61: Trapeziometacarpal Ligament Reconstruction

Published on 18/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1780 times

Procedure 61 Trapeziometacarpal Ligament Reconstruction

imageSee Video 45: Thumb CMC Joint Beak Ligament Reconstruction Using the FCR Tendon

Procedure

Step 2

image The FCR tendon is identified at the wrist crease, and the sheath is sharply opened proximally and distally.

image The radial half of the FCR tendon in the proximal forearm is transected proximally at 6 cm from the wrist crease and separated from the other half of the tendon using two small transverse incisions (Fig. 61-5). At the level of the wrist crease, the FCR is covered by a sheath that needs to be opened to trace the FCR slip close to its insertion at the base of the index metacarpal. The FCR rotates 90 degrees within the sheath; it is important to follow the fibers so that the tendon is not inadvertently transected. One should not slide the scissors through the tendon fibers but rather cut along the fibers to maintain the integrity of the tendon.

Evidence

Eaton RG, Lane LB, Littler JW, Keyser JJ. Ligament reconstruction for the painful thumb carpometacarpal joint: a long-term assessment. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984;9:692-699.

This study reviews the first 50 consecutive reconstructions, with an average follow-up of 7 years. Intractable pain was the primary indication for surgery. Each joint was examined both before and after surgery and rated as stage I through stage IV according to the radiographic appearance. Of the patients with zero or minimal articular changes (stages I and II), 95% achieved good or excellent results (little or no postoperative pain). Of the patients with moderate to advanced degenerative changes (stages III and IV), 74% achieved good or excellent results. All stage I cases and 82% of stage II cases were free of recognizable degeneration on follow-up radiographs up to 13 years postoperatively. These findings suggest that ligament reconstruction, which is now recommended only for stage I or stage II disease, will restore stability, reduce pain, and possibly even retard joint degeneration in a large proportion of patients with painful instability of the thumb CMC joint. (Level IV evidence)

Freedman DM, Eaton RG, Glickel SZ. Long-term results of volar ligament reconstruction for symptomatic basal joint laxity. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2000;25:297-304.

The long-term results of volar ligament reconstruction were assessed in 19 patients (24 thumbs). The average age at surgery was 33 years (range, 18 to 55 years). Twenty-three thumbs were radiographic stage I; a preoperative radiograph was not available in one. The follow-up period averaged 15 years (range, 10 to 23 years). At the final follow-up visit, 15 thumbs were stage I, 7 were stage II, and 2 were stage III. Fifteen patients were at least 90% satisfied with the results of the surgery. Only 8% of thumbs advanced to radiographic arthritic disease, which compares favorably with the 17% to 33% reported incidence of stage III/IV basal joint arthritis in the general population. (Level IV evidence)

Takwale VJ, Stanley JK, Shahane SA. Post-traumatic instability of the trapeziometacarpal joint of the thumb: diagnosis and the results of reconstruction of the beak ligament. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2004;86:541-545.

The authors retrospectively reviewed reconstruction of the anterior oblique ligament using a slip of the flexor carpi radialis tendon in 26 patients with a mean age of 34.6 years and a mean follow-up of 55 months. They found that 87% obtained significant relief from pain, and mean grip strength recovered to 86% of the contralateral side. Eighty-one percent of patients noted a subjective improvement. The authors state that although their small sample size precludes statistical analysis, the trends noted in their study suggest that a better outcome may occur if surgery is performed early after a period of nonoperative management. (Level IV evidence)