Abnormal liver function test results

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2139 times

24 Abnormal liver function test results

Case

A 45-year-old male was found to have abnormal liver function tests on routine investigations performed for an insurance examination. Serum alanine aminotransferase level was elevated at 105 IU/L. International Normalized Ratio (INR), albumin and bilirubin were normal. The patient also had a history of hypertension controlled on antihypertensive therapy and an elevated fasting serum triglyceride concentration. His father had type 2 diabetes, but there was no family history of liver disease. An abdominal ultrasound examination demonstrated changes consistent with fatty liver, but no other abnormality. Further investigations showed no evidence of autoimmune, viral or inherited liver disease. His ferritin was mildly elevated, but with normal transferrin saturation and no mutation of the haemochromatosis (HFE) gene. Physical examination revealed him to be overweight, but otherwise was unremarkable. The patient was advised to reduce his weight and exercise regularly. Under the guidance of a dietician a 5% weight loss was achieved with an improvement in alanine aminotransferase levels. Following that he failed to maintain the intervention, gained weight and discontinued medical review. Ten years later he again was found to have abnormal liver tests but also INR 1.6, albumin 28 gm/L and bilirubin 25 μg/L. He had become diabetic with symptomatic ischaemic heart disease. Abdominal ultrasound on this occasion showed a small irregular liver with splenomegaly, consistent with cirrhosis and an apparent mass in the liver. On a triple phase computed tomography (CT) scan of the liver, the 2-cm mass lesion was typical of a hepatocellular carcinoma and was managed surgically.

An Approach to the Patient with Liver Disease

The liver is a remarkable organ with substantial functional reserve and impressive regenerative capacity. The presence of abnormal liver function profiles, therefore, may not be apparent at the bedside. However, when abnormal liver function test results are found, their significance needs to be assessed in the light of clinical (bedside) findings. The pattern of liver function test abnormalities can be subdivided into either a hepatocellular or cholestatic disease category as discussed below. Organ imaging is an important complementary tool in the assessment of abnormal liver function profiles. The presence of normal liver function profiles makes hepatic disease unlikely, although there are many exceptions, including well-compensated cirrhosis, some cases of chronic hepatitis C, and those with certain space-occupying lesions of the liver.

Liver disease will present as one of a limited number of clinical syndromes. Each syndrome may be caused by a number of specific disease processes. A diagnosis is achieved by paying attention to historical features and physical findings (Box 24.1) and the results of laboratory and other investigations. Only then can specific treatment for the cause of the liver abnormality be planned. Therapy, in many instances, is directed to the management of the clinical problem in addition to treatment directed to the underlying condition.

In this chapter, liver function tests and their clinical relevance are discussed first because abnormalities are commonly detected in asymptomatic individuals. Next, the common clinical presentations of liver disease are covered. Finally, important liver diseases are described.

Liver Function Test Interpretation

In the initial assessment of a patient with abnormal liver function test results, a number of questions need to be considered:

Routine liver function tests usually include serum bilirubin, albumin, International Normalised Ratio (or prothrombin time), transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase and, in some laboratories, lactate dehydrogenase. Other tests should be ordered only for specific indications.

Bilirubin

Elevated serum bilirubin levels may occur in all forms of liver disease. However, it must be remembered that a jaundiced patient does not necessarily have significant hepatic disease. Serum levels of bilirubin reflect production, hepatic uptake, processing (conjugation) and secretion. The physiology of bilirubin and an approach to diagnosis and management of jaundice is described in Chapter 23.

The value of the ratio between conjugated and non-conjugated bilirubin in distinguishing the nature of a liver disorder is limited. Conjugated bilirubin levels are highest in cholestatic disease and in fulminant hepatic failure. Unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia may reflect haemolysis, neonatal physiological jaundice or genetic defects in bilirubin transport and conjugation (Gilbert’s and Crigler-Najjar syndromes). Haemolysis rarely produces total bilirubin levels greater than 50–90 μmol/L.

In acute liver disease, the bilirubin level is of little prognostic significance. On the other hand, rising serum bilirubin levels reflect the approach of end-stage disease in many chronic liver diseases. For example, in primary biliary cirrhosis this signals the need to consider liver transplantation. In secondary malignancy it is often a signal of a preterminal event.

In the presence of chronic liver disease, when hepatic reserve is limited, relatively small increases in bilirubin production (as with haemolysis) can produce a disproportionate increase in serum bilirubin. When there is cholestasis, renal failure will reduce the clearance of conjugated bilirubin sufficiently to increase serum levels. Furthermore, conjugated bilirubin binds irreversibly to albumin such that bound bilirubin will not be cleared until the albumin it is bound to is catabolised.

Tests reflecting hepatic function

Prothrombin time or INR

As with albumin, the vitamin K-dependent clotting factors are synthesised by the liver. The plasma concentrations of prothrombin and factors VII, IX and X often fall in the presence of significant liver disease. The prothrombin time assesses the activity of these coagulation factors. The INR is the ratio between the clotting time (in seconds) using the patient’s plasma divided by that for a control sample using standardised reagents (normal range: 0.8–1.2).

Because of the relatively short half-life of some of these proteins, abnormalities can develop quickly following the onset of hepatic decompensation. In certain circumstances, this may occur within hours (e.g. fatty liver of pregnancy).

Cholestasis can result in vitamin K malabsorption and, in so doing, lead to a raised INR. In that situation, parenteral vitamin K promptly reverses the abnormality. On the other hand, a raised INR that is unresponsive to vitamin K often suggests significant hepatocellular dysfunction.

In a patient with liver disease who is bleeding, the abnormal clotting may represent direct losses and consumption of clotting factors. Stored blood has no effective clotting factors, and contains anticoagulant. After a large transfusion, the clotting factors must therefore also be replaced by giving fresh frozen plasma.

It should be noted that the INR does not necessarily reflect the severity of chronic liver disease. It may be normal or near normal in the presence of advanced cirrhosis. In fulminant hepatic failure, serial INR measurements are of prognostic value with recovery being more likely if the INR decreases. Prognosis is poor when the INR is greater than 3. In vitro tests of clotting factors, such as the INR, will not necessarily reflect the coagulation status of the patient with liver disease.

Tests of Liver Injury

Alkaline phosphatase

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is an enzyme localised to the biliary membrane of hepatocytes. An elevation of the serum ALP level is a marker of biliary disease or a hepatic infiltrative disorder.

Although cholestasis may be present with a normal ALP level, in three-quarters of patients with cholestasis, serum ALP levels will be three or more times greater than the upper limit of normal. Mild elevations of hepatic ALP levels are often seen in hepatocellular injury. Serum ALP levels may also be elevated, at times in isolation, in other disorders affecting the liver, including congestive cardiac failure and lymphoma. A mild elevation is often seen in patients with a non-hepatic illness; this returns to normal over a period of weeks to months, after the underlying condition is treated.

ALP is also found in bone, intestine, kidney and placenta. Consequently, damage to these organs will elevate the serum ALP level. Furthermore, during pregnancy and periods of rapid growth (neonatal and adolescent periods), serum levels of this enzyme are higher. When the serum ALP level is elevated in the absence of other abnormalities in the liver function tests, a non-hepatic cause, such as Paget’s disease, tumours involving bone, acromegaly and fractures, should be considered. Milder rises in ALP may occur following infarction involving the heart, lung, gastrointestinal tract or kidneys.

5′-nucleotidase, a membrane-associated enzyme, is elevated in the plasma primarily in cholestatic liver disease. Although present in pancreas, brain, intestine and heart, this enzyme is more specific for liver disorders than is alkaline phosphatase.

Other tests useful in hepatic assessment

A marked elevation (over 1000 U/L) of alpha-fetoprotein is most often due to hepatocellular carcinoma. This test has been used for screening an individual with chronic hepatitis B for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, having a sensitivity of 70%. It is of limited value, however, because the sensitivity falls to 30% in non-hepatitis B hepatocellular carcinoma. Milder elevations occur in both acute and chronic liver disease of many causes (Ch 25).

Autoantibodies are helpful in diagnosing certain forms of liver disease (Table 24.1). Serum concentration of caeruloplasmin and iron studies are important tools in the diagnosis of Wilson’s disease and haemochromatosis, respectively (Table 24.2), but are also altered by liver injury unrelated to either of these conditions. Tests for viral hepatitis are also important (Table 24.3).

Table 24.1 Tests for autoimmune liver disease

Test Condition Comment
Antinuclear antibody (ANA) Autoimmune chronic hepatitis Diagnosis requires liver biopsy
Smooth muscle antibody (SMA) (anti-actin) Autoimmune chronic hepatitis Diagnosis requires liver biopsy
Anti-liver kidney microsomal antibody (anti-LKM1) Autoimmune chronic hepatitis Diagnosis requires liver biopsy
Antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) Primary biliary cirrhosis(95%) Diagnosis requires liver biopsy
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA) Primary sclerosing cholangitis Diagnosis requires magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Table 24.2 Tests for metabolic disorders affecting the liver

Test Condition Comment
Iron studies Haemochromatosis See text
Copper and caeruloplasmin Wilson’s disease See text
Alpha-1 antitrypsin level and phenotype Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency Heterozygotes may have abnormal liver function tests without significant liver disease
Thyroid function tests Hypothyroidism Fatty liver
Blood glucose level Diabetes mellitus Fatty liver, haemochromatosis
Insulin/C-peptide Insulin resistance Fatty liver, metabolic syndrome
Cholesterol and triglycerides Primary and secondary hyperlipidaemia Fatty liver, alcoholic liver disease

Table 24.3 Tests for viral hepatitis

Test Meaning of a positive result Comment
1. Tests for hepatitis A virus (HAV)    
Anti-HAV IgM Recent acquisition of HAV Acute hepatic illness likely to be HAV
Anti-HAV IgG Past infection/vaccination Immunity
2. Tests for hepatitis B virus (HBV)    
HBsAg (surface ag) Present/chronic infection Structural component of virus
Anti-HBsAg (surface ab) Past infection/vaccination Immunity
Anti-HBc IgM (core ab) Recent acquisition of HBV The test for acute HBV infection
HBeAg (e ag) Marker of viral replication High risk of infectivity
Anti-HBeAg (e ab) Suggests no viral replication Unlikely to be infectious
HBV DNA Presence of complete virus High risk of infectivity
3. Tests for hepatitis C virus (HCV)    
Anti-HCV Exposure to HCV Interpret in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory data
HCV RNA by PCR Presence of virus
HCV genotyping Treatment planning and response
4. Tests for hepatitis D virus (HDV)    
Anti-HDV IgG/IgM Exposure to HDV Acute or chronic HDV
Delta antigen HDV present Acute or chronic HDV
5. Tests for hepatitis E virus (HEV)    
Anti-HEV IgM Recent acquisition of HEV Acute hepatitic illness likely to be HEV
6. Tests for other organisms    
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgM Recent acquisition of CMV Acute hepatitic illness likely to be CMV
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) IgM Recent acquisition of EBV Acute hepatitic illness likely to be EBV
Anti-HIV HIV-AIDS Opportunistic hepatobiliary infections
Toxoplasmosis serology Consider toxoplasmosis
Q fever serology Consider Q fever

ag = antigen; ab = antibody; PCR = polymerase chain reaction.

Liver biopsy

Histological and, on occasion, chemical analysis and microbiological examination of the liver are essential in the diagnosis of many hepatic disorders. The usual technique for obtaining a liver biopsy involves a percutaneous approach through a lower intercostal space in the right midaxillary line. Ultrasound scanning or CT can be used to optimise the needle entry point or target specific abnormalities. Haemorrhage from the biopsy wound to the liver or injury to adjacent organs are the major risks. These may be significant in approximately 1% of biopsies. The risk of haemorrhage is minimised by ensuring a platelet count greater than 80 × 109/L (80,000/mm3) and an INR less than 1.2. When coagulopathy or gross ascites prevents a percutaneous biopsy, a transjugular approach can be used.

The decision to proceed to liver biopsy is reached when the potential information gained outweighs the risks of the procedure. In particular, obtaining information about the patient’s prognosis or diagnostic information that might alter therapy is the important consideration. Although it is not always appropriate to perform a liver biopsy to only achieve a diagnosis, it is not unusual for the clinical diagnosis to be altered by the information gained at biopsy. The clinical course of the illness should also be considered. The patient with improving liver function test profiles and resolving symptoms is probably best observed rather than biopsied early. It should be noted, however, that, in certain conditions such as chronic hepatitis C and haemochromatosis and in some alcoholic patients, hepatic fibrosis can progress to cirrhosis with little clinical or laboratory evidence of aggressive liver disease.

The significance of liver biopsy features is considered in relation to specific disorders later in this chapter. The extent, nature and activity of inflammatory and fibrotic processes are of particular concern. The presence of fibro-inflammatory changes is more likely to be related to a progression to cirrhosis. The absence of such changes carries a better prognosis. Sampling error can be a problem as the tissue sample represents only a tiny proportion of the liver mass and the disease process may not be uniform across the organ. Cirrhosis can be missed in 10–20% of cases, depending on the size and number of samples taken.

The Well Patient with Abnormal Liver Function Profile

Many patients now present to their practitioner apparently in good health but with an abnormal set of liver function test results, often found at routine insurance medical examination. These patients raise a whole range of diagnostic possibilities and, in evaluating them, a full history and examination is required. The most common causes of abnormal liver function test results in otherwise well individuals are non-alcoholic fatty disease (which may or may not be associated with significant inflammation) and alcohol-related liver damage. Another common cause will be the ingestion of medications. However, the presence of other serious, progressive and eventually potentially life-threatening conditions needs to be considered.

History

All patients with abnormal liver function test results need to be questioned about their family history of liver disease, and their ingestion currently or in the past of alcohol and medications.

A history of diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease and high lipid levels should be sought; these together with obesity are associated with hepatic steatosis. The features of the metabolic syndrome with rising body weight and reduced physical activity are common in those with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, especially when there is a family history of type 2 diabetes.

A history of overseas travel and exposure to blood products from transfusions or injection of drugs, legally or illegally, needs to be sought (e.g. hepatitis B or C). A history of known exposure to patients with infectious liver diseases should be asked about. A sexual history must be obtained because exposure to some viruses is much more common in individuals with multiple sexual partners (e.g. hepatitis B and HIV).

When there is a family history of liver disease, social background requires close review. ‘Learned’ excessive alcohol consumption can lead to liver disease without the patient being aware that their intake is potentially dangerous. The amount of alcohol the ‘social drinker’ consumes varies according to his or her background.

There is a possibility of genetic predisposition to alcoholic liver disease.

Migration from areas of high prevalence of hepatitis B or C (e.g. Southeast Asia) should be noted. These viruses, acquired at birth or in early childhood, may not generate symptoms for many years.

Haemochromatosis is preferably diagnosed prior to the onset of symptoms; abnormalities of liver function tests and abnormal iron study findings are clues. However, a history of joint pains, diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease or impotence in the patient or the existence of an affected relative suggests the possibility of haemochromatosis.

Wilson’s disease is likely to be asymptomatic only in younger children. At older ages, features of cirrhosis or neurological abnormalities are likely. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, homozygote or heterozygote, may present with the incidental finding of abnormal liver function profiles in an otherwise well patient.

In the otherwise well patient, a history of abdominal pain (e.g. biliary pain: Ch 4), loss of appetite or weight (Ch 17), or a change in the colour of stools or urine (Ch 23) needs to be sought but is almost invariably absent.

Investigation

The approach to investigations is guided by the history, examination and liver function test pattern. Further testing is based on the provisional diagnosis and likely prognosis. When no hints as to the diagnosis have been found, a systematic investigation for potentially dangerous causes of liver disease needs to be considered. This would normally be done after a period of observation with serial liver function tests to determine whether there is a spontaneous recovery, a stable abnormality or deterioration.

Liver imaging is of value (Ch 23). Abdominal ultrasound scans can provide information about the size and shape of the liver and spleen. Often any mass lesions present can also be identified. Ultrasonography will often detect fatty liver. Abdominal CT will provide information on the presence or absence of space-occupying lesions while, in addition, providing insight into liver density, which may be increased in haemochromatosis. Magnetic resonance imaging will usually add little to the information provided by a CT scan but can be of value in certain circumstances, such as in the assessment of mass lesions and of the biliary tract.

Tests for evidence of viral hepatitis (Table 24.3), autoimmune liver disease (Table 24.1) and other causes of chronic liver disease (iron or copper overload, and other inherited liver diseases) (Table 24.2) should be done if hepatocellular disease is possible. If the diagnosis remains unclear and the prognosis of concern, a liver biopsy is required.

Chronic hepatitis is an ongoing inflammatory process. The causes are listed in Table 24.4. If fibrosis follows as part of the healing process consequent to this inflammation, progression to cirrhosis and eventual liver failure is possible. For this reason, potentially controllable chronic hepatitis needs to be identified and treated before irreversible injury has occurred.

Table 24.4 Important causes of chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis

Chronic hepatitis Cirrhosis

In each of the conditions generating chronic hepatitis there is an ongoing inflammatory attack directed toward the hepatocyte. This can be the result of direct hepatocyte injury, as is the case in hepatitis C infection (the most common cause of chronic hepatitis in Australia) and Wilson’s disease, which is rare. On the other hand, liver cell injury may be immune-mediated, as occurs with hepatitis B infection, autoimmune chronic hepatitis and certain drug reactions.

Evidence of continuing hepatic inflammation based on a persistent elevation of serum transaminases (6 months or more) is usually required to entertain the diagnosis of a chronic hepatitis. However, it can take many months for serum transaminases to return to normal levels following some acute hepatic illnesses. Once the presence of chronic hepatitis is considered likely, establish the aetiology of the illness, the extent of liver damage and the activity of the inflammatory process. These latter two features can be assessed only by the histological examination of a liver biopsy.

The Sick Patient with Jaundice: Acute Liver Disease

Acute hepatitis

History

Acute hepatitis of any cause can present with similar clinical features. Typically there is nausea with or without vomiting, right upper quadrant pain, weakness, fever, fatigue, itching and jaundice. An acute icteric illness may follow infection with one of the hepatitis viruses (see below). A similar clinical picture may be seen in Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus infections, in toxoplasmosis and occasionally in other viral infections. Viral exposure is suggested by parenteral risk factors such as intravenous drug use, tattooing, intimate contacts with hepatitis-infected patients, blood transfusion, travel to endemic areas and during local epidemics. Acute autoimmune disease is suggested by the presence of other autoimmune disorders (e.g. thyroid disease). A careful and complete drug history is vital. Both recently commenced drugs and those taken for prolonged periods should be considered. In patients showing evidence of depressive behaviour, drug overdose must be considered. If paracetamol (acetaminophen) has been used, then a careful ethanol consumption history is vital (see the next page). Normally safe, therapeutic doses of paracetamol may produce significant liver injury in those chronically consuming excessive amounts of ethanol. It should also be noted that inadvertent paracetamol overdose may occur due the patient’s lack of knowledge of safe dosage or the use of multiple different preparations containing the drug. Excessive ethanol consumption, especially recent bingeing, could indicate acute alcoholic hepatitis. Gallstone disease can occasionally present as an acute hepatitic illness that can be difficult to differentiate clinically. A family history of liver disease should be noted. Wilson’s disease may present as an acute illness, usually in childhood.

Acute hepatitis may occur in a previously well person or in the presence of underlying chronic liver disease. In the latter case, the result can be devastating when preexisting liver disease results in little functional hepatic reserve. In pregnancy, acute viral hepatitis is the most common cause of this syndrome, but consideration should be given to pregnancy-related liver disease (see ‘Liver disease in pregnancy’ later in this chapter).

Acute Liver Failure

History

The historical features of acute hepatitis should be enquired about. However, details will need to be obtained from others when the patient has established encephalopathy. Acute infection with the hepatotropic viruses A, B, D or E (and very rarely C) can cause fulminant hepatic failure. In late pregnancy, acute fatty liver should be considered. Ask about drugs, which may cause direct toxic effects (e.g. following overdose of paracetamol) or cause idiosyncratic reactions (e.g. halothane and sulfonamides).

Following an acute overdose of 140 mg/kg or more of paracetamol, the glucuronide and sulfate pathways in the liver become saturated and hepatic glutathione becomes depleted, leading to reactive metabolites covalently binding to liver cells causing lysis. Hepatotoxicity manifests 24–48 hours after ingestion. The early identification of paracetamol overdose is crucial. Serum levels should be measured 4 and 24 hours after suspected ingestion; the administration of N-acetylcysteine will prevent progression to hepatic failure. It gives maximal benefit if instituted within 8–10 hours of ingestion (but is indicated after that time as well). ALT levels are typically very high while the bilirubin is relatively low. An intake of a normally subtoxic dose of paracetamol in the presence of chronic alcohol abuse may lead to acute hepatic failure. In the USA approximately 50% of paracetamol overdose is non-intentional with the drug taken over days. In these cases the serum drug levels are lower. Toxicity normograms are of no value in this circumstance.

Fluorinated hydrocarbon solvents (in glue sniffing) and mushroom poisoning have also been linked to acute hepatic failure. Wilson’s disease may rarely present in acute liver failure, and death usually follows without liver transplantation.

In fulminant hepatic failure there is a sudden loss of functional hepatocyte mass, often associated with portal hypertension. The associated complications of encephalopathy, coagulopathy, renal failure and sepsis evolve. Multi-organ failure often occurs, with the patient’s death from cerebral oedema or infection.

INR = International Normalized Ratio.

From O’Grady JG, Alexander GJM, et al. Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure. Gastroenterology 1989; 97:439–445.

The patient with fulminant hepatic failure needs to be admitted directly to a unit capable of offering liver transplantation. Admission to intensive care is required with careful management of cerebral oedema, gastrointestinal bleeding, infection and renal failure.

