Sugano, N, Noble, PC, Kamaric, E. A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:610–614.

39. Reference deleted in proofs.

40. Staheli, LT, Corbett, M, Wyss, C, et al. Lower-extremity rotational problems in children. Normal values to guide management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:39–47.

41. Lee, SH, Chung, CY, Park, MS, et al. Tibial torsion in cerebral palsy: validity and reliability of measurement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2098–2104.

42. Dietz, FR. Intoeing—fact, fiction and opinion. Am Fam Physician. 1994;50:1249–1259. [1262-1264].

43. Do, TT. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of bowlegs. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2001;13:42–46.

44. Cheema, JI, Grissom, LE, Harcke, HT. Radiographic characteristics of lower-extremity bowing in children. Radiographics. 2003;23:871–880.

45. Jouve, JL, Kohler, R, Mubarak, SJ, et al. Focal fibrocartilaginous dysplasia (“fibrous periosteal inclusion”): an additional series of eleven cases and literature review. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27:75–84.

46. Bell, SN, Campbell, PE, Cole, WG, et al. Tibia vara caused by focal fibrocartilaginous dysplasia: three case reports. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:780–784.

47. Yaniv, M, Becker, T, Goldwirt, M, et al. Prevalence of bowlegs among child and adolescent soccer players. Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16:392–396.

48. Laor, T, Wall, EJ, Vu, LP. Physeal widening in the knee due to stress injury in child athletes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1260–1264.

49. Witvrouw, E, Danneels, L, Thijs, Y, et al. Does soccer participation lead to genu varum? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:422–427.

50. Holt, JF, Latourette, HB, Watson, EH. Physiological bowing of the legs in young children. J Am Med Assoc. 1954;154:390–394.

51. Levine, AM, Drennan, JC. Physiological bowing and tibia vara: the metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle in the measurement of bowleg deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1158–1163.

52. Salenius, P, Vankka, E. The development of the tibiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:259–261.

53. Ozonoff, MB. The lower extremity. In Pediatric orthopedic radiology, 2nd ed, Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1992:304–396.

54. Heath, CH, Staheli, LT. Normal limits of knee angle in white children—genu varum and genu valgum. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993;13:259–262.

55. Shopfner, CE, Coin, CG. Genu varus and valgus in children. Radiology. 1969;92:723–732.

56. Eggert, P, Viemann, M. Physiological bowlegs or infantile Blount’s disease. Some new aspects on an old problem. Pediatr Radiol. 1996;26:349–352.

57. Davids, JR, Blackhurst, DW, Allen, BL, Jr. Radiographic evaluation of bowed legs in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:257–263.

58. Blount, WP. Tibia vara. J Bone Surg. 1937;19:1–29.

59. Blount, WP. Tibia vara, osteochondrosis deformans tibiae. Curr Pract Orthop Surg. 1966;3:141–156.

60. Sabharwal, S. Blount disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1758–1776.

61. Loder, RT, Johnston, CE, 2nd. Infantile tibia vara. J Pediatr Orthop. 1987;7:639–646.

62. Gettys, FK, Jackson, JB, Frick, SL. Obesity in pediatric orthopaedics. Orthop Clin North Am. 2011;42:95–105. [vii].

63. Langenskiöld, A. Tibia vara: a critical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989:195–207.

64. Iwasawa, T, Inaba, Y, Nishimura, G, et al. MR findings of bowlegs in toddlers. Pediatr Radiol. 1999;29:826–834.

65. Craig, JG, van Holsbeeck, M, Zaltz, I. The utility of MR in assessing Blount disease. Skeletal Radiol. 2002;31:208–213.

66. Lin, C-J, Lin, S-C, Huang, W, et al. Physiological knock-knee in preschool children: prevalence, correlating factors, gait analysis, and clinical significance. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19:650–654.

67. Green, WT, Wyatt, GM, Anderson, M. Orthoroentgenography as a method of measuring the bones of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1946;28:60–65.

68. Aaron, A, Weinstein, D, Thickman, D, et al. Comparison of orthoroentgenography and computed tomography in the measurement of limb-length discrepancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:897–902.

69. Poutawera, V, Stott, NS. The reliability of computed tomography scanograms in the measurement of limb length discrepancy. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2010;19:42–46.

70. Friend, L, Widmann, RF. Advances in management of limb length discrepancy and lower limb deformity. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008;20:46–51.

71. Ozonoff, MB. The foot. In Pediatric orthopedic radiology, 2nd ed, Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1992:397–460.

