Adrenergic (sympathomimetic) bronchodilators

Published on 12/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 11982 times

CHAPTER 6

Adrenergic (sympathomimetic) bronchodilators

Key terms and definitions

Adrenergic bronchodilator

Agent that stimulates sympathetic nervous fibers, which allow relaxation of smooth muscle in the airway. Also known as sympathomimetic bronchodilator or β2 agonist.

α-receptor stimulation

Causes vasoconstriction and vasopressor effect; in the upper airway (nasal passages), this can provide decongestion.

Asthma paradox

Refers to the increasing incidence of asthma morbidity, and especially asthma mortality, despite advances in the understanding of asthma and availability of improved drugs to treat asthma.

β1-receptor stimulation

Causes increased myocardial conductivity and increased heart rate as well as increased contractile force.

β2-receptor stimulation

Causes relaxation of bronchial smooth muscle, with some inhibition of inflammatory mediator release and stimulation of mucociliary clearance.

Bronchospasm

Narrowing of the bronchial airways, caused by contraction of smooth muscle.

Catecholamines

Group of similar compounds having sympathomimetic action; they mimic the actions of epinephrine.

Cyclic adenosine 3’, 5’-monophosphate (cAMP)

Nucleotide produced by β2-receptor stimulation; it affects many cells, but causes relaxation of bronchial smooth muscle.

Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)

Nucleotide producing the opposite effect of cAMP; that is, it causes bronchoconstriction.

Downregulation

Long-term desensitization of β receptors to β2 agonists, caused by a reduction in the number of β receptors.

Prodrug

Drug that exhibits its pharmacologic activity when it is converted, inside the body, to its active form.

Sympathomimetic

Producing effects similar to those of the sympathetic nervous system.

Chapter 6 presents adrenergic drugs used as inhaled bronchodilators. The specific agents and the clinical indications for this class of drugs are summarized, along with their mechanism of action as mediated by β receptors. Structure-activity relationships of available agents are presented as a basis for their difference in receptor selectivity and duration of action. Differences among routes of administration are discussed, and side effects are reviewed. A brief summary of the debate over possible harmful effects with β-agonists is given.

Clinical indications for adrenergic bronchodilators

The general indication for use of an adrenergic bronchodilator is relaxation of airway smooth muscle in the presence of reversible airflow obstruction associated with acute and chronic asthma (including exercise-induced asthma), bronchitis, emphysema, bronchiectasis, and other obstructive airway diseases. Differences in the rate of onset, peak effect, and duration led to a distinction in use between short-acting and long-acting agents. Various recommendations and guidelines exist for the use of β agonists in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma.

Specific adrenergic agents and formulations

Table 6-1 lists adrenergic bronchodilators currently approved for general clinical use in the United States as of the writing of this edition. Practitioners are urged to read package inserts on a drug before administration. These inserts give details of dosage strengths and frequencies, adverse effects, shelf life, and storage requirements, all of which are needed for safe application. Table 6-1 is not intended to replace more detailed information supplied by the manufacturer on each of the bronchodilator agents. There are three subgroups of adrenergic bronchodilators based on distinct differences in duration of action:

TABLE 6-1

Inhaled Adrenergic Bronchodilator Agents Currently Available in the United States

DRUG BRAND NAME RECEPTOR PREFERENCE ADULT DOSAGE TIME COURSE (ONSET, PEAK, DURATION)
Ultra-Short-Acting Adrenergic Bronchodilator Agents
Epinephrine Adrenalin Chloride, Primatene Mist α, β

Racemic epinephrine microNefrin, Nephron, S-2 α, β SVN: 2.25% solution, 0.25-0.5 mL (5.63-11.25 mg) qid Short-Acting Adrenergic Bronchodilator Agents Metaproterenol Alupent β2 Albuterol Proventil HFA, Ventolin HFA, ProAir HFA, AccuNeb, VoSpire ER β2 Pirbuterol Maxair Autohaler β2 MDI: 200 μg/puff, 2 puffs q4-6h Levalbuterol Xopenex, Xopenex HFA β2 Long-Acting Adrenergic Bronchodilator Agents Salmeterol Serevent Diskus β2 DPI: 50 μg/blister bid Formoterol Perforomist, Foradil β2   Foradil Certihaler β2 DPI: 8.5 μg/inhalation, bid Arformoterol Brovana β2 SVN: 15 μg/2 mL unit dose, bid

image

DPI, Dry powder inhaler; MDI, metered dose inhaler; SVN, small volume nebulizer.

Catecholamines

The sympathomimetic bronchodilators are all either catecholamines or derivatives of catecholamines. A catecholamine is a chemical structure consisting of an aromatic catechol nucleus and a dialiphatic amine side chain. In Figure 6-1, the basic catecholamine structure is seen to be composed of a benzene ring with hydroxyl groups at the third and fourth carbon sites and an amine side chain attached at the first carbon position.

The terminal amine group (NH2) and the benzene ring are connected by two carbon atoms, designated as α and β, a notation not to be confused with α and β receptors in the sympathetic nervous system. Examples of catecholamines are dopamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, isoproterenol, and isoetharine. The first three occur naturally in the body. Catecholamines, or sympathomimetic amines, mimic the actions of epinephrine more or less precisely, causing tachycardia, elevated blood pressure, smooth muscle relaxation of bronchioles and skeletal muscle blood vessels, glycogenolysis, skeletal muscle tremor, and central nervous system (CNS) stimulation.

Adrenergic bronchodilators as stereoisomers

Adrenergic bronchodilators can exist in two different spatial arrangements, producing isomers. Rotation around the β carbon on the ethylamine side chain of the basic molecular structure seen in Figure 6-1 produces two nonsuperimposable mirror images, termed enantiomers or simply isomers. Figure 6-2 illustrates epinephrine as a stereoisomer, showing the (R)-isomers and (S)-isomers as the mirror image of each other. Enantiomers have similar physical and chemical properties but different physiologic effects. The (R)-isomer, or levo isomer, is active on airway β receptors, producing bronchodilation, and on extrapulmonary adrenergic receptors. The (S)-isomer, or dextro isomer, is not active on adrenergic receptors such as β receptors, and until more recently the (S)-isomer was considered physiologically inert. The two mirror images of the isomers rotate light in opposite directions, and this is the basis for designating them as dextrorotatory (d, +) or levorotatory (l, −). Using their actual spatial configuration, the levo isomer and dextro isomer are referred to as the (R)-isomer (for rectus, right) and (S)-isomer (for sinister, left), respectively. Adrenergic bronchodilators such as epinephrine, albuterol, and salmeterol have been produced synthetically as racemic mixtures, or 50:50 equimolar mixes of the (R)-isomers and (S)-isomers. Natural epinephrine found in the adrenal gland occurs as the (R)-isomer, or levo isomer, only. Levalbuterol, released in 1999, represents the first synthetic inhaled solution available as the single (R)-isomer of racemic albuterol. Structures of the currently available inhaled β agonists to be discussed are shown in Figure 6-3. Only a single isomer form is shown, for simplification and clarity.

Epinephrine.