Hepatic encephalopathy and cerebral oedema

This may develop rapidly and may even precede the onset of jaundice. Raised ammonia levels associated with liver failure cause brain swelling, inflammation, increased cerebral blood flow and a breakdown of the blood–brain barrier. Deeper grades (described later in this chapter) of encephalopathy are associated with a worse prognosis. Unlike the encephalopathy of chronic liver disease, there is often early agitation and delusional ideation. Cerebral oedema is more likely to occur when encephalopathy develops rapidly after the onset of jaundice. However, survival is worse in those in whom encephalopathy evolves slowly. Cerebral oedema, present in up to 80% of those in grade IV encephalopathy, is a significant cause of death. Clinically, this is reflected by systemic hypertension, bradycardia with progressive rigidity and decerebrate posturing. Direct pressure monitoring with a subdural or epidural transducer is the only reliable means of assessing cerebral pressure. Prognosis is particularly poor and liver transplantation inappropriate when the cerebral perfusion pressure is less than 50 mmHg, and is refractory to mannitol therapy. Grade III and IV encephalopathies (see below) are associated with a worse prognosis.

Management aims to reduce systemic vasodilatation and cerebral perfusion pressure, maintaining a low mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure. Mannitol, sodium, hypothermia (when there is hyperacute high grade encephalopathy and requiring vasopressors) and dialysis (in those developing renal impairment) have been used in the treatment of cerebral oedema.

Patients Presenting with Cirrhosis and its Complications

Cirrhosis represents the non-specific end-stage of hepatic disease that has disrupted the structural organisation of the liver. The presence of cirrhosis is established on a liver biopsy. Fibrosis or scarring surrounding regenerative nodules of hepatocytes is its hallmark. Although cirrhosis is a histological diagnosis, its presence is clinically suspected by finding signs of chronic liver disease and portal hypertension (Box 24.1) or on high quality imaging. Symptomatic liver disease and eventually liver failure occur as the result of impaired hepatocellular function within the distorted architecture of the regenerative nodules and, with progression, eventual loss of an effective liver cell mass. Distortion of the hepatic circulation contributes to portal hypertension and inefficient/ineffective perfusion of parenchymal cells. Portal systemic shunts may develop, allowing blood from the gastrointestinal tract to flow directly to the systemic circulation.

Cirrhosis should be considered as either compensated, with no signs of complications and a relatively good prognosis, or decompensated (Ch 25). Those with compensated cirrhosis are likely to be asymptomatic and the diagnosis may be made incidentally during the investigation of an unrelated condition. In this situation, counselling regarding diet, ethanol consumption and the identification and management of any underlying treatable condition are warranted (see ‘The well patient with abnormal liver function profile’ above). Recent data have indicated that the removal or cure of the underlying disease process can be followed by a reduction in hepatic fibrosis (e.g. after the cure of hepatitis C).

The serum levels of liver enzymes (ALT, AST and ALP) can be mildly abnormal or even normal in compensated cirrhosis. However, because of reduced hepatic synthetic function or poor nutrition, the serum albumin concentration is often reduced, and the INR may be increased. There may be thrombocytopenia related to splenomegaly from portal hypertension. Anaemia can be multifactorial but is often related to gastrointestinal blood loss, poor nutrition (e.g. in alcoholics), chronic disease and hypersplenism.

The Child-Pugh score (Table 24.6) provides a useful means of assessing the severity of cirrhosis and the prognosis. A Child-Pugh ‘A’ classification applies to a score of less than 7; ‘B’, a score between 7 and 9; and ‘C’, greater than 9. The 1-year survival of these classification groups is 100%, 80% and 45%, respectively. A higher score also indicates those more likely to succumb to complications during hepatic and no hepatic surgical procedures.

The MELD (Model for End Stage Liver Disease) score is a validated means of assessing the prognosis and survival of a patient with chronic liver disease that incorporates bilirubin, INR and creatinine values. This score can be used to prioritise the allocation of organs within a liver transplantation program (see Ch 25).

Maintaining adequate nutrition is vital to the management of patients with cirrhosis and chronic liver disease in general. These patients are often catabolic, requiring greater than usual energy intake. Nausea and dyspepsia are common and may reduce food intake and thus their nutritional status further. Dietary measures should be put in place to ensure a diet of adequate energy and protein intake with attention to micronutrient supplementation as needed (e.g. fat-soluble vitamins). The advice of an experienced dietician should be sought.

The Well Patient with Cirrhosis

Examination

Physical examination includes a search for signs of chronic liver disease (Box 24.1) and evidence of extrahepatic features of possible aetiological factors.

Investigation

Investigations are directed to (1) determining the aetiology of the cirrhosis (Table 24.4); and (2) assessing the severity of hepatic injury. When physical findings and investigations suggest cirrhosis, liver biopsy should be considered to establish its presence, to assess the activity of the fibroinflammatory process and to seek evidence of the aetiology. A past history of excessive ethanol consumption is often identified. In other cases, a specific aetiology can often be established by using special tests for autoantibodies, viral serology and metabolic disorders (Tables 24.124.3). Elevations in serum transaminase levels imply ongoing hepatocellular injury. Raised INR (prolonged prothrombin time) and hypoalbuminaemia suggest reduced hepatocellular synthetic function. Abdominal ultrasound scans with Doppler studies will provide evidence of portal hypertension (splenomegaly, portal flow and wave pattern), ascites and liver size (reflecting the remaining liver cell mass). Varices are excluded by upper endoscopy.

Management

The management of the well cirrhotic patient depends on the underlying cause. The cirrhotic should cease drinking alcohol completely. Failure to do so is likely to cause progression and early death. Abstinence, on the other hand, can allow a long and productive life despite the cirrhosis. Cirrhotic patients with autoimmune chronic hepatitis and significant inflammation on biopsy could benefit from corticosteroid therapy. Interferon is of limited benefit, and potentially dangerous in those with cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis B. Oral antivirals, on the other hand, may be of value. Counselling of the patient and, if necessary, family members is required when infectious or genetic conditions are identified. Regular ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma should be performed at 6-monthly intervals. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy should be performed to seek and, if present, treat significant oesophageal varices.

Apart from any treatment associated with the underlying cause, the asymptomatic patient with cirrhosis needs to maintain an adequate diet. Sufficient kilojoules, protein and micronutrients should be ingested. A complex carbohydrate snack before retiring in the evenings could help prevent the patient from becoming catabolic overnight as the hepatic glycogen stores become depleted. Regular follow-up is necessary, specifically seeking evidence of evolving complications of cirrhosis (namely, portal hypertension and ascites, portal vein thrombosis, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome and hepatocellular carcinoma). See Chapter 25 for more details.

Complications of Portal Hypertension in the Patient with Chronic Liver Disease

Portal hypertension

In cirrhosis, the disturbed architecture of the liver and perivascular fibrosis increase the resistance of portal blood flow. Portal pressure is also increased consequent to sodium retention and expansion of the blood volume that follows the peripheral vasodilatation of cirrhosis. Cirrhotic patients suffer the combined effects of hepatocellular dysfunction and portal hypertension. Although cirrhosis is the commonest cause, primary liver disease is not the only basis for portal hypertension.

Portal and hepatic vascular disorders can also cause portal hypertension while leaving hepatocyte function relatively intact (Box 24.2). In these situations when liver cell function is maintained, portal systemic shunt surgery, rather than transplantation, may be appropriate for severe disease (Figs 24.2A and 24.2B). When vascular or thrombotic processes are found, an underlying cause for these should be sought and managed accordingly.

Acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in patient with portal hypertension

Examination

Assessment of the physical signs of blood volume loss is vital (Ch 10). Signs of chronic liver disease (Box 24.1) support the possibility of cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. Splenomegaly suggests portal hypertension. In acute or chronic liver disease, the liver may be palpable and tender. The cirrhotic liver is likely to be small. Blood in the gastrointestinal tract can precipitate encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients. This should be sought and documented. There should be a search for signs of other complications of chronic liver disease including ascites and sepsis.

The chest should be carefully examined for evidence of aspiration, especially in alcoholic patients.

Investigations

Basic haematological investigations are required as with any gastrointestinal haemorrhage (Ch 10). When chronic liver disease is present, particular attention is paid to the factors of the Child-Pugh score (above). Electrolyte disturbances are not uncommon. Renal function must be checked. The source of the upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage is demonstrated by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as soon as is practical.

Management

Significant upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage requires urgent resuscitation. Once this is achieved, endoscopy can be used to confirm and often control the source of bleeding. Acute variceal bleeding is usually controlled endoscopically by band ligation. The long-acting somatostatin analogue, octreotide, or terlipressin (triglycyl lysine vasopressin) provides an effective pharmacological means of managing acute variceal haemorrhage. These agents are often used to complement endoscopic therapy or to achieve control of blood loss while endoscopy is being arranged. Octreotide is given as a bolus dose of 50 μg intravenously, followed by an infusion of 50 μg/hour for at least 72 hours. When endoscopic therapy is unavailable or not possible, balloon tamponade applied at the cardio-oesophageal junction can be used to control bleeding from oesophageal varices for up to 24 hours. Gastric varices do not respond to endoscopic therapy as well as oesophageal varices, although injection therapy using cyanoacrylate or fibrin glue can be a successful intervention in those with bleeding gastric varices.

Transjugular intrahepatic portal systemic shunting (TIPS) or surgical portal systemic shunting may be considered to control variceal bleeding when endoscopic therapy fails. TIPS involves the introduction of expandable metal stents between the portal and hepatic venous system, within the liver, placed under radiological control.

Apart from portal systemic shunting, surgical alternatives acutely include transaction of the oesophagus. In cirrhotic patients, an acute surgical shunt has a high mortality. The risk is directly related to the Child-Pugh score.

The long-term value of the shunting procedures is questionable; a careful case selection is essential.

Antibiotic prophylaxis is required during variceal bleeding, preferably prior to endoscopic therapy. Cefriaxone, 1 g daily, is appropriate and should be continued for at least 3 days.

Liver transplantation should be considered in suitable cirrhotic patients in the long term. When liver cell function is well preserved (as in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension), portal systemic shunting may be viable alternative (Fig 24.2A and B).

Varices may occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract. Bleeding from these lesions may also be managed endoscopically if they are accessible, but surgical treatment could be required.

Ascites in the Cirrhotic Patient with or without Renal Impairment

The accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity is a common feature of decompensating chronic liver disease. Ascites occurs in 50% of previously compensated cirrhotic patients over a 10-year period. This complication marks a poor prognosis with a 2-year survival of 50%. The survival in these patients is worse with increasing age, co-existent hepatocellular carcinoma, diabetes and ongoing alcohol consumption. The development of ascites is also associated with a deterioration of quality of life and an increase in health care utilisation.

Examination

Ascites is usually readily identified on physical examination. The demonstration of shifting dullness is not possible with volumes less than 2 L. Smaller amounts of fluid can be found by the finding of periumbilical percussion dullness with the patient on hands and knees. In obese patients, physical examination for ascites can be difficult and inconclusive. In such cases abdominal ultrasound examination is indicated.

Signs of chronic liver disease (Box 24.1) are expected in patients presenting with ascites and cirrhosis. Peripheral oedema is often present. Other complications of chronic liver disease or of the underlying condition may be present. Their absence should raise the possibility of acute hepatic disease or non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Alternately, there may be a non-hepatic cause for the ascites. Physical examination may identify other causes of ascites, including cardiac failure and malignant disease. A pleural effusion, particularly on the right, may be present. Umbilical hernias commonly occur in ascites patients and surgical repair in this circumstance carries a high mortality.

