42: Thoracic Compression Fracture

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2749 times

CHAPTER 42

Thoracic Compression Fracture

Toni J. Hanson, MD

Synonyms

Thoracic compression fracture

Dorsal compression fracture

Wedge compression

Vertebral crush fracture

ICD-9 Codes

733.19   Pathologic fracture of other specified site

733.13   Pathologic fracture of vertebrae

ICD-10 Codes

M84.40   Pathological fracture, unspecified site

S22.009  Unspecified fracture of unspecified thoracic vertebra

Add seventh character (A—initial encounter closed fracture, B—initial encounter open fracture, D—subsequent encounter fracture with routine healing, G—subsequent encounter fracture with delayed healing, K—subsequent encounter fracture with nonunion, S—sequela)

Definition

A compression fracture is caused by forces transmitted along the vertebral body. The ligaments are intact, and compression fractures are usually stable [1] (Fig. 42.1). Compression fractures in the thoracic vertebrae are commonly seen in osteoporosis with decreased bone mineral density. They may be asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally on radiography. Such fractures may occur with trivial trauma and are usually stable [2,3]. Pathologic vertebral fractures may occur with metastatic cancer (commonly from lung, breast, or prostate) as well as with other processes affecting vertebrae. Trauma, such as a fall from a height or a motor vehicle accident, can also result in thoracic compression fracture. Considerable force is required to fracture healthy vertebrae, which are resistant to compression. In such cases, the force required to produce a fracture may cause extension of fracture components into the spinal canal with neurologic findings. There may be evidence of additional trauma, such as calcaneal fractures from a fall. Multiple thoracic compression fractures, as seen with osteoporosis, can produce a kyphotic deformity [46]. An estimated 1.5 million vertebral compression fractures occur annually in the United States, with 25% of postmenopausal women affected in their lifetime. Estimates indicate that there are 44 million persons with osteoporosis and 34 million with low bone mass in the United States [7]. Existence of vertebral compression fracture increases the risk of future vertebral compression fractures (with 1 fracture, there is a 5-fold increase; with 2 or more fractures, there is a 12-fold increase) [8].

f42-01-9781455775774
FIGURE 42.1 Thoracic compression fracture with reduction in anterior vertebral height and wedging of the vertebrae.

Symptoms

Pain in the thoracic spine over the affected vertebrae is the usual hallmark of the presentation. It may be severe, sharp, exacerbated with movement, and decreased with rest. Severe pain may last 2 to 3 weeks and then decrease during 6 to 8 weeks, but pain may persist for months. Acute fractures in osteoporosis, however, may result in little discomfort or poor localization [9]. In osteoporotic fractures, the mid and lower thoracic vertebrae are typically affected. A good history and physical examination are essential as there may be indicators of a more ominous underlying pathologic process [10,11].

Physical Examination

Tenderness with palpation or percussion over the affected region of the thoracic vertebrae is the primary finding on physical examination. Spinal movements also produce pain. Kyphotic deformity, loss of height, and impingement of the lower ribs on the superior iliac crest may be present in the patient who has had multiple prior compression fractures. Neurologic examination below the level of the fracture is recommended to assess for presence of reflex changes, pathologic reflexes such as Babinski sign, and sensory alterations. Sacral segments can be assessed through evaluation of rectal tone, volitional sphincter control, anal wink, and pinprick if there is concern about bowel and bladder function [12]. It is also important to assess the patient’s gait for stability. Comorbid neurologic and orthopedic conditions may contribute to gait dysfunction and fall risk [13,14].

Functional Limitations

Functional limitations in a patient with an acute painful thoracic compression fracture can be significant. The patient may experience loss of mobility and independence in activities of daily living and household activities, and there may be an impact on social, avocational, vocational, and psychological functioning. In patients with severe symptoms, hospitalization may be necessary [15].