Epinephrine is a potent catecholamine bronchodilator that stimulates α and β receptors. Because epinephrine lacks β2-receptor specificity, there is a high prevalence of side effects such as tachycardia, blood pressure increase, tremor, headache, and insomnia. Epinephrine occurs naturally in the adrenal medulla and has a rapid onset but a short duration because of metabolism by catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT). It has been administered both by inhalation and by subcutaneous injection to treat patients with asthma exacerbation. It is also used as a cardiac stimulant, based on its strong β1 effects. Self-administered, intramuscular injectable doses of 0.3 mg and 0.15 mg are marketed to control systemic hypersensitivity (anaphylactic) reactions.

This drug is more useful for the management of acute asthma rather than for daily maintenance therapy because of its pharmacokinetics and side-effect profile. The parenteral form of epinephrine is a natural extract, consisting of only the (R)-isomer, or levo isomer. The synthetic formulation of epinephrine for nebulization, microNefrin or Nephron, is a racemic mixture of the (R)-isomer, or levo isomer, and (S)-isomer, or dextro isomer. The mode of action of racemic epinephrine is the same as with natural epinephrine, giving α and β stimulation. Because only the (R)-isomer is active on adrenergic receptors, a 1:100 strength formulation of natural epinephrine (injectable formulation) has been used for nebulization, whereas a 2.25% strength racemic mixture is used in nebulization. An epinephrine metered dose inhaler (MDI) is sold over-the-counter as Primatene Mist. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ruled in 2006 that Primatene Mist was not essential, which will lead to its removal from the market if the manufacturer does not convert to the hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulation by December 31, 2011.

Metabolism of catecholamines

Despite the increase in β2 specificity with increased side chain bulk, all of the previously mentioned catecholamines are rapidly inactivated by the cytoplasmic enzyme COMT. This enzyme is found in the liver and kidneys and throughout the rest of the body. Figure 6-4, A, illustrates the action of COMT as it transfers a methyl group to the carbon-3 position on the catechol nucleus. The resulting compound, metanephrine, is inactive on adrenergic receptors. Because the action of COMT on circulating catecholamines is very efficient, the duration of action of these drugs is severely limited, with a range of 1.5 hours to at most 3 hours.

Catecholamines are also unsuitable for oral administration because they are inactivated in the gut and liver by conjugation with sulfate or glucuronide at the carbon-4 site. Because of this action, they have no effect when taken by mouth, limiting their route of administration to inhalation or injection. Catecholamines are also readily inactivated to inert adrenochromes by heat, light, or air (Figure 6-4, B). For this reason, racemic epinephrine is stored in an amber-colored bottle or a foil-protected wrapper. Nebulizer rainout (i.e., nebulized particles that condense and fall, under the influence of gravity) in the tubing may appear pinkish after treatment, and a patient’s sputum may even appear pink-tinged after using aerosols of catecholamines.

Resorcinol agents

Because the limited duration of action with catecholamines is unsuitable for maintenance therapy of bronchospastic airways, drug researchers sought to modify the catechol nucleus, which is so vulnerable to inactivation by COMT. As a result, the hydroxyl attachment at the carbon-4 site was shifted to the carbon-5 position, producing a resorcinol nucleus (see Figure 6-3). This change resulted in metaproterenol (named for the 3,5-attachments in the meta position). Because metaproterenol is not inactivated by COMT, it has a significantly longer duration of action of 4 to 6 hours compared with the short-acting catecholamine bronchodilators. Metaproterenol can be taken orally because it resists inactivation by sulfatase enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract and liver. For these reasons, the newer generation of resorcinols and other catecholamine derivatives is much better suited for maintenance therapy than the older catecholamine agents. Metaproterenol is slower to reach a peak effect (30 to 60 minutes) than epinephrine. The chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) version of metaproterenol was removed from the market on June 14, 2010.

Saligenin agents

A different modification of the catechol nucleus at the carbon-3 site resulted in the saligenin albuterol, referred to as salbutamol in Europe (see Figure 6-3). Albuterol is available in various pharmaceutical vehicles in the United States, including oral extended-release tablets, syrup, nebulizer solution, and MDI. As with the resorcinol bronchodilators, this drug has a β2-preferential effect; is effective via oral administration; and has a duration of up to 6 hours, with a peak effect in 30 to 60 minutes.

Pirbuterol

Pirbuterol is another noncatecholamine adrenergic agent currently available as pirbuterol acetate (Maxair) in an MDI formulation with a breath-actuated inhaler delivery device. The strength is 0.2 mg per puff, and the usual dose is 2 puffs. Pirbuterol is structurally similar to albuterol except for a pyridine ring in place of the benzene ring (see Figure 6-3). The onset of activity by aerosol is 5 to 8 minutes, with a peak effect at 30 minutes and a duration of action of approximately 5 hours. Pirbuterol is said to be less potent on a weight basis than albuterol and similar in efficacy and toxicity to metaproterenol.4 The side-effect profile is the same as with other β2 agonists. The CFC version of pirbuterol will not be able to be manufactured or sold after December 31, 2013.

Prodrug: bitolterol

Bitolterol (Tornalate) differs from the previous agents discussed in that the administered form must be converted in the body to the active drug. Because of this, bitolterol is referred to as a prodrug. The sequence of activation is shown in Figure 6-5.

The bitolterol molecule consists of two toluate ester groups on the aromatic ring at the carbon-3 and carbon-4 positions. These attachments protect the molecule from degradation by COMT. The large N-tertiary butyl substituent on the amine side chain prevents oxidation by monoamine oxidase (MAO). Bitolterol is administered as an inhalation solution, and once in the body the bitolterol molecule is hydrolyzed by esterase enzymes in the tissue and blood to the active bronchodilator colterol. The process of activation begins when the drug is administered and gradually continues over time, resulting in a prolonged duration or sustained-release effect of up to 8 hours. Onset and peak effect are similar to those of the noncatecholamine agent metaproterenol, administered by inhalation. The active form, colterol, is a catecholamine and is inactivated by COMT similar to any other catecholamine. The speed of this inactivation is offset by the gradual hydrolysis of bitolterol, to provide a prolonged duration of activity. The bulky side chain gives a preferential β2 effect to the active form, colterol.5

In animal studies, bitolterol given orally or intravenously selectively distributed to the lungs. The inhalation route in humans seems preferable to treat the lungs locally, and the hydrolysis of bitolterol to colterol proceeds faster in the lungs than elsewhere, giving a selective effect and accumulation in the lungs. Colterol is excreted in urine and feces as free and conjugated colterol and as metabolites of colterol. Although interesting from a pharmacologic viewpoint, bitolterol has been removed from market in the United States.

Levalbuterol: (R)-isomer of albuterol

Previous inhaled formulations of adrenergic bronchodilators were all synthetic racemic mixtures, containing the (R)-isomer and the (S)-isomer in equal amounts. Levalbuterol is the pure (R)-isomer of racemic albuterol. Both stereoisomers of albuterol are shown in Figure 6-6. Although the (S)-isomer is physiologically inactive on adrenergic receptors, there is accumulating evidence that the (S)-isomer is not completely inactive. Barnes6 suggested, however, there is no difference between single isomer levalbuterol and racemic albuterol. Box 6-1 lists some of the physiologic effects of (S)-isomer of albuterol noted in the literature.713 The effects noted would antagonize the bronchodilating effects of the (R)-isomer of an adrenergic drug and promote bronchoconstriction. In addition, the (S)-isomer is more slowly metabolized than the (R)-isomer. Levalbuterol is the single (R)-isomer form of racemic albuterol and is available in an HFA-propelled MDI, with nebulization solution in three strengths: 0.31-mg, 0.63-mg, and 1.25-mg unit doses. Levalbuterol is also available as a concentrate, 1.25 mg in 0.5 mL. In a study by Nelson and associates,14 the 0.63-mg dose was found to be comparable to the 2.5-mg racemic albuterol dose in onset and duration (Figure 6-7).

image
Figure 6-7 Mean percent change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline (week 0) to the end of treatment (week 4) with various doses of levalbuterol, racemic albuterol, and placebo (PBO). (From Nelson HS, Bensch G, Pleskow WW, et al: Improved bronchodilation with levalbuterol compared with racemic albuterol in patients with asthma, J Allergy Clin Immunol 102:943, 1998.)

