Adverse circulatory effects of exercise

Published on 26/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1195 times

Chapter 10 Adverse circulatory effects of exercise

SYNCOPE

In an upright individual, the gravitational field between heart and brain means that cerebral perfusion pressure is always lower than blood pressure at the level of the arterial baroreceptors. In consequence, cerebral perfusion varies more dramatically with variations in cardiac ejection and peripheral resistance than does perfusion to other organs, and situations that result in substantially reduced blood pressure may, in the upright posture, result in fainting (syncope) due to inadequate blood flow to the forebrain.

Causes of syncope

Such reductions in blood pressure could result from reduced venous return and cardiac filling or from reduced baroreflex capacity to induce peripheral vasoconstriction. In the context of exercise, the typical primary effect is obstructed systemic venous return due to elevation of intrathoracic pressure. This pressure increase can be induced voluntarily by forced expiration against a closed glottis and is known as the Valsalva manoeuvre (Fig. 10.1). It occurs naturally during any activity that involves thoracic muscle activation and breath holding, such as carrying heavy suitcases, weight lifting or straining on the lavatory.

In normal, healthy individuals, the arterial baroreflex responses to reduced stroke volume (increased peripheral resistance and tachycardia) are usually fast and large enough to maintain blood pressure at a level that allows adequate cerebral perfusion. Several factors can, however, reduce the effectiveness of these compensations so that consciousness is impaired. Reduced blood volume will reduce the efficiency of cardiac filling and so exaggerate the fall in stroke volume. Increased venous compliance will lead to greater pooling of blood in dependent veins, with less efficient mobilization of this for any given degree of sympathetic vasoconstrictor activation. Finally, any blood-borne influences that cause cerebral vasoconstriction will reduce cerebral perfusion further at any given blood pressure.

All of these additional factors may be associated with athletic performance of specific types. In competitions that involve weight divisions, many performers restrict their fluid intake dramatically in order to make weight, with resulting depletion of plasma volume. Intense, long-term dynamic training has been reported to cause increases in compliance of the large veins, predisposing these athletes to increased venous pooling and to hypotension and fainting during rapid postural change, even in the absence of a Valsalva manoeuvre (Hernandez & Franke 2004). Finally, the elevation of plasma adrenaline (epinephrine) and noradrenaline (norepinephrine) due to the generalized sympathetic discharge associated with central command is enhanced by the additional sympathetic activation due to the stress of competition. Although the cerebral vasculature itself receives only a sparse sympathetic innervation, these circulating catecholamines exert a moderate vasoconstrictor effect on the cerebral precapillary resistance vessels and so reduce brain perfusion at any given level of pressure gradient. An example of Valsalva-induced syncope in a competitive athlete appears in the Case history below.

HYPERTHERMIA

Dependence on evaporative cooling

As discussed in Chapter 9 (p. 106), the internal heat generated by even intense prolonged exercise produces only moderate hyperthermia, so long as there is effective evaporative cooling by sweat. By definition, therefore, anything that interferes with heat loss is likely to result in excessive elevation of body temperature. If this rises to more than 41° C (106° F) then central nervous function begins to be impaired, with permanent brain damage or death occurring at only slightly higher temperatures.

Sweat is a highly effective source of heat loss when air humidity is low. This is illustrated dramatically by our capacity to maintain a near-normal core temperature in sauna baths, where the temperature is routinely set at around 100° C (212° F), but relative humidity is around 10% or less. However, the efficiency of evaporative heat loss is highly dependent on absolute relative humidity, as witnessed by the greatly increased sweat production produced by quite small increments in sauna humidity when one pours water on the coals. If environmental relative humidity is 90% or more, as is often the case in many tropical climates, then virtually no sweat evaporates and there is consequently almost no benefit for heat loss, despite the fact that the volume of sweat secreted for a given workload and ambient temperature is much greater than under less humid conditions (Fig. 10.2). Under these circumstances, heat loss depends almost entirely on radiation and convection, which are far less efficient than evaporation.

Heat stroke

With normal evaporative heat loss, as discussed above, core temperature can be held close to the resting value even during intense work in hot environments, provided that plasma volume is maintained. If the efficiency of the evaporative heat loss pathway is impaired, however, exercise in the heat may elevate core temperature rapidly to values in excess of 40° C (104° F), resulting in heat stroke. Initially there is confusion, with reduced capacity for cognition and decision-making and at internal temperatures of around 41.5° C (107° F) consciousness is lost. At 42° C (108° F), sustained and often fatal damage to central neuronal structures occurs due to protein coagulation.

Individuals most susceptible to heat stroke during physical activity are, predictably, those in whom heat loss is minimized by insulative clothing and who are compelled to maintain a high level of work in a hot environment. Typical examples of this group are soldiers on route march and grid-iron footballers. As well, as discussed in the preceding section, it is important to remember that even when exercise stops heat will continue to enter the bloodstream from the previously active muscles. In situations of severe hyperthermia, where very small increments of core temperature can mean the difference between life and death, immediate and efficient removal of heat from the body is essential.