Diagnostic Testing

Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the thoracic spine can confirm the clinical impression of a thoracic compression fracture. On radiographic examination in a thoracic compression fracture, the height of the affected vertebrae is reduced, generally in a wedge-shaped fashion, with anterior height less than posterior vertebral height. In osteoporosis, biconcave deformities can also be noted on spinal radiographs (Fig. 42.2A). A bone scan may help localize (but not necessarily determine the etiology of) processes such as metastatic cancer, occult fracture, and infection. Spinal imaging, such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, may also elucidate further detail [16] (Fig. 42.2B). Percutaneous needle biopsy of the affected vertebral body can be helpful diagnostically in selected cases. Laboratory tests are obtained as appropriate. These include a complete blood count and sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein level (which are nonspecific but sensitive indicators of an occult infection or inflammatory disease). Serum alkaline phosphatase, serum and urine protein electrophoresis, and other laboratory tests are beneficial when a malignant neoplasm is suspected. Diagnostic testing is directed, as appropriate, on the basis of the entire clinical presentation, including secondary causes of osteoporosis. Bone densitometry can be performed when the patient is improved clinically.

f42-02-9781455775774
FIGURE 42.2 A, Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs demonstrating thoracic compression fracture (arrow). B, Magnetic resonance images demonstrating T1 (left) and T2 (right) appearance of a thoracic compression fracture. C, Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs demonstrating appearance of vertebrae after vertebroplasty. (Courtesy Kent R. Theilen, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.)

Differential Diagnosis

Thoracic sprain

Thoracic radiculopathy

Thoracic disc herniation

Metastatic malignant disease

Primary spine malignant neoplasm (uncommon, most frequently multiple myeloma) [17]

Benign spinal tumors

Infection, osteomyelitis (rare) [18]

Inflammatory arthritis

Musculoskeletal pain, other

Referred pain (pancreatic cancer, abdominal aortic aneurysm)

Treatment

Initial

Initial treatment consists of activity modification, including limited bed rest. Cushioning with use of a mattress overlay (such as an egg crate) can also be helpful. Pharmacologic agents, including oral analgesics, muscle relaxants, and anti-inflammatory medications, as appropriate to the patient, are helpful. Agents such as tramadol 50 mg (one or two every 4 to 6 hours, not exceeding eight per day), acetaminophen 300 mg/codeine 30 mg (one or two every 4 to 6 hours), and controlled-release oxycodone CR (10 mg or 20 mg every 12 hours) may be considered. Acetaminophen dose should not exceed 3 g/day. Muscle relaxants such as cyclobenzaprine, 10 mg three times daily, may be helpful initially with muscle spasm. A variety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including celecoxib (Celebrex, a cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor), can be considered, depending on the patient. Calcitonin (one spray daily, alternating nostrils, providing 200IU per spray) has also been used for painful osteoporotic fractures [19]. Stool softeners and laxatives may be necessary to reduce strain with bowel movements and constipation, particularly with narcotic analgesics. Selection of pharmacologic agents must factor in the age, comorbidities, and clinical status of the patient. Avoidance of spinal motion, especially flexion, by appropriate body mechanics (such as log rolling in bed) and spinal bracing is helpful. There are a variety of spinal orthoses that reduce spinal flexion (Fig. 42.3). They must be properly fitted [20,21]. A lumbosacral orthosis may be sufficient for a low thoracic fracture. A thoracolumbosacral orthosis is used frequently (Fig. 42.3A-D). If a greater degree of fracture immobilization is required, an off-the-shelf orthosis (Fig. 42.3E) or a custom-molded body jacket may be fitted by an orthotist. Proper diagnosis and treatment of underlying contributors to the thoracic compression fracture are necessary [22,23]. Most thoracic compression fractures will heal with symptomatic improvement in 4 to 6 weeks [24,25].

f42-03-9781455775774
FIGURE 42.3 A, Cruciform anterior spinal hyperextension brace (to limit flexion). B, Three-point sagittal hyperextension brace (to limit flexion). C, Thoracolumbosacral orthosis, anterior view. D, Thoracolumbosacral orthosis, posterior view. E, Off-the-shelf molded spinal orthosis with Velcro closures.

Rehabilitation

Physical therapy is helpful to assist with gentle mobilization of the patient by employing proper body mechanics, optimizing transfer techniques, and training with gait aids (such as a wheeled walker) to reduce biomechanical stresses on the spine and to ensure gait safety [26]. Pain-relieving modalities, such as therapeutic heat or cold, and transcutaneous electrical stimulation may also be employed. Exercise should not increase spinal symptoms and should be implemented at the appropriate juncture. In addition to proper body mechanics and postural training emphasizing spinal extension and avoidance of flexion, spinal extensor muscle strengthening, limb muscle strengthening, stretching to muscle groups (such as the chest, hips, and lower extremity muscles), and deep breathing exercises may also be indicated. Weight-bearing exercises for bone health, balance, and fall prevention are also important [27]. Proper footwear, with cushioning inserts, can also be helpful. Occupational therapy can help the patient with activities of daily living, reinforce proper spinal ergonomics, address equipment needs, and prevent falls. Successful rehabilitation is targeted at increasing the patient’s comfort, decreasing deformity, and decreasing resultant disability and is individualized to address specific patient needs [2830].

