A young woman with abnormal vaginal bleeding

Published on 10/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 978 times

Problem 7 A young woman with abnormal vaginal bleeding

In this case the bleeding was only a little heavier than a normal period, there had been no abdominal or pelvic pain, there were no symptoms consistent with early pregnancy. The last PAP smear was done 12 months ago and all previous PAP smears have been normal.

Physical examination of the patient is unremarkable. In particular, abdominal and pelvic examination is normal. The vagina and cervix appear healthy.

The results of the tests you arranged were as follows:

Investigation 7.1 Summary of results

Haemoglobin 42 g/L
White cell count 8.5 × 109/L
Platelets 160 × 109/L
Urinary pregnancy test positive
Serum beta hCG 1200 U/L
Cervical PAP smear no abnormal cells detected; endocervical cells identified
Cervical swab no evidence of chlamydial infection

In this instance the pregnancy test was positive, and the complete blood picture, the cervical swab and PAP smear were normal.

On the basis of the positive pregnancy test a pelvic ultrasound examination is arranged (Figure 7.1).

Answers

A.1 Further questioning needs to evaluate the extent of the bleeding as compared with a normal period, whether the bleeding occurred after sexual activity, whether there has been any associated pain, whether symptoms of ovulation are usually experienced and whether they were evident during the most recent cycle, and whether there are any symptoms seen consistent with early pregnancy such as more breast enlargement and tenderness than normal, or nausea, or vomiting. When she had her last PAP smear would also be worth defining to evaluate whether the bleeding was likely to be due to a cervical problem.

When taking a history from a woman with abnormal vaginal bleeding the following possible causes need to be considered:

A.2 The clinical examination is often of limited value in making the correct diagnosis in patients with abnormal vaginal bleeding. Even if this patient was pregnant the uterus is not going to be significantly enlarged. If a cervical cancer was present or a uterine fibroid was being extruded, this should be able to be seen unless it is entirely within the cervical canal. If the bleeding is due to DUB, no abnormality will be able to be detected on clinical examination. In the absence of pain, even if the bleeding was associated with an ectopic pregnancy, it is likely that the pelvic examination findings will be normal. If pain was present it is more likely that there will be bleeding into the pelvic peritoneal cavity, under which circumstances it is likely that there will be adnexal tenderness, cervical excitation and a ‘boggy’ feeling in the pouch of Douglas.

A.3 The investigations required are:

A.4 She is pregnant; however, the site of this, and whether it is progressing satisfactorily, are not known. The cause of the bleeding has therefore not been defined.

A vaginal ultrasound examination is required to site the pregnancy and to determine if it is progressing normally. Ideally this should not be performed until the quantitative beta-hCG level is assessed and shown to be at least 1000 IU/L, because even a normal intrauterine gestation sac will not be visible at lower hCG levels. If the hCG level is greater than 1000 IU/L and a gestation sac cannot be seen in the uterus, it is highly likely the diagnosis is an ectopic pregnancy. Sometimes the actual sac containing the fetus can be seen outside the uterus, or a mass of clot and the pregnancy can be seen in one adnexum. The other possible diagnosis if a gestation sac cannot be found under those circumstances is that the whole pregnancy was intrauterine but has been lost (complete abortion).

If the vaginal ultrasound shows the sac is in the uterus, the type of ‘abortion’ then needs to be defined by the ultrasound examination. Types include:

A.5 The ultrasound shows an empty uterus, so the diagnosis is either an ectopic pregnancy or complete abortion, providing the beta-hCG level is greater than 1000 IU/L. The hCG level must therefore be checked.

If it is >1000 IU/L, the diagnosis is probably an ectopic pregnancy and laparoscopic assessment to confirm this diagnosis is usually recommended. The other option would be to reassess the beta-hCG level in 2 and 4 days time, as:

There are a number of therapeutic options once the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy has been defined and preferably proven by laparoscopy. The most appropriate option would be the administration of a single dose of intramuscular methotrexate (1 mg/kg) along with folinic acid rescue to destroy the ectopic pregnancy. This is associated with a better chance of tubal patency than when any of the surgical options are employed. It is appropriate treatment, if there is no or minimal intraperitoneal bleeding, especially if the beta hCG level is less than 4000 IU/L, the pregnancy sac size is small or not identified, and no fetal heart tones are detected in the ectopic pregnancy itself if it can be seen. Tubal rupture with resulting intraperitoneal bleeding can occur after methotrexate therapy, but is unusual.

Other options include:

Further Information

, www.advancedfertility.com/ectopfot.htm. Laparoscopic images of ectopic pregnancy

, www.emedicine.com/EMERG/topic478.htm. An article from the eMedicine series on ectopic pregnancy