Side effects of tremor and heart rate changes were less with the single-isomer formulation. The 1.25-mg levalbuterol dose showed a higher peak effect on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) with an 8-hour duration compared with racemic albuterol. Side effects with this dose were equivalent to the side effects seen with racemic albuterol. It is significant that an equivalent clinical response was seen with one-fourth the racemic dose (0.63 mg) when using the pure isomer, although the racemic mixture contains 1.25 mg of the (R)-isomer (one-half of the total 2.5-mg dose).

Long-acting β-adrenergic agents

The trend in adrenergic bronchodilators has been toward development from nonspecific, short-acting agents, such as epinephrine, to β2-specific agents with action lasting 4 to 6 hours, such as albuterol and levalbuterol. Longer acting agents offer the advantages of less frequent dosing and protection through the night for asthmatic patients. These agents include extended-release albuterol and newer drugs such as salmeterol (Serevent), formoterol (Foradil, Foradil Certihaler), and arformoterol (Brovana). Long-acting bronchodilators are contrasted with short-acting agents. Short-acting agents include albuterol, levalbuterol, and pirbuterol, although these agents at one time were considered longer acting compared with the ultra-short-acting catecholamines such as epinephrine.

Salmeterol

Salmeterol, a β2-selective receptor agonist, is available in a dry powder formulation in the Diskus inhaler. Salmeterol xinafoate is a racemic mixture of two enantiomers, with the (R)-isomer containing the predominant β2 activity.15

Bronchodilator effect.

Salmeterol represents a new generation of long-acting β2-specific bronchodilating agents, whose bronchodilation profile differs from the agents previously discussed. The median time to reach a 15% increase in FEV1 above baseline (considered the onset of bronchodilation) in asthmatic subjects is longer with salmeterol than albuterol; it has been reported as between 14 and 22 minutes16,17 and generally is longer than 10 minutes.18 The slower onset of action with salmeterol is significant for its clinical application (discussed subsequently). The time to peak bronchodilating effect is generally 3 to 5 hours, and its duration of action in maintaining an FEV1 15% above pretreatment baseline is 12 hours or longer. At each point (onset, peak effect, and duration), salmeterol exhibits slower, longer times for effect compared with shorter acting bronchodilators such as albuterol.

With inhaled salmeterol xinafoate, an initial peak plasma concentration of 1 to 2 μg/L is seen 5 minutes after inhalation, with a second peak of 0.07 to 0.2 μg/L at 45 minutes; the second peak is probably due to absorption of swallowed dose. The drug is metabolized by hydroxylation, with elimination primarily in the feces.19 The increased duration of action of salmeterol is due to its increased lipophilicity, conferred by the long side chain. The “tail” of the molecule anchors at an exosite in the cell membrane, allowing continual activation of the β receptor. The mode of action is discussed more fully subsequently.

Formoterol

Formoterol is another β2-selective agonist with a long-acting bronchodilatory effect of 12 hours in duration. A racemic mixture of (R,R)-formoterol and (S,S)-formoterol was approved by the FDA as Foradil for maintenance treatment of asthma in adults and children 5 years or older and for acute prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm in adults and children 5 years or older. Formoterol is also indicated for the treatment of COPD and can be used in conjunction with other inhaled medications, such as inhaled corticosteroids, short-acting β agonist, and theophylline. Racemic formoterol is available as a dry powder aerosol for use with the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler (DPI). The current recommended dose for adults and children 5 years or older is 12 μg twice daily by Aerolizer.

Foradil Certihaler has more recently become available in the market in the United States for adults and children 5 years and older. The small DPI is breath actuated and delivers 8.5 μg of drug on each breath. It is recommended to be taken twice daily.

The use of liquid nebulization is still very popular with many patients and is a great alternative to MDI and DPI use. Perforomist is available in a liquid nebulization form of 20 μg/2 mL unit dose and is prescribed twice daily. Currently, it is approved only for use with COPD at present.

The chemical structure of formoterol is shown in Figure 6-8. As with salmeterol, the extensive side chain, or “tail,” makes formoterol more lipophilic than the shorter acting bronchodilators and is the basis for its longer duration of effect. The increased lipophilicity of salmeterol and formoterol allows the drugs to remain in the lipid cell membrane. Even if a tissue preparation containing the drugs is perfused or washed, the drug activity persists. Salmeterol is more lipophilic than formoterol, and this along with its anchoring capability may explain why salmeterol is less prone to being “washed away” than formoterol.18

Bronchodilator effect.

Similar to salmeterol, formoterol has a prolonged duration of bronchodilating effect of up to 12 hours. In contrast to salmeterol, the onset of action for formoterol is significantly faster. The time from inhalation to significant bronchodilation is similar to that of albuterol. It has been reported that 1 minute after inhalation of formoterol there is a significant increase in specific airway conductance (SGAW).20 The onset of bronchodilation is generally considered to be 2 to 3 minutes with formoterol compared with 10 minutes or longer with salmeterol. Figure 6-9 shows the dose-proportional response to inhaled (R,R)-formoterol, the single isomer isolated from the racemic mixture of (R,R)-formoterol and (S,S)-formoterol, compared with inhaled racemic albuterol.21 In a study by van Noord and colleagues22 comparing racemic formoterol, 24 μg; salmeterol, 50 μg; and albuterol, 200 μg, the increase in SGAW (airway conductance) after 1 minute was 44%, less than 16%, and 44%. The time to maximal increase in airway conductance was 2 hours, 2 to 4 hours, and 30 minutes for the three drugs. The maximal increase was 135%, 111%, and 100%.20,22

The efficacy of formoterol in relaxing airway smooth muscle (its maximal effect) is greater than that of albuterol, which is greater than that of salmeterol. The lower intrinsic efficacy of salmeterol would make it a better agent than formoterol for patients with cardiovascular disease.18

Antiinflammatory effects

Both the short-acting and the long-acting β agonists show antiinflammatory effects in vitro. Salmeterol, formoterol, and arformoterol inhibit human mast cell activation and degranulation in vitro, prevent an increase in vascular permeability with inflammatory mediators, and generally diminish the attraction and accumulation of airway inflammatory cells.18 Despite these in vitro antiinflammatory effects, salmeterol and formoterol have not been shown to inhibit accumulation of inflammatory cells in the airway or the increase in inflammatory markers in vivo. Neither drug is considered to have a sufficient effect on airway inflammation in patients with asthma to replace antiinflammatory drugs such as corticosteroids.

Clinical use

Long-acting β agonists are indicated for maintenance therapy of asthma that is not controlled by regular low-dose inhaled corticosteroids and for COPD needing daily inhaled bronchodilator therapy for reversible airway obstruction. National guidelines recommend the introduction of a long-acting β agonist in step 3 care of asthma (asthma not controlled by lower doses of antiinflammatory medications)1 and use as deemed necessary for COPD.23 Use of long-acting β agonists may prevent the need to increase the inhaled dose of corticosteroid. Several points should be noted in the clinical use of long-acting agents because of their differences from shorter acting β agonists.

• Long-acting β2 agonists are not recommended for rescue bronchodilation because repeated administration with their longer duration and increased lipophilic property risk accumulation and toxicity.18

• A shorter acting β2 agonist, such as albuterol or other agents previously discussed, should be prescribed and available for asthmatics for treatment of breakthrough symptoms if additional bronchodilator therapy is needed between scheduled doses of a long-acting β2 agonist; asthmatics must be well educated in the appropriate use of the two types of β agonists (shorter acting versus long-acting).

• Although they have antiinflammatory effects, short-acting or long-acting β agonists are not a substitute for inhaled corticosteroids in asthma maintenance or for other antiinflammatory medications if such are required.

• The difference in rate of onset between salmeterol and formoterol may require classifying β2 agonists as “fast” and “slow” in addition to “short” and “long” acting, with salmeterol classified as a slow and long-acting bronchodilator versus formoterol as a fast and long-acting bronchodilator.24

The addition of a long-acting β2 agonist to inhaled corticosteroids can lead to improved lung function and a decrease in symptoms.25 A combination product of salmeterol and fluticasone in a Diskus inhaler (Advair Diskus) showed superior asthma control and better lung function than either drug taken alone.2629 Because of their prolonged bronchodilation, long-acting β2 agonists taken twice daily have a greater area under the FEV1 curve compared with short-acting agents taken four times daily. Figure 6-10 illustrates dose-response curves for albuterol and salmeterol. In contrast to albuterol, which tends to return to baseline in 4 to 6 hours, salmeterol provides a more sustained level of bronchodilation, giving a higher baseline of lung function.30 The same effect has been found in comparing twice-daily salmeterol with four-times-daily inhaled ipratropium bromide, a shorter acting anticholinergic bronchodilator that is discussed in Chapter 7.31

image
Figure 6-10 Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) response and duration of effect for inhaled salmeterol, 42 μg twice daily; albuterol, 180 μg four times daily; and placebo. (Modified from Pearlman DS, Chervinsky P, LaForce C, et al: A comparison of salmeterol with albuterol in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma, N Engl J Med 327:1420, © 1992 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.)

Salpeter and associates,32 in a meta-analysis, reported that long-acting β2 agonists increased the risk of asthma hospitalizations and deaths compared with placebo. Nelson and colleagues33 also described an increase in death rate among patients using salmeterol; their findings reported the highest death rate among African Americans. These studies did not take into account the severity of asthma or whether the participants used other medications. Asthma in some participants may have been worse than in others. Concerning cotreatments, the studies could not account for other medications participants may have been taking or with what regularity they were taking them. The latter could have serious consequences if, for example, a participant stopped using inhaled corticosteroids that were prescribed to treat asthma. Any of these variables—asthma severity, presence of cotreatments, and patient adherence—could affect interpretation of data. Nevertheless, the labeling of these agents has been changed to warn that death can occur.

Because of the ongoing concerns of safety of long-acting β2 agonists, the FDA is now requiring changes on how long-acting β2 agonists are used in the treatment of asthma. As of June 2, 2010, the FDA now requires the following:

Mode of action

The bronchodilating action of the adrenergic drugs is due to stimulation of β2 receptors located on bronchial smooth muscle. In addition to β2 receptors, some adrenergic bronchodilators can stimulate α and β1 receptors, with the following clinical effects:

Both α and β receptors are examples of G protein–linked receptors. Table 6-2 lists each of the adrenergic receptor types, along with its particular type of G protein, effector system, and second messenger and an example of cell response in the lungs. As described in Chapter 2, the G protein is a heterotrimer whose α subunit differentiates the type of G protein. The G protein couples the adrenergic receptor to the effector enzyme, which initiates the cell response by means of a particular intracellular second messenger. The mode of action with β-receptor, α2-receptor, and α1-receptor stimulation is described for each.

TABLE 6-2

Adrenergic Receptor Types: G Proteins, Effector Systems, Second Messengers, and Examples of Cell Responses

RECEPTOR G PROTEIN EFFECTOR SECOND MESSENGER RESPONSE
α1 Gq Phospholipase C (PLC) Inositol triphosphate (IP3), diacylglycerol (DAG) Vasoconstriction
α2 Gi Adenylyl cyclase (inhibits) cAMP (inhibits) Inhibition of neurotransmitter release
β (β1, β2, β3) Gs Adenylyl cyclase (stimulates) cAMP (increases) Smooth muscle relaxation

image

cAMP, Cyclic adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate.

β-receptor and α2-receptor activation

The mode of action of β agonists and the β receptors has been well characterized, although the activity of α receptors is not as well understood. The mode of action for relaxation of airway smooth muscle when a β2 receptor is stimulated is illustrated in Figure 6-11. Adrenergic agonists such as albuterol or epinephrine attach to β receptors, which are polypeptide chains that traverse the cell membrane seven times and have an extracellular NH2 terminus and an intracellular carboxy (COOH) terminus. This attachment causes activation of the stimulatory G protein, designated Gs. The actual binding site of a β agonist is within the cell membrane, inside the “barrel” or circle formed by the transmembrane loops of the receptor chain. The β agonist forms bonds with elements of the third, fifth, and sixth transmembrane loops. When stimulated by a β agonist, the receptor undergoes a conformational change, which reduces the affinity of the α subunit of the G protein for guanosine diphosphate (GDP). The GDP is replaced by GTP, and the α subunit dissociates from the receptor and the β-γ portion of the G protein to link with the effector system. The effector system for the β receptor is adenylyl cyclase, a membrane-bound enzyme. Activation of adenylyl cyclase by the α subunit of the Gs protein causes increased synthesis of the second messenger, cyclic adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate (cAMP). cAMP may cause smooth muscle relaxation by increasing the inactivation of myosin light chain kinase, an enzyme that initiates myosin-actin interaction and subsequent smooth muscle contraction. An increase in cAMP also leads to a decrease in intracellular calcium.

A similar sequence of events is responsible for the action of α2-receptor stimulation, which can inhibit further neurotransmitter release from the presynaptic neuron when stimulated by norepinephrine in a feedback, autoregulatory fashion (see Chapter 5). However, stimulation of α2 receptors (not shown in Figure 6-11) results in activation of an inhibitory G protein, designated Gi, whose α subunit serves to inhibit the enzyme adenylyl cyclase, lowering the rate of synthesis for intracellular cAMP.

α1-receptor activation

Stimulation of an α1 receptor by an agonist such as phenylephrine or epinephrine (which has affinity for both α and β receptors) results in vasoconstriction of peripheral blood vessels, including vessels in the airway. The mode of action for this effect as mediated by the G protein–linked α1 receptor is illustrated in Figure 6-12. Stimulation of the α1 receptor causes a conformational change in the receptor, which activates the G protein designated Gq. With activation, GDP dissociates from the G protein; GTP binds to the α subunit of the G protein; and the α subunit dissociates from the β-γ dimer, to activate the effector phospholipase C (PLC). Activation of the effector, PLC, leads to the conversion of membrane phosphoinositides into inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). IP3 stimulates release of intracellular stores of calcium into the cytoplasm of the cell, and DAG activates protein kinase C. Contraction of vascular smooth muscle results.

