Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Published on 03/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1856 times

21

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is a clonal malignancy of lymphoid precursor cells. In over 80% of cases the malignant cells are primitive precursors of B-lymphocytes and the remainder are T-cell leukaemias. The abnormal cell may arise at various stages of early lymphocyte differentiation (see p. 8).

ALL has a peak incidence in childhood with a gradual rise in incidence in later years (Fig 21.1). The disease has distinct characteristics in children and adults. Childhood ALL is often curable by chemotherapy whereas cure is elusive in adult ALL. Poorer outcome in adult ALL is due to a combination of a greater frequency of high-risk leukaemia with more drug resistance, and less effective treatment regimens.

Classification

The French-American-British (FAB) morphological classification is based on characteristics of the blast cells, including cell size, nuclear–cytoplasmic ratio, number and size of nucleoli and the degree of cytoplasmic basophilia (Fig 21.2). Morphological classification is now less important than that based on immunophenotyping, cytogenetics and molecular analysis (Table 21.1).

Definition of the immunological subtypes of ALL depends on the presence or absence of various cell surface and cytoplasmic antigens. A commonly used classification divides ALL into early pre-B, pre-B, B-cell and T-cell subtypes. Mature B-cell ALL typically has L3 morphology. The current WHO classification divides most ALL subtypes into B- or T-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma under the heading ‘precursor lymphoid neoplasms’. Mature B-ALL is included as Burkitt lymphoma.

In the selection of treatment it is important to differentiate between three broad groups; T-cell ALL, mature B-ALL and all other types of B-lineage ALL. Genetic abnormalities are becoming increasingly important in classification of ALL as they give vital prognostic information (Table 21.2).

Table 21.2

Chromosomal abnormalities in ALL

Abnormality   Prognostic significance
Numerical change    
High hyperdiploidy (over 50 chromosomes)   Favourable
Hyperdiploidy (47–50)   Intermediate
Pseudodiploidy (46 with structural/numerical change)   Intermediate
Hypodiploidy (less than 46)   Poor
Structural abnormality Genes involved  
Philadelphia chromosome, t(9;22)1 BCR-ABL Poor
t(12;21)2 TEL-AML1 (ETV6-RUNX1) Good
t(1;19) E2A-PBX1 Good
t(v;11q23) MLL-AF4, ENL-MLL Poor
t(8;14)3 MYC Good

1Must be distinguished from the lymphoid blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukaemia.

2Occurs in 20% cases of childhood ALL. Not detectable by standard cytogenetics.

3Seen in B-ALL with L3 morphology.

Clinical features

These can be very variable. Accumulation of malignant lymphoblasts in the marrow leads to a scarcity of normal cells in the peripheral blood and symptoms may include those associated with anaemia, infection and haemorrhage. Other common complaints are anorexia and back or joint pain. T-cell ALL is associated with a large mediastinal nodal mass and pleural effusions which result in dyspnoea. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is more often seen in ALL than in AML and patients can present with symptoms of raised intracranial pressure (headache, vomiting) or cranial nerve palsies (particularly VI and VII). Examination findings may include pallor, haemorrhage into the skin and mucosae, lymphadenopathy and moderate hepatosplenomegaly. In males the testes can be involved and should be routinely examined.

Diagnosis

5 Cytogenetics

Cytogenetic analysis is doubly useful as structural abnormalities correlate with particular subtypes of ALL and both structural and numerical abnormalities give prognostic information (see Table 21.2). Varying patterns of cytogenetic abnormality may partly explain the different prognosis in children and adults. The Philadelphia chromosome, regarded as a marker of ‘incurability’ by chemotherapy, is found in 20–30% of adult cases but in only 2% of children.

6 Molecular techniques

Molecular analysis yields complementary and additional information to conventional cytogenetics (see Table 21.2). The cryptic t(12;21) creates a TEL-AML1 (ETV6-RUNX1) fusion gene – this is the commonest genetic rearrangement in childhood ALL and it can only be detected by molecular techniques. Although not yet routinely available in most laboratories, global gene expression profiling reveals distinct patterns in specific subtypes of ALL (see p. 100).

Management and outcome

General principles

Patients with ALL require supportive care. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. Drug schedules vary but remission induction classically relies on three agents: vincristine, a glucocorticoid (e.g. prednisolone) and asparaginase. The anthracycline daunorubicin may be included in the induction regimen and other drugs, notably methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and cytosine arabinoside, then added in ‘intensification’ (‘consolidation’) (see p. 54 for more detail of individual drugs). The rationale for early intensification of treatment is to reduce the leukaemic cell population quickly and reduce the likelihood of drug resistance. Therapy is usually completed with a period of ‘maintenance’ using methotrexate and mercaptopurine. The greater chance of CNS disease in ALL (than in AML) necessitates prophylactic treatment to prevent CNS relapse. The usual method is intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy with the possible addition of cranial irradiation in those at highest risk.

The ultimate choice of management is influenced by a number of prognostic factors which have changed with improving treatment (Table 21.3). Where clinical and laboratory features predict a poor response to chemotherapy alone, more intensive treatments such as allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) are considered. Of all the prognostic indices the most influential is age.

ALL in children

The majority of children are curable with current chemotherapy regimens. The standard strategy is intensive induction therapy, CNS prophylaxis, and maintenance treatment for 2–2.5 years. In children receiving the most intensive protocols, 5-year disease-free survivals of nearly 90% are now achievable. Autologous and allogeneic SCT is best reserved for relapse after chemotherapy or for patients with poor prognostic features. New methods for detecting minimal residual disease during treatment (e.g. after induction) allow early identification of patients at high risk of relapse. Mature B-ALL is a special case best treated with short-term fractionated intensive chemotherapy. With improved cure rates the long-term side-effects of the drugs, including endocrine problems, secondary leukaemia and cardiotoxicity, are becoming increasingly relevant. Wherever feasible, the use of agents with the safest profiles is desirable.

ALL in adults

The majority of adult patients enter remission but are not curable with chemotherapy alone and less than 40% will become long-term survivors. Most chemocurable patients are aged between 16 and 25 years with other good prognostic features. This ‘good risk’ subgroup resembles childhood ALL and chemotherapy alone is a reasonable initial policy with cure rates of around 75%. For adults with higher-risk disease the hope of cure is likely to depend on even more intensive therapy with either autologous or allogeneic SCT. Allogeneic SCT from an HLA-matched family donor performed in first remission gives long-term survival of around 50%. SCT using an unrelated HLA-’matched’ donor is more risky but can be successful. In Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib is useful adjunctive therapy (see p. 45). Optimum management of adult ALL has yet to be defined and there is a need for careful consideration of all the known prognostic factors in each case. More elderly patients (over 60 years) tolerate chemotherapy less well and cure rates are very low. In these cases it is often kinder to concentrate on palliation of symptoms and provision of a short period of good quality life rather than undertaking aggressive chemotherapy with a negligible chance of success.