25. DEPRESSION

Published on 09/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1007 times

CHAPTER 25. DEPRESSION
Peg Esper

DEFINITION AND INCIDENCE

The term “depression” can be used to describe an emotional state that may be as simple as minor mood alterations or as major as a pathological inability to function or cope with life (Breitbart, Dickerson, Shuster et al., 2002). Reactive, or situational, depression is a common and expected response to a life-threatening disease. Reactive depression is generally self-limiting and resolves as the individual uses education, support, and other coping resources to face the threat against well-being.
A depressed mood becomes a problem for patients when it is prolonged or severe and interferes with daily functioning. Depressed mood related to an identifiable psychosocial stressor that exceeds what would be normally expected or that impairs social or occupational functioning may fit the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for an Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood (Strain, 1998). Although less specific than the criteria for Major Depressive Disorder, this diagnosis does allow for identification of early or temporary depressed states and can assist in obtaining appropriate treatment.
Major Depressive Disorder is a serious medical condition that disrupts an individual’s mood, behavior, thought processes, and physical health (American Psychiatric Association, 2000a). The DSM-IV criteria for this diagnosis are listed in Box 25-1.
Box 25-1

Author

At least five of the following symptoms have been present most of the day, or almost every day, for at least 2 weeks. At least one of the symptoms must be item 1 or 2.
1. Depressed mood (feeling sad or empty; appears tearful)
2. Markedly decreased interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, activities
3. Significant weight loss
4. Insomnia or hypersomnia
5. Psychomotor agitation or retardation
6. Fatigue or loss of energy
7. Feelings of worthlessness, or excessive or inappropriate guilt
8. Diminished ability to think or concentrate, or indecisiveness
9. Recurrent thoughts of death (not just fear of dying), recurrent suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt
From American Psychiatric Association (2000a). Major depressive disorder: A patient and family guide. Washington, DC; Author: American Psychiatric Association (2000b). Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with major depression (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Many studies document the prevalence of depression in various populations. However, these studies are somewhat difficult to compare since the researchers do not always differentiate among reactive depression, adjustment disorders, and major depressive disorders. The incidence of depressive symptoms in cancer patients varies among studies, but it is thought to be as high as 25% for significant mood disturbance (Goy & Ganzini, 2003). Depression is seen in equal proportions in patients without cancer who have terminal diagnoses (Waller & Caroline, 2000).
The data on incidence of major depressive episodes in persons with advanced cancer show less variability than do the preceding studies, probably because the criteria for major depression are well defined. Approximately 5% to 15% of patients with advanced cancer have a major depressive disorder (Hinshaw, Carnahan, & Johnson, 2002).

ETIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Recent research into the etiology of depression has found what appears to be complex bidirectional relationships among neural, endocrine, and immune systems (Illman, Corringham, Robinson et al., 2005). These data lend support for a theory of cytokine-mediated depression. Interleukin-6 has been specifically identified as higher in individuals with acute depressive conditions (Illman et al., 2005). Overactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis has also been implicated in the development of depression. This combination is believed to have an overall immunosuppressive effect on the patient (Hinshaw et al., 2002).
There are a number of risk factors associated with a diagnosis of depression (Goldberg, 2004; Hinshaw et al., 2002; Paice, 2002):
▪ Older age
▪ Diagnosis with a chronic or life-threatening illness
▪ Unmanaged symptoms, especially pain
▪ Lack of social support
▪ Self-concept disturbance, due to changes in body image or ability to carry out roles
▪ History of substance use
▪ Personal or family history of depression
▪ Difficulty in expressing emotions
▪ Spiritual or existential distress
▪ Use of medications with depressive side effects, including antihypertensives, benzodiazepines, corticosteroids, neuroleptics, amphotericin B, and certain chemotherapy agents
▪ Disease-related metabolic changes, nutritional deficiencies, systemic infections, hypercalcemia, the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone, hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, and adrenal insufficiency

ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENT

As individuals face end-of-life, the emotions that accompany the dying process can be overwhelming. The terminally ill experience multiple losses and naturally grieve these losses. Although reactive depression is normal, it is nonetheless distressing and should not be ignored. It is extremely important that the clinician assess for signs of a depressed mood and determine the severity of the patient’s depression—from mood change to adjustment disorder to major depression—and provide for the appropriate management for all levels of depression.