72. Vanderwilde, R, Staheli, LT, Chew, DE, et al. Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:407–415.

73. Gentili, A, Masih, S, Yao, L, et al. Pictoral review: foot axes and angles. Br J Radiol. 69, 1996. [9688-974].

74. Cummings, RJ, Davidson, RS, Armstrong, PF, et al. Congenital clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:290–308.

75. Coley, BD, Shiels, WE, Kean, J, et al. Age-dependent dynamic sonographic measurement of pediatric clubfoot. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:1125–1129.

76. Shiels, WE, Coley, BD, Kean, J, et al. Focused dynamic sonographic examination of the congenital clubfoot. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:1118–1124.

77. Aurell, Y, Johansson, A, Hansson, G, et al. Ultrasound anatomy in the normal neonatal and infant foot: an anatomic introduction to ultrasound assessment of foot deformities. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2306–2312.

78. Aurell, Y, Johansson, A, Hansson, G, et al. Ultrasound anatomy in the neonatal clubfoot. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2509–2517.

79. Gore, AI, Spencer, JP. The newborn foot. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69:865–872.

80. Fridman, MW, de Almeida Fialho, HS. The role of radiographic measurements in the evaluation of congenital clubfoot surgical results. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:129–138.

81. Sullivan, JA. Pediatric flatfoot: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999;7:44–53.

82. McKie, J, Radomisli, T. Congenital vertical talus: a review. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010;27:145–156.

83. Schlesinger, AE, Deeney, VF, Caskey, PF. Sonography of the nonossified tarsal navicular cartilage in an infant with congenital vertical talus. Pediatr Radiol. 1989;20:134–135.

84. Hutchinson, B. Pediatric metatarsus adductus and skewfoot deformity. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010;27:93–104.

85. Napiontek, M. Skewfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22:130–133.

86. Harris, EJ, Vanore, JV, Thomas, JL, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:341–373.

87. Rodriguez, N, Choung, DJ, Dobbs, MB. Rigid pediatric pes planovalgus: conservative and surgical treatment options. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010;27:79–92.

88. Blitz, NM, Stabile, RJ, Giorgini, RJ, et al. Flexible pediatric and adolescent pes planovalgus: conservative and surgical treatment options. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010;27:59–77.

89. Schwend, RM, Drennan, JC. Cavus foot deformity in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:201–211.

90. Allard, P, Sirois, JP, Thiry, PS, et al. Roentgenographic study of cavus foot deformity in Friedreich ataxia patients: preliminary report. Can J Neurol Sci. 1982;9:113–117.

91. Talab, YA. Hallux valgus in children: a 5-14-year follow-up study of 30 feet treated with a modified Mitchell osteotomy. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73:195–198.

92. Kerr Graham, H, Selber, P. Musculoskeletal aspects of cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:157–166.

93. Morrell, DS, Pearson, JM, Sauser, DD. Progressive bone and joint abnormalities of the spine and lower extremities in cerebral palsy. Radiographics. 2002;22:257–268.

94. Imrie, MN, Yaszay, B. Management of spinal deformity in cerebral palsy. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41:531–547.

95. Nishioka, E, Yoshida, K, Yamanaka, K, et al. Radiographic studies of the wrist and elbow in cerebral palsy. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5:268–274.

96. Abu-Sneineh, AK, Gabos, PG, Miller, F. Radial head dislocation in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:155–158.

97. Leclercq, C, Xarchas, C. Kienbock’s disease in cerebral palsy. J Hand Surg Br. 1998;23:746–748.

98. Sauser, DD, Hewes, RC, Root, L. Hip changes in spastic cerebral palsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146:1219–1222.

99. Topoleski, TA, Kurtz, CA, Grogan, DP. Radiographic abnormalities and clinical symptoms associated with patella alta in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20:636–639.

100. Kaye, JJ, Freiberger, RH. Fragmentation of the lower pole of the patella in spastic lower extremities. Radiology. 1971;101:97–100.

101. Davids, JR. The foot and ankle in cerebral palsy. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41:579–593.

102. Leet, AI, Mesfin, A, Pichard, C, et al. Fractures in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26:624–627.

103. Karol, LA. Orthopedic management in myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Clin North Am. 1995;6:259–268.

104. Westcott, MA, Dynes, MC, Remer, EM, et al. Congenital and acquired orthopedic abnormalities in patients with myelomeningocele. Radiographics. 1992;12:1155–1173.

105. Boytim, MJ, Davidson, RS, Charney, E, et al. Neonatal fractures in myelomeningocele patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11:28–30.

106. Kumar, SJ, Cowell, HR, Townsend, P. Physeal, metaphyseal, and diaphyseal injuries of the lower extremities in children with myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Orthop. 1984;4:25–27.

107. Lock, TR, Aronson, DD. Fractures in patients who have myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1153–1157.

Share this: