6: Quantitative Acupuncture Evaluation and Clinical Techniques

Published on 22/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Complementary Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 1657 times

CHAPTER 6 Quantitative Acupuncture Evaluation and Clinical Techniques

INTRODUCTION: QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION PREDICTS THE EFFICACY OF ACUPUNCTURE THERAPY

To be a good clinical procedure, an acupuncture evaluation of patients should be simple, precise, reliable, and reproducible by any practitioner. In traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) the goal of qualitative evaluation (pulse, tongue, and tongue coating) is to determine the nature and the cause of the symptoms according to ancient pathologic concepts: (1) the diseased organ or organs (Zang fu) and related channels (meridians) and (2) the nature of the imbalance (yin or yang, hot or cold, excessive or deficient).

The coating of the tongue and the character of the pulse reflect qualitative features of the body’s pathophysiology but do not always provide stable, reliable information. For example, the tongue coating may change after food intake and the pulse is altered after drinking, walking, or emotional disturbance.

In addition, the art of qualitative diagnosis is subtle and complex. Years of training are required for a practitioner to learn the 28 different pulses and their combinations and the numerous types of coatings. Thus qualitative diagnosis is a time-consuming, highly empirical procedure that is difficult to master and unnecessary in acupuncture pain management.

The goal of the quantitative method presented in this book is to evaluate the self-healing capacity of each patient and to predict the effectiveness of acupuncture therapy for each individual case. Two pathophysiologic factors affect the efficacy of acupuncture: the individual self-healing potential of each patient and the severity and “healability” (the healable nature of the disease[s]) of the afflicting symptom(s) or disease(s) itself. These two factors affect the efficacy of treatment and the time required for each patient to heal. Therefore, when making an evaluation, acupuncture practitioners must take these factors into account to understand whether and to what degree a patient can recover from his or her specific pathologic symptoms or diseases.

The following clinical example can help us to understand the nature of acupuncture therapy.

Four patients (not necessarily in the same age group) were afflicted with essentially the same pain symptom. After receiving four acupuncture treatments using the same treatment protocol, patient A and patient B experienced total pain relief, patient C experienced a reduction of pain up to about 50%, and patient D did not feel any improvement from the treatments.

Five months later patient A was still experiencing no pain; patient B experienced some pain, which was totally relieved after two additional acupuncture treatments; patient C experienced a return of most of the pain symptoms and needed four additional acupuncture treatments to maintain control of the pain; and patient D experienced little or no benefit from acupuncture therapy despite having continued the treatments for 5 months.

Statistically, patient A represents 28% of the patient population who can completely self-heal; patient B, 34%; patient C, 30% (B and C can partially self-heal); and patient D, 8% (can slowly, or not all, self-heal) (Table 6-1).

This example clearly illustrates that the efficacy of acupuncture treatment depends primarily on (1) the degree of the patient’s self-healing potential and (2) the healability of the afflicting symptoms or diseases.

A good acupuncture evaluation should provide information concerning treatment efficacy and give an answer to the following questions for a specific patient:

Our method of quantitative acupuncture evaluation (QAE) determines the healing potential of each patient and provides answers to these questions. QAE is an easy method to learn, as well as being time-saving, reliable, and reproducible by any practitioner.

QUANTITATIVE ACUPUNCTURE EVALUATION

The results of QAE allow practitioners to predict the efficacy, duration, and prognosis of the treatment. Any pathologic insult or disease tends to reduce the patient’s self-healing potential and impairs homeostasis. The impaired or declining homeostasis transforms latent (nonsensitive) acupoints into passive (tender) acupoints. The homeostasis of each patient reflects his or her body’s ability to repair the damage evidenced by pathologic symptoms.

Thus the number of tender homeostatic acupoints (NHAs; see Chapter 5) shows the interaction between the self-healing potential (HP) and the severity of the symptoms (SS). This relationship can be roughly expressed in the following linear formula:

image

This formula expresses the condition that the number of HAs is proportional to the severity of the symptoms (SS) and inversely proportional to the self-healing potential (HP); f represents a factor that varies for each individual.

A healthy person maintains optimum homeostasis, which results in the best self-healing and produces a fast, complete cure of most pain symptoms. Such a person will have only a few tender acupoints. If a healthy person suffers from acute pain symptoms, they can usually be relieved by two to four acupuncture treatments.

