Acute liver failure

Published on 09/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2002 times

Chapter 47 ACUTE LIVER FAILURE

CAUSES OF ACUTE LIVER FAILURE

Acute liver failure represents a syndrome that is the final common pathway for a variety of liver insults. A cause for ALF can be established in approximately 60%–80% of cases. There is a marked worldwide variation in the relative incidence of the various underlying causes. For example, in Australia, the UK and the USA, medications (e.g. paracetamol) and idiosyncratic drug reactions are the most commonly identified aetiologies. In other parts of the world, including Asia, acute viral hepatitis is a leading cause of ALF.

Herbal agents

HELLP syndrome = haemolysis elevated liver enzymes low platelet syndrome.

CLINICAL FEATURES AND MAJOR COMPLICATIONS

The clinical features of ALF result from reduced hepatocellular function and from complications involving other organs. Non-specific symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and malaise are common initially, closely followed by the onset of jaundice.

INITIAL EVALUATION AND PROGNOSIS

The initial evaluation of patients with suspected ALF should be aimed at determining the underlying aetiology, assessing the severity of the disease and the underlying prognosis and identifying complications. The outcome of ALF is related to the aetiology, the degree of encephalopathy and related complications.

History taking should address possible exposure to viral infection and drugs (including herbal medications and other nutritional supplements) or other toxins; collateral history from family members is often necessary. It is also important to ask about the date of onset of jaundice and encephalopathy. Physical examination must include careful assessment and documentation of mental status and a search for stigmata of chronic liver disease (which should be absent). Jaundice is often, but not always, present. Right upper quadrant tenderness is variably present. Liver size may be small, indicating a loss of volume due to hepatic necrosis. Hepatomegaly should raise suspicion of viral hepatitis, malignant infiltration, congestive heart failure or acute Budd-Chiari syndrome. Patients frequently present with hypotension and tachycardia, which results from the reduced systemic vascular resistance accompanying FHF.

In addition to coagulation parameters, initial laboratory examination usually includes routine chemistry (liver function, renal function, electrolytes, blood glucose), arterial blood gas measurements (acid–base status, hypoxia, lactate), full blood count, paracetamol level, viral hepatitis serology, tests for Wilson’s disease and autoimmune hepatitis and a pregnancy test in females. The serum ammonia level may be significantly elevated in patients with FHF. Liver ultrasound and Doppler may assist in determining hepatic vein flow and the presence of ascites. Any suspicion of an underlying infection should prompt a thorough search for an infective focus, including cultures of blood, sputum and urine and a chest radiograph. Cerebral computed tomography (CT) may be necessary to establish the presence of cerebral oedema. Liver biopsy is not always necessary, particularly in the context of a coagulopathy.

Determination of prognosis is important as it guides key management decisions, including the need for referral to a specialist transplant centre. However, assessment of prognosis in the individual patient is difficult and cannot be predicted by any single factor alone. The most important variables include the underlying aetiology (paracetamol toxicity, hepatitis A, ischaemic hepatitis and pregnancy-associated liver disease are associated with a more favourable outcome), the patient’s age (<10 and >40 associated with poor prognosis) and the degree of encephalopathy (spontaneous recovery less likely with stages 3 or 4 encephalopathy). In general, the best prognoses occur in the absence of complications. Cerebral oedema, renal failure, ARDS, bleeding, and sepsis reduce the probability of survival.

In patients with FHF due to hepatitis A virus, survival rates are greater than 50%. The outcome for patients with FHF as the result of other causes of viral hepatitis is much less favourable.

In patients with Wilson disease, FHF is almost uniformly fatal without liver transplantation.

Rate of development and degree of encephalopathy is a useful predictor of outcome; a short time from jaundice (usually the first unequivocal sign of liver disease recognised by the patient or family) to encephalopathy is paradoxically associated with improved survival. When this interval is less than 2 weeks, the patient has hyperacute liver failure.

MANAGEMENT

The principles of management in patients with ALF include intensive medical management with general supportive measures, preferably in an intensive care setting, aetiology-specific management (when appropriate) and early referral and transfer to a specialist liver transplant unit. Unfortunately, despite aggressive treatment, many patients die from FHF. Prior to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for FHF, the mortality rate was generally greater than 80%. Approximately 6% of OLTs performed in the USA are for FHF. However, with improved intensive care, the prognosis is much better now than in the past, with some series reporting a survival rate of approximately 60%.

General measures

For those patients with ALF in whom no aetiology-specific therapy exists, treatment is limited to general supportive measures that anticipate and manage complications, allowing the liver time to regenerate. Patients with altered mentation should generally be admitted to an intensive care unit. These patients can deteriorate rapidly and require constant monitoring; early consideration of transfer to a transplant centre is important, as worsening encephalopathy increases the risk involved with transfer and may even preclude transfer. Specific criteria have been developed to guide decisions regarding transfer to a specialist liver transplant unit. Management issues relating to the most common complications seen in patients with ALF are outlined below.

Liver transplantation

The advent of orthotopic liver transplantation has dramatically improved overall survival rates for patients with ALF from less than 30% in the pre-transplant era to more than 60% presently. Post-transplant survival rates for ALF have been reported to be as high as 80%–90%. In the patient with ALF being considered for transplantation (Table 47.2), the likelihood of spontaneous recovery must be balanced against the risks of surgery and longterm immunosuppression. Approximately 40%–50% of patients with ALF will undergo transplantation. Despite the urgent listing assigned to these patients, a significant proportion will die on the waiting list or develop complications precluding transplantation due to a critical ongoing shortage of donor organs. Some centres utilise artificial liver support systems, although this is still considered experimental.

TABLE 47.2 King’s College criteria for liver transplantation in acute liver failure

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) cases Non-paracetamol (non-acetaminophen) cases

INR = international normalised ratio.

A general approach to the management of patients with ALF is represented in Figure 47.1.