4: Fluids, Volume Regulation, and Volume Disturbances

Published on 06/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1360 times

CHAPTER 4 Fluids, Volume Regulation, and Volume Disturbances

5 List conditions that stimulate and inhibit release of antidiuretic hormone

See Table 4-1.

TABLE 4-1 Conditions that Stimulate and Inhibit Release of Adrenocorticotropic Hormone

  Stimulates Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Release Inhibits Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Release
Normal physiologic states Hyperosmolality Hypo-osmolality
Hypovolemia Hypervolemia
Upright position Supine position
β-Adrenergic stimulation α-Adrenergic stimulation
Pain and emotional stress
Cholinergic stimulation
Abnormal physiologic states Hemorrhagic shock Excess water intake
Hyperthermia Hypothermia
Increased intracranial pressure
Positive airway pressure
Medications Morphine Ethanol
Nicotine Atropine
Barbiturates Phenytoin
Tricyclic antidepressants Glucocorticoids
Chlorpropamide Chlorpromazine
Results Oliguria, concentrated urine Polyuria, dilute urine

7 List causes of diabetes insipidus

See Table 4-2.

TABLE 4-2 Causes of Diabetes Insipidus

Vasopressin Deficiency (Neurogenic Diabetes Insipidus) Vasopressin Insensitivity (Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus)
Familial (autosomal-dominant) Familial (X-linked recessive)
Acquired Acquired
Idiopathic Pyelonephritis
Craniofacial, basilar skull fractures Postrenal obstruction
Craniopharyngioma, lymphoma, metastasis Sickle cell disease and trait
Granuloma (sarcoidosis, histiocytosis) Amyloidosis
Central nervous system infections Hypokalemia, hypercalcemia
Sheehan’s syndrome, cerebral aneurysm, cardiopulmonary bypass Sarcoidosis
Hypoxic brain injury, brain death Lithium

16 Review the colloidal solutions that are available

There are two albumin preparations, 5% and 25%. Preparation methods eliminate the possibility of infection. The 5% solution has a colloid osmotic pressure of about 20 mm Hg, which is the approximate colloid osmotic pressure under normal circumstances. The 25% solution (also called salt-poor albumin) obviously has a colloid osmotic pressure of about five times the normal situation. If intravascular volume is depleted yet extracellular volume is greatly expanded, this excess colloid osmotic pressure will draw fluid from the interstitium into the vascular space.

Hydroxyethyl starch in a 6% solution (dissolved in either normal saline or lactated Ringer’s solution) is another colloid preparation. The heterogeneous preparation contains polymerized molecules with molecular weights of between 20,000 and 100,000 daltons. Metabolized by amylase, it accumulates in the reticuloendothelial system and is renally excreted. Partial thromboplastin time is increased. It has dilutional effects on clotting factors, and the hetastarch molecules can move into organizing fibrin clot. Thus coagulation can be impaired. It is recommended that not more than 20 ml/kg be administered. The preparation dissolved in lactated Ringer’s is thought to have lesser effects on coagulation, perhaps because it is less heterogeneous in molecular weight dispersion. There are no effects on crossmatching of blood.

Dextrans are water-soluble, polymerized glucose molecules. Two preparations are available (dextran 40 and 70), and the molecular weights of the respective solutions are 40 and 70 kilodaltons. Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions and inhibition of platelet adhesiveness have been noted. Crossmatching of blood may be difficult (Table 4-4).

TABLE 4-4 Commonly Administered Colloids

Colloid Benefits and Risks
Albumin (5% or 25%) Expensive; allergic reactions; question its use where there is a loss of capillary integrity
Hetastarch Currently constituted in either NS or RL; administer less than 20 ml/kg to avoid antiplatelet effects; renally excreted; increases serum amylase
Dextran (40 or 70) Anaphylactic reactions; interferes with platelet function and crossmatching; increases hepatic transaminases

LR, Lactated Ringer’s solution; NS, normal saline.

21 How much fluid is appropriate to administer during a surgical procedure?

As has been previously mentioned, many cookbook recipes exist for administering intravenous fluids during surgical procedures. Many of these traditional recommendations have little evidence to support them. Clearly some fluid is better than none. For instance, nausea and vomiting and postural hypotension are reduced in patients having outpatient surgical procedures if the patient receives a liter or two of intravenous fluid perioperatively. But how much and for what procedure continue to be investigated. Every patient is different because each has differing periods of fasting, severity of illness, volume contraction, and coexisting disease.

There is good evidence that fluid restriction is beneficial in patients having thoracotomy and lung resections because of concern for postoperative pulmonary edema. Similarly, elective neurosurgical procedures and hepatic resections require judicious fluid administration. The viability of myocutaneous flaps is impaired in the setting of excess edema.

Recent investigations have compared liberal (consider this 12 to 15 ml/kg/hr or greater) to restrictive (consider this 4 to 8 ml/kg/hr) fluid administration protocols in patients having bowel resections. In the fluid-restricted group decreases in blood pressure of 20% of baseline or urine output of less than 0.5 ml/kg/hr were treated with repeated boluses of Ringer’s lactate, 250 ml. The restricted group had shorter hospitalizations, more rapid return of bowel function, and fewer surgical complications.