64: Pacemakers and Internal Cardioverter Defibrillators

Published on 06/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1994 times

CHAPTER 64 Pacemakers and Internal Cardioverter Defibrillators

22 Does failure of a pacemaker stimulus to capture the heart necessarily imply pacemaker malfunction?

There are many reasons a pacemaker stimulus may not depolarize the tissue. Assess whether a stimulus is an atrial or ventricular stimulus (Figure 64-1). The tissue may have been refractory from a recent event such as a premature ventricular contraction, which is known as functional loss of capture. Occasionally the paced complex is not seen on a single-lead monitoring system because the axis of the paced rhythm is perpendicular to the monitoring lead. In this case the paced complex will not be visible on the lead viewed despite normal function and normal appearance on other leads if they were monitored. However, if repeated failure to capture is seen or the patient appears compromised, emergent evaluation of pacemaker function should be sought.

23 If a pacemaker stimulus is superimposed on a native complex, is the pacemaker necessarily malfunctioning?

No. There are many explanations for the previous finding. Most commonly this is a case in which the pacemaker timer times out before sensing an intrinsic event. In this case the device will release a stimulus. The intrinsic event may have started earlier on a surface lead but was not sensed by the device at the site of the lead until well into the complex. This is a common finding with normal VVI pacing (Figure 64-2). Other programmable behavior may also explain this finding, although inappropriate sensing must also be ruled out.

image

Figure 64-2 Normal VVI pacing.LR is Lower Rate (of pacing), VRP is Ventricular Refractory Period.

(From Zaidan JR: Pacemakers. In Barash PG, editor: Refresher courses in anesthesiology, vol. 21, Philadelphia, 1993, Lippincott, with permission.)