Salmeterol, formoterol, and arformoterol: mechanism of action

The action of salmeterol in providing sustained protection from bronchoconstriction differs to a degree from that of the previously described adrenergic bronchodilators. The difference in pharmacodynamics of salmeterol is reflected in its pharmacokinetics with a slower onset and time to peak effect and a longer duration of action compared with previous adrenergic agents.

The structure of salmeterol is shown in Figure 6-3, along with that of other β agonists for comparison. The drug is a modification of the saligenin albuterol, with a long nonpolar (i.e., lipophilic) N-substituted side chain. Salmeterol consists of a polar, or hydrophilic, phenyl ethanolamine “head,” with a large lipophilic “tail” or side chain. As a result of this structure, salmeterol is lipophilic, in contrast to most β agonists, which are hydrophilic and approach the β receptor directly from the aqueous extracellular space. In contrast, salmeterol, as a lipophilic molecule, diffuses into the cell membrane phospholipid bilayer and approaches the β receptor laterally, as shown in Figure 6-13. The lipophilic nonpolar side chain binds to an area of the β receptor referred to as the exosite, a hydrophobic region. With the side chain (“tail”) anchored in the exosite, the active saligenin “head” binds to and activates the β receptor at the same location as albuterol.

The binding properties of salmeterol, formoterol, and arformoterol differ from those of albuterol and other β agonists. Because the side chain of salmeterol is anchored at the exosite, the active “head” portion continually attaches to and detaches from the receptor site. This activity provides ongoing stimulation of the β receptor and is the basis for the persistent duration of action of salmeterol. This model of activity is supported by studies of the effect of β antagonists on the β-agonist action of salmeterol and molecular binding studies. If albuterol is attached to the β receptor, the smooth muscle relaxation can be fully reversed by a β-blocking agent such as propranolol or sotalol, indicating a competitive blockade. When the β-blocking agent is removed, there is no further relaxation of smooth muscle. The albuterol has been displaced, and the action of the drug is terminated. If salmeterol stimulates a receptor, a β antagonist such as propranolol would also reverse the effect of relaxation. However, when the propranolol is removed from the tissue, the relaxant effect of salmeterol is reestablished. This indicates that the salmeterol remains anchored in the receptor and is available to stimulate the β receptor continually after the blocking agent is removed.15

The prolonged activity of formoterol is also thought to be due to its lipophilicity, although formoterol is less lipophilic than salmeterol. Formoterol and arformoterol, which is moderately lipophilic, enter the bilipid cell membrane, where they are retained, with the lipid layer acting as a depot and giving a long-acting effect. At the same time, formoterol and arformoterol can approach the β receptor from the aqueous phase, giving it a rapid onset of action.20

Routes of administration

β-adrenergic bronchodilators are currently available for inhalation (MDI, nebulizer solution, or DPI), oral administration (tablets or syrup), and parenteral administration (injection), although not all agents are found in each form. Regardless of the route of administration, there are three general patterns to the time course of bronchodilation with drugs in this group. The catecholamines show a rapid onset of 1 to 3 minutes, a peak effect at about 15 to 20 minutes, and a rapid decline in effect after 1 hour. The noncatecholamines (resorcinols and saligenins), with the exception of salmeterol, show an onset of 5 to 15 minutes, a peak effect at 30 to 60 minutes, and a duration of 4 to 6 hours. Salmeterol differs significantly, with a slower onset (more than 20 minutes) and peak effect (at about 3 hours) and a 12-hour duration. Formoterol and arformoterol are similar in duration to salmeterol but with an onset as rapid as that of albuterol. Aside from these general patterns, which depend on the type of drug used, the route of administration further affects the time course of a drug. Inhaled and injected adrenergic bronchodilators have a quicker onset than orally administered agents.

Inhalation route

All of the β-adrenergic bronchodilators marketed in the United States are available for inhalation delivery, using an MDI, a nebulizer (including intermittent positive-pressure breathing nebulization), or a DPI. Catecholamines must be given by inhalation because they are ineffective orally. Inhalation is the preferred route for administering β-adrenergic drugs for all of the following reasons:

The use of aerosol delivery during an acute attack of airway obstruction has been questioned. However, several studies have failed to show substantial differences between inhaled and parenteral β-adrenergic agents in acute severe asthma.34,35 There is no reason to avoid these bronchodilators as inhaled aerosols during acute episodes.36 The inhalation route targets the lung directly. Combining oral delivery with additional inhalation has been shown to produce good additive effects with albuterol.37

The major difficulties with aerosol administration are the time needed for nebulization (5 to 10 minutes), the possible embarrassment of using an MDI in public or at school, and inability to use an MDI correctly. Difficulty in correctly using an MDI can be remedied by using spacer devices or, alternatively, by using a gas-powered handheld nebulizer. A DPI can eliminate problems associated with nebulizers and MDIs.

Continuous nebulization

Administration of inhaled adrenergic agents by continuous nebulization has been used to manage severe asthma, in an effort to avoid respiratory failure, intubation, and mechanical ventilation. The Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma released by NAEPP EPR 3 recommend 2.5 to 5 mg of albuterol by nebulizer every 20 minutes for three doses and 10 to 15 mg/hr by continuous nebulization.1 Because a nebulizer treatment takes approximately 10 minutes, giving three treatments every 20 minutes requires repeated therapist attendance. Continuous administration by nebulizer may simplify such frequent treatments. The use of continuous nebulization of β-agonist bronchodilators was reviewed by Fink and Dhand,38 who presented a summary of studies, including dosages used. With continuous nebulization, there are no general standards for doses other than the recommendation from NAEPP EPR 3; in the studies cited by Fink and Dhand,38 dosages vary from 2.5 to 15 mg/hr and include schedules based on milligrams per kilogram per hour.

The impact and optimal use of continuous nebulization versus intermittent nebulization are unclear. In the five randomized controlled trials cited by Fink and Dhand,38 there was similar improvement between continuous versus intermittent nebulization. One study by Lin and associates39 showed faster improvement using continuous nebulization in patients with FEV1 less than 50% of predicted. A study by Shrestha and colleagues40 compared a high dose (7.5 mg) and low dose (2.5 mg) of albuterol with both continuous and intermittent nebulization. FEV1 improved more with continuous than intermittent nebulization, and the low dose of 2.5 mg was as effective as the higher dose of 7.5 mg with continuous administration. These and other results suggest that there is a benefit to continuous nebulization in severe airflow obstruction, but a dose less than 10 to 15 mg/hr may be effective, with less toxicity. Less clinician time is required for the administration of continuous nebulization. Fink and Dhand38 suggested that for emergency department patients with severe airway obstruction, who do not respond sufficiently after 1 hour of intermittent nebulization of β agonists, continuous nebulization offers a practical approach to optimal dosing in a cost-effective manner.

Toxicity and monitoring.