Management

Symptomatic ascites is initially managed with fluid and sodium restriction (no added salt). If this fails to control the ascites, spironolactone, up to 400 mg/day, can be used. It must be noted that spironolactone will take several days to have an effect. A loop diuretic, such as frusemide, may then be added in resistant cases, initially at 20–160 mg/day. Careful monitoring of renal function and serum electrolytes is needed as renal impairment and electrolyte disturbances followed by hepatic decompensation with encephalopathy can be precipitated by this therapy.

In profound ascites, paracentesis can also be used. Large volumes of ascitic fluid can be safely removed, especially if peripheral oedema is present; albumin should be infused during large volume paracentesis (greater than 5 L).

There is evidence that intravenous albumin may be of value in the therapy of ascitic patients when used in combination with diuretics or paracentesis and during treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or the hepatorenal syndrome.

Refractory ascites is an indicator of a poor prognosis. TIPS controls refractory ascites in more than 70% of cases. However, patients remain hyponatraemic and require ongoing diuretic therapy. The success of TIPS is tempered by portal systemic encephalopathy and shunt occlusion. The risk of encephalopathy increases with age, shunt size, liver function and prior portal systemic encephalopathy. In general, survival is similar with TIPS and large volume paracentesis, although TIPS may provide a survival advantage in those with higher MELD scores. The patient’s suitability for liver transplantation should be considered as transplant is the definitive therapy for refractory ascites.

Peritoneovenous shunts can be used but are fraught with problems including infection, blockage and stimulation of the coagulation cascade (causing disseminated intravascular coagulation).

Ascites, Fever and Pain: Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is nearly always an indicator of severe liver disease. It carries a poor short- and long-term prognosis. There is a greater risk of this complication when the ascitic protein level is low. It may be asymptomatic initially.

Investigation and mechanisms

Ascitic fluid must be sampled and examined in all patients with ascites and a recent decompensation (Ch 20); this should be done on admission regardless of clinical signs. Of all cirrhotic patients with ascites admitted to hospital, 12–15% will have spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. An ascitic polymorphonuclear leukocyte count greater than or equal to 250 cells/L is indicative of the condition. Ascitic fluid cultures should be collected and the samples inoculated into blood culture bottles, at the bedside. Cefotaxime is adequate antibiotic therapy in most cases. Outcomes may be improved by the addition of intravenous albumin: 1.5 g/kg of body weight at diagnosis, then 1 g/kg of body weight on the third day.

Common organisms include Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Klebsiella spp. Spread to the peritoneum appears to be via the blood. Bacteria may also breach a mucosal barrier as occurs during gastrointestinal haemorrhage or instrumentation.

The lower the ascitic fluid protein concentration, the more likely spontaneous bacterial peritonitis becomes. Peritoneal macrophage dysfunction and reduced opsonic capacity of ascitic fluid may allow progression of colonisation of infection.

Secondary peritonitis, following perforation of a viscus, needs to be excluded, as this would also require surgical intervention. Such surgery would carry a very high mortality. Cirrhotic patients with ascites and secondary peritonitis can also display a paucity of clinical signs.

Hepatic Encephalopathy in the Cirrhotic Patient

The precise mechanisms responsible for this process are unclear. Under normal circumstances the liver detoxifies neuroactive nitrogenous metabolites that pass into the portal system from the gastrointestinal tract. With the loss of functional hepatocytes and/or portal systemic shunting of blood, these ‘toxins’ reach the systemic circulation where they may alter central nervous system function. The actions of the raised ammonia concentration in combination with other toxins could account for much of what occurs in those with hepatic encephalopathy, including changes to the blood–brain barrier and altered amino acid neurotransmitter metabolism. Blood ammonia concentrations correlate with the level of coma, but are not useful in the absence of a full clinical assessment or in the assessment of the patient’s progress.

Minimal HE  

HE = hepatic encephalopathy.

Without recognised precipitating factors.

From Ferenci P, Lockwood A, Mullen K, et al. Hepatic encephalopathy—definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: final report of the Working Party at the 11th World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998. Hepatology 2002; 35:716–721.

Encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients may occur as an episodic, persistent or minimal form. Minimal encephalopathy may be objectively demonstrable only by psychometric testing. Although not easily identified, this chronic, low-grade deficit can adversely affect the patient’s functional capacity and quality of life. The identification of this group is important as they are subject to a greater rate of accidents (e.g. motor vehicle accidents) and altered work performance. The risk of minimal encephalopathy is higher in the presence of Child-Pugh C cirrhosis, older age, alcoholic liver disease, TIPS and varices. These patients should not be permitted to drive a motor vehicle.

Hepatic encephalopathy accompanying severe, acute liver disease carries a grave prognosis and is accompanied by the clinical features of acute disease. In chronic liver disease with appropriate clinical features (above), milder, overt long-term encephalopathy may be found. Insomnia can be an early feature. A reversal of normal sleep patterns (sleeping during daylight hours and waking at night) is suggestive of early encephalopathy. More profound encephalopathy accompanies acute episodes of decompensation (e.g. infection and gastrointestinal bleeding) or progression to end-stage liver failure. Drug effects (especially sedatives), electrolyte abnormalities (diuretics), constipation, dietary protein load and renal failure should also be considered as precipitants (Box 24.4). Blood ammonia levels are elevated but vary widely.

Infection may be present without fever, leucocytosis or localising signs. A systematic search for evidence of sepsis is required, with a chest x-ray examination and cultures of blood, urine, ascites and sputum.

Portal systemic shunting, surgical or spontaneous, also often results in hepatic encephalopathy. Serum ammonia levels are useful in detecting unsuspected significant portal systemic shunts, as are Doppler ultrasound studies.

Management

Management of hepatic encephalopathy attempts to improve the underlying condition, together with supportive measures and the reduction of the amount of ‘toxins’ entering the circulation from the intestine. Treatment is directed at any precipitating event, such as sepsis or gastrointestinal bleeding. The addition of lactulose, to acidify the colonic contents and act as a cathartic, is helpful. Alterations in colonic flora and the nitrogen, fatty acid and glutamine metabolism of colonic bacteria may also contribute to the activity of this agent. Treatment is aimed at producing one or two soft stools daily. Lactulose decreases the psychometric abnormalities associated with minimal encephalopathy as well as improving clinically overt encephalopathy. In these patients a positive trial of lactulose can assist in establishing the diagnosis.

Neomycin suppresses the production of ‘toxins’ by bowel bacteria and is as effective as lactulose. The combination of these two agents is unlikely to provide added benefit. Another non-absorbed antibiotic, rifaximin is equally effective but expensive. Rifaximin can be cost-effective if added to lactulose if the latter has been shown to be insufficient.

L-ornithine L-aspartate (LOLA) is superior to placebo. Probiotics may prove effective therapy but require further study. Protein restriction is in general of no value and may negatively affect the patient’s nutritional status.

Patients should not be permitted to become constipated and great care must be taken with the use of medications. Zinc, which may increase the capacity to metabolise ammonia, can be useful in malnourished patients. Hepatic transplantation will reverse the condition.

Liver Disease in Pregnancy

In normal pregnancy, serum levels of AST and ALT are not altered, but the GGT level is reduced. ALP levels, on the other hand, may double after 3 months. The serum albumin concentration is reduced slightly by haemodilution.

Hepatic diseases during pregnancy are generally managed as if the patient were not pregnant. Liver disease in pregnancy can conveniently be divided into disease that is incidental to the pregnancy, disease that is exacerbated by the pregnancy, and pregnancy-specific disorders (see Table 24.8). Severe chronic liver disease reduces fertility such that decompensated chronic liver disease is not common in pregnant women. Pregnancy does not preclude hepatic transplantation for acute hepatic failure. Furthermore, past hepatic transplantation does not prevent subsequent successful pregnancy.

Table 24.8 Liver disease in pregnancy

Disease Cause Comment
Incidental to pregnancy

Related to pregnancy (possibly influenced by hormones present in pregnancy) Specific to pregnancy

HELLP = haemolysis, elevated liver function tests and low platelets.

Specific Hepatic Diseases

Viral hepatitis

Hepatitis A

The hepatitis A virus is an RNA picornavirus transmitted by the faecal–oral route. It is not cytopathic to the hepatocyte; liver injury occurs as a consequence of T-lymphocyte activity. The incubation period is 15–45 days (mean: 30 days). In the pre-icteric phase there is viraemia, and the virus is also present in saliva and urine. Faecal viral shedding occurs late in the incubation period and extends for approximately 2 weeks. Viral shedding ceases about the time the patient becomes icteric. Vertical transmission is not a feature.

Hepatitis A is a self-limiting acute illness. The diagnosis is established by finding IgM antibodies to the hepatitis A virus in the presence of an acute hepatitic illness. This virus does not cause chronic liver disease. There is a prodromal illness in 85% of icteric cases. Overall mortality is 0.1%, but this increases with age to approximately 1% in those over 40 years. Serum transaminase levels often reach several thousand units per litre and may remain elevated, at a much lesser extent, for months after the acute illness settles. Especially in adults, 10–20% of cases develop a relapsing course over several months. Occasionally protracted cholestasis may develop; these can benefit from cholestyramine or corticosteroid therapy.

The proportion of symptomatic cases increases with age. In toddlers, approximately 10% of cases are symptomatic. On the other hand, between 50% and 70% of adults develop the symptomatic illness. The incidence of severe hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure increases with increasing age. However, more than 60% of cases with hepatitis A fulminant hepatic failure survive without liver transplantation. In Australia there is a reduction in childhood exposure to hepatitis A, and so a reduction in immunity in the young adult population. There is little immunity in adults younger than 30 years. Overseas travel to areas of high prevalence carries a risk of acquiring hepatitis A (even if travel is restricted to five-star hotels).

Vaccination is effective and should be considered for those at risk. Those at risk include travellers, plumbers and sewer workers, paediatric nurses and child-care staff, and people exposed during local epidemics. Vaccination could also be offered to food handlers, who if infected would represent a risk to others. People with compensated chronic liver disease or about to undergo immunosuppressive therapy should consider vaccination, as acute hepatitis A infection could precipitate a life-threatening decompensation. Passive immunity using pooled immunoglobulin is of limited temporary value.

Hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a hardy, highly infectious DNA virus. There is an incubation period of 30–180 days (mean: 60–90 days) (Fig 24.3). Acute hepatitis occurs in approximately 25% of those who acquire the virus, with approximately 1% developing fulminant hepatic failure. The majority of cases are asymptomatic and recover completely, unaware of the infection. In hepatitis B infection, liver injury is mediated by T-lymphocytes; the virus itself does not seem to cause hepatocyte death.

The treatment of acute hepatitis B is supportive.

Five to 10% of adults who acquire hepatitis B progress to chronic infection (Figs 24.4 and 24.5). In these, the prognosis is dependent on the degree of liver injury and the duration of infection. Chronic infection is characterised by the persistence of hepatitis B surface antigen, and IgG antibodies to core protein with or without e-antigen. Chronic hepatitis B infection can progress through four phases: immune tolerance, immune clearance, immune control and immune escape. The management of patients depends on which phase they are in (Table 24.9). During active phases of infection, liver biopsy can be of great value in assessing the degree of inflammation and determining whether cirrhosis has developed.

After a period of chronic infection, hepatitis B virus DNA may integrate into the hepatocyte genome, preventing its complete removal and predisposing to hepatocellular carcinoma. Worldwide, this virus is the most significant cause of hepatocellular carcinoma. Supercoiled hepatitis B DNA within hepatocytes is also resistant to removal by current therapies.

