39: PCI Versus Medical Therapy for Stable Angina

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 02/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 882 times

CASE 39 PCI Versus Medical Therapy for Stable Angina

Case presentation

A 73-year-old woman with a past medical history of poorly controlled hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, and gastroesophageal reflux disease and a family history of coronary artery disease presented with exertional chest and arm discomfort and shortness of breath. She underwent an exercise stress thallium test during which she exercised 6 minutes in a standard Bruce protocol, achieved 73% of her age-predicted heart rate, and reached a maximum blood pressure of 200/90 mmHg. The test was terminated secondary to fatigue. Nuclear imaging revealed no convincing evidence of ischemia. Due to continued symptoms, she underwent cardiac catheterization. The right coronary artery was dominant, with minimal disease (Figure 39-1). The left coronary showed minimal disease of the left anterior descending artery and a severe stenosis in the mid-circumflex artery (Figures 39-2, 39-3 and Video 39-1). After her physician discussed the risks and benefits of percutaneous intervention versus optimal medical therapy, she chose medical management. Her medical regimen was maximized and included an angiotensin-receptor blocker, a calcium-channel blocker, aspirin, a beta-blocker, long-acting nitrates, and a statin. However, despite this therapy, she continued to experience exertional chest pressure and shortness of breath that significantly limited her physical activity. Thus, 3 months later she decided to pursue percutaneous intervention of the circumflex artery.