Continuous nebulization of β2 agonists is not standard therapy, and patients receiving this treatment have serious airflow obstruction. Potential complications include cardiac arrhythmias, hypokalemia, and hyperglycemia. Unifocal premature ventricular contractions were reported in one patient by Portnoy and associates.42 Significant tremor may also occur. Subsensitivity to continuous therapy was not observed by Portnoy and associates. Close monitoring of patients receiving continuous β agonists is necessary and includes observation and cardiac and electrolyte monitoring. Selective β2 agonists, such as albuterol, should be used to reduce side effects.

Oral route

The oral route has the advantages of ease, simplicity, short time required for administration, and exact reproducibility and control of dosage. However, In terms of clinical effects, this is not the preferred route. The time course of oral β agonists differs from that of inhaled β agonists. The onset of action begins in about 1.5 hours, with a peak effect reached after 1 to 2 hours and a duration of action between 3 and 6 hours.43 Larger doses are required than with inhalation, and the frequency and degree of unwanted side effects increase substantially. Catecholamines are ineffective by mouth, as previously discussed. Noncatecholamine bronchodilators in the adrenergic group seem to lose their β2 specificity with oral use, possibly because of the reduction of the side chain bulk in a first pass through the liver.44 Patient compliance on a three- or four-times-daily schedule may be better than with a nebulizer. If this is the case with an individual patient and the side effects are tolerable, oral use may be indicated for bronchodilator therapy. The introduction of an oral tablet of albuterol with extended action properties (Repetab, Volmax) offers the possibility of protection from bronchoconstriction for longer than 8 hours. However, inhaled salmeterol and formoterol now offer a 12-hour duration. Either the extended-release tablet or a long-acting β agonist is advantageous in preventing nocturnal asthma and deterioration of flow rates in the morning.

Parenteral route

β-adrenergic bronchodilators have been given subcutaneously and intravenously, usually in the emergency management of acute asthma. Subcutaneously, epinephrine 0.3 mg (0.3 mL of 1:1000 strength), every 15 to 20 minutes up to 1 mg in 2 hours, and terbutaline, 0.25 mg (0.25 mL of a 1-mg/mL solution) repeated in 15 to 30 minutes, not exceeding 0.5 mg in 4 hours, have been used. Shim45 suggested that for practical purposes both aerosolized and subcutaneous routes should be used to manage acute obstruction, although there may be little difference in effect with the two routes. No difference in effect between epinephrine and terbutaline has been found when given subcutaneously.

The intravenous route has been used most commonly with isoproterenol and with albuterol. Intravenous administration of these agents was thought to be useful during severe obstruction because these agents would be distributed throughout the lungs, whereas aerosol delivery would not allow them to penetrate the periphery. This assumption is questionable for both subcutaneous and intravenous bronchodilator therapy because aerosols do exert an effect with obstruction. Intravenous isoproterenol is not clearly advantageous as a bronchodilator, although this route is used for cardiac stimulation in shock and bradycardia. The dose-limiting factor is tachycardia. Intravenous therapy is a last resort and requires an infusion pump, cardiac monitor, and close attention. Pediatric dosages range from 0.1 to 0.8 μg/kg/min, and adult dosages range from 0.03 to 0.2 μg/kg/min, until bronchial relaxation or side effects occur.45 The combination of myocardial stimulation and hypoxia can cause serious arrhythmias; intravenous isoproterenol should be avoided in acute asthma, in favor of β2-specific agents. Albuterol has been given intravenously as a bolus of 100 to 500 μg or by infusion of 4 to 25 μg/min.46 Although albuterol is more β2 specific by aerosol than isoproterenol, the usefulness of intravenous administration compared with oral, aerosol, or subcutaneous administration is not clearly established.

Adverse side effects

Just as adrenergic bronchodilators exert a therapeutic effect by stimulation of α-adrenergic, β1-adrenergic, or β2-adrenergic receptors, they can likewise cause unwanted effects as a result of stimulation of these receptors. Generally, the term side effect indicates any effect other than the intended therapeutic effect. The most common clinically observed side effects of adrenergic bronchodilators are listed in Box 6-2 and are briefly discussed. The number and severity of these side effects vary among patients; not every side effect is seen with each patient. The later adrenergic agents (albuterol, bitolterol, pirbuterol, levalbuterol, and salmeterol) are much more β2 specific than previous agents such as ephedrine, epinephrine, or isoproterenol, and because of this, there is a greater likelihood of cardiac stimulation causing tachycardia and blood pressure increases with the last three agents than with the newer drugs. The more recent agents are safe, and the side effects listed are more of a nuisance than a danger and are easily monitored by clinicians. The introduction of single-isomer β agonists such as levalbuterol may show a further specificity and decrease in side effects, which are potentially caused by the detrimental effects of the (S)-isomer of β agonists.

Tremor

The annoying effect of muscle tremor with β agonists is due to stimulation of β2 receptors in skeletal muscle. It is dose related and is the dose-limiting side effect of the β2-specific agents, especially with oral administration. The adrenergic receptors mediating muscle tremor have been shown to be of the β2 type.47,48 As shown previously, this side effect is much more noticeable with oral delivery, which provides a rationale for aerosol administration of these agents. Tolerance to the side effect of tremor usually develops after days to weeks with the oral route, and patients should be reassured of this when beginning to use these drugs.

Cardiac effects

The older adrenergic agents with strong β1-stimulating and α-stimulating effects were considered dangerous in the presence of congestive heart failure. The dose-limiting side effect with these agents is tachycardia. They increase cardiac output and oxygen consumption by stimulating β1 receptors, leading to a decrease in cardiac efficiency, which is the work relative to oxygen consumption. Newer agents have a preferential β2 effect to minimize cardiac stimulation. However, tachycardia may also follow use of the newer agents, and there is evidence that this is due to the presence of β2 receptors even in the heart.49 β2 agonists cause vasodilation, and this can cause a reflex tachycardia. Despite this effect, agents such as terbutaline or albuterol can actually improve cardiac performance. Albuterol and terbutaline can cause peripheral vasodilation and increase myocardial contractility without increasing oxygen demand by the heart.34 The net effect is to reduce afterload and improve cardiac output with no oxygen cost. These agents are therefore attractive for use with airway obstruction combined with congestive heart failure.

Seider and colleagues50 reported that neither heart rate nor frequency of premature beats was significantly affected by inhaled terbutaline or ipratropium bromide (an anticholinergic bronchodilator) in 14 patients with COPD and ischemic heart disease. Although there are no written standards, most health care practitioners accept no more than a 20% change in pretreatment pulse after bronchodilator therapy has been initiated. This is why it is important to check the pulse rate before, during, and after bronchodilator therapy to evaluate cardiac response. If the pulse rate has increased more than 20% relative to the pretreatment pulse, stopping treatment with referral to the prescribing health care practitioner may be warranted to prevent unwanted cardiac effects.

Tolerance to bronchodilator effect

Adaptation to a drug with repeated use is a concern because use of the drug is actually reducing its effectiveness. With β agonists, there is in vitro evidence of an acute desensitization of the β receptor within minutes of exposure to a β agonist as well as a longer term desensitization. Figure 6-14 shows both an acute decrease in response during sustained exposure of the receptor to the agonist and a long-term decrease in maximal response with subsequent drug exposure. This decrease in bronchodilator response has been observed with short-acting and long-acting β agonists.