Procedures

Invasive procedures are generally not necessary. Percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty with use of polymethyl methacrylate may be helpful to reduce fracture pain, to reinforce thoracic vertebral strength, and to improve function; with kyphoplasty, some potential restoration of vertebral height has been reported [26,31] (Fig. 42.2C). Patients with imaging evidence of an acute or a subacute thoracic fracture who have correlating pain, who fail to improve with conservative management, and who are without contraindications may be candidates for such interventional procedures [32,33]. In two randomized controlled trials, no beneficial effect was noted in vertebroplasty versus sham [32,34].

Surgery

Surgery is rarely necessary. Surgical stabilization can be considered in patients with continued severe pain after compression fracture as a result of nonunion of the fracture, in patients with spinal instability, or if neurologic complications occur. Referral to a spine surgeon is recommended in these cases for further assessment [35].

Potential Disease Complications

Neurologic complications, including nerve or spinal cord compromise, as well as orthopedic complications with continued pain, nonunion, and instability can occur. Underlying primary disease, for example, metastatic thoracic compression, needs to be addressed. Patients with severe kyphosis may experience cardiopulmonary dysfunction. Severe kyphosis may also result in rib impingement on the iliac bones, producing further symptoms. Severe pain accompanying a fracture may further limit deep breathing and increase the risk of pulmonary complications, such as pneumonia. Progressive spinal deformity may produce secondary pain generators. The patient may have progressive levels of dependency as a result.

Potential Treatment Complications

Side effects with medications, particularly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as well as narcotic medications, can occur. It is important to select medications appropriate for individual patients. There may be difficulty with the use of spinal orthotics, such as intolerance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Kyphotic patients frequently do not tolerate orthoses and fitting is a problem. Complications of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty can include infection, bleeding, fracture (in the treated or adjacent vertebrae), and systemic issues such as embolism. Cement leaks into surrounding tissues with spinal cord, spinal nerve, or vascular compression can occur [36]. Surgery can result in many complications, not only from general anesthesia risks but also from infection, bleeding, or thromboembolism. Poor mechanical strength of bone, as in osteoporosis with paucity of dense lamellar and cortical bone, may result in suboptimal surgical outcome.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Dr. Kent Thielen for use of the case study; Sara Harstad for orthotic modeling; and Pamela Harders for secretarial support.

References

[1] Bezel E, Stillerman C. The thoracic spine. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishers; 1999 p. 20.

[2] Toh E, Yerby S, Bay B. The behavior of thoracic trabecular bone during flexion. J Exp Clin Med. 2005;30:163–170.

[3] Toyone T, Tanaka T, Wada Y, Kamikawa K. Changes in vertebral wedging rate between supine and standing position and its association with back pain: a prospective study in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2006;31:2963–2966.

[4] Kesson M, Atkins E. The thoracic spine. In: Kesson M, Atkins E, eds. Orthopaedic medicine: a practical approach. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998:262–281.

[5] McRae R. The thoracic and lumbar spine. In: London: Churchill Livingstone/Harcourt; 79–105. Parkinson M, ed. Pocketbook of orthopaedics and fractures. 1999;vol 1.

[6] Dandy D, Edwards D. Disorders of the spine. In: Dandy D, Edwards D, eds. Essential orthopaedics and trauma. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1998:431–451.

[7] Qaseem A, Snow V, Shekelle P, et al. Pharmacologic treatment of low bone density or osteoporosis to prevent fractures: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:404–415.

[8] Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. 1996;18:1254–1259.

[9] Bonner F, Chesnut C, Fitzsimmons A, Lindsay R. Osteoporosis. In: DeLisa J, Gans BM, eds. Rehabilitation medicine: principles and practice. 3rd ed Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:1453–1475.