HANDY HINTS

Because there is only a narrow range between normothermia and the temperature at which irreversible cerebral protein damage occurs, it is essential to halt the rise in core temperature rapidly. The obvious first step is to shelter the victim from solar heat gain. The next is to provide effective pathways for heat loss.

With core temperatures that are not higher than 40° C (104° F), copious sponging of the skin with water is usually effective, provided that the environment is relatively dry. At temperatures closer to the danger point of 42° C (108° C) or when evaporative cooling is poor because of high air humidity, it is necessary to immerse the victim in a bath of water or under a shower. Usually there is no opportunity of taking accurate core temperature readings and assessment of the degree of hyperthermia has to be based on the state of consciousness and on whether the subject is still sweating.

In theory, cold water should be the most efficient treatment because it creates the greatest thermal gradient. In practice, contact of the skin with cold water causes massive discharge of cutaneous cold receptors, which activates heat retention outflows from the hypothalamus including profound cutaneous vasoconstriction. The massive fall in skin blood flow prevents effective heat loss. This can lead to core temperature rising further to a critical value as stored tissue heat enters the bloodstream, before the central thermoreceptors override the peripheral input. It is, therefore, safer and more efficient to use water that is tepid or around room temperature than that typically coming from a cold water supply.

The other effective alternative would be to create a thermal gradient so large that there will be rapid heat loss even in the absence of skin blood flow, by immersion in an ice-water mixture. This strategy is often recommended for treatment of individuals whose internal temperatures are critically high and who are unconscious as a result. In awake people, on the other hand, sudden whole-body immersion in ice water is too painful for it to be the method of choice.

Tissue damage due to fluid depletion

Plasma volume depletion equivalent to reduction of total blood volume by 1.5 l or more is sufficient to reduce mean blood pressure even when sympathetic drive is maximal. In these circumstances, the consequent fall in tissue perfusion may have deleterious outcomes unless effective fluid replacement is achieved within 1–2 h. The problems occur mainly in regions of the circulation where microcirculatory counter-current exchange leads to local hypoxia (see Chapter 5, p. 58). In the kidney, the fall in medullary blood flow can cause necrotic damage to the loops of Henle and the collecting ducts, resulting in loss of urinary concentrating power and further fluid loss. In the small intestine, the fall in perfusion of the villi can result in sloughing of the villar epithelium, leading to exposure of the underlying tissue to intestinal proteolytic enzymes and to potential entry into the bloodstream of Gram-negative bacteria that are normally restricted to the gut lumen.

If blood pressure is low enough to prevent effective capillary perfusion through some areas of peripheral tissues, then blood cells begin to fall out of suspension and form clumps within the downstream venules (see Chapter 5, p. 60). Once this has occurred, even restoration of blood volume sufficient to reduce peripheral resistance to normal may not restore effective perfusion in these areas, because the venular cell clumps create a resistance sufficient to redirect blood flow to other, lower resistance, regions of the tissue.

SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH

Occasionally, an apparently normal young individual collapses and dies during exercise because the heart stops beating. This so-called sudden cardiac death is extremely rare (of the order of one individual per 50 000 per year), so it is unlikely to occur in any exercise-related research study, but such a serious event has to be borne in mind as a remote possibility. By definition, sudden cardiac death in athletes does not involve overt cardiac disease processes, but it obviously must involve some abnormality of cardiac function that is triggered or exacerbated by exercise.

There are two main causes of sudden cardiac death (Catanzaro et al 2006, Corrado et al 2006). One is a genetically determined type of cardiac muscle cell membrane abnormality (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy), characterized by increased capacity to generate arrhythmias. The second is developmental abnormality of the coronary arteries. The left and right coronary arteries normally arise from the left and right sides of the aortic sinus respectively and run from there to the left and right myocardium. Occasionally, however, both arteries arise from the same side of the aortic sinus and so one must travel between the aorta and the pulmonary artery in order to reach the appropriate side of the heart. When cardiac output rises during exercise, aorta and pulmonary arteries become distended and the aberrant coronary artery may be compressed, resulting in hypoxia to that side of the heart.

Much debate has gone on as to whether routine screening programmes should be put in place to exclude individuals with one of these abnormalities from participating in sport (Corrado et al 2006). In practice, this would be extremely difficult and the benefits would be uncertain. Retrospective analysis indicates that only a minority of individuals who sustain sudden cardiac death during exercise have any suggestive signs, including identifiable ECG abnormalities. Finding those at risk would, therefore, require complex and expensive investigations, with, even then, no guarantee that all such individuals would be identified. Against this approach is the certainty that participation in sports programmes has proven advantages for health in general and that many people involved in sports would be likely to choose to continue their involvement in spite of a known risk.

On balance, a sensible approach seems to be as follows. Identify by careful screening the people at obvious risk (history of fainting or dizziness, ECG evidence of atrial fibrillation, ventricular extrasystoles or ischaemia) and exclude them from experimental exercise studies. Ensure that individuals in this category are investigated further before being accepted into competitive sports programmes. But also recognize that a tiny number of unidentifiable people will remain at risk and in whom it is entirely uncertain whether they might die as a result of exercise.