30: Intracranial Hemorrhage After Coronary Intervention

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1182 times

CASE 30 Intracranial Hemorrhage After Coronary Intervention

Catheterization

Left venticulography revealed mild anterior hypokinesis with preserved ejection fraction. Coronary angiography found no evidence of obstructive disease in the right or left circumflex coronary arteries. Severe atherosclerotic narrowing of the proximal segment of the left anterior descending artery was likely the explanation for her acute coronary syndrome (Figures 30-1, 30-2 and Videos 30-1, 30-2). Atherosclerosis also involved the first diagonal branch and the midsegment of the left anterior descending artery, but these lesions were felt to be nonobstructive. The lesion in the proximal segment of the left anterior descending artery was treated with balloon angioplasty followed by placement of a everolimus-eluting stent (2.5 mm diameter by 15 mm long) with an excellent angiographic result (Figure 30-3 and Video 30-3), and intravascular ultrasound confirmed stent apposition. The dose of enoxaparin planned for the morning of the procedure was held (last dose greater than 12 hours from catheterization) and procedural anticoagulation consisted of bivalirudin (33 mg intravenous bolus followed by an intravenous infusion of 1.7 mg/kg/hr) and 600 mg of clopidogrel administered orally at the time of the intervention. Hemostasis was achieved with a femoral artery closure device and she returned to a telemetry unit feeling well with no complaints.

Discussion

Cerebrovascular accidents are a rare but dreaded complication of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures, occurring in 0.2% to 0.4% of procedures and associated with a high mortality.1,2 Most of these events are caused by atheroembolism or clot. Despite the liberal use of procedural anticoagulation, intracranial hemorrhage is, fortunately, very rare. In large series of patients treated with bivalirudin, the risk of intracranial hemorrhage was exceedingly low (one event out of 2993 patients or 0.03%)3; the rate of intracranial hemorrhage when the more powerful glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are used is similarly very small at only 0.07%.3 Following intervention, anticoagulation is maintained using dual antiplatelet therapy with the risk of hemorrhagic stroke from the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel of only 0.1% with no difference from aspirin alone.4

Management of an intracranial bleed occurring soon after deployment of a coronary stent is a genuine medical catch-22. The same is true for any other major life-threatening bleed such as a serious gastrointestinal or genitourinary hemorrhage. On one hand, the anticoagulants must be stopped to staunch the life-threatening bleed; on the other hand, cessation of anticoagulants might cause acute stent thrombosis and a potentially fatal acute myocardial infarction. The decisions to stop, continue, or hold and reinstitute anticoagulants in the setting of a freshly-deployed stent should not be made in a cavalier fashion. Extensive discussions regarding the risks and benefits of each strategy should occur with the consultant expert as well as the patient and family, with a coherent plan in place to anticipate and treat any potential adverse outcome. In the present case, the serious nature of intracranial hemorrhage led to the wise decision to hold anticoagulation, thus preventing further bleeding and, fortunately, resulting in a favorable outcome.