35: Silicone Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty

Published on 19/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1429 times

Procedure 35 Silicone Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty

imageSee Video 27: Silicone Metacarpophalangeal Joint Replacement Arthoplasty for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Procedure

Step 1

image The radial sagittal bands are incised to expose the MCP joints, and synovial tissues are sharply excised from the joints (see Fig. 35-3, sagittal band incision marked by dotted line).

image The collateral ligaments are divided at the metacarpal neck, and heads of the metacarpals are resected at the proximal origin of the collateral ligament using an oscillating saw (Fig. 35-4). After metacarpal head resections, the fingers can be brought into alignment. Resection of the heads should decrease the tightness of the ulnar intrinsic tendons that contribute to ulnar deviation of the fingers. Therefore, ulnar lateral band release is usually not necessary, if sufficient resection of the head of the metacarpal is performed.

Step 5

image The implants are inserted (Fig. 35-8), and the radially placed 3-0 braided sutures are used to reattach the radial collateral ligament and bring the fingers into slight radial deviation (Fig. 35-9A to E). The ulnar lateral bands can be released, if they are still tight and cause the fingers to deviate ulnarly. However, as stated previously, ulnar band release is usually not necessary.

Evidence

Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM. A prospective outcomes study of Swanson metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty for the rheumatoid hand. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2004;29:646-653.

This study presented 6-month and 1-year prospective outcomes data from patients who had undergone MCP joint reconstruction. Functional assessment by grip strength, pinch strength, and Jebsen-Taylor test did not improve significantly compared with preoperative values. Subjective assessment by the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), however, did improve significantly. Ulnar drift significantly decreased 1 year after surgery by an average of 24 degrees, and MCP joint range of motion increased, but this change was not significant. Continued follow-up evaluation of this cohort will determine whether these improvements are maintained in the long term. (Level III evidence)

Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM, et al. Reasons why rheumatoid arthritis patients seek surgical treatment for hand deformities. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006;31:289-294.

The purpose of this study was to determine how function, pain, and aesthetics rank in order of importance to rheumatoid arthritis patients who are considering MCP joint arthroplasty for rheumatoid hand deformities. Function, pain, and aesthetic domains from the MHQ were used in a logistic regression model to determine the factors associated with choosing hand reconstruction. Patients with less function and greater pain were more likely to choose MCP joint arthroplasty. Aesthetics was not a statistically significant predictor. (Level III evidence)

Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Wilgis EF, et al. Outcomes of silicone arthroplasty for rheumatoid metacarpophalangeal joints stratified by fingers. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009;34:1647-1652.

This multicenter, international prospective cohort study evaluated 68 patients with RA treated with SMPA. Ulnar drift, extension lag, and arc of motion for the MCP joint of each finger were measured at baseline preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. All fingers showed an improvement in ulnar drift, extension lag, and arc of motion. The largest improvements were seen in the ulnar digits compared with the radial digits. The authors concluded that despite experiential increased difficulty in maintaining posture of the ulnar digits after SMPA owing to deforming forces, sufficient correction of the deformities in the ulnar fingers is possible if adequate bone resection and realigning of the extensor mechanism are carefully performed during the procedure. (Level I evidence)

Chung KC, Kowalski CP, Kim HM, Kazmers IS. Patient outcomes following Swanson Silastic metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty in the rheumatoid hand: systematic overview. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1395-1402.

This National Institutes of Health R01 study was initiated to determine the outcomes of MCP joint arthroplasty. Although MCP joint arthroplasty had been performed for more than 30 years, the research studies on this procedure varied greatly in length of follow-up, outcome assessments, and study design. (Level III evidence)