[10] Van de Velde T. Disorders of the thoracic spine: non-disc lesions. In: Ombregt L, ed. A system of orthopaedic medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995:455–469.

[11] Errico T, Stecker S, Kostuik J. Thoracic pain syndromes. In: Frymoyer J, ed. The adult spine: principles and practices. 2nd ed Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:1623–1637.

[12] Huston C, Pitt D, Lane C. Strategies for treating osteoporosis and its neurologic complications. Appl Neurol. 2005;1:.

[13] Hu S, Carlson G, Tribus C. Disorders, diseases, and injuries of the spine. In: Skinner H, ed. Current diagnosis and treatment in orthopedics. 2nd ed New York: Lane Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 2000:177–246.

[14] Pattavina C. Diagnostic imaging. In: Hart R, ed. Handbook of orthopaedic emergencies. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1999:32–47 116–126; 127–140.

[15] Goldstein T. Treatment of common problems of the spine. In: Goldstein T, ed. Geriatric orthopaedics: rehabilitative management of common problems. 2nd ed Gaithersburg, Md: Aspen Publications; 1999:211–232.

[16] Bisese J. Compression fracture secondary to underlying metastasis. In: Bolger E, Ramos-Englis M, eds. Spinal MRI: a teaching file approach. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1992:73–129.

[17] Heller J, Pedlow F. Tumors of the spine. In: Garfin S, Vaccaro AR, eds. Orthopaedic knowledge update. Spine. Rosemont, Ill: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1997:235–256.

[18] Levine M, Heller J. Spinal infections. In: Garfin S, Vaccaro A, eds. Orthopaedic knowledge update. Spine. Rosemont, Ill: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1997:257–271.

[19] Kim D, Vaccaro A. Osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine; current options and considerations for treatment. Spine. 2006;6:479–487.

[20] Saunders H. Spinal orthotics. In: Bloomington, Minn: Educational Opportunities; 285–296. Saunders R, ed. Evaluation, treatment and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders. 1993;vol. 1.

[21] Bussel M, Merritt J, Fenwick L. Spinal orthoses. In: Redford J, ed. Orthotics clinical practice and rehabilitation technology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995:71–101.

[22] Khosla S, Bilezikian J, Dempster D, et al. Benefits and risks of bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:2272–2282.

[23] Mura M, Drake M, Mullan R, et al. Clinical review. Comparative effectiveness of drug treatments to prevent fragility fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:1871–1880.

[24] Brunton S, Carmichael B, Gold D. Vertebral compression fractures in primary care. J Fam Pract. 2005;54:781–788.

[25] Old J, Calvert M. Vertebral compression fractures in the elderly. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69:111–116.

[26] Rehabilitation of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2003 p. 4.

[27] Sinaki M. Critical appraisal of physical rehabilitation measures after osteoporosis vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:773–779.

[28] Browngoehl L. Osteoporosis. In: Grabois M, Garrison SJ, Hart KA, Lehmkuhl LD, eds. Physical medicine and rehabilitation: the complete approach. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Science; 2000:1565–1577.

[29] Eilbert W. Long-term care and rehabilitation of orthopaedic injuries. In: Hart R, Rittenberry TJ, Uehara DT, eds. Handbook of orthopaedic emergencies. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1999:127–138.

[30] Barr J, Barr M, Lemley T, McCann R. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine. 2000;25:923–928.

[31] Kostuik J, Heggeness M. Surgery of the osteoporotic spine. In: Frymoyer J, ed. The adult spine: principles and practice. 2nd ed Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:1639–1664.

[32] Kallmes D, Comstock B, Heagerty P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spine fractures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:569–579.

[33] Rad A, Gray L, Sinaki M, Kallmes D. Role of physical activity in new onset fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:1020–1023.

[34] Buchbinder R, Osborne R, Ebeling P, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:557–568.

[35] Snell E, Scarpone M. Orthopaedic issues in aging. In: Baratz M, Watson AD, Imbriglia JE, eds. Orthopaedic surgery: the essentials. New York: Thieme; 1999:865–870.

[36] Khosla A, Diehn F, Rad A, Kallmes D. Neither subendplate cement deposition nor cement leakage into the disk space during vertebroplasty significantly affects patient outcomes. Radiology. 2012;264:180–186.