When chronic disease or chronic pain is affecting the body, homeostasis declines, the healing potential is reduced, and additional tender HAs gradually appear in a predictable sequence and in predictable locations. Patients with chronic pain usually need 8 to 16 acupuncture treatments to achieve pain relief. The same symptoms may return after about 4 to 6 months, and then additional acupuncture treatments will be needed to keep the pain under control for another 4 to 6 months.

If homeostasis deteriorates beyond a certain physiologic limit, the mechanism of self-healing is severely impeded. No matter how many treatments are administered, these patients will feel little or no relief.

Dr. H.C. Dung classified patients into four groups (see Table 6-1) according to their self-healing potential and treatment prognosis, after studying more than 15,000 cases.

Classification of patients is important because it allows prediction of the efficacy, duration, and prognosis of acupuncture therapy. To classify patients into groups, it is not necessary for a practitioner to count every passive HA in the body. Because HAs appear in an anticipated sequence and at highly predictable locations, it is sufficient to check a few landmark acupoints to obtain a clear picture about the group to which a patient belongs at the time of the treatment.

The selected landmark acupoints for patient evaluation are the H1 deep radial on the forearm (Figures 6-1 and 6-2) and H4 saphenous (Figure 6-3). The deep radial nerve and the saphenous nerve are similar to one another. Both emerge from deep tissues at similar locations just below the elbow and knee and start to branch to innervate other muscles. Figures 6-1 and 6-3 show that more HAs can appear distally to both H1 and H4. These additional points are located along the deep radial and saphenous nerves, about 2 to 3 cm apart. We call these points H1-2, H1-3, H1-4 (located on the deep radial nerve) and H4-2, H4-3, H4-4 (located on the saphenous nerve). Thus the total number of points is 16 bilaterally.

image

Figure 6-2 Surface location of H1 deep radial and its derivative tender points H1-2, H1-3, and H1-4 used to evaluate the self-healing potential.

(Modified from Lumley J: Surface anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical examination, ed 3, Edinburgh, 2002, Churchill Livingstone.)

The two points, H1 and H4, are tender in almost all patients. When the self-healing potential of a patient declines, the second points, H1-2 and H4-2, appear tender. If the self-healing potential continues to decline, the third points, H1-3 and H4-3, also become sensitive. When the self-healing potential is minimal, the fourth acupoints, H1-4 and H4-4, become tender.

When examining a patient we palpate all these 16 diagnostic points on the forearms and legs on both sides of the body. Using the results of this examination we can classify our patients into four groups, as shown in Table 6-2.

By combining data from Tables 6-1 and 6-2, we can predict the efficacy, duration, and outcome of acupuncture treatments. Statistical analysis shows that about one third of patients belong to group A (28%). The effects of acupuncture can seem miraculous for this group. Group D accounts for about one tenth of patients (8%), and these are least able to benefit from acupuncture therapy. Most patients, about 64%, belong to groups B and C and represent an average or slightly below average health level. Acupuncture treatments can successfully control chronic pain for patients in groups B and C for some time. In some cases the pain will recur in about 4 to 6 months (see Table 6-1); some patients may enjoy longer pain relief if they take appropriate measures for health maintenance. The mechanism of pain relapse was explained in Chapters 3 and 5. Age and genetic factors may influence the self-healing potential. The age of most group A patients is below 40, and most group D patients are above 60 years of age. Nevertheless it is not uncommon to see older patients in group A and younger patients in group D. We should not assume that older patients are necessarily sick or weak.

When checking acupoints, the practitioner must be able to apply correct and consistent pressure to each acupoint, which is not a difficult skill to learn. As a general rule, apply 2 to 3 pounds of thumb pressure on each diagnostic point. Applying insufficient pressure may cause underestimation of the tenderness of the acupoint, and applying excessive pressure may cause overestimation of the sensitivity of the acupoint.

The following simple guidelines facilitate the evaluation procedure:

CLINICAL TECHNIQUES

The following section describes how to apply the quantitative evaluation method to acupuncture treatment.

Definition of Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatments

Acupuncture efficacy is measured by (1) the number of treatments needed for maximal relief and (2) the duration of the pain relief. It depends on the interaction between a patient’s self-healing potential and the severity and nature of the symptoms. In Tables 6-1 and 6-2, we classify pain patients into four groups: A, B, C, and D. Accordingly we can classify acupuncture efficacy into four groups: excellent for group A, good for group B, average for group C, and poor for group D. Different groups need a different number of treatments and experience different durations of pain relief.

