58: Iliac Artery Disease

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1319 times

CASE 58 Iliac Artery Disease

Angiography

Abdominal angiography found normal renal arteries and distal aorta. Angiography of the pelvic vessels demonstrated a severe stenosis of the left external iliac artery (Figures 58-2, 58-3). Initially, there did not appear to be appreciable disease in the right iliac system to account for the findings on the noninvasive study; however, there was significant vessel overlap. The femoral and runoff vessels appeared normal bilaterally.

The left external iliac lesion was felt to be consistent with her noninvasive studies and likely accounted for her symptoms. The etiology of her right leg findings was not apparent on the initial angiograms. The operator decided to proceed with intervention of the left external iliac. Arterial access had initially been obtained in the right common femoral artery for the diagnostic angiograms. A long, 6 French Ansel 2 sheath was taken up and over the aortoiliac bifurcation and positioned proximal to the left external iliac lesion. A bolus of unfractionated heparin was administered intravenously to achieve a therapeutic activated clotting time of greater than 250 seconds. The operator positioned an 0.018 inch guidewire distally (Figure 58-4) and dilated the stenosis with a 5 mm diameter by 40 mm long balloon (Figure 58-5). Following balloon angioplasty, substantial residual narrowing remained due to elastic recoil. The operator then deployed a 7 mm diameter by 40 mm long self-expanding nitinol stent and postdilated the stent with the 5 mm diameter by 40 mm long balloon. The post-stent angiogram revealed an excellent result (Figure 58-6) and angiography of the distal runoff showed no distal emboli.

Following the procedure on the left external iliac artery, the operator withdrew the long sheath over a 0.035 inch wire. Pressure monitoring during the pullback uncovered a 60 mmHg pressure gradient between the distal aorta and the distal right external iliac. Another angiogram was performed, which found a stenosis just proximal to the inguinal ligament (Figure 58-7). The lesion did not resolve with intraarterial nitroglycerin. Although it did not appear severe angiographically, this stenosis was associated with a significant pressure gradient and likely accounted for the patient’s right leg symptoms and the findings on the noninvasive studies. The distal right external iliac stenosis was then treated with a 5 mm diameter by 40 mm long balloon for a prolonged inflation (Figures 58-8, 58-9). The operator was not entirely satisfied with the angiographic result and placed a 7 mm diameter by 40 mm long self-expanding nitinol stent, post dilated with the 5 mm diameter by 40 mm long balloon. The final angiograms demonstrated an excellent result with no evidence of distal embolization (Figure 58-10).

Discussion

Over 8 million individuals in the United States have peripheral arterial disease. Many are asymptomatic; however, at least a third experience claudication, and up to 5% develop limb-threatening ischemia.1 Noninvasive physiologic testing helps determine the degree of arterial insufficiency and provides information regarding the location of the stenoses. Conventional angiography remains the gold standard to define the arterial anatomy and diagnose luminal obstruction. Adjunctive techniques performed during angiography are also helpful to assess the disease severity and include measurement of translesional pressure gradients and intravascular ultrasound. In fact, in this case, based solely on the angiogram, the disease in the right external iliac artery might have been disregarded; the measurement of a translesional pressure gradient determined that this disease was, in fact, significant.

Endovascular therapy has emerged as the leading method to relieve lifestyle-limiting symptoms. The decision between endovascular therapy and surgical therapy often depends on the severity and location of the lesions, as well as patient comorbidities and the overall functional status of the patient.

Inflow disease, defined as a stenosis located above the inguinal ligament, is present in approximately 30% of patients with claudication. Patients with isolated inflow disease may complain of typical calf claudication, but may also have thigh and/or buttock claudication; men will often complain of impotence.

The management of inflow disease is outlined in the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC), which was last revised in 2007.2 In this document, a classification system has been devised to help guide in the management of inflow disease (Table 58-1). Based on the excellent long-term patency rates with endovascular therapy, aortoiliac disease classified as TASC A or B is considered best treated initially by endovascular techniques. Lesions classified as TASC D are managed surgically. Lesions characterized as TASC C have a lower likelihood of long-term success with an endovascular approach. In this category, patient variables such as comorbidities and overall functional status become extremely important in the decision process. Surgical management is usually recommended in patients with TASC C lesions and low surgical risk due to better long-term outcomes with regards to patency. However, in these categories, it may be reasonable to proceed with an initial endovascular approach as long as surgical targets are not compromised. As the field of endovascular therapy evolves, new devices and novel techniques may improve the long-term patency and new data originating from larger series and randomized controlled trials may change these recommendations to a primary endovascular strategy.

TABLE 58-1 TASC Classification of Aortoiliac Disease2

Classification Characteristics
Type A

Type B Type C Type D

While the TASC criteria are helpful in decision-making, it should be emphasized that patency rates do not always equate with clinical outcomes; the ultimate goal is to improve the patient’s quality of life. In addition, the TASC criteria are based on an interpretation of the angiogram and subtle changes in the description of a lesion can significantly change the classification. For instance in the case presented here, the disease would be classified as TASC A based on the presence of bilateral external iliac stenosis <3 cm; the classification changes to TASC C if these lesions are interpreted as 3 to 10 cm in length.