Assessment of Depression

The problem often cited when assessing major depression in persons with advanced diseases is that many of the somatic symptoms of depression (e.g., weight loss, fatigue, sleeping alterations) overlap with the symptoms of the disease process itself. Thus, the clinician must focus on the psychological symptoms of depressed mood, decreased interest in activities, inability to concentrate, feelings of worthlessness or excessive guilt, and recurrent death wishes as potential signs of depression (Goldberg, 2004; Nelson, 2002). In a major depression, these symptoms are present every day or almost every day for at least 2 weeks.
Major depression may be classified as mild, moderate, or severe on the basis of the severity of the symptoms. Mild depressive episodes have minimal symptoms and minor functional impairment. Moderate depression is characterized by symptoms that exceed the minimum and a greater degree of functional impairment. Severe episodes of depression involve the presence of several symptoms in excess of the minimum, and these symptoms markedly interfere with social or occupational functioning (American Psychiatric Association, 2000b).
It is often helpful to use a screening tool to assist in identifying the presence and, to some degree, the severity of depressed mood states. Information from one of the following assessment tools assists the clinician in identifying those persons who require a more detailed evaluation of their depressed mood and incorporating an instrument that best fits the practice setting.
▪ Beck Depression Inventory: The patient is asked a series of 21 questions that are scored to determine depression (Beck & Steer, 1987). This tool is based on the DSM criteria for depression.
▪ Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale: This 14-item self-report tool excludes most of the somatic symptoms of depression that are often symptoms of advanced disease and takes about 5 to 7 minutes to complete (Zabora, 1998). This tool cannot distinguish between depression and sadness (Carroll, Callies, & Noyes, 1993).
▪ Geriatric Depression Scale: This tool is designed specifically for assessing depression in the elderly. It is a 30-item subjective questionnaire that excludes somatic complaints, focusing on the psychosocial symptoms of depression (Koenig, Meador, & Cohen, 1988).
▪ In evaluating effectiveness of measurement tools to screen for and evaluate ongoing depression, the measure with the best sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value in a study conducted by Lloyd-Williams, Spiller, and Ward (2003) was identified to be the act of asking the patient, “Are you depressed?” (Nelson, 2002).

Assessment of Suicide Risk

Although suicide is relatively uncommon among cancer patients, this population has a risk of committing suicide twice that of the general population (Hinshaw et al., 2002). Essentially all persons in palliative care programs have one of the risk factors for suicide: advanced disease and poor prognosis; a suicide assessment is essential for all persons with depressed mood states.
The clinician must assess for additional factors associated with a higher risk for suicide (Goldberg, 2004; Waller & Caroline, 2000):
▪ Uncontrolled symptoms, including pain, fatigue, and emotional suffering
▪ Feelings of hopelessness and despair
▪ Men are at greater risk than women
▪ Higher incidence in oral, pharyngeal, or lung cancer or AIDS
▪ Delirium
▪ History of substance abuse, psychiatric disorder, or suicide attempt
▪ Familial history of suicide
▪ Social isolation
▪ Recent death of a loved one
It is essential that the clinician assess the seriousness of suicidal intent by asking patients whether they have ever considered taking their own lives. Further questioning is then necessary to determine whether the individual has a plan for self-harm, to establish the specificity of the plan, and to determine whether the patient has the means to carry it out. Mental health experts emphasize that any patient who has devised a plan and a means to commit suicide should be immediately referred for a thorough psychiatric evaluation. The assessment for suicide risk is ongoing. It is especially important to reevaluate the severely depressed patient who is frequently undergoing treatment for depression. A patient without the energy to follow through on a suicidal act while severely depressed may indeed have the energy as the depression lessens.

HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

The patient’s feelings of hopelessness, worthlessness, or suicidal ideation must be fully explored along with a thorough physical assessment of the somatic responses to depression (Breitbart et al., 2002; Goldberg, 2004; Hinshaw et al., 2002; Mystakidou, Rosenfeld, Parpa et al., 2005). Changes in heart rate and respiratory rate may indicate anxiety, which often accompanies depression.
The clinician must identify other potential causes for the patient’s somatic complaints, as well as disease-, symptom-, or medication-related causes of the depressive symptoms. A thorough assessment includes identification of uncontrolled symptoms, metabolic abnormalities, endocrine abnormalities, and medications associated with depressive symptoms.