Eventually, chronic hepatitis B results in cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. Well-compensated, chronic hepatitis B liver disease has a 5-year survival of 84%. Five-year survival in decompensated chronic hepatitis B is only 14%. It is possible for a patient with chronic hepatitis B to spontaneously clear the virus as he or she mounts an immune response to the virus. This is usually associated with an episode of clinical hepatitis and is associated with loss of viral antigens and the development of antibodies. The tests used in the assessment of hepatitis B infection are outlined in Table 24.3.

The hepatitis B virus is physically resilient and extremely infectious. It is present in most body fluids of those infected and can readily be transmitted to close contacts. People living in the same house as the patient are at risk and should be vaccinated. Sharing needles amongst intravenous drug users, sexual exposure and inadequately sterilised skin-piecing equipment (e.g. that used for tattooing) carry a very high risk of transmitting the virus. Vertical transmission readily occurs. This is usually at the time of birth, and immunisation provides good protection to the infant. The presence of hepatitis B infection also needs to be considered in patients born in areas where there is a high prevalence, such as southern and eastern Europe and Southeast Asia.

Passive immunity against hepatitis B can be achieved with an injection of hyperimmune immunoglobulin directed against hepatitis B (HBIG) within 72 hours of exposure. Active immunity through a course of three injections of surface antigen is safe and effective. However, a small proportion of individuals are not capable of mounting a response to this vaccine. This is especially a problem with increasing age, in immunocompromised people, in those on dialysis and in obese individuals.

The aim of treatment for chronic hepatitis B infection is to suppress viral replication (reduced hepatitis B DNA levels), thereby reducing liver injury as reflected by normalization of ALT. In hepatitis B e-antigen positive patients seroconversion is associated with improved prognosis.

Pegylated interferon is administered subcutaneously for 12 months with the advantages of the absence of viral resistance, durability of seroconversion and a defined duration. Side effects of interferon, on the other hand, include a flu-like syndrome early, and later headaches, weight loss, alopecia and bone marrow suppression; depression may also occur. With interferon, higher ALT levels, recent acquisition of the virus and low HBV DNA titres are associated with good long-term responses. Thirty to 50% of selected cases lose circulating HBV DNA and HBeAg and become anti-HBeAg positive. Clearance of surface antigen is possible in a small proportion of patients. Improvement may continue for years after the completion of treatment. Five to 10% of patients relapse over 5 years after treatment. In HBe antigen-positive patients HBV genotype may help predict response to interferon therapy, the best candidates being those with genotype A, high ALT levels and low HBV DNA titres. Interferon therapy is generally not useful if there is combined infection with hepatitis C or D. Response in the presence of HIV infection is poor.

Oral nucleosides and nucleotides effectively suppress viral replication and are well tolerated but require long-term therapy to prevent relapse. Entecavir and tenofovir are effective while adefovir can be used as second-line therapy. Lamivudine is effective but its use is often associated with the development of resistance (YMDD variant) and relapse. Other oral agents include telbivudine and emtricitabine. Combination therapy using these agents may prove more effective but requires further investigation. The optimal duration of oral therapy is not clear but in e-antigen positive patients who seroconvert with undetectable hepatitis B DNA, withdrawal may be considered after a further 6–12 months of treatment. In e-antigen negative patients therapy may need to be lifelong.

Liver transplantation is a therapeutic option in those with end-stage chronic hepatitis B. If the patient is HBV DNA negative, a good response to transplantation is possible. On the other hand, liver transplantation into a HBV DNA-positive patient is often followed by severe recurrent disease, often rapidly progressing to graft destruction (fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis). Antiviral therapy and HBV immunoglobulins may improve outcomes.

A number of mutant varieties of hepatitis B have been identified. A ‘precore’ mutant, which does not produce e-antigen, may be associated with more severe acute hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure. The serum of patients infected with this variant is negative for e-antigen but positive for surface antigen and HBV DNA. Another form of hepatitis B has evolved an alteration in the surface antigen that allows it to escape the immunity afforded by antibodies to this antigen (and thus vaccination).

Patients with chronic hepatitis B who are to undergo chemotherapy or other immunosuppressive therapy should be treated to prevent a severe reactivation hepatitis.

Hepatitis C virus

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an RNA virus, which is thought to be directly cytopathic to the hepatocyte (Figs 24.6 and 24.7). Prior to routine screening for this virus, it was responsible for at least 90% of cases of post-transfusion non-A non-B hepatitis. The carrier rate in the general population is unclear, but is probably between 0.2% and 1%. The incubation period for acute hepatitis C is 15–160 days (mean: 50 days). In the majority of cases, the acquisition of hepatitis C virus is not associated with an acute symptomatic illness. Chronic infection is common, however, occurring in up to 80% of infected cases. Of those who acquire hepatitis C, approximately 10–15% develop severe liver disease, which can take decades to develop. Hepatic failure and hepatocellular carcinoma may then follow. Significant hepatitis or liver injury (on liver biopsy) can be associated with normal serum ALT levels. Conversely, some people with mild histological liver damage have serum ALT levels greater than two or three times the upper limit of normal. From this it is apparent that ALT measurements are of limited value in the assessment of the severity of hepatitis C virus infection.

image

Figure 24.6 Viral hepatitis, chronic, type C. Mild microvesicular fatty change is usually present.

From Kanel GC, Korula K. Liver biopsy evaluation. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000, with permission.

Hepatitis C virus appears to infect and replicate in both hepatocytes and mononuclear cells. Its antigenic structure is variable and appears able to escape immune surveillance. Furthermore, there are multiple genotypes (varieties) of the virus. Prior or current infection with hepatitis C virus does not protect an individual from acquiring further hepatitis C infections. One patient may harbour a number of varieties of hepatitis C virus. The genotype will influence the severity of the infection, the response to therapy and the infection’s prognosis.

Transmission of hepatitis C in Western society is primarily by sharing needles. In the past, blood transfusion was a major mode. Other modes of parenteral transmission, such as needlestick injuries, are possible. Under normal circumstances, the risk of sexual transmission is very low: approximately 0.1% per year in a monogamous sexual partnership. Sexual transmission is more likely when another sexually transmitted disease or HIV/AIDS is present. Vertical transmission is also unusual, occurring in approximately 5% of cases, particularly when the maternal viral load is high. Alcoholics are also at higher risk of acquiring hepatitis C.

Risk factors for the progression of hepatitis C infection to more significant liver injury include excessive alcohol consumption, the presence of fatty liver, acquisition of the virus after the age of 40 years, male gender and coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B.

Pegylated alpha-interferon (given by once-weekly injection) in combination with oral ribaviron can be very effective in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Response to treatment is more likely with HCV genotypes 2 and 3, histologically less hepatic fibrosis, shorter duration of infection and lower viral titres. Moreover, the viral genotype may influence the severity of the disease and the viral titres. Patients with cirrhosis are less likely to respond to interferon and ribaviron therapy, but significant benefit can still be achieved. The addition of the investigational oral protease inhibitor telaprevir to standard therapy may improve treatment success in non- responders.

In general, those without cirrhosis and genotypes 2 and 3 can expect a sustained virological response (the loss of HCV RNA from the blood and cure in most) in 80% or more who complete 24 weeks of treatment. Patients with genotype 1 will require treatment for 48 weeks and can reach response rates of over 50%.

HCV therapy failure is associated with excessive alcohol consumption, insulin resistance, obesity, treatment non-compliance, adverse events requiring dose reduction and insufficient duration of therapy. An individual’s genetic make-up may also influence his or her responsiveness to therapy.

Liver transplantation is a therapeutic option in end-stage hepatitis C. Following transplantation, viraemia is common. Among transplanted patients, 75–90% will develop chronic hepatitis C within 2–3 years (usually within 1 year).

Hepatitis C is responsibly for approximately 25% of hepatocellular carcinoma across the world. The incidence is increasing in Western countries and surveillance should be considered in cirrhotic patients. It is of note, however, that antiviral therapy reduces the risk of developing this malignancy. Six-monthly surveillance abdominal ultrasound examinations should be performed to screen cirrhotic patients for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Vaccinate hepatitis C patients to protect against hepatitis A and B. Hepatitic C can cause extrahepatic disease, including porphyria cutanea tarda (skin blisters—think C!), mixed cryoglobulinemia (palpable purpura) and lichen planus.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is the most common cause for abnormal liver function tests in Australia, the USA and the UK. The prevalence of approximately 20% has been increasing dramatically over recent years as the average body weights of these communities increase. It is often associated with mild (usually up to twice the upper limit of normal) rises in serum transaminase levels, often with elevated GGT levels. Typical patients are overweight with the features of the metabolic syndrome. Thus, strong associations exist with obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. There is commonly a family history of type 2 diabetes and evidence of insulin resistance.

When associated with hepatic inflammation (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease can unusually progress to produce significant hepatic fibrosis and eventual cirrhosis. Insulin resistance is likely to be the main pathogenic mechanism by which fatty liver occurs in these patients. A subsequent insult or ‘second hit’ (e.g. endotoxaemia) is thought to precipitate the more aggressive inflammatory steatohepatitis.

Usually there is fatty infiltration of the liver on ultrasonography, with no other apparent cause for abnormal liver function test results. CT scan of the abdomen can also identify hepatic fatty infiltration, often with associated marked visceral fat deposition. In the typical case, liver biopsy is not necessary. However, if a biopsy is performed, this condition may have histological findings indistinguishable from alcoholic liver injury. Careful history taking and viral serology are required to clarify the diagnosis in uncertain cases. A carbohydrate-deficient transferrin test will be negative (Table 24.10), but no other biochemical features are diagnostically helpful. High BMI, age greater than 50 years, ALT greater than twice the upper limit of normal and triglycerides greater than 1.7 μmol/L have been associated with a greater risk of hepatic fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Table 24.10 Tests useful in alcoholic liver disease

Test Comment
Erythrocyte mean cell volume Round macrocytes, low specificity
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase Enzyme-induced by ethanol, level related to long-term prognosis, sensitive but low specificity
Urate, high density lipoprotein and triclycerides Elevated, low specificity
Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin Sensitive and specific, reflects regular excessive ethanol consumption within previous 2 weeks

Management is directed towards weight loss and exercise, which can improve insulin sensitivity. When successful, this can result in biochemical and histological improvement. Sudden weight loss may be accompanied by further rises in serum transaminase levels. The rate of weight reduction should be less than 1 kg/week. When the patient’s weight fluctuates, the transaminase levels may vary in parallel. Clearly, optimal diabetic control is essential. When hyperlipidaemia is present, it should be managed as usual with diet and medications (e.g. statins) as normally indicated. The use of metformin, ursodeoxycholic acid and glitazones requires further investigation.

Bariatric surgery has been found to improve non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as well as other complications of morbid obesity.

Other causes of hepatic steatosis include excessive alcohol consumption, recent profound weight loss, hyperalimentation, intestinal bypass surgery and thyroid dysfunction. In these cases the condition is asymptomatic and may be discovered when an abnormal liver function profile or hepatomegaly is detected incidentally.

Certain drug toxicity reactions, fatty liver of pregnancy and Reye’s syndrome are also associated with hepatic steatosis, but cause no clinically apparent illnesses.