Exposure of cells with β receptors to isoproterenol causes a short-term, acute reduction in adenylyl cyclase activity and production of cAMP. The immediate desensitization is caused by an “uncoupling” of the receptor and the effector enzyme adenylyl cyclase.51 A model for desensitization of the β receptor is diagrammed in Figure 6-15. When stimulated by a β agonist, the β receptor goes into a low-affinity binding state (i.e., has reduced affinity for binding with a β agonist). Simultaneously, the β agonist causes an increase in cAMP, which increases protein kinase A, also referred to as β-adrenergic receptor kinase (β-ARK). β-ARK causes phosphorylation (transfer of phosphate groups [P]) of the hydroxyl groups (OH) on the carboxy-terminal portion of the β receptor. This phosphorylation induces binding of a protein named β-arrestin, which prevents the receptor from interacting with Gs and disrupts the coupling of Gs with the effector enzyme adenylyl cyclase. Removal of the β agonist allows the dissociation of β-arrestin and the phosphate groups from the receptor, and the receptor returns to a fully active state.

Long-term desensitization is considered to be caused by a reduction in the number of β receptors; this is termed downregulation. Both norepinephrine and albuterol have caused a reduction of almost 50% in vitro in the number of β-adrenergic receptors in airway smooth muscle of guinea pigs.51 Exposure of isolated human bronchus to isoproterenol or terbutaline produces similar desensitization.52 Long-term desensitization is also illustrated in Figure 6-14, as indicated by the lower peak response to subsequent administration of an adrenergic agonist.

Although use of an inhaled β agonist does cause a reduction in peak effect, the bronchodilator response is still significant and stabilizes within several weeks with continued use.18 Such tolerance is not generally considered clinically important and does not contraindicate the use of these agents. The same phenomenon of tolerance is also responsible for diminished side effects, such as muscle tremor, among patients regularly using inhaled β-agonist bronchodilators.

In addition to loss of receptors (downregulation) by exposure to a β agonist, altered β-receptor function may be caused secondary to inflammation. Increased levels of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) may destabilize membrane support of the β receptor, changing its function. Cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) may cause desensitization, and platelet-activating factor (PAF) inhibits the relaxing effect of isoproterenol on human tracheal tissue.

Corticosteroids can reverse the desensitization of β receptors and are said to be able to potentiate the response to β agonists.53 Corticosteroids have the following effects, in relation to β-agonist and β-receptor function:

β agonists may have a positive effect on corticosteroid function and activity. A review by Anderson25 explored possible mechanisms for the beneficial interaction of β agonists and corticosteroids.

Loss of bronchoprotection

A distinction was found by Ahrens and colleagues54 to exist between the bronchodilating effect and the bronchoprotective effect of β agonists. The bronchodilating effect of a β agonist can be measured on the basis of airflow change, as indicated by a change in FEV1 or peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). The bronchoprotective effect refers to the reaction of the airways to challenge by provocative stimuli such as allergens or irritants and is measured with doses of histamine, methacholine, or cold air. Ahrens and colleagues54 found that the protective effect with agonists such as metaproterenol or albuterol declines more rapidly than the bronchodilating effect. Not only is there a difference in time between these effects, but also it was found that tolerance occurs with the bronchoprotective effect of a β agonist, just as with the bronchodilating effect. Results from a study by O’Connor and associates55 are shown in Figure 6-16. The difference in dose of adenosine (AMP) and methacholine required to induce a 20% decline in FEV1 (PC20) after the inhalation of terbutaline compared with placebo is seen before and after 7 days of steady treatment with terbutaline. Airway response to challenge is seen to occur with a significantly lower dose of either AMP or methacholine in subjects with mild asthma, after 7 days of β-agonist exposure, showing tolerance to the protective effect of terbutaline. The development of tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of the long-acting β agonist salmeterol was shown to occur both in the absence of corticosteroid therapy (by Bhagat and colleagues56) and with concomitant inhaled corticosteroid treatment (by Kalra and associates57). In a study by Rosenthal and associates,58 after the first 4 weeks of regular treatment with salmeterol, there was no increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness or loss of bronchoprotection. Sustained improvements were seen in pulmonary function and asthma symptom control.58

image
Figure 6-16 Data of O’Connor and colleagues55 showing decrease in the challenge dose of adenosine (AMP) and methacholine after inhaling 500 μg of terbutaline compared with placebo, before and after a 7-day treatment period with terbutaline, indicating a loss of protection against airway stimuli with regular terbutaline use, especially with the inflammatory agent AMP. The higher the number of doubling doses needed for bronchoconstriction, the lower the airway responsiveness—that is, the greater the airway protection. (From O’Connor BJ, Aikman SL, Barnes PJ: Tolerance to the nonbronchodilator effects of inhaled β2-agonists in asthma, N Engl J Med 327:1204, © 1992 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.)

The mechanism underlying the increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness with use of β agonists is unclear. Evidence accumulating on the effects of the (S)-isomer of β agonists suggests a possible cause.59 The same effects could conceivably be implicated in the reduction in maximal bronchodilator effect with repeated use.

Fall in arterial oxygen pressure

A decrease in arterial oxygen pressure (Pao2) has been noted with isoproterenol administration during asthmatic bronchospasm, as ventilation improves and the exacerbation is relieved. The same effect has subsequently been noted with newer β agonists such as albuterol and salmeterol.60 The mechanism seems to be an increase in perfusion (i.e., blood flow) of poorly ventilated portions of the lung. It is known that regional alveolar hypoxia produces regional pulmonary vasoconstriction in an effort to shunt perfusion to lung areas of higher oxygen tension. This vasoconstriction is probably accomplished by α-sympathetic receptors.61

Administration of inhaled β agonists may reverse hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction by β2 stimulation, increasing perfusion to underventilated lung regions.62 Preferential delivery of the inhaled aerosol to better ventilated lung regions increases the ventilation-perfusion mismatch. It has been noted that such decreases in Pao2 are statistically significant but physiologically may be negligible.60,63 Oxygen tension decreases most in subjects with the highest initial Pao2. Decreases in Pao2 rarely exceed 10 mm Hg, and the Pao2 values tend to be on the flat portion of the oxyhemoglobin curve so that decreases in arterial oxygen saturation (Sao2) are minimized. Oxygen tensions usually return to baseline within 30 minutes.

Metabolic disturbances

Adrenergic bronchodilators can increase blood glucose and insulin levels and decrease serum potassium levels. This is a normal effect of sympathomimetics. In diabetic patients, clinicians should be aware of a possible effect on glucose and insulin levels. Hypokalemia has also been reported after parenteral administration of albuterol and epinephrine.64 The clinical importance of this side effect is controversial, and it would be of concern mainly for patients with cardiac disease or in interpreting serum potassium levels obtained shortly after use of adrenergic bronchodilators. The mechanism of the effect on potassium is probably activation of the sodium-potassium pump by the β receptor, with enhanced transport of potassium from the extracellular to the intracellular compartment. Such metabolic effects are minimized with inhaled aerosols of β-adrenergic agents because plasma levels of the drug remain low.