With two to four treatments, patients in group A enjoy complete pain relief for at least 1 year or even for years if proper preventive measures are taken.

Group B patients need about four to eight treatments to obtain pain relief of about 4 to 6 months’ duration or longer if they adopt appropriate preventive maintenance.

Acupuncture treatments achieve average efficacy in group C patients. Patients in this group need more than eight treatments to obtain pain relief for an average of 5 months. After the symptoms relapse these patients need another session of acupuncture treatments to keep the pain under control for another 5 months (5 ± 1 months). Patients in this group can upgrade to group B by continuing preventive acupuncture treatments even after the pain symptoms are relieved.

Acupuncture generally demonstrates poor efficacy in group D patients. Acupuncture treatments may offer patients in this group pain relief for only a few days. Our clinical evidence shows that, with help from other supportive procedures such as diet, exercise, massage, and change of lifestyle, some of the group D patients may upgrade to group C. Sometimes remarkable results can be achieved for group D patients who demonstrate a strong desire to be healed and who are well supported by their practitioner and family members.

Collecting Information to Evaluate a Patient’s Healing Potential

In acupuncture therapy for soft tissue pain, understanding the full capacity of a patient’s self-healing potential is more important than understanding the mechanism and nature of the pathologic symptoms or diseases afflicting that patient. This is why acupuncture is able to treat with success symptoms that originate from what might be labeled mechanism unknown by health care professionals.

Thus QAE is not meant to differentiate diseases or to investigate the mechanism of diseases. The goal of QAE is to provide the information necessary for evaluating the self-healing potential of a patient and the projected efficacy of acupuncture treatments.

Before making a plan for acupuncture treatment, a practitioner should create the patient’s complete medical profile, and to do this the following information should be obtained.

Handling Syncope

When a patient experiences syncope during acupuncture treatment, the practitioner should remain calm and use the following procedures:

image

Figure 6-4 The point on the philtrum to be needled in cases of syncope. It is just below the septum of the nose.

(Modified from Jenkins D: Hollinshead’s functional anatomy of the limbs and back, ed 8, Philadelphia, 2002.)

This procedure is clinically proven and effectively brings the patient back to consciousness. The physiologic mechanism of this centuries-old prescription is still unclear; possibly needling these points increases blood pressure.

Usually this type of needling terminates syncope quickly, almost immediately. As a rule, after “needle fainting” a patient feels tired and experiences slight discomfort all over the body, partly caused by psychological panic. If the patient does not wake up in a few minutes, an emergency call to a hospital is advised, although the acupuncture literature has never recorded a syncope of such prolonged duration.

Pneumothorax

If an acupuncture needle perforates the pulmonary pleura (the serous membrane investing the lungs and lining the chest wall), the needle may cause a local lesion to the pleura or in some cases to the lung. As a result air could penetrate the lesion-damaged tissue of the thoracic wall and accumulate in the pleural cavity, which prevents lung expansion and results in difficult breathing accompanied by chest pain. This condition is called pneumothorax. Special attention to thoracic anatomy is needed (see Chapter 9 and Figure 9-12, p. 137) to avoid pneumothorax when needling points on the anterior, lateral, or posterior thorax.

No medical record exists to indicate that pneumothorax caused by needling has led to a life-threatening condition, but improper acupuncture needling will produce a severe traumatic effect on the patient. If an acupuncture needle perforates the pleura, the patient may suddenly feel pain radiating from the needling site. Usually the patient starts coughing about 30 minutes later and experiences short breaths, pain in the chest area, and tingling or numbness in the arms. When pneumothorax is suspected, the patient should be hospitalized for emergency aid. To prevent pneumothorax, we suggest using needles 25 to 30 mm (about 1 inch) long for paravertebral points (see Chapter 5) and 15 mm long for the lateral and anterior thorax.

When needling acupoints such as the H3 spinal accessory and H13 dorsal scapula (see Chapter 5), we recommend the following procedure: insert a needle (40 mm long) skin deep, and then grasp and hold up the muscle tissue between the fingers and the thumb. After the muscle is raised, continue inserting the needle until it reaches the nodule in the muscle and then immediately withdraw the needle without loosening grasp of the tissue. This safe procedure can be repeated a few times to achieve better muscle relaxation. This needling method should be performed only by experienced practitioners who are familiar with the gross anatomy of this region. Inexperienced practitioners may use an alternative procedure by inserting a few shorter needles (25 mm long) around H3 and H13 to achieve desirable results.

