29: Awareness During Anesthesia

Published on 06/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1134 times

CHAPTER 29 Awareness During Anesthesia

4 Describe clinical signs and symptoms of light anesthesia

Both motor signs and sympathetic activation can indicate lighter levels of anesthesia. Motor signs in response to light anesthesia frequently precede hemodynamic changes or sympathetic activation. Specific motor signs include eyelid or eye motion, swallowing, coughing, grimacing, and movement of the extremities or head. Increased respiratory effort is caused by activity of intercostal and abdominal muscles, which are suppressed at deeper levels of anesthesia. With the use of neuromuscular blockade, motor signs do not provide information about anesthetic depth. Consequently sympathetic activation represents an additional method for assessing light anesthesia. Sympathetic effects associated with light anesthesia include hypertension, tachycardia, mydriasis, tearing, sweating, and salivation. Such findings are nonspecific and are modified by anesthetic agents; thus their presence or absence is also an unreliable indicator of awareness. Other perioperative medications such as β-blockers and sympathetic blockade render these findings unreliable. In fact, signs of light anesthesia (e.g., tachycardia, hypertension) were found in only a minority of patients claiming awareness.

8 Are monitors available to assess the depth of anesthesia?

Brain electrical activity monitoring can be used to assess depth of anesthesia and includes two categories: processed electroencephalogram (pEEG) and evoked responses (e.g., auditory). No single monitor can provide a fail-safe answer to the question of depth of anesthesia. pEEG waveform technology of differing formats can be used and has entered the market to a greater extent then evoked responses. The most familiar technology is known as the bispectral index (BIS). The purpose of any of these forms of EEG analysis is to estimate the degree of hypnosis that the patient is experiencing. Raw data, collected by electrodes placed on the forehead and temporal area, are processed by the computer module to create a dimensionless numeric representation of the degree of sedation. Lower numbers correspond to a greater depth, whereas higher numbers are found in awake or lightly sedated patients. The incidence of awareness in high-risk cases was reduced by approximately 82% (0.91% to 0.17%) when BIS-guided anesthesia was provided with a BIS goal of 40 to 60 during anesthesia. Using BIS during general anesthesia with concurrent muscle relaxation resulted in a similar reduction of 77% (0.18% to 0.04%) in the incidence of awareness. In addition to the Food and Drug Administration–approved use of the BIS monitor for depth of anesthesia, using the BIS may help the anesthetist to better titrate the anesthesia to the individual. A deeper anesthetic has been associated with higher 1-year mortality in older adults, leading investigators to the conclusion that titrating BIS values may improve outcomes other than awareness. Although a BIS score less than 60 may reduce probability of awareness, the risk is not eliminated. A case report highlighted a patient with chronic pain and intraoperative hemodynamic lability who had vivid and painful explicit recall of surgery despite an average BIS score of 44. The ASA Task Force suggests that brain electrical activity monitoring is not routinely indicated but the use of brain monitoring should be considered on a case-by-case basis for selected patients (high-risk patients, light general anesthesia).