8: Acute Repair of Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Injury

Published on 18/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2536 times

Procedure 8 Acute Repair of Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Injury

image See Video 5: Acute Repair of Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Injury

Figure 8-7 is adapted from Tang JB. Flexor tendon repair in zone 2C. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1994;19:72-75, with permission from Elsevier. Figure 8-18 is adapted from Strickland JW. Development of flexor tendon surgery: twenty-five years of progress. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2000;25:214-235, with permission from Elsevier.

Examination/Imaging

Clinical Examination

image Patients present with loss of active distal interphalangeal (DIP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint flexion if both FDP and FDS are divided, or loss of only DIP joint flexion if only FDP has been injured. On inspection, the normal finger cascade is lost with the affected digit in an extended position.

image The function of the FDP is determined by asking the patient to actively flex the DIP joint of the involved finger.

image Testing for FDS injury is more complex compared with the FDP because the PIP joint is flexed both by the FDS and by the FDP. Therefore, one needs to check the function of the FDS while blocking the action of the FDP.

The standard test for the FDS takes advantage of the fact that the FDP tendons to the long, ring, and small fingers share a common muscle belly. The finger being tested is allowed to flex while the action of the FDP tendon is blocked by preventing flexion of the DIP joint of the other two fingers (Fig. 8-1). The standard test is not reliable for the index finger because the index finger FDP has an independent muscle belly (Fig. 8-2). In addition, the action of the FDS of the small finger may be dependent on the FDS to the ring finger, and they may need to be tested together (Fig. 8-3).

image A partial tendon laceration should be suspected in patients in whom active motion is associated with pain or triggering.

image In patients who cannot cooperate (e.g., children or comatose or intoxicated patients), one can look for passive movement of the fingers resulting from the wrist tenodesis effect or by squeezing the forearm muscles (Fig. 8-5). The same maneuvers can be used when trying to differentiate between tendon injury and inability to move as a result of nerve palsy.

image It is important to examine the patient for presence of concomitant injuries to the digital arteries and nerves.

Procedure

Step 2: Retrieval of Proximal Tendon End

image This can be challenging when the tendon has retracted into the palm. The following maneuvers are used in sequence:

image If both these maneuvers do not work, the method described by Sourmelis and McGrouther should be tried. A chevron incision is made in the distal palm proximal to the A1 pulley. The flexor tendons are identified. If they are still within the A1/A2 pulley, they are not disturbed. A 5/6 French pediatric feeding tube is passed from retrograde through the flexor sheath to emerge at the proximal incision. The feeding tube is sutured to the palmar surface of the flexor tendon without withdrawing the tendons from the fibrous flexor sheath. If the tendon ends have retracted proximal to the A1 pulley, the feeding tube is sutured to the end of the tendons. Using a combination of pulling the feeding tube at the distal incision and pushing the flexor tendon at the proximal incision, the tendon ends are delivered into laceration (Fig. 8-11).

image After retrieval to the site of repair, the tendon should be secured in place with a hypodermic needle to prevent it from retracting proximally and to allow a tension-free repair.

Step 3: Tendon Repair

image The tendon ends are gently débrided of frayed ends while retaining their length.

image The FDS is repaired before the FDP. An attempt is made to repair both slips of the FDS (Fig. 8-12). This may be difficult, especially in zone 2C, where the A2 pulley is narrowest. In such circumstances, repair of one slip is appropriate. Because of the flatness of the FDS at zone 2, its repair is a simple horizontal mattress suture repair of each slip of the FDS.

image Many methods of tendon repair have been described for the FDP. We use a 6-0 Prolene suture epitendinous repair combined with a 3-0 Ethibond modified double-Kessler core suture (Fig. 8-13).

image First the epitendinous repair of the dorsal half of the tendon is carried out. Sutures bites are taken at 1- to 2-mm intervals approximately 1 to 2 mm from the edge of the tendon. This is a continuous suture repair, and the loops are locked.

image Next a modified Kessler core suture is placed in the standard manner (Fig. 8-14). The transverse portion of the suture is locked. It is important to remember that 3-0 Ethibond is a braided suture and does not glide well within the tendon substance. One should therefore pull the required length of the suture through the tendon at first pass. A minimum of 0.7 cm, and most commonly 1 to 1.2 cm, of the tendon is grasped by the longitudinal portion of the suture loop before making the transverse portion.

image A horizontal mattress suture is placed within the previous suture repair using 4-0 Ethibond. Approximately 0.5 to 0.6 cm of the tendon is grapsed by the longitudinal portion of the suture loop before making the transverse portion (Fig. 8-15).

image The palmar half of the epitendonous repair is now completed (Fig. 8-16).