INTERVENTION AND TREATMENT

The clinician must utilize the entire team when caring for persons with depressive symptoms. The supportive care of the nurse, social worker, spiritual counselor, and primary care physician may be sufficient to address the distress associated with a depressed mood. However, a clinical psychiatrist should be consulted when caring for the individual with major depression (American Psychiatric Association, 2000b).
Optimal therapy for major depression is often a combination of supportive psychotherapy, cognitive-behavioral techniques, and pharmaceutical management. For mild major depression, psychotherapy alone, antidepressant medication alone, or a combination of the two may be used. Moderate and severe major depressions often require the combination of psychotherapy and antidepressant medications. Short-term interventions for mild depression include active listening, offering verbal support, providing information to assist the individual in coping with the situation, identifying past strengths, and supporting previously successful ways of coping. The importance of incorporating spiritual support when appropriate should not be underrated. For the individual at risk for suicide, it is essential to consult a skilled psychiatrist, maintain a supportive relationship, and focus on improved quality of living (Goldberg, 2004; Goy & Ganzini, 2003; Hinshaw et al., 2002; Nelson, 2002; American Psychiatric Association, 2000b).
For individuals with a high risk of suicide, the clinician must take steps to ensure safety. Supervision, either in the patient’s residence or in a facility, may be required 24 hours a day. Objects or medications that may be used for self-harm must also be removed from the environment.
Antidepressant medications are effective in the treatment of depression. There are several different classes of antidepressant medications, whose effectiveness is comparable among and within classes. Medication selection is based on anticipated side effects, patient preference, quantity and quality of clinical trial data, and medication costs. Based on these considerations, the following medications can be considered: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), desipramine, nortriptyline, bupropion, and venlafaxine (American Psychiatric Association, 2000b). The elderly are particularly prone to the orthostatic hypotensive and anticholinergic side effects of tricyclic antidepressants and tend to have fewer side effects if one of the antidepressants listed is used (Goldberg, 2004). The axiom “start low and go slow” is certainly appropriate when titrating antidepressants in the elderly. Table 25-1 lists some of the more frequently used antidepressants by class and indicates the prevalence of various side effects. In June 2005, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Public Health Advisory regarding the potential suicidality in adults taking antidepressant medications. It is clear that clinicians must use sound clinical judgment in placing individuals on any medication and that in situations such as this, where an increased risk of suicide may exist, patients must be followed carefully for clinical changes suggestive of worsening symptoms. This includes closer monitoring when doses are increased or agents changed as well as when first initiated (FDA, 2005).
TABLE 25-1 Antidepressants
*Prevalence: ++++, very high; +++, high; ++, moderate; +, low.
All tricyclics cause slowed cardiac conduction; have the propensity to lower seizure threshold; 2000 mg can be a fatal overdose in adults; some tricyclics have established therapeutic plasma levels; moderately priced.
The lower dosages are most appropriate for depressed symptoms; no need to titrate as the tricyclics; caution warranted when coprescribed with other medications that undergo extensive hepatic metabolism, especially in the elderly; costly.
§Side effects similar to those of the SSRIs; daily dosing for extended-release capsules, twice-daily and thrice-daily dosing for tablets; should be considered when a trial of SSRIs has been ineffective; costly.
Sustained-release form given twice daily, tablets thrice daily; avoid use in patients with a history of seizure disorders; most activating antidepressant available; costly.
Moderate to costly medications; often good for depression mixed with insomnia.
Effect*
Drug Dosage (mg/day) Anticholinergic Effects Sedation Orthostatic Effects Sexual Effects GI Upset Agitation/Insomnia Comments
Tricyclics
Amitriptyline (Elavil) 100–300 ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ + None Used for neuropathic pain/hypnotic
Desipramine (Norpramin) 100–300 ++ ++ ++ +++ + +
Doxepin (Sinequan) 100–300 ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ + None
Imipramine (Tofranil) 100–300 ++++ +++ ++++ +++ + None
Nortriptyline (Pamelor) 50–200 ++ ++ ++ +++ + None “Therapeutic window” plasma level; must be within 50-150 ng/ml efficacy
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
Citalopram HBr (Celexa) 20–60 None + None ++++ +++ + Used for neuropathic pain/hypnotic
Fluoxetine (Prozac) 10–80 None None None ++++ +++ ++++
Paroxetine (Paxil) 20–60 + + None ++++ +++ +
Sertraline HCl 50–200 None + None ++++ ++++ ++
Serotonin/Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors§
Venlafaxine HCl (Effexor) 37–375 None + + +++ ++++ ++ “Therapeutic window” plasma level; must be within 50–150 ng/ml for efficacy
Norepinephrine/Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitors
Bupropion HCl (Wellbutrin) 150–450 None None None None ++ ++++
Other Antidepressants
Maprotiline HCl (Ludiomil) 150–225 ++ ++ ++ ++ + None
Mirtazapine (Remeron) 15–45 None +++ None None + None
Nefazodone HCl (Serzone) 300–600 None +++ + None ++ +
Trazodone HCl (Desyrel) 200–600 + ++++ ++++ None ++ None
Anxiety often accompanies depression. Cognitive-behavioral interventions, active listening, and psychosocial support, alone or in combination with administration of benzodiazepines, are helpful in managing this symptom. See Chapter 17 for a more detailed discussion.
Complementary interventions also play a role in the treatment of depression. These interventions can improve mood and outlook, decrease feelings of hopelessness and helplessness, and decrease anxiety (Goldberg, 2004; Hinshaw et al., 2002). Chapter 32 addresses the use and benefits of complementary therapies in end-of-life care. The clinician should consider the following for patients who have depressed mood states:
▪ Pet therapy
▪ Art therapy
▪ Color therapy
▪ Music therapy
▪ Guided imagery
▪ Aromatherapy

