6: Transfusion Therapy

Published on 06/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1077 times

CHAPTER 6 Transfusion Therapy

7 Review the major transfusion-related reactions

9 Is there convincing evidence that the effect of a transfusion on immune function is harmful?

Much of the evidence for immune modulation and infection related to transfusion is retrospective in nature and as such suffers from a failure to control for confounding variables. There are insufficent numbers of randomized, controlled studies of sufficient power, and the studies that do exist have been conducted on critically ill patients, not in the perioperative setting (perhaps with the exception of patients having coronary bypass). As such, definitive recommendations await. However, a few points are worthy of discussion.

The Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care trial was sufficiently powered to evaluate the impact of transfusion on outcome. The groups under study were divided into a restrictive transfusion (hemoglobin trigger of 7 g/dl, targeting a hemoglobin level between 7 and 9 g/dl) and a liberal transfusion group (hemoglobin transfusion trigger of 10 g/dl, targeting a hemoglobin level of 10 to 12 g/dl). Thirty-day mortality was lower in the restrictive transfusion group, although a statistical significance of p<0.05 was not met. However, if the patients were subdivided by acuity of illness, fewer acutely ill patients in the restrictive transfusion group had lower 30-day mortality.

Other prospective studies are less convincing in their findings, but there are overlapping transfusion triggers, and the patient populations differ. Some but not all observational studies have found that the number of transfused units is an independent risk factor for mortality and increased length of stay. Overall it must be said that the final word on the impact of transfusion on mortality has yet to be written. It should be noted that many countries now routinely perform leukoreduction on donated blood out of concern for the impact of transfusion on the recipient’s immune function.

14 Review the ABO and Rh blood genotypes and the associated antibody patterns

Blood type is determined by two alleles of three types: O, A, and B. A and B refer to antigens on the red blood cell surface. An individual can have either A or B, both A and B, or neither (blood type O). If an individual does not have the type A antigen, over time anti-A antibodies (also known as agglutinins) form. A patient with type AB blood has both antigens and will form no agglutinins. Individuals with type O blood have no antigen and develop both A and B antibodies (Table 6-2). The antibodies are primarily immunoglobulin (Ig)M or IgG. Acute hemolytic reactions are caused by complement activation and release of proteolytic enzymes that digest the red cell membrane.

People with type O blood have neither A nor B antigens (agglutinogens) on their cell surface. These cells cannot be agglutinated by antibodies (agglutinins) that may be present in a transfusion recipient’s blood. Thus type O blood is known as the universal donor for red blood cells. Patients with type AB blood have both classes of antigens (agglutinogens) and therefore do not form A or B antibodies (agglutinins). Because there are no antibodies in the plasma, type AB patients are universal donors for plasma.

There are six common antigens in the Rh system; the presence of the D antigen is what is most commonly referred to as Rh positive. The Rh blood type system is slightly different because Rh agglutinins rarely form spontaneously. Usually massive exposure, as from a prior transfusion, is necessary to stimulate their formation. An Rh-negative patient can receive Rh-positive blood in an emergency situation, although antibodies will form in some patients, and there may be a delayed, usually mild, hemolytic transfusion reaction. But now the patient is Rh sensitized and can have a more significant transfusion reaction if exposed to Rh-positive blood at a later date.

20 What are the limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of alternative hemoglobin solutions?

The benefits of alternatives to erythrocyte transfusion include a lack of antigenicity, possible unlimited availability, no disease transmission risk, long storage life, and better rheologic properties. Two types of oxygen-carrying solutions have been developed:

This discussion focuses on the latter. Such compounds are manufactured from human recombinant hemoglobin, outdated human blood, or bovine blood. The stromal components of erythrocytes are removed, and the hemoglobin molecule polymerized or liposome encapsulated to prevent rapid renal excretion and nephrotoxicity. Cell-free hemoglobin solutions have two major problems. First, they have low concentrations of 2,3-DPG. The lack of 2,3-DPG shifts the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve to the left, the affinity of hemoglobin for oxygen increases, and oxygen cannot be off-loaded at the tissue level. Second, they are nitric oxide scavengers and produce excessive vasoconstriction. Pulmonary hypertension and myocardial ischemia are risks; in fact, reports of death from myocardial infarction have delayed release of these solutions for general use. These solutions also result in platelet activation; release of proinflammatory mediators; methemoglobinemia; and, because of their color, interference with laboratory tests.