3: Extensive Coronary Calcification

Published on 02/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1813 times

CASE 3 Extensive Coronary Calcification

Cardiac catheterization

Fluoroscopy confirmed the extensive coronary calcification in both the right and left coronary trees seen by CT scan (Figure 3-2). Despite heavy calcification, there was no significant luminal obstruction present in the left coronary artery on angiography. The right coronary artery, however, contained a complex, high-grade stenosis in the proximal segment, with extensive calcification (Figure 3-3 and Video 3-1).

Because of the extensive calcification, the operator planned to treat the artery by first performing rotational atherectomy followed by balloon angioplasty and stenting. After placing a temporary transvenous pacemaker, procedural anticoagulation was accomplished with a double bolus followed by an infusion of eptifibatide, along with a bolus of unfractionated heparin, to achieve an activated clotting time of greater than 200 seconds. A 6 French extra backup right coronary guide catheter was selectively engaged and a floppy RotaWire passed into the distal vessel. The operator used a 1.5 mm atherectomy burr, platformed to 160,000 rotations per minute. After three 30-second runs, the burr passed through the proximal lesion without deceleration and a satisfactory angiographic result was observed (Figure 3-4). The burr was removed from the guide catheter and a 2.5 mm diameter by 15 mm long compliant balloon fully expanded at only 6 atmospheres pressure. A 2.5 mm diameter by 15 mm long bare-metal stent was deployed at 15 atmospheres with an excellent angiographic result (Figure 3-5 and Video 3-2); intravascular ultrasound confirmed full stent deployment at the stent site.

Discussion

Calcified coronary lesions offer substantial challenges to the interventional cardiologist. The noncompliant nature of these lesions often leads to difficulty passing balloons and stents, and typically requires the use of aggressive guide catheters to provide the back-up necessary to deliver these devices to the lesion. Once a balloon is delivered to the stenosis, the rigid lesion usually responds poorly to balloon angioplasty, leaving a significant residual stenosis, and is associated with a substantial risk of dissection. This can be a serious problem if the coronary calcification subsequently thwarts the operator’s ability to deliver a stent. Furthermore, if a stent is successfully delivered, the rigid lesion may prevent full stent expansion, leading to a higher risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis, or, in an effort to fully expand the stent, the operator may resort to balloon inflation using higher and higher pressures, which may cause vessel perforation or extensive edge dissections.

Procedural success in the presence of heavy coronary calcification may be facilitated by first debulking the lesion with rotational atherectomy (RA). Rotational atherectomy involves the use of a diamond-coated burr rotating at high speed to ablate the inelastic tissue of the plaque while preserving elastic tissue of the vessel wall. Ablation of even a small amount of calcified plaque often changes lesion compliance enough to render it more amenable to intervention. Pre-stenting atheroablation in calcified lesions results in a better acute angiographic result, a larger lumen, and a more favorable clinical outcome compared to either stenting alone or rotational atherectomy alone.1

Rotational atherectomy adds complexity to the procedure. Similar to other atheroablative techniques, it is associated with higher complication rates, including periprocedural myocardial infarction, perforation, dissection, and slow- or no-reflow phenomenon. The use of adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors along with heparin helps reduce the risk of no-reflow, and temporary pacemakers are often placed during right coronary interventions because of the heart block and bradycardia associated with rotational atherectomy in this vessel. Marked tortuosity and the presence of a dissection or visible thrombus increase the risk of rotational atherectomy and represent relative contraindications to this procedure.

The decision to first perform rotational atherectomy in a patient such as the one shown here is an important one. While many cases of extensive coronary calcification are successfully treated with balloon angioplasty and stenting, their response is highly unpredictable. A strategy of first attempting balloon angioplasty may be regretted when the operator struggles to dilate the lesion, creates an extensive dissection with a significant residual stenosis, and is then unable to pass a stent. Rotational atherectomy at this point is not possible because of the risk of extending the dissection. Pre-balloon RA might have prevented this scenario. Interestingly, success does not typically require aggressive atherectomy. Use of a single small-diameter burr such as the one used in this case (1.5 mm) is usually adequate to remove enough luminal calcium to facilitate balloon inflation and stent deployment. In fact, a strategy of aggressive rotational atherectomy (burr to artery ratio > 0.7) offers no advantage over modest atherectomy (burr to artery ratio < 0.7).2