Propellant toxicity and paradoxic bronchospasm

The use of MDIs powered by CFC (e.g., Freon) can cause bronchospasm of hyperreactive airways. This reaction to the propellant was shown by Yarbrough and colleagues.65 They found that 7% of 175 subjects who used an MDI with placebo and propellant experienced a decrease of 10% or more in FEV1. The incidence was about 4% when using an MDI with metaproterenol and propellant, probably because the bronchodilating effect overcame the propellant effect. In most cases, bronchospasm lasts less than 3 minutes. There is apparently no noticeable difference in adverse reactions among patients using a CFC MDI and patients using an HFA MDI.66 A dry powder formulation is an ideal alternative formulation to an MDI if sensitivity to propellants exists, assuming drug availability and adequate inspiratory flow rate. Use of a nebulizer instead of an MDI may also be considered if bronchospasm occurs in a patient. Finally, the oral route offers an alternative to the inhalation route of administration. Cocchetto and associates67 reviewed the literature on paradoxic bronchospasm with use of inhalation aerosols.

Sensitivity to additives

An increasingly publicized problem for individuals with hyperreactive airways is sensitivity to sulfite preservatives, with resulting bronchospasm. Sulfites are used as preservatives for food and are used as antioxidants for bronchodilator solutions to prevent degradation and inactivation. Sulfites include sodium or potassium sulfite, bisulfite, and metabisulfite. When a sulfite is placed in solution, at warm temperature in an acid pH such as saliva, it converts to sulfurous acid and sulfur dioxide. Sulfur dioxide is known to cause bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients. A solution of racemic epinephrine is known to contain sulfites as preservatives. There have been reports of coughing and wheezing and pruritus after use of sulfite-containing bronchodilators.

Other additives and preservatives that can potentially have an effect on airway smooth muscle include benzalkonium chloride (BAC), ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), and hydrochloric or sulfuric acid to adjust pH of the solution. Asmus and colleagues68 recommended that only additive-free, sterile-filled unit-dose bronchodilator solutions be used for nebulizer treatment of acute airflow obstruction, especially if doses are given hourly or continuously. Clinicians should check aerosol formulations for BAC or EDTA, and if symptoms of bronchoconstriction occur, consider these as a possible cause.

Compatibility of other agents with bronchodilators

Respiratory therapists often mix multiple agents into the liquid medication cup of nebulizer. However, most, if not all, agents are not FDA approved to be mixed with other agents.

Several studies have tested the compatibility of common bronchodilators with other agents used in respiratory care. Kamin and associates69 found no chemical changes when they mixed albuterol with ipratropium, cromolyn, budesonide, tobramycin, or colistin. However, when antibiotics are to be administered in a nebulizer, it is best to separate the antibiotics and administer in the nebulizer individually. Bonasia and colleagues70 reported that levalbuterol is compatible with ipratropium, cromolyn, acetylcysteine, and budesonide for at least 30 minutes at room temperature. Akapo and coworkers71 discovered that formoterol nebulizer solution was compatible with ipratropium, cromolyn, acetylcysteine, and budesonide.

Mixing solutions is a common practice, and the literature supports the mixing of many common agents used in respiratory care. Mixing of agents should be done with caution, however. Special attention should be directed to the nebulizer in use and its function.

β-agonist controversy

The asthma paradox is a descriptive phrase for the increasing incidence of asthma morbidity, and especially asthma mortality, despite advances in the understanding of asthma and availability of improved drugs to treat asthma. Many studies have implicated the use of short-acting β agonists in asthma near-death emergencies and deaths,72,73 worsening clinical outcomes,74,75 and increased hyperreactivity.76,77 The events described in these studies may have been related to lack of corticosteroid use, leaving uncontrolled asthma symptoms to be treated only with short-acting β agonists.

Short-acting drugs, such as albuterol, and long-acting agents, such as salmeterol, have not in general been associated with a significant worsening of asthma.78 However, more recent evidence has indicated that long-acting β agonists may have a potential to increase asthma hospitalization or cause death.32,33 It has been noted that regular use of fenoterol and isoproterenol, but not other β agonists, may lead to worsening asthma control.59 Tolerance to the bronchodilator effect does occur with the use of β agonists, although this stabilizes and does not progress. There is an increase in bronchial hyperreactivity after institution of regular β-agonist therapy, which is not well explained. Evidence suggests that this effect may be caused or enhanced by the (S)-enantiomer of β agonists, which has a range of proinflammatory effects.

Asthma morbidity and mortality

A complete analysis of the relationship between β agonists and worsening asthma based on the literature seems to indicate that there is not a class effect of these drugs causing deterioration of asthma.59 Although it is unclear that β-agonist use increases risk of morbidity or death from asthma, asthma mortality is reported to be increasing in the United States and worldwide, despite more available treatment options, including β2-specific and longer acting adrenergic bronchodilators.79 There are several causes, not all involving β-agonist therapy, that may potentially lead to worsening asthma severity:

• Use of β agonists may allow allergic individuals to expose themselves to allergens and stimuli, with no immediate symptoms to warn them but with development of progressive airway inflammation and increasing bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

• Repeated self-administration of β agonists gives temporary relief of asthma symptoms through bronchodilation, which may cause underestimation of severity and delay in seeking medical help. β agonists do not block progressive airway inflammation, which can lead to death from lethal airway obstruction and hypoxia.

• Use of β agonists to alleviate symptoms of wheezing and resistance may lead to insufficient use, through poor patient education, poor patient compliance, or both, of antiinflammatory therapy to control the basic inflammatory nature of asthma.

• Accumulation of the (S)-isomer with racemic β agonists could exert a detrimental effect on asthma control.

• There is increased airway irritation with environmental pollution and lifestyle changes.80

Discussion of the relationship of β-agonist use to asthma morbidity and mortality should review the use of β agonists in the context of the NAEPP guidelines. The 1991, 1997, 2002, and 2007 documents all stress that asthma is a disease of chronic airway inflammation. Treatment with regular β-agonist therapy in severe asthma (asthma requiring step 2 care or greater) does not address the underlying inflammatory process. In evaluating β-agonist therapy in asthma, one must evaluate concomitant antiinflammatory therapy (or the lack of it) and environmental management of the asthma.

imageRESPIRATORY CARE ASSESSMENT OF β-AGONIST THERAPY

Long term

imageSELF-ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS

1. Identify two adrenergic bronchodilators used clinically that are catecholamines.

2. Which of the catecholamine bronchodilators given by aerosol is β2 specific?

3. What is the duration of action of the catecholamine bronchodilators?

4. Identify two advantages introduced with the modifications of the catecholamine structure in adrenergic bronchodilators.

5. Identify the usual dose by aerosol for an SVN for levalbuterol and albuterol.

6. What is an extremely common side effect with β2-adrenergic bronchodilators?

7. Identify the approximate duration of action for epinephrine, pirbuterol, and salmeterol.

8. Identify the generic drug for each of the following brand names: Brovana, Maxair, Serevent Diskus, Ventolin HFA.

9. Which route of administration is more likely to have greater severity of side effects with a β agonist, oral or inhaled aerosol?

10. You notice a pinkish tinge to aerosol rainout in the large-bore tubing connecting a patient’s mouthpiece to a nebulizer after a treatment with racemic epinephrine; what has caused this?

11. A patient exhibits paradoxic bronchoconstriction from the Freon propellant when using Primatene Mist by MDI. Suggest an alternative for the patient.

12. If you are working with an asthmatic with occasional symptoms of wheezing and chest tightness, which respond well to an inhaled β agonist, would you suggest using salmeterol?

13. Suggest a β agonist that would be appropriate for the patient in question 12.