PATIENT AND FAMILY EDUCATION

Depression, like many psychiatric illnesses, is often perceived as an embarrassment or a disgrace. Patients and families need support and education about the diagnosis of depression, with emphasis that it is not a sign of weakness or a character flaw. Some persons find written information helpful, such as the Major Depressive Disorder: A Patient and Family Guide (American Psychiatric Association, 2000a).
The following information must be included in the teaching plan for the patient and family:
▪ Take medications as prescribed, noting that antidepressants may not produce the full therapeutic benefit for a few weeks.
▪ Report any untoward side effects of the medications so that they can be addressed.
▪ Report any worsening of symptoms.
▪ Keep a record of the depressive symptoms to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions.
▪ Use the interdisciplinary team for support and information.

EVALUATION AND PLAN FOR FOLLOW-UP

Early detection and ongoing assessment of depression are important considerations for the clinician caring for patients at end-of-life. Timely interventions are not always possible, and thoughtful consideration should be given to the appropriate medications that can be used to improve patient outcomes.
CASE STUDY
Mr. G. is a 42-year-old man with metastatic melanoma. He has completed three cycles of treatment with a combination therapy that he has tolerated quite well. His major complaints had been fatigue and mild anorexia. Before starting a fourth cycle of treatment, he experienced some visual disturbances, so an MRI of the brain was performed. MRI showed that he had developed two new metastatic sites of disease in the brain. One lesion was identified as being very close to his optic nerve, and the other was located more centrally in the brain. The tumor near the optic nerve was surgically resected, leaving Mr. G. with minimal visual sequelae, but the other lesion was deemed inoperable and treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.
The clinician saw Mr. G. in the clinic after he completed the stereotactic radiosurgery. He was on a steroid taper to be completed later in the week. Mr. G. is a little quiet during the visit and, when asked about this, he states he feels he is just tired from his stay in the hospital. On the review of systems, his only complaints are some mild fatigue and anorexia. The physical examination today does not reveal any significant findings, and his laboratory studies show only a slight anemia of 12.2 mg/dl. His weight is down 10 pounds from his visit 4 weeks earlier. Residual fatigue is often seen following radiation therapy, and suggestions to help with the patient’s weight loss are discussed. The clinician notices that the patient’s wife appears frustrated and questions whether there is something else that needs to be addressed. The wife indicates that her husband has become very distant and short-tempered with everyone at home. She also states that he is not going to bed until very late at night and then wants to sleep off and on all day. She is tearful and says that she feels like he is pushing everyone away from him right now.
Mr. G. has central nervous system involvement by disease, but it was already determined during the examination that he has no specific neurological symptoms that day. However, the clinician realizes that Mr. G. was not quite “himself” during the visit. The patient and his wife have had a very supportive relationship during previous clinic appointments. When Mr. G. is asked to comment on his wife’s concerns, he is unable to make eye contact and states that he is just concerned about recovery from his treatment. Following a review of what can be expected, this does not appear to be the whole story. The clinician asks Mr. G., “Are you depressed?” Mr. G. then broke out in sobs and admitted that he is just tired of everything. He does not want to think about the cancer and the fact that it will likely end his life sooner rather than later. He gets angry with himself for being short with his family and says that he feels all alone. Mr. G. acknowledges that he probably is depressed.
Patients taking corticosteroids may have mood swings and can be psychologically labile. To determine how much of Mr. G.’s symptoms might be related solely to the use of corticosteroids, it is noted as part of this assessment that his symptoms have been worsening despite having been on regularly decreasing doses of steroid medication. Although there may be an association with his current emotional state and steroid use, there still appears to be an underlying issue with depression.
