92: Excision of a Dorsal Wrist Ganglion

Published on 17/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1503 times

Procedure 92 Excision of a Dorsal Wrist Ganglion

imageSee Video 68: Treatment of Dorsal Wrist Ganglions

Procedure

Evidence

Clay NR, Clement DA. The treatment of dorsal wrist ganglia by radical excision. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1988;13:187-191.

The authors followed 62 patients with dorsal wrist ganglia who underwent excision through a transverse dorsal incision. The specimen included a portion of the wrist capsule and any attachments to deeper structures. The authors were able to follow up 51 patients at a mean interval of 28 months. Seventy-three percent were asymptomatic, and 17% had only mild pain. Nine patients complained of weakness of grip. There were two recurrences, and one patient develop SL instability. (Level IV evidence)

Dias JJ, Dhukaram V, Kumar P. The natural history of untreated dorsal wrist ganglia and patient reported outcome 6 years after intervention. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2007;32:502-508.

The authors evaluated the long-term outcome of excision, aspiration, and no treatment of 283 dorsal wrist ganglia in 283 patients who responded to a postal questionnaire at a mean of 70 months. The resolution of symptoms was similar between the treatment groups (P > .3). Pain and unsightliness improved in all three treatment groups. The prevalence of weakness and stiffness varied only slightly in all three treatment groups. More patients with a recurrent or persistent ganglion complained of pain, stiffness, and unsightliness (P < .0001). Patient satisfaction was higher after surgical excision (P < .0001), even if the ganglion recurred. Twenty-three of 55 (58%) untreated ganglia resolved spontaneously. The recurrence rates were 58% (45/78) and 39% (40/103) following aspiration and excision, respectively. Eight of 103 patients had complications following surgery. According to this study, neither excision nor aspiration provided significant long-term benefit over no treatment. (Level III evidence)