Acute Abdomen, Bowel/Biliary Obstruction, and Fistula

Published on 04/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1171 times

Chapter 47

Acute Abdomen, Bowel/Biliary Obstruction, and Fistula

Summary of Key Points

Self-Assessment Questions

1. Which is correct?

(See Answer 1)

2. Which is correct?

(See Answer 2)

3. Which is correct?

(See Answer 3)

4. Which is correct?

(See Answer 4)

Answers

1. Answer: C. Perforation associated with colon cancer could occur proximal to the tumor site, such as at the cecum (the law of Laplace). Although small bowel perforations should be resected with primary anastomosis, colonic perforations, especially in the setting of the unprepped bowel and in the immunosuppressed patient, should be treated with resection and diversion. One-stage procedures to include primary anastomosis in these situations must be used cautiously and are generally not advised. Small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors including Imatinib and sunitinib are also reported to be associated with bowel perforation or GI bleeding.

2. Answer: C. Treatment of upper GI tract bleeding requires defining its source. Endoscopic examination would be diagnostic as well as therapeutic. In most patients, nonoperative treatment is successful. GI bleeding or intraabdominal hemorrhage in patients with GIST has been reported to be 3% to 5% with imatinib and 3% to 9% with sunitinib therapy. Close follow-up would be recommended, especially for patients with necrotic or cystic degeneration shown on imaging studies during treatment. The incidence of appendicitis has been reported to be between 0.2% and 2%, which is equivalent to the incidence in the general pediatric population. Pancreatitis is rare in patients with primary pancreatic cancer or metastases to the pancreas.

3. Answer: C. A contrast study of the large bowel would be useful to determine the location of the obstruction in patients with suspected carcinomatosis. Recurrence of cancer, either locally or as diffuse peritoneal disease, is a more common problem and, unfortunately, is more difficult to treat. However, small bowel obstruction in the setting of intraluminal primary or secondary tumors almost never resolves by conservative treatment, and surgical intervention is indicated. Surgical resection and/or bypass to treat bowel obstruction in a patient with end-stage cancer might not yield durable palliation. Recent series have reported effective palliation in up to 80% of patients with obstruction. A decompressive gastrostomy tube in conjunction with either enteral or parenteral fluids might be the procedure of choice. Management of malignant bowel obstruction must be coordinated with end-of-life care in some patients.

4. Answer: D. For suspected malignant biliary obstruction, computed tomography (CT) would give you more valuable information about the location and etiology of a malignant biliary obstruction. Routine use of preoperative ERCP for resectable pancreaticobiliary disease is debated. Several studies have shown that it increases perioperative infectious complications. The most common indications for abdominal surgery in patients with GVHD are GI bleeding and obstruction. Perforation of the bowel is uncommon. The diagnosis of VOD can usually be made on the basis of clinical signs, with liver biopsy being reserved for patients for whom the diagnosis is not certain.

SEE CHAPTER 47 QUESTIONS