Support is offered to Mr. and Mrs. G. and they are assured that this is not an abnormal response to everything Mr. G. is dealing with right now. He is referred for some counseling and the entire family is encouraged to speak with someone outside of the situation. Mr. G. agrees to counseling and to a trial of an antidepressant medication. Mr. G begins with bupropion hydrochloride 100 mg twice daily for 3 days; the dosage is then increased to 100 mg three times daily because Mr. G. has also expressed frustration in the past with his difficulties in trying to stop smoking. A follow-up is scheduled in 2 weeks.
After 1 week, Mr. G. calls and indicates that his mood seems to be improved and that he and his family are scheduled to have their first counseling session in a couple of days. He notes that he really has not wanted a cigarette since his neurosurgical procedure and does not know if that really has anything to do with the antidepressant medication. He is quite concerned, however, that over the last 48 hours he has had a significant problem with insomnia and feels very agitated in the evening. The decision is made to change Mr. G.’s antidepressant to citalopram hydrobromide (Celexa) 20 mg/day orally. The following week when he comes to the clinic, both he and his wife indicate that things are much improved. Mr. G. notes that the insomnia is no longer present and that he feels he is coping a little better. The patient was able to be maintained at the 20 mg/day dosage with adequate control of his depression and minimal side effects.
REFERENCES
American Psychiatric Association, Major depressive disorder: A patient and family guide. ( 2000)Author, Washington, DC.
American Psychiatric Association, Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with major depression. 2nd ed. ( 2000)Author, Washington, DC.
Beck, A.; Steer, R., Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) manual. ( 1987)The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Antonio, Tex..
Breitbart, W.; Dickerson, E.D.; Shuster, J.L.; et al., Depression, In: (Editors: Kuebler, K.K.; Esper, P.) Palliative care practices from A to Z for the bedside clinician ( 2002)Oncology Nursing Society Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 8588.
Carroll, B.; Callies, A.; Noyes, R., Screening for depression and anxiety in cancer patients using the hospital anxiety and depression scale, Gen Hosp Psych 15 (1993) 6974.
Food and Drug Administration, FDA reviews data for antidepressant use in adults, Retrieved August 8, 2005, from www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2005/ANS01362.html ( 2005).
Goldberg, L., Psychological issues in palliative care: Depression, anxiety, agitation, and delirium, Clin Fam Prac 6 (2) ( 2004) 441470.
Goy, E.; Ganzini, L., End-of-life care in geriatric psychiatry, Clin Geriatr Med 19 (4) ( 2003) 841856; vii-viii..
Hinshaw, D.B.; Carnahan, J.M.; Johnson, D.L., Depression, anxiety, and asthenia in advanced illness, J Am Coll Surg 195 (2) ( 2002) 271277.
Illman, J.; Corringham, R.; Robinson Jr., D.; et al., Are inflammatory cytokines the common link between cancer-associated cachexia and depression?J Suppl Oncol 3 (1) ( 2005) 3750.
Koenig, H.; Meador, K.; Cohen, H., Self-rated depression scales and screening for major depression in the older hospitalized patient with medical illness, J Am Geriatc Soc 36 (1988) 699706.
Lloyd-Williams, M.; Spiller, J.; Ward, J., Which depression screening tools should be used in palliative care?Pall Med 17 (1) ( 2003) 4043.
Mystakidou, K.; Rosenfeld, B.; Parpa, E.; et al., Desire for death near the end of life: The role of depression, anxiety and pain, Gen Hosp Psych 27 (4) ( 2005) 258262.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Retrieved August 31, 2005, from www.nccn.com/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/distress.pdf ( 2005).
Nelson, J.E., Palliative care of the chronically critically ill patient, Crit Care Clin 18 (3) ( 2002) 659681.
Paice, J.A., Managing psychological conditions in palliative care: Dying need not mean enduring uncontrollable anxiety, depression, or delirium, Am J Nurs 102 (11) ( 2002) 3643.
Rozans, M.; Dreisbach, A.; Lertora, J.L.; et al., Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: A review, J Clin Oncol 20 (1) ( 2002) 335339.
Strain, J.J., Adjustment disorders, In: (Editor: Holland, J.C.) Psycho-oncology ( 1998)Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 509517.
Waller, A.; Caroline, N., Handbook of palliative care in cancer. 2nd ed. ( 2000)Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
Zabora, J.R., Screening procedures for psychosocial distress, In: (Editor: Holland, J.C.) Psycho-oncology ( 1998)Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 653661.