Special care should be taken when treating patients with a thinner body wall, especially patients with a spine problem, such as scoliosis, or a history of heavy smoking, because these patients have thinner, less elastic, weaker thoracic muscles. They may require more time to recover from the needle-induced lesions.

Acupuncture lesions may produce possible pneumothorax symptoms even after treatment. The hole from a needle-induced lesion in less elastic muscles may reopen when patients in the high-risk group simply breathe or do physical exercises. For safety reasons, when needling PAs in the thoracic region of patients in the high-risk group use only shorter needles tilting to the midline.

Needling Reaction

Physiologic reactions to acupuncture needling can be observed in some patients. The reaction may appear during treatment (immediate reaction) or a few hours after treatment (latent reaction).

Latent Reaction

About 10% of patients feel more pain within 24 or 48 hours after acupuncture treatment. This pain may be “wandering” or appear in a new location. For instance, a patient complaining of lower back pain might experience shoulder pain, knee pain, or a headache for 1 or 2 days after acupuncture treatment.

This latent reaction occurs mostly in two different groups of patients: very healthy (group A) or very unhealthy (group D). The reaction in group A is referred to as a positive latent reaction and the reaction in group D as a negative latent reaction. A majority of patients experience none of these temporary side effects.

In older or weaker patients with multiple chronic health problems, the negative latent physiologic reaction can be induced by overstimulation from needling. During the first few treatments of weaker or older patients, no more than 10 needles should be used to avoid a negative latent reaction. After patients adjust to the needling and become physically stronger, more needles can be introduced if necessary.

The negative latent reaction can be explained as follows. Each acupuncture needle creates a tiny lesion or trauma to the soft tissues, including peripheral nerve endings. The healing of the needle-induced lesions is an energy-consuming process. A physically weak body with multiple injuries or symptoms can accept only a limited number of new needle-induced lesions because a weak body does not have enough healing energy to heal many of them. Patients who experience a negative latent reaction are mostly women 40 years of age or older.

Another group of patients, mostly young, healthy, athletic males in their twenties or thirties, may feel more pain within 24 hours after their first acupuncture treatment. This positive latent reaction does not indicate overstimulation but is a positive sign showing that the patient is having a strong response to acupuncture therapy. This type of patient usually requires fewer treatment sessions and recovers faster than most other patients.

What to Do When a Patient Experiences a Latent Reaction

A latent reaction, whether negative or positive, is not dangerous and can be easily relieved. When a patient experiences a latent reaction, a practitioner may insert a few needles in the painful area for about 5 to 10 minutes to cause the pain to subside. Usually we use one or two needles in a patient experiencing a negative latent reaction and four needles in a patient experiencing a positive latent reaction. Mild and light massage or moist heat also can help to calm down latent reaction pain.

More than 30% of patients feel tired and fatigued for a day after the treatment. This tiredness forces patients to sleep more and to perform fewer physical activities. Subsequent to the fatigue phase, patients usually experience a feeling of improvement and relief of symptoms. Thus the fatigue phase should be interpreted as positive body language convincing the patients to conserve the energy needed for healing of the symptoms after stress is removed.

A few patients complain of soreness at needle sites for 2 to 5 days after treatment. We suggest two explanations for this phenomenon. The first possibility is that needling interrupts the contracture structure deep in the muscle and/or other tissues and causes an antiinflammatory reaction. The needle-induced lesion continues to stimulate the tissues for a few days after the needle is removed. The second possibility is that a needle may perforate the deep blood vessel slightly and cause tiny internal bleeding, which stimulates the tissues for a few days. Usually massage or moist heat will reduce the soreness.

How Many Needles Should Be Used for Each Treatment?

Understanding the needling mechanisms and the physiologic strength or weakness of a patient permits a practitioner to decide how many needles should be used during an acupuncture treatment.

Each needle creates a microlesion in the tissues. In most patients it takes 2 days or longer for the needle-induced lesions to be replaced by fresh cells, and this process takes longer in weak patients. Thus, as indicated earlier, acupuncture-induced healing is an energy-consuming process.

Because the healing of needle-induced lesions usually takes longer for weaker and older patients because of their low energy level and low self-healing potential, a practitioner should use fewer needles during acupuncture treatments for these patients. As a reaction to overneedling, some patients may feel tired after treatment; they may feel soreness on the needled spots, or experience more pain for 1 or 2 days.

Healthier and younger patients have enough energy to heal the needle-induced lesions faster, and a practitioner could use more needles during an acupuncture treatment for these patients. As a rule of thumb, up to 30 needles can be used in one session.

