79: External Fixation of Comminuted Intra-articular Distal Radius Fractures

Published on 21/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1821 times

Procedure 79 External Fixation of Comminuted Intra-articular Distal Radius Fractures

Procedure

Step 2

Evidence

Capo JT, Rossy W, Henry P, et al. External fixation of distal radius fractures: effect of distraction and duration. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009;34:1605-1611.

Twenty-four patients with closed distal radius fractures treated with a spanning external fixator plus supplementary percutaneous K-wires were evaluated at an average follow-up time of 22 months. All fractures were extra-articular (A type) or simple intra-articular (C type). The amount of distraction attained by the fixator was determined by measuring the carpal height ratio on plain radiographs. Using the Gartland-Werley classification, there were 11 excellent, 10 good, and 3 fair results. Statistical analysis indicated that a higher carpal height ratio at the initial reduction positively correlated (P = .041) with an excellent outcome. Duration of external fixation did not have a significant impact on the final outcome within the parameters studied (P = .891). Average wrist range of motion at follow-up was as follows: flexion, 54.1 degrees (75% of the contralateral side); extension, 59.0 degrees (78%); radial deviation, 18.0 degrees (85%); ulnar deviation, 22 degrees (73%); pronation, 79.0 degrees (95%); and supination, 76.6 degrees (93%). None of the individual components of range of motion correlated negatively with increasing distraction at fixator application or duration of fixation. (Level V evidence)

Kreder HJ, Hanel DP, Agel J, et al. Indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: a randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2005;87:829-836.

A total of 179 adult patients with displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius were randomized to receive indirect percutaneous reduction and external fixation (n = 88) or open reduction and internal fixation (n = 91). Patients were followed for 2 years. During the first year, the upper limb musculoskeletal function assessment score, the SF-36 bodily pain sub-scale score, the overall Jebsen score, and pinch strength and grip strength improved significantly in all patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the radiologic restoration of anatomic features or the range of movement between the groups. During the 2-year period, patients who underwent indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation had a more rapid return of function and a better functional outcome than those who underwent open reduction and internal fixation, provided that the intra-articular step and gap deformity were minimized. (Level III evidence)

Leung F, Tu YK, Chew WY, Chow SP. Comparison of external and percutaneous pin fixation with plate fixation for intra-articular distal radial fractures: a randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2008;90:16-22.

This is a therapeutic level I study that compared the outcomes for external fixation combined with percutaneous pin fixation versus plate fixation. At 1 and 2 years after surgery, results of plate fixation were better than external fixation according to both the Gartland-Werley point system and the Modified Green-O’Brien system. The study also showed continuous clinical improvement for at least 24 months. Another finding in this study was that both types of fixation were similarly effective for managing AO group C1 fractures, but better clinical and radiographic results were observed with plate fixation for AO group C2 fractures. However, for group C3 fractures, both plating and external fixation had difficulty achieving accurate reduction and maintaining stable fixation. In terms of arthritis grade, plate fixation demonstrated significantly better results both at 1 and 2 years after surgery. Some of the limitations present in this study include the heterogenous fixation in both groups and the inability to use a validated patient-assessed scoring system. (Level I evidence)

Margaliot Z, Haase SC, Kotsis SV, et al. A meta-analysis of outcomes of external fixation versus plate osteosynthesis for unstable distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;30:1185-1199.

The study is a systemic review and meta-analysis of literature on external and internal fixation of distal radius fracture. MEDLINE and EMBASE database were searched for articles published between 1980 and 2004. In the 46 articles that were included, meta-analysis did not demonstrate any statistical or clinical differences in grip strength, wrist range of motion, radiographic alignment, pain, and physician-rated outcome between these two groups. Although higher rates of infection, hardware failure, and neuritis were documented with external fixation, tendon complications and early hardware removal were more apparent with the internal fixation group. The drawback in this review is the considerable heterogeneity in all the studies, which affects the precision of meta-analysis. The review shows that in contrast to external fixation, plate osteosynthesis provides rigid fixation and allows for immediate motion. However, both techniques may achieve similar outcome in the long-term. (Level II evidence)

Wei DH, Raizman NM, Bottino CJ, et al. Unstable distal radial fractures treated with external fixation, a radial column plate, or a volar plate: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2009;91:1568-1577.

This is a therapeutic level I study that compared the functional outcomes of treatment of unstable distal radial fractures with external fixation, a radial column plate, and a volar plate. Follow-up conducted at varying intervals postoperatively demonstrated that at 6 weeks, the DASH score was better with volar plate than with external fixation but similar with use of volar plate and radial column plate. At 3 months, DASH scores were significantly better with volar plate than with external fixation and radial column plate. At 6 months and 1 year, DASH scores for the three groups were comparable with those for the normal population. Grip strength was similar for the three groups at 1 year. The range of motion of the wrist was not significantly different among the three groups from 12 weeks postoperatively. At 1 year, radial inclination and radial length were significantly better in the radial column plate than the other two groups. In conclusion, unstable distal radial fractures treated with locked volar plate recovered more quickly compared with external fixation and radial column plate. However, 1 year after surgery, all three techniques provided good subjective and objective functional outcomes. (Level I evidence)