Acute abdominal pain

Published on 09/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2233 times

Chapter 7 ACUTE ABDOMINAL PAIN

CAUSES OF ACUTE ABDOMINAL PAIN

Generalised abdominal pain

Constant abdominal pain

In a patient with generalised constant abdominal pain and abdominal rigidity, the working diagnosis is peritonitis. This is always secondary to some other process. Often, but not always, this is due to a perforated viscus. The role of surgery is to provide peritoneal toilet and to prevent ongoing contamination by removing or repairing the perforated viscus. There are a number of conditions that fulfill this criterion. There are other conditions, however, that may demonstrate the signs of peritonitis but not require intervention (see Figure 7.1). Typically acute pancreatitis with generalised inflammation may have tenderness and guarding but does not require a laparotomy. A diagnostic elevated lipase may be very useful in this setting. In females, pelvic inflammatory disease may show generalised signs and does not benefit from laparotomy as there is no ongoing contamination. This should be considered in appropriate clinical contexts. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in portal hypertension should also be considered in patients presenting with generalised abdominal pain and portal hypertension with ascites.

Beware of the patient complaining of severe constant generalised abdominal pain who appears to have a relatively soft ‘doughy’ abdomen to palpation. This patient may have ischaemic bowel. Suspicion may be raised if they have bloody diarrhoea and atrial fibrillation. Investigations may reveal an elevated white cell count and a metabolic acidosis. Venous obstruction is often more subtle and slowly progressive.

Colicky abdominal pain

Colicky abdominal pain is episodic pain that comes in waves every 4–5 minutes. It is crescendo decrescendo in nature. When it is generalised the diagnosis is usually between gastroenteritis or a bowel obstruction. Gastroenteritis will often be associated with early vomiting and diarrhoea and abdominal distension will not be a feature. Some infective forms of gastroenteritis may not produce diarrhoea.

In contrast, a bowel obstruction will usually be associated with vomiting and constipation with progressive abdominal distension. The higher the obstruction is anatomically in the intestine, the earlier the vomiting and the later the constipation. The more distal the obstructing lesion, the greater the distension. A supine and erect plain abdominal film will usually confirm the diagnosis. An erect chest X-ray should always be ordered to look for free peritoneal gas. The supine abdominal film is the most useful. With the patient lying flat it will not show the fluid levels of the erect film but it will show gaseous distended bowel down to the level of obstruction. The ileum or small intestine can be distinguished by its central position and valvulae conniventes extending across the intestinal lumen. The jejunum or large intestine is distinguished by its incomplete valves and more peripheral position.

Be very wary of the diagnosis of constipation causing abdominal pain if the rectum is empty or if abdominal tenderness is present.

Surgery is indicated for an obstructed bowel when the cause for the obstruction is unlikely to resolve. The timing is a balance between appropriate resuscitation of the patient and avoiding the development of gut ischaemia.

Small intestine obstruction is more difficult to manage than colonic obstruction as there are no objective diagnostic indicators of early bowel ischaemia. Colonic ischaemia can be predicted if the bowel lumen is distended above a 10 cm diameter, as venous drainage in the bowel wall will be impaired at this level. The caecum is the part of the large intestine usually most susceptible to distension and can be monitored clinically and radiologically.

If constant abdominal pain, worsening tenderness, fever, leucocytosis and acidosis are present, gut ischaemia should be suspected and urgent surgery is indicted.

All these signs and symptoms can be absent or late.

Localised abdominal pain

The management of focal abdominal pain relates very much to the presumed or proven diagnosis, the natural history of the condition and the morbidity if treated conservatively or operatively. Typically, appendicitis is usually treated operatively as it is known that the natural history may lead to perforation and generalised peritonitis. Appendicectomy is straightforward and is associated with low morbidity. Acute diverticulitis of the colon is usually treated conservatively with antibiotics. Diverticulitis may sometimes perforate but operative resection of the affected bowel will usually lead to a temporary colostomy and will not prevent further recurrence. Surgery is therefore reserved for the patient whose condition does not resolve with conservative management.

It is best to consider these conditions in relation to the position in the abdomen in which the signs occur.

ASSESSMENT

History and physical examination is the cornerstone of diagnosis in the acute abdomen. Most decisions concerning acute abdominal pain can be made by the bedside.

MANAGEMENT

The approach to managing the patient should be performed in three steps:

Decision and plan of management

A plan of action now needs to be formulated. The management decision can be enhanced by the use of appropriate blood tests, plain X-ray, abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) scan, angiography and endoscopy. The use of plain X-ray and ultrasound can be very useful in the assessment of patients with acute abdominal pain. CT may be useful if the diagnosis is unclear. It must be stressed that overinvestigation can lead to unnecessary delay and must be avoided. An investigation should only be ordered if its outcome is likely to have a significant impact on management.

Initially it must be decided if the patient requires immediate surgery, delayed surgery or observation with conservative management and further investigations. If immediate surgery is required, it should be established whether there is time or the need for preoperative stabilisation. The patient with a bleeding condition, such as a ruptured aortic aneurysm or ruptured ectopic pregnancy or a perforated viscus, is often best managed by urgent surgical intervention with no delay. Further resuscitation can occur while surgery is performed. A delay in intervention in these conditions is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

A bowel obstruction will benefit from fluid resuscitation prior to surgery as long as bowel viability is not compromised.

The management of focal abdominal sepsis is dependent on specific factors that depend, in turn, on potential complications of the intervention. As a general rule, a focal acute inflammation of the colon is usually treated conservatively with antibiotics. If there is a large associated abscess, this will usually be treated by imaging guided percutaneous drainage or open surgery.

Appendicitis and acute cholecystitis are usually be treated surgically. In the event of a delay of more than 72 hours, both conditions are often treated conservatively with antibiotics. This is because resection of these organs at this time may lead to damage of the surrounding organs due to the attempts by these structures to wall off the inflammation. The bile duct with the gall bladder and surrounding small intestine and caecum with the appendix could be placed in jeopardy.

If a plan of management cannot be decided upon, then the role of further observation or an intervention must be considered. It is also important to decide whether the patient needs to be placed in a high dependency area based on their condition or comorbidity.

A patient should never be left in pain. Appropriate analgesia should be administered early in small frequent doses. Analgesia will not mask signs but will reduce the patient’s awareness of pain. There is a duty of care to ensure frequent pain reassessment.

It is essential that communication with the treating clinician is both timely and accurate. If the patient is unstable or the diagnosis unclear, early communication with the consultant is mandatory.