For first-time patients without any previous experience of acupuncture treatments, fewer acupoints should be needled because these patients’ bodies need time to adjust to this new modality. A patient should be treated as a first-time patient if he or she has not received acupuncture treatments for longer than 6 months.

To provide effective acupuncture treatments, practitioners are encouraged to modify the protocol and to adjust it to each patient’s level of homeostasis, severity of pain symptoms, and tolerance to needles.

Frequency of Acupuncture Appointments

A successful acupuncture therapy should be administered with proper treatment “dosage” and treatment timing. Acupuncture “dosage” refers to the number of needles used in each treatment and to the timing of treatment. “Underneedling” may slow the healing process in most patients, whereas “overneedling” may cause strong “postneedling” reaction in a few patients.

For most patients, about 2 days are needed to heal the needle-induced lesions. For weaker and older patients, more than 2 days will be needed to heal the same lesions. Sufficient time should be allowed to heal the needle-induced lesions between treatments, especially for weak and older patients. Therefore the timing of acupuncture appointments depends on the following three factors.

Standardized Protocol for the Prone Position

The patient lies comfortably in the prone position. The practitioner, using a finger or a thumb, palpates all 13 accessible HAs. All HAs are bilateral except H20 spinous process of T7. The forearms are not included.

Head (2): H2 great auricular, H7 greater occipital
Shoulder bridge (1): H3 spinal accessory
Shoulder (2): H8 infraspinatus, H13 dorsal scapula
Upper back (2): H20 spinous process of T7, H21 posterior cutaneous of T6
Lower back (3): H14 superior cluneal, H15 posterior

Individualized Protocol

The individualized protocol combines SAs and PAs to customize acupuncture treatments to the patient’s needs and pathologic symptoms.

Locating Symptomatic Acupoints

As explained in Chapter 5, HAs appear in a similar pattern in every patient. Each HA also serves as a “road map” for locating SAs. Finding and treating the right SAs greatly enhances the efficacy of the treatment. The following is an explanation of the general procedure of locating SAs.

Most symptomatic SAs emerge around local HAs. SAs are affected by a patient’s individual pain symptoms and therefore have an individual pattern. Some SAs are predictable, and some are not.

Practical Application of the General Protocol

The following examples show how to apply the protocol and modify it for different patients. The treatment begins with the quantitative evaluation and palpation of HAs and SAs to locate the most tender acupoints. Then, based on information collected from the patient, the practitioner decides how to modify the protocol according to the individual pain pattern, homeostasis, and needling tolerance of the patient.

Below are examples of how to modify the protocol.

Example 1: Chronic Neck Pain

Example 3: Chronic Lower Back Pain

SUMMARY

The therapeutic efficacy of acupuncture depends on the patient’s self-healing potential and on the ability of the practitioner to activate it. As a rule, healthy people have a greater healing potential. As symptoms or diseases become severe, the self-healing potential is impaired and the healing process is slowed.

When health or homeostasis declines, acupoints transform from the latent phase (nonsensitive) to the passive phase (sensitive) in an anticipatable sequence and HAs appear in predictable locations. Thus the number of passive HAs is a quantitative indicator of the degree of homeostasis in the body.

Based on the number of tender HAs, we can statistically differentiate patients into four types of homeostasis/self-healing potential: 28%, excellent (group A); 34%, good (group B); 30%, average (group C); and 8%, poor (group D). Patients in each group react to acupuncture differently (see Tables 6-1 and 6-2).

From an understanding of the nature of acupuncture therapy, we have been able to develop a universally applicable treatment protocol for all peripheral pain symptoms. The protocol has both standardized and individualized components.

The standardized part of the protocol is based on the 24 HAs, and the individualized part includes SAs and PAs. The SAs should be carefully searched for because they appear in different places for every patient. Local HAs provide the “road map” for finding local SAs. The location of SAs is in turn a direct guide to which PAs should be used (segmental mechanism, see Chapters 3 and 5).

The entire procedure presented in this chapter for selecting, combining, and prescribing acupoints is practitioner-friendly and standardized but is flexible enough to address each patient’s individual needs. The treatment protocol simultaneously (1) promotes homeostasis and enhances self-healing potential and (2) treats particular pain symptoms.

As noted, by its neurophysiological nature acupuncture therapy is nonspecific. Through the use of SAs and PAs, we are able to make it specific for particular symptoms and patients as well.