Postoperative Care and Expected Outcomes

image The patient is splinted in 30 degrees of wrist flexion and 60 degrees of metaphalangeal (MP) flexion and with the fingers in slight flexion.

image It is critical for the surgeon and therapist to maintain direct communication during the postoperative period.

image Tendon repair strength declines for the first week after surgery, plateaus for 1 week, and then slowly begins to get stronger. In this initial phase of healing, all strength across the repair is due to the suture and will increase predictably with increasing strand count. During tendon healing, the force applied to the repair should always be below the repair strength, or rupture may occur. Following this logic, and explicitly described later for a four-strand core-suture repair, passive exercises always remain below rupture threshold and are used for the initial 4 weeks following surgery. At 4 weeks, active exercises are safely started. Strengthening is not started until 8 weeks (Fig. 8-18).

image Indiana Early Active Mobilization, or the Tenodesis Program, is initiated on postoperative day 3. This involves both passive exercises using a Modified Duran Program and place-and-hold exercises.

image At 4 weeks, the tenodesis splint is discontinued, but the place-and-hold exercises continue. Additional active exercises are started, consisting of making a fist while the wrist is in neutral position. Active wrist flexion and extension are allowed. The Modified Duran Program is continued within the DBS.

image At 5 weeks, active extension is allowed.

image At 6 weeks, the DBS is discontinued, and the involved finger is buddy-taped to the adjacent finger. An extension splint is worn at night.

image At 8 weeks, progressive strengthening is started.

image At 10 to 12 weeks, the patient may return to all activities but should not perform heavy lifting until 16 weeks.

image Based on the Total Active Motion (TAM) evaluation system proposed by Kleinert and Verdan, and advocated by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, most patients should regain good to excellent function after primary repair of flexor tendons (Table 8-1). TAM is calculated by the following formula:

Evidence

Kitis PT, Buker N, Kara IG. Comparison of two methods of controlled mobilisation of repaired flexor tendons in zone 2. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43:160-165.

This study compares active and passive regimens of postoperative motion. Controlled active motion (Kleinert/Washington) was compared with group-controlled passive motion (Duran). The controlled active motion group achieved better results in Total Active Motion (TAM) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. This is the first high-level evidence study demonstrating superiority of early active versus early passive movement. (Level II evidence)

Tang JB. Flexor tendon repair in zone 2C. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1994;1:72-75.

This article reports on a randomized prospective clinical study evaluating Total Active Motion (TAM) after repair of both the FDS and FDP, versus the FDP alone, in zone 2B (under the A2 pulley). The results indicated decreased TAM when both FDS and FDP are repaired in this region. Furthermore, there was a higher rate of adhesions or rupture requiring operative management. The author concluded that with a laceration at zone 2C, the FDS should be excised in favor of repairing FDP alone. (Level IV evidence)

Tang JB. Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in zone 2. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2007;32:118-129.

In this expert opinion article, the author presents his practical views on zone 2 flexor tendon repairs. Tang discusses indications, techniques, and postsurgical treatment and outcome measures and further describes methods of sheath-pulley release, tendon repair, postoperative motion, and outcome evaluation. Based on the information in this review, the author notes that predictable outcomes of flexor tendon repair in zone 2 are now routine. (Level V evidence)

Thien TB, Becker JH, Theis JC. Rehabilitation after surgery for flexor tendon injuries in the hand. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;4:CD003979.

This is the only Cochrane review regarding flexor tendon repair, and it specifically reviews postoperative therapy. Six randomized controlled trials were reviewed. Despite widespread use of postoperative therapies, this review found insufficient evidence to define the best mobilization strategy. There was a trend toward early active mobilization strategies. (Level II evidence)