64: Diagnostic Wrist Arthroscopy

Published on 18/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1163 times

Procedure 64 Diagnostic Wrist Arthroscopy

imageSee Video 48: Diagnostic Wrist Arthroscopy

Examination/Imaging

Clinical Examination

image Arthroscopy has revolutionized the practice of hand surgery by providing the capability to examine and treat intra-articular abnormalities. Development of wrist arthroscopy is a natural transition from the successful application of arthroscopy of the larger joints. Wrist arthroscopy has seen considerable growth since Whipple reported the original description of the technique he developed for reviewing the intra-articular anatomy of the joints.

image A spectrum of injuries is seen in patients with interosseous ligament tears. The interosseous ligament stretches, partially tears, and develops into a full-thickness tear. Patients with scapholunate instability complain of point tenderness directly over the dorsum of the scapholunate ligament. Swelling may be seen localized in this area, and patients may have a positive Watson maneuver. The latter is performed by pushing the tubercle of the scaphoid dorsally with radial wrist deviation. Patients with lunotriquetral interosseous instability complain of point tenderness directly over the dorsum of the lunotriquetral interval. Patients may have a positive shuck test, in which anterior-posterior translation is felt between the lunate and triquetrum, causing point tenderness. A squeeze test consists of radial ulnar compression of the wrist between the thumb and index finger of the examiner. Patients with lunotriquetral instability will complain of pain at the lunotriquetral interval.

image Patients with injury to the TFCC complain of pain at the head of the ulna or the prestyloid recess.

image Patients with fractures of the scaphoid are tender in the snuffbox.

image Patients with fractures of the distal radius have generalized swelling around the wrist and are tender to palpation over the distal radius.

Surgical Anatomy

image The wrist is the labyrinth of eight carpal bones. Multiple articular surfaces with intrinsic and extrinsic ligaments and the TFCC form a perplexing joint that continuously challenges physicians with an array of diagnoses. Wrist arthroscopy allows direct visualization of the cartilage surfaces, carpal bones, and ligaments using bright light and magnification.

image The scapholunate interosseous ligament is best seen with the arthroscope in the 3-4 portal. The lunotriquetral interval is best seen with the arthroscope in the 4-5 or 6R portals owing to its more distal location. The scapholunate interval as seen from the midcarpal space should be tight and congruent. There should be no step-off or separation. The lunotriquetral interval may have slight play between the lunate and the triquetrum. An approximately 1-mm distal step-off of the triquetrum may be seen.

image Geissler defined an arthroscopic classification for interosseous ligament injury. A spectrum of injury is seen throughout this ligament. The ligament stretches and then tears, usually in a volar to dorsal direction. This arthroscopic classification is based on evaluation of the interosseous ligament from both the radiocarpal and midcarpal spaces. (Fig. 64-1 shows arthroscopic view of a normal scapholunate ligament.)

Exposures

image Wrist arthroscopy portals are made according to the space to which they correspond with respect to the extensor compartments (Fig. 64-6).

image The traditional portal is the 3-4 portal. This portal is made between the third and fourth dorsal compartments of the wrist. The 3-4 portal is located by palpating Lister tubercle by advancing the finger about 1 cm distal until the soft spot is noted over the dorsal lip of the radius. The 3-4 portal is in line with the radial border of the long finger. (Fig. 64-7 shows the thumb being used to palpate between the third and fourth dorsal compartments to identify the 3-4 portal space.) When the wrist is injected with arthroscopy fluid from the 6U portal, a bubble of swelling is typically noted over the 3-4 portal region. This further helps locate the 3-4 portal.

image The 4-5 portal is located by rolling the finger over the palpable fourth compartment and then finding the soft spot opposite the 3-4 portal on the ulnar aspect of the fourth compartment. As a general rule, the 4-5 portal lies slightly more proximal than the 3-4 portal because of the radial inclination of the distal radius. The 4-5 portal is a typical working portal that is in line with the midaxis of the ring metacarpal.

image The 6R and 6U portals are named according to their positions relative to the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon, with the 6R portal being radial and the 6U portal being ulnar to the tendon. The 6R portal is a typical working portal, and the 6U portal is typically used for inflow of fluid into the wrist. (Fig. 64-8 shows inflow through 6U, 6R being used as a working portal, and 3-4 being used as the arthroscope portal.)

image The 1-2 portal is made along the dorsal aspect of the snuffbox. By making this portal along the dorsal aspect, it prevents injury to the radial artery.

image The radial midcarpal portal is made 1 cm distal to the 3-4 portal. This portal gives good visualization of the midcarpal space. The ulnar midcarpal portal is made 1 cm distal to the 4-5 portal. Typically, there is more room in the ulnar midcarpal portal than the radial midcarpal portal. If the surgeon has difficulty entering the midcarpal space in the radial midcarpal portal, the ulnar midcarpal portal should be used because it has easier access.

image The STT portal is made just ulnar to the EPL tendon. This portal is best made with the arthroscope in the radial midcarpal portal, and a spinal needle is used to identify the exact location.

Procedure

Step 4

Evidence

Chung KC, Zimmerman NB, Travis MT. Wrist arthrography versus arthroscopy: a comparative study of 150 cases. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1996;21:591-594.

The authors used triple-injection wrist arthrography and arthroscopy to evaluate 150 patients with suspected wrist ligamentous injuries. The diagnoses obtained by these two techniques were compared to determine the differences between the two modalities. All the patients in this study had both the clinical diagnosis of ligamentous injuries of the wrist and normal findings on x-ray films. Intercarpal abnormalities were found in 106 patients (71%) at wrist arthrography and in 136 patients (91%) at arthroscopy. There was only 42% agreement (63 patients) between the arthrographic and arthroscopic diagnoses. Eighty-seven patients (58%) had alterations of their arthrographic diagnoses following arthroscopy. For patients with normal arthrographic findings (44 patients), 88% underwent arthroscopy because there was insufficient correlation between the physical examination findings and the arthroscopic findings. Of the 44 patients with normal arthrographic findings, 35 patients (80% of the subgroup) had injuries found at arthroscopy. More than half of the patients had alterations in their arthrographic diagnoses following arthroscopy. The authors concluded that in a patient with suspected ligamentous injury of the wrist, wrist arthroscopy may be the most efficient method in arriving at a definitive diagnosis. (Level IV evidence)

Geissler WB, Freeland AE, Weiss APC, Chow JCY. Techniques of wrist arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1999;81:1184-1197.

This paper presents the basic techniques of wrist arthroscopy and their application to common disorders of the wrist. (Level V evidence)

Johnstone DJ, Thorogood S, Smith WH, Scott TD. A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the investigation of chronic wrist pain. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1997;22:714-718.

The authors conducted a prospective study wherein they evaluated 43 patients with chronic wrist pain using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy. Pathology within the wrist joint was detected in 30 cases with MRI and in 32 cases with arthroscopy. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI compared with arthroscopy were 0.8 and 0.7 for TFCC pathology, 0.37 and 1.0 for scapholunate ligament, and 0 and 0.97 for lunotriquetral ligament. They concluded that MRI is not helpful in the investigation of suspected carpal instability and that the results of MRI for TFCC injuries should be interpreted with caution. (Level IV evidence)