Alcoholic liver disease

Although alcohol is a direct hepatotoxin, a patient’s nutritional state and genetic make-up will influence the degree of hepatic injury caused by excessive intake of this agent. Alcohol-induced liver injury is generally classified into fatty liver, alcoholic hepatitis and cirrhosis (Fig 24.8). The mainstay of therapy is abstinence from alcohol.

image

Figure 24.8 Alcoholic fatty liver. The majority of hepatocytes show a microvesicular fatty change in an active alcoholic.

From Kanel GC, Korula K. Liver biopsy evaluation. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000, with permission.

Fatty liver is in general considered reversible if excessive alcohol consumption is ceased. Recovery and good hepatic function is expected. However if drinking continues, the degree of fatty change is a prognostic indicator of significant long-term liver injury. Clinically there is hepatomegaly. There are no peripheral signs of chronic liver disease. Serum transaminases and especially GGT levels are moderately raised. When serum AST levels are two or more times greater than the ALT level, alcoholic liver disease is more likely the cause. (This does not apply in the presence of cirrhosis.) Fatty infiltration may be apparent on ultrasonography.

In alcoholic hepatitis there is active inflammatory injury to the liver. This may be mild, even subclinical, or severe and life-threatening. The severe form is typified by a mild fever, jaundice, neutrophil leucocytosis, moderate elevations of serum transaminase levels (usually < 300 U/L) and tender hepatomegaly. There may be a hepatic bruit. Liver failure with encephalopathy, ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding (often from oesophageal varices) and sepsis may occur.

Treatment is in general supportive. If the patient is malnourished, aggressive nutritional support may improve the short-term outcome; high kilojoule, high protein diets are appropriate.

Corticosteroids may improve short-term survival in those with severe acute alcoholic hepatitis and jaundice, a high INR or prolonged encephalopathy but no gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the available data do not support the use of corticosteroids in alcoholic hepatitis. In these patients enteral nutritional supplementation may also improve survival. Furthermore, pentoxifylline (400 mg t.d.s.) has been shown to improve survival in severe acute alcoholic hepatitis, by reducing the risk of developing the hepatorenal syndrome. Antioxidants have been shown not to be of benefit.

Propylthiouracil may be of some value in alcoholic hepatitis, increasing survival, but it is not widely used. Colchicine may be of benefit in cirrhosis, but data are limited and conflicting.

Cirrhosis caused by alcohol consumption is similar clinically to that of other causes. Liver injury can progress to cirrhosis after overt alcoholic hepatitis or in the absence of clinically apparent hepatitis. If alcohol consumption continues, there may be superimposed alcoholic hepatitis and rapid progression to decompensated, end-stage liver disease and death.

It is important to note that severe alcohol-related liver disease can be associated with a substantial reversible component if alcohol is stopped. Hepatocyte function will improve and, with the resolution of hepatocyte swelling, portal hypertension can also ameliorate. With abstinence a remarkable degree of recovery may occur, even though it is possible for liver injury to progress once drinking has ceased.

Liver transplantation is a valid therapy, particularly in decompensated post-alcoholic cirrhosis where the long-term outcomes are similar to those of transplantation for other conditions. However, the patient’s condition can improve to such a degree with abstinence that transplantation is not required. Care must be taken to exclude alcohol-related injury to other major organs, such as the brain and heart, prior to considering transplantation.

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus is greater in alcoholics than in the general population. The reason for this is not clear. However, the consumption of excessive amounts of alcohol accelerates hepatitis C-associated liver disease. Interface hepatitis seen on liver biopsy in an alcoholic is likely to be due to hepatitis C infection.

In assessing a patient’s alcohol consumption, an estimate of the number of grams of ethanol consumed per day is useful. The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia recommends that consumption by males and females should not exceed an average of 20 g per day, with two alcohol-free days per week. Ethanol consumption above these levels is associated with increasing risk of injury. The clinician should aim to identify those individuals at risk. Once they are identified, brief counselling is often effective in reducing ethanol consumption towards safer levels. When applied by the general practitioner, this approach is effective in reducing a community’s overall alcohol consumption and reducing alcohol-related social and physical trauma and pathology. ‘Skid row’ type alcoholics will not respond to this approach. These severe cases may require more intensive management, but are much less likely to respond favourably.

Systematic questionnaires in relation to alcohol dependency are useful. A number of screening questions have been devised. One of the simplest is the CAGE screening test. In this, patients are asked if they ever felt:

The greater the number of positive responses, the more likely the patient is to have an alcohol-dependency problem.

The GGT level could be used to monitor abstinence, but it is non-specific. GGT levels should normalise over 2–5 weeks of abstinence. Up to one-third of heavy drinkers do not have a raised GGT level. An isolated binge does not usually elevate the GGT level. The carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT) test is of more value but is not readily available. The CDT test detects a variant of transferrin in the serum that carries fewer sialic acid moieties than the usual form. The presence of CDT reflects the consumption of excessive amounts of ethanol. Levels rise after several weeks of excessive drinking and remain elevated for approximately 2 weeks after drinking has ceased.

Haemochromatosis

This is the commonest genetic disorder in the Australian Anglo-Celtic population. Untreated, this condition, producing iron overload, significantly reduces life expectancy. Moreover, haemochromatosis treated before there is end organ damage is associated with a normal life expectancy. Patients often present because of the incidental finding of abnormal liver function test results or iron studies, or come to medical attention after a relative has been diagnosed. Adequate screening and an accurate diagnosis are essential in first and second order relatives of confirmed cases.

One of the commonest presenting symptoms is unexplained fatigue. Haemochromatosis may be present in 1% of patients in diabetic and rheumatological outpatient clinics, where they may go unrecognised. Cardiac failure in the presence of a cardiomyopathy is another presenting feature, albeit unusual.

Clinically apparent advanced haemochromatosis presents between 50 and 70 years of age (Fig 24.9). The male to female ratio is between 4:1 and 5:1, depending on the study that measures it. Presenting features may include unexplained hepatomegaly, fatigue, loss of libido and hypogonadism (from pituitary iron deposition), cardiac dysfunction from cardiomyopathy, skin pigmentation (from melatonin and iron) and arthralgias with arthropathy. The arthropathy may involve the second and third metacarpophalangeal joints as well as proximal interphalangeal joints, the knees, wrists and hips. The liver is usually the first organ damaged, and patients may present with cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a diagnosis of haemochromatosis is not excluded by normal liver function test results.

The defect responsible for iron loading in haemochromatosis appears to lie in malregulation of metabolism and intestinal iron absorption. Haemochromatosis is an autosomal recessive condition. The responsible gene (HFE) lies on chromosome 6 near the HLA site. There is an approximately 70% linkage with HLA-A3. Approximately 1 in 300 (0.3%) Australians of northern European (including UK) descents are homozygous for the C282Y mutation. People who are homozygous for the C282Y mutation and those with both C282Y and H63D mutations (compound heterozygotes) are at greatest risk of significant iron overload. However, only a limited number of those with these genotypes develop disease. A second defect in iron metabolism may be required to cause pathological iron accumulation. A defect in the hepatic iron-regulatory peptide hepcidin may determine the phenotypic expression of haemochromatosis. Juvenile haemochromatosis has been associated with mutation of the HFE2 (haemojuvelin) gene on chromosome 1.

Iron studies (serum iron, transferrin and ferritin) are used to determine the likelihood of haemochromatosis. In this situation, the transferrin saturation and the serum ferritin concentration are of most value, especially the former. A normal transferring saturation makes haemochromatosis unlikely.

In males, a transferrin saturation over 62% (in females, over 50%) identifies more than 90% of homozygotes. The serum ferritin concentration, a measure of tissue iron stores, predicts approximately 70% of homozygotes. It must be noted that ferritin is an acute phase reactant and can be non-specifically elevated in many conditions (e.g. alcoholic hepatitis, chronic hepatitis, hepatoma, hyperthyroidism, chronic inflammation and histiocytosis). Moreover, it will be elevated as a direct consequence of hepatocellular injury. As with the transaminases, cytoplasmic ferritin will be lost to the serum when hepatocytes are damaged. Similarly other components of the iron studies are influenced by many conditions. Gene testing (homozygous C282Y) confirms the diagnosis.

The diagnosis of haemochromatosis when in doubt is established by the measurement of the tissue iron concentration on liver biopsy. The hepatic iron index (HII) is calculated by dividing the liver iron concentration (μmol/g dry weight) by the patient’s age in years. An HII >2 is indicative of haemochromatosis. This is complemented by hepatic histology with staining for iron (Fig 24.10). In haemochromatosis, excess iron occurs predominantly within hepatocytes (as opposed to Kuppfer cells in cases of secondary iron overload). A key role of liver biopsy is also to identify the presence of cirrhosis with its implications for long-term prognosis.

image

Figure 24.10 Haemochromatosis. Abundant haemosiderin pigment is present diffusely throughout the liver.

From Kanel GC, Korula K. Liver biopsy evaluation. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000, with permission.

Those individuals who are heterozygote for the C282Y mutation may also have abnormal iron test results, especially if they consume excessive amounts of alcohol. In these individuals, iron overload can become significant in the presence of other disorders such as hereditary spherocytosis, beta-thalassaemia minor, idiopathic sideroblastic anaemia and porphyria cutanea tarda.

Screening of first- and second-degree relatives of patients with haemochromatosis using HFE analysis, fasting serum transferrin saturation and ferritin levels is necessary to identify cases prior to the onset of clinical disease.

The treatment of haemochromatosis is phlebotomy. Venesections may be commenced at weekly intervals and adjusted according to the estimated iron load and the patient’s tolerance. Treatment is monitored with serial haemoglobin levels and iron studies. The aim is to achieve and maintain normal iron studies. The haemoglobin level will usually remain stable until the patient is ‘de-ironed’, then it can fall rapidly. If anaemia becomes problematic before the iron status has been normalised, lower volume or less frequent venesections can be used. Maintenance venesections are started, and continued indefinitely. If the patient is ‘de-ironed’ within 18 months and there is no end organ damage, life expectancy is normal.

Haemochromatosis may be complicated by the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, with a relative risk of more than 200. This is more likely in males, in those over the age of 50 years, in the presence of cirrhosis, chronic alcoholism, smoking and past transfusion. It is not related to the amount of iron removed during treatment and only unusually occurs in a non-cirrhotic liver.

Wilson’s disease

Wilson’s disease occurs in approximately 1 in 40,000 people and is the consequence of mutation of the ATP7B gene on chromosome 13, leading to defective copper trafficking and thereby the progressive accumulation of copper with ongoing liver injury through childhood into adult life. More than 60 polymorphisms have been identified, making genetic testing unhelpful in clinical practice. ATP7B is a trans-Golgi membrane hepatocyte copper-transporting ATPase involved in biliary copper excretion.

Catastrophic haemolysis and an acute hepatic illness are unusual complications. In those who do not succumb to liver disease in early life, neurological abnormalities can evolve in early adulthood (including psychiatric diseases, dysarthria, ataxia, incoordination and tremor). Patients with Wilson’s disease may also be at elevated risk of intraabdominal malignancy.

