81: Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy

Published on 17/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1948 times

Procedure 81 Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy

imageSee Video 59: Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy

Examination/Imaging

Clinical Examination

image Patients with ulnar impaction syndrome present with ulnar-sided wrist pain, swelling, and limitation of motion. This may coexist with other causes of ulnar-sided wrist pain, including triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries, distal radioulnar (DRU) joint instability, and lunotriquetral ligament injuries, among others. It is important to consider these conditions before attributing the symptoms to ulnar impaction syndrome, particularly among patients with negative ulnar variance.

image The following provocative clinical tests are helpful in the diagnosis of ulnocarpal impaction syndrome.

Imaging

Table 81-1 Palmar Classification of TFCC Injuries

Type 1 Traumatic Lesions
1a Isolated central disk perforation
1b Peripheral ulnar-sided tear of TFCC (with or without ulnar styloid fracture)
1c Distal TFCC disruption from distal ulnocarpal ligaments
1d Radial TFCC disruption ± sigmoid notch fracture
Type 2 Degenerative Lesions
2a TFCC wear
2b 2a with lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia
2c TFCC perforation with lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia
2d 2c + lunotriquetral ligament perforation
2e 2d + ulnocarpal arthritis

Procedure

Evidence

Baek GH, Chung MS, Lee YH, et al. Ulnar shortening osteotomy in idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2006;88:212-220.

The authors describe the outcomes following 31 ulnar shortening osteotomy procedures in 29 patients who were followed for about 3 years postoperatively. The authors report a significant improvement in patient-reported outcome, a reduction in dorsal subluxation, and resolution of degenerative cystic carpal changes within 2 years of the operation. (Level IV evidence)

Chen NC, Wolfe SE. Ulna shortening osteotomy using a compression device. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2003;28:88-93.

This article examines 18 patients over a 10-year period with ulnar impaction syndrome who underwent ulnar shortening osteotomy with a compression device technique, and outcomes were assessed using the Chun and Palmer wrist grading system. Overall, favorable outcomes were achieved with respect to function and pain. However, 8 patients required plate removal for hardware prominence and discomfort. (Level IV evidence)

Kitzinger HB, Karle B, Low S, Krimmer H. Ulnar shortening osteotomy with a premounted sliding-hole plate. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58:636-639.

This article examines 27 patients who underwent ulnar shortening osteotomy over a 2-year period. They report an improvement in patient-reported function, as measured by DASH scores, and in pain, measured along a visual analog scale. Although grip strength and range of motion improved significantly following the procedure, 6 patients complained of discomfort related to hardware. (Level IV evidence)