83: Darrach Procedure

Published on 17/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1641 times

Procedure 83 Darrach Procedure

imageSee Video 62: Darrach Procedure

Examination/Imaging

Evidence

De Witte PB, Wijffels M, Jupiter JB, Ring D. The Darrach procedure for post-traumatic reconstruction. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009;75:316-322.

The authors report their experience with the Darrach procedure in 26 patients with a mean age of 53 years to address posttraumatic stiffness, instability, nonunion, and radioulnar length discrepancy. With an average follow-up of 21 months, the authors note an average improvement in total arc of forearm rotation of 87 degrees, from 49 to 136 degrees (P < .001), and pain reduction (P = .04), with only two patients requiring reoperation related to the residual ulna. They conclude that the Darrach procedure significantly improves forearm rotation and reduces pain in patients with posttraumatic problems of the DRU joint with a low complication and reoperation rate. (Level IV evidence)

George MS, Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. The Sauve-Kapandji procedure and the Darrach procedure for distal radio-ulnar joint dysfunction after Colles’ fracture. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2004;29:608-613.

The authors retrospectively evaluated the results of 30 Darrach procedures and 18 Sauve-Kapandji procedures for the treatment of distal radioulnar joint derangement following malunion of displaced intraarticular distal radius fractures in patients younger than 50 years. In the Sauve-Kapandji group, 12 patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) survey at a mean of 4 years postoperatively, and 9 patients were available for follow-up examination at a mean of 2 years postoperatively. In the Darrach group, 21 patients completed the DASH survey at a mean of 6 years postoperatively, and 13 patients were available for follow-up examination at a mean of 4 years postoperatively. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to forearm or wrist range of motion, grip strength, Modified Mayo Wrist scores, or DASH scores. All patients in the Sauve-Kapandji group showed radiographic fusion of the DRU joint, and one patient was revised to a Darrach procedure for a painful click with complete resolution of symptoms. Six patients in the Darrach group showed evidence of significant regrowth of the ulnar stump, and one patient showed significant ulnar carpal translation. The authors conclude that both procedures yield comparable and unpredictable results following Colles fracture in patients younger than 50 years. The Sauve-Kapandji procedure is better in younger patients because it maintains the ulnocarpal buttress, preserves the triangular fibrocartilage complex and ulnocarpal ligaments, provides a more physiologic pattern of force transmission from the hand to the forearm, and maintains the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon in its compartment. (Level III evidence)

Minami A, Iwasaki N, Ishikawa J, et al. Treatments of osteoarthritis of the distal radioulnar joint: long-term results of three procedures. Hand Surg. 2005;10:243-248.

The authors retrospectively evaluated 61 wrists in 61 patients with an average age of 59.8 years with osteoarthritis of the distal radioulnar joint treated by three consecutive procedures (20 Darrach, 25 Sauve-Kapandji, and 16 hemiresection-interposition arthroplasty procedures). Postoperative pain, range of motion, grip strength, return to work status, and radiographic results were evaluated over an average follow-up of 10 years (range 5 to 14 years). The authors found that pain relief was superior with the Sauve-Kapandji and hemiresection-interposition arthroplasty procedures compared with the Darrach procedure, although this was not statistically significant. Both the Sauve-Kapandji and hemiresection-interposition arthroplasty procedures had statistically significant improvements in wrist flexion and extension, grip strength, and return to original work status compared with the Darrach procedure. All procedures showed statistically significant improvements in forearm supination and pronation. The authors conclude that the Darrach procedure is better indicated for severe osteoarthritic changes of the distal radioulnar joint in elderly patients; the Sauve-Kapandji procedure is indicated when the triangular fibrocartilage complex cannot be reconstructed or with positive ulnar variance greater than 5 mm even with intact triangular fibrocartilage complex; and the hemiresection-interposition arthroplasty procedure is indicated when the triangular fibrocartilage complex is intact or could be reconstructed. (Level III evidence)