90: Total Wrist Arthroplasty

Published on 17/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1183 times

Procedure 90 Total Wrist Arthroplasty

Exposures

Procedure

Step 3

image The guide bar is again inserted into the medullary cavity, and a broach is used to prepare the cavity (Fig. 90-10A and B). A mallet is used to place the broach flush with the cut surface of the radius. A trial implant is inserted and tapped with an impactor to fully seat it (Fig. 90-11A and B). In most cases, this system is press-fit without the use of cement. An appropriate-sized trial implant should not extend past the radial and ulnar corners of the distal radius.

Evidence

Cavaliere CM, Chung KC. A systematic review of total wrist arthroplasty compared with total wrist arthrodesis for rheumatoid arthritis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:813-825.

The authors performed a systematic review of the existing literature on outcomes of both procedures in rheumatoid arthritis. They found that total wrist fusion provides more reliable relief than total wrist arthroplasty, and complication and revision rates were higher for total wrist arthroplasty, although satisfaction was high in both groups. Functional active arc of motion with total wrist arthroplasty was demonstrated in only 3 of 14 studies reporting appropriate data. The authors concluded that existing data do not support widespread application of total wrist arthroplasty for the rheumatoid wrist. (Level II evidence)

Cavaliere CM, Chung KC. A cost-utility analysis of nonsurgical management, total wrist arthroplasty, and total wrist arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2010;35:379-391.

The authors performed a cost-utility analysis comparing nonsurgical management, total wrist arthroplasty, and total wrist arthrodesis for the rheumatoid wrist. They surveyed 49 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 109 hand surgeons and rheumatologists and found that both patients and physicians favored surgical management over nonsurgical treatment. They concluded that total wrist arthroplasty and total wrist arthrodesis are both extremely cost-effective procedures and that total wrist arthroplasty has only a small incremental cost over total wrist arthrodesis. Based on this, total wrist arthroplasty should not be considered cost-prohibitive in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. (Level II evidence)

Divelbliss BJ, Sollerman C, Adams BD. Early results of the Universal total wrist arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002;27:195-204.

Outcomes of use of the Universal I prosthesis were evaluated in 14 wrists at 1-year follow-up and 8 wrists at 2-year follow-up. All patients were women, and mean age was 48 years. The DASH score decreased from 46 to 22. Complications included three palmar dislocations, and all three patients had active inflammation of the wrists. This paper provided an outcome evaluation of the first-generation prosthesis using the Universal total wrist design. (Level IV evidence)

Murphy DM, Khoury JG, Imbriglia JE, Adams BD. Comparison of arthroplasty and arthrodesis for the rheumatoid wrist. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2003;28:570-576.

This is a retrospective study comparing 24 patients with arthrodesis with 23 patients with arthroplasty. Both groups were matched by age and radiographic staging. The outcomes were based on the DASH and PRWE questionnaires. The authors showed that there was no difference in the outcomes questionnaire scores between the two groups. Both groups were equally satisfied, and the complication rates were similar. (Level III evidence)

Radmer S, Andresen R, Sparmann M. Total wrist arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2003;28:789-794.

This is a second follow-up study of a previous 18-month follow-up study of use of a wrist prosthesis. At 18-month follow-up, the authors reported excellent outcomes in all patients, with minimal complication rates. At 52-month follow-up of 40 patients with this type of wrist prosthesis, all patients had serious complications, and all underwent arthrodesis. This study illustrated the need for long-term follow-up of wrist arthroplasty procedures to establish their effectiveness and complications. (Level IV evidence)

Vicar AJ, Burton RI. Surgical management of the rheumatoid wrist-fusion or arthroplasty. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1986;11:790-797.

This is a retrospective review of two groups of patients who underwent wrist fusion or arthroplasty. The authors found that both groups did well with either procedure. The wrist arthroplasty group had 5 degrees of flexion, 30 degrees of extension, and 10 degrees of ulnar and radial deviation. The authors recommended arthroplasty in the dominant wrist when both wrists required treatment. The nondominant wrist should be fused in neutral position. (Level III evidence)