Low serum caeruloplasmin levels suggest the diagnosis, although this may remain normal in some cases. The presence of Kayser-Fleischer rings (brown deposits around the periphery of the iris, best seen at slit-lamp examination) suggests this diagnosis. However, Kayser-Fleischer rings are also rarely found in chronic cholestatic liver diseases. Liver biopsy will often demonstrate excessive copper staining but this occurs in other diseases; chemical analysis of liver tissue copper concentration is usually a reliable indicator of the diagnosis. Urinary copper excretion and copper dynamic studies may also be needed to establish the diagnosis.

Effective therapy is available for Wilson’s disease. D-penicillamine (250 to 500 mg daily increasing incrementally to 1000–1500 mg in two to four divided doses) chelates copper and allows its removal from the body. An alternative chelating agent for patients unable to take penicillamine is trimethylene tetramine dihydrochloride. Therapy is supplemented with oral zinc, which leads to the inhibition of gastrointestinal copper absorption. Effective chelation therapy early in the disease will stabilise, improve or prevent end organ injury.

In early, presymptomatic Wilson’s disease, zinc (50 mg b.d.) therapy can prevent progression to clinical disease.

Liver transplantation should be considered when there is liver failure or when chelation therapy fails in the presence of advanced liver disease. Medical therapy is the preferred therapy in those with neurological Wilson’s disease, as it is unclear whether transplantation provides any extra benefit in that circumstance.

Idiopathic, autoimmune chronic hepatitis

Idiopathic, autoimmune chronic hepatitis (IACH) is an uncommon condition predominantly affecting women. It is characterised by the presence of progressive liver disease and a polyclonal hyperglobulinaemia associated with a variety of autoantibodies. Responsiveness to corticosteroid therapy is also typical.

The onset of IACH is usually insidious with progressive fatigue, anorexia and jaundice. Seventy-five per cent of patients are female, mostly between 10 and 40 years of age. In the more aggressive forms, there is progression to cirrhosis and eventually liver failure. Untreated, more than 50% of patients die in 3–5 years.

The aetiology of this condition is unclear, but once established there is progressive cytotoxic T-cell-mediated injury of hepatocytes. In certain circumstances, it appears that viral hepatitis could be the initiating event of IACH.

Autoantibodies, commonly anti-actin (anti-smooth muscle) and antinuclear antibodies, are present. There is a prominent polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia. In an often aggressive variant that usually affects young females, the smooth muscle antibody and antinuclear antibody can be absent while an anti-liver/kidney microtonal antibody (anti-LKM1) is found.

On liver biopsy in aggressive disease, the chronic inflammatory infiltrate, including plasma cells, typically expands the portal areas and extends into the liver lobule, causing erosion of the limiting plate (interface necrosis, Fig 24.11). Varying degrees of fibrosis may be present. Fibrotic linkages between portal tracts or cirrhosis are markers of aggressive disease.

Corticosteroid treatment is appropriate when liver biopsy shows more aggressive chronic hepatitis, gammaglobulin levels are greater than twice normal, and ALT levels are greater than five times normal. Corticosteroids (tapering from 30 mg/day to 60 mg/day) with or without azathioprine improve the clinical syndrome and survival. Azathioprine (1–2 mg/kg) may be used to supplement corticosteroid therapy or to act as a steroid-sparing agent. In some the corticosteroid can be withdrawn and remission maintained with azathioprine. A positive response to treatment supports the diagnosis. Mortality is reduced, hepatic inflammation and fibrosis are suppressed and symptoms improve on steroids. Sufficient therapy is required to keep the serum transaminase levels below twice the upper limit of normal, preferably normal, and normalised IgG concentration. Slower progression of the disease may continue, however. Although some patients can cease therapy after several years, treatment will need to be lifelong in the majority of cases. If the disease progresses, liver transplantation will eventually need to be considered. The benign, generally non-progressive, milder form of autoimmune hepatitis may not require therapy.

Especially when long-term corticosteroid therapy is required, weight control and protection of bone density (calcium and vitamin D supplementation with or without a bisphosphonate) are particularly important. Chronic infection with strongyloides (stool examination) and tuberculosis (chest x-ray) and currency of vaccination could help prevent significant infectious complications.

Primary biliary cirrhosis

In primary biliary cirrhosis there is an immune-mediated destruction of the small intrahepatic bile ducts. This illness follows a prolonged course with eventual development of cirrhosis and liver failure. Primary biliary cirrhosis typically presents in a middle-aged female with pruritus, a raised alkaline phosphatase level and a positive antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) result.

ALP and, to a lesser extent, serum transaminase levels are usually elevated in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. AMA is present in the serum in 95% of cases. Its presence is highly suggestive of the diagnosis. IgM levels are often elevated. Differentiation between AMA-negative primary biliary cirrhosis and IACH may be difficult. Smooth muscle antibody and antinuclear antibody may be present in the former, and low titres of AMA can occur in IACH. A true overlap syndrome can occur, and will present features of both conditions. Furthermore, on liver biopsy, primary biliary cirrhosis can share features with IACH, although differentiation is usually possible (Fig 24.12). If uncertainty remains, a therapeutic trial of corticosteroids is likely to induce an improvement in IACH but not in primary biliary cirrhosis.

image

Figure 24.12 Primary biliary cirrhosis. The interlobar bile duct is slightly hyperplastic and exhibits lymphocytes within the duct wall.

From Kanel GC, Korula K. Liver biopsy evaluation. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000, with permission.

Adverse prognostic signs in primary biliary cirrhosis include a high serum bilirubin concentration (over 100 μmol/L), a low serum albumin concentration, ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding, advanced age, cirrhosis or central cholestasis on liver biopsy and low serum IgM levels.

Pruritus is a common clinical feature of primary biliary cirrhosis. This will often respond to ursodeoxycholic acid. Alternative therapy includes cholestyramine. Fat-soluble vitamin deficiency (A, D, E and K), which is secondary to cholestasis, should be sought and treated accordingly. Osteopenia due to osteoporosis may result in disabling fractures. There may be evidence of autoimmune disorders involving other organs such as the eyes, joints and thyroid. Hypercholesterolaemia with xanthelasmas and xanthomas are further features of primary biliary cirrhosis.

Ursodeoxycholic acid (13–15 mg/kg/day) is effective therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis, improving survival and delaying the need for transplantation. In the overlap syndrome a combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and corticosteroids may be required.

End-stage primary biliary cirrhosis is a common indication for liver transplantation in adults, with a success rate of 80% or more. Transplantation should be considered when the serum bilirubin concentration rises progressively above 100 μmol/L, or when there is uncontrolled gastrointestinal bleeding, ascites or intractable pruritus.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PGS) is characterised by the inflammatory destruction of bile ducts larger than those involved in primary biliary cirrhosis. This condition is considered to be due to an autoimmune process. Approximately 70% of cases of PSC occur in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA) are common, especially in those with associated ulcerative colitis (up to 90% of cases).

The diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis relies on cholangiography identifying focal biliary strictures with associated beadlike dilatations. Liver biopsy is of limited diagnostic value (Fig 24.13). Because of the presence of portal inflammation, there may be difficulty in differentiating primary sclerosing cholangitis from other chronic inflammatory conditions on liver biopsy.

The progression of primary sclerosing cholangitis is difficult to predict. Advanced age, severe changes on liver histology, splenomegaly and high serum bilirubin concentrations are adverse prognostic features.

When localised strictures occur, endoscopic therapy can be considered. Placing stents across strictures or balloon dilation may be of value. The risk of bacterial contamination of the biliary tract needs to be considered, especially if foreign bodies (stents) are left in situ. Recurrent cholangitis is a problem, with and without intervention. Liver transplantation is the only effective treatment for primary sclerosing cholangitis. A successful outcome is expected in more than 70% of well-selected cases. The use of high doses of ursodeoxycholic acid has been reported in PSC. This treatment is of no proven value and may shorten the patient’s survival time.

Primary cholangiocarcinoma complicates 10–20% of cases of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Sudden rapid progression of pruritus, jaundice and weight loss suggest malignancy. However, this diagnosis can be difficult and may not be made until postmortem. Brush cytology on ERCP provides a positive result in only 20% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma. If transplant takes place, the outcome is poor when primary cholangiocarcinoma is present.

Drugs and the liver

A careful history of medication use is vital in the assessment of the patient with abnormal liver function test results. Toxic or idiosyncratic adverse reactions may occur with many therapeutic agents (Table 24.11). Immune mechanisms are responsible for many of these reactions. The contraceptive pill may be associated with a number of liver diseases including hepatic adenoma (rare—usually single), hepatocellular carcinoma (very rare), peliosis hepatis (large blood-filled cavities), Budd-Chiari syndrome (see below), cholestasis and cholesterol gallstones (because of more lithogenic bile).

Table 24.11 Drugs and the liver

Liver disease Clinicopathological features Drug examples
1. Altered LFTs without liver disease    
Due to microsomal enzyme induction No clinical features; raised GGT and ALP; ground glass cells Phenytoin, warfarin
Hyperbilirubinaemia Jaundice rare Rifampicin
2. Hepatocellular necrosis: hepatocellular necrosis with varying inflammatory change, ALT > 5 × normal    
Focal necrosis Lobular hepatitis, resembles viral hepatitis Isoniazid, cloxacillin, halothane (mild)
Bridging necrosis Traces of necrosis connect adjacent portal and/or central veins Isoniazid, alpha-methyldopa
Zonal necrosis Well-demarcated zone of necrotic hepatocytes; less conspicuous inflammation Paracetamol, halothane (severe)
Massive necrosis Entire hepatic acini necrotic; fulminant hepatic failure Halothane (fatal), valproic acid NSAIDs
3. Fatty liver    
Acute fatty change Usually microvesicular; clinical features of hepatitis, liver failure Tetracycline, valproic acid, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, L-asparaginase
Steatohepatitis Resembles alcoholic hepatitis histologically; clinical features of chronic liver disease Perhexiline maleate, amiodarone
4. Granulomatous reactions    
Non-caseating granulomas Varying lobular hepatitis, cholestasis or pericholangitis; usually mixed LFT results, may be hepatocellular Allopurinol, chlorpromazine, chlorothiazide, isoniazid, phenytoin, sulfonamides
5. Acute cholestasis    
Cholestasis without hepatitis Cholestasis, no inflammation; pruritus with minimal systemic symptoms ALP > 2 × normal OCS, anabolic androgens
Cholestasis with hepatitis Cholestasis with portal and lobular inflammation; systemic symptoms; ALT elevated as well as ALP Chlorpromazine, erythromycin estolate, flucloxacillin
Cholestasis with bile duct injury Destructive lesions of bile duct epithelium; clinically similar to acute cholangitis Flucloxacillin, chlorpromazine
6. Chronic cholestasis: cholestasis > 3 months    
Vanishing bile duct syndrome Paucity of small bile ducts, varying fibrosis; clinically resembles primary biliary cirrhosis; AMA negative Chlorpromazine, amitriptyline, flucloxacillin
7. Chronic parenchymal liver disease: abnormalities present > 3 months    
Chronic hepatitis Periportal and/or bridging necrosis, fibrosis or cirrhosis; clinical and biochemical features of chronic liver disease; liver failure may occur Alpha-methyldopa, nitrofurantoin, dantrolene
Fibrosis and cirrhosis Portal hypertension; LFTs often normal Methotrexate, hypervitaminosis A
8. Vascular disorders    
Sinusoidal dilatation Isolated finding or adjacent to tumours; hepatomegaly is the only clinical feature OCS
Peliosis hepatis Destructive lesions of sinusoids resulting in blood-filled lakes Anabolic androgens
Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension Portal and perisinusoidal fibrosis; splenomegaly, oesophageal varices Vinyl chloride, azathioprine, hypervitaminosis A
Hepatic venous outflow obstruction Budd-Chiari syndrome, veno-occlusive disease and overlap syndromes 6-thioguanine, OCS, pyrrolizidine alkaloids
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia Regeneration nodules with minimal fibrosis; portal hypertension Azathioprine, dactinomycin
9. Hepatic tumours    
Focal nodular hyperplasia Hamartoma, associated vascularity attributable to oestrogens OCS
Hepatocellular adenoma Benign neoplasm of hepatocytes OCS, androgens
Hepatocellular carcinoma Primary liver cancer (hepatoma) OCS, androgens
Rarer carcinomas Fibrolamellar variant, hepatoblastoma, cholangiocarcinoma, cholangiohepatocellular tumours, carcinosarcoma OCS
Angiosarcoma Malignant tumour, possibly arises from sinusoidal lining cells Arsenic, vinyl chloride, thorium dioxide

ALP = alkaline phosphatase; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AMA = anti-mitochondrial antibody; LFTs = liver function tests; NSAIDs = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; OCS = oral contraceptive steroids.

From Farrell G. Drug induced liver disease. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994, with permission.

Paracetamol overdose, deliberate or accidental, is a relatively common cause of severe acute liver disease. In this case toxic metabolites of the drug are generated by cytochrome p450s and damage hepatocytes. The induction of these enzymes, as occurs with chronic alcohol consumption, may enhance paracetamol toxicity.

Polymorphisms of certain p450s may also influence an individual’s risk of drug-induced liver injury by affecting the rate of production of toxic metabolites (e.g. nefazodone). The generation of toxic metabolites may also be responsible for liver damage associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Liver injury may follow idiosyncratic drug-induced metabolic modification. For example, the statins may induce a mild asymptomatic rise in liver enzymes, but occasionally cause more severe, acute cholestatic hepatitis. The effect seems to be mediated by changes in mevalonic acid metabolism.

Jaundice and other symptoms of drug-induced liver injury generally persist for a limited period after the withdrawal of the offending agent but long-term abnormalities in liver function tests and of hepatic histology may not be as unusual as previously believed. However, late liver failure is not expected. In particular, hepatic injury associated with methyldopa, amiodarone, nitrofurantoin, diclofenac and clavulanic acid/amoxicillin may be followed by chronic, ongoing liver disease.

Vascular and perfusion disorders of the liver

Vasculitis and thrombotic disorders can affect the vessels of the liver. These conditions often produce portal hypertension with varying degrees of hepatocellular dysfunction.

Obstruction of the portal vein may occur in association with sepsis or thrombotic disorders and presents usually with bleeding from varices, or splenomegaly is detected on examination. This results in portal hypertension, often with preservation of hepatocyte function. Portal vein thrombosis can also complicate cirrhosis.

Veno-occlusive disease of the liver is associated with obstruction of the terminal hepatic venules. Precipitating events include bone marrow transplantation and exposure to chemotherapeutic agents and certain plant alkaloids. Clinically, there is right upper quadrant tenderness, hepatomegaly, ascites and jaundice. Progression to liver failure may occur.

Budd-Chiari syndrome involves thrombosis of the hepatic veins. It presents with pain, hepatomegaly and ascites (Ch 4). There is portal hypertension and loss of hepatocyte function. There are acute and chronic forms of this syndrome. Progression to liver failure is not unusual.

Thrombotic conditions involving the portal and hepatic vessels are associated with hypercoagulable states such as paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria, polycythaemia rubra vera, pregnancy, the contraceptive pill, lupus anticoagulant, malignancy (e.g. renal, adrenal, testicular and thyroid), a fibrous membrane, amoebic abscess or hydatid cyst and drugs (e.g. azathioprine).

The diagnosis of portal and hepatic vein obstruction can often be established with ultrasonography and Doppler flow studies. Portal venography may be necessary. The definitive diagnosis of veno-occlusive disease requires liver biopsy although the diagnosis is often made clinically.

Cardiac disease may cause an abnormal liver function profile. Hepatic ischaemia in association with hypotension, as occurs during cardiac arrest, will result in a marked elevation of serum transaminase levels, often to several thousand units per litre. Unlike other conditions, the serum lactate dehydrogenase level is also markedly elevated. Recovery of the liver is prompt. Liver dysfunction does not interfere with the clinical course of the cause of the hypotension nor the prognosis. Moreover, the final prognosis is determined by the underlying illness.

Right-sided heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation cause hepatic congestion, and associated abnormalities in liver function test results are not unusual. Elevations in alkaline phosphatase levels are common and will improve with control of the cardiac failure. Persistent hepatic congestion can eventually lead to fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Both the incidence of and mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma are increasing in Australia and other Western countries, primarily as a consequence of chronic viral hepatitis. Treatment options depend on the size and location of the tumour and as such early detection is important. The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma can be made on good quality imaging, such as triple phase CT scan or MRI, without the need for biopsy.

Surgical resection of single lesions less than 2 cm in diameter leads to a 80% 5-year survival. This approach is appropriate when the liver disease is compensated without significant portal hypertension. It is important to have an understanding of the liver segments. There are eight segments. Each has a separate blood supply from the hepatic artery and portal vein, and a segmental bile duct drains into the right or left hepatic ducts. Removal of separate segments of the liver is feasible and this is important when considering surgical resection of a malignancy.

When there is a single hepatocellular carcinoma (less than 5 cm) or up to three lesions less than 3 cm in diameter, liver transplantation can be potentially curative and should be considered. If transplantation is contraindicated local ablative therapy (radiofrequency ablation or ethanol injection) can be of value. With advanced hepatocellular carcinoma transarterial chemoembolisation and for those with more severe underlying liver disease, oral sorefenib can slow the progression of the disease. Patients with terminal disease should be managed symptomatically (see Ch 28).

Cirrhosis is an important predisposing factor in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cirrhosis of any cause may be considered potentially premalignant. However, the most significant aetiological factors include hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection, haemochromatosis and alcohol consumption. Hepatitis B infection and possibly hepatitis C can induce hepatocellular carcinoma without prior cirrhosis. Symptomatic hepatocellular carcinoma carries a poor prognosis. Screening of groups at high risk should be performed routinely. Ultrasonography can identify small, potentially curable lesions and should be performed in cirrhotic patients at 6-monthly intervals.

The fibrolamellar variant, usually found in young Caucasian females, responds well to local resection.

Acute fatty liver of pregnancy

This condition occurs in approximately 1 in 13,000 pregnancies. It carries with it a high fetal and maternal mortality. A brief non-specific prodrome may rapidly progress to fulminant hepatic failure. The onset is in the third trimester, generally after 32 weeks of gestation. Twin, male and primipara pregnancies are at greater risk of acute fatty liver.

Nausea and vomiting are features of the clinical illness. Polydipsia may occur in association with diabetes insipidus. There may be abdominal pain. This can be epigastric or centred in the right upper quadrant. Malaise and fatigue is followed by pruritus and jaundice that rapidly progresses to liver failure. Ascites occurs in 50% of cases. Encephalopathy, hypoglycaemia, coagulopathy and renal failure follow. The mortality, without hepatic transplantation, is greater than 80% in advanced cases.

Commonly there is mild hypertension, oedema and proteinuria, suggesting a possible relationship to preeclampsia. Haematology reveals leucocytosis, thrombocytopenia and evidence of microangiopathic haemolysis. Creatinine is elevated with a greater elevation in uric acid levels. Bilirubin and ALP levels are raised, while serum transaminase levels are between 300 U/L and 500 U/L. Hypoglycaemia and coagulopathy may be severe and represent significant management problems.

Abdominal ultrasound scans have poor sensitivity in identifying acute fatty liver but are of use in excluding Budd-Chiari syndrome and gallstones. If necessary, a fine-needle aspiration biopsy will confirm the diagnosis. However, once the clinical diagnosis is made, performing a biopsy could waste valuable time and in so doing adversely affect the outcome.

The treatment of acute fatty liver of pregnancy is emergency delivery of the fetus. This reduces the mortality to approximately 20%. It is of note that the mother’s condition may worsen after delivery. Liver transplantation may be required. There is no chronic disease following recovery. Recurrent acute fatty liver with subsequent pregnancies is not expected, but has rarely been reported.

Key Points

Further reading

Amin J., Law M.G., Bartlett M., et al. Causes of death after diagnosis of hepatitis b or hepatitis C infection: a large community-based linkage study. Lancet. 2006;48:938-945.

Bambha K., Kim W.R., Talwalker J., et al. Incidence, clinical spectrum and outcome of primary sclerosing cholangitis in a United States community. Gastroenterol. 2003;125:1364-1369.

Black M. Drug hepatoltoxicity. Clin Liver Dis. 2003;7:295-512.

Buster E., Hansen B., Lau G., et al. Factors that predict response of patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B to peginterferon-alfa. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:2002-2009.

Cabre E., Rodriguez Iglesias P., Caballeria J., et al. Short and long term outcome of severe alcohol-induced hepatitis treated with steroids or enteral nutrition: a multicenter randomized trial. Hepatology. 2000;32:36-42.

Chitturi S., et al. NASH and insulin resistance: insulin hypersecretion and specific association with the insulin resistance syndrome. Hepatology. 2002;35:373-379.

Deugnier Y., Brissot P., Loreal O. Iron and the liver: update 2008. J Hepatol. 2008;48:S113-S123.

Farrell G.C., Larter C.Z. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2006;43(suppl 1):S99-S112.

Ferenci P., Lockwood A., Mullen K., et al. Hepatic Encephalopathy—definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: final report of the Working Party at the 11th World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998. Hepatology. 2002;35:716-721.

Green R.M., Flamm S. AGA technical review on the evaluation of liver chemistry tests. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1367-2384.

Hay J.E. Liver disease in pregnancy. Hepatology. 2008;47:1067-1076.

Hézode C., Forestier N., Dusheiko G., et al. Telaprevir and peginterferon with or without ribavirin for chronic HCV infection. NEJM. 2009;360(18):1839-1850.

Lok A.S.F., MaMahon B.J. Chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2007;45:507-539.

Munoz S.J. The hepatorenal syndrome. Med Clin N Am.. 2008;92:813-837.

Ratziu V., Giral P., Charlotte F., et al. Liver fibrosis in overweight patients. Gastroenterol. 2000;118:1117-1123.

Rauch A., Kutalik Z., Descombes P., et al. Genetic variation in IL28B is associated with hepatitis C and treatment failure. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:1338-1345.

Roberts E.A., Schilsky M.L. Practice guideline on Wilson’s disease. Hepatology. 2003;37:1475-1492.

Runyon B.A. Care of patients with ascites. N Eng J Med. 1994;330:337-342.

Sherlock S. Alcoholic liver disease. Lancet. 1995;345:227-229.

Sorrell M.F., Belongia Edward A., et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement: management of Hepatitis B. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:104-110.