22: Electrocardiography

Published on 06/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1096 times

CHAPTER 22 Electrocardiography

13 How are patients with myocardial infarction subdivided on the basis of ECG changes during infarction?

Myocardial infarctions (MIs) are often divided into two types: ST segment elevation MI and non-ST segment elevation MI. Patients with ST segment elevation should be considered for immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or thrombolytic therapy if PCI is unavailable. Q waves usually develop over time in the leads where there is elevation. Q waves may diminish in size or go away over