Case 53

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 994 times

CASE 53

image

ANSWERS

CASE 53

Mycotic Pseudoaneurysm

1B, C, and D

2C

3B

4A

Reference

Reddy GP, Gunn M, Mitsumori LM, et al. Multislice CT and MRI of the thoracic aorta. In: Webb WR, Higgins CB, eds. Thoracic imaging: pulmonary and cardiovascular radiology. ed 2 Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

Cross-Reference

Cardiac Imaging: The REQUISITES, ed 3, pp 377–379.

Comment

Etiology and Pathology

Etiologies of aortic pseudoaneurysm include atherosclerosis (penetrating aortic ulcer), infection, trauma (deceleration injury—although this is an unusual location), and iatrogenic cause. Pseudoaneurysms are characterized by disruption of one or more layers of the vessel wall, whereas true aneurysms have intact walls.

True and False Aneurysm

In a true aneurysm of the aorta, all three layers of the aortic wall are intact. In contrast, a false aneurysm results from a focal disruption of one or more layers of the aortic wall and may be contained by the adventitia and surrounding fibrous tissue.

Imaging

CT and MRI are the best imaging methods for evaluation of a thoracic aortic aneurysm. Disruption of the wall is difficult to identify on imaging. However, many observers use the following rule of thumb: a relatively narrow ostium (<50% of the aneurysm diameter) suggests that the outpouching is a pseudoaneurysm (Figure), and a wide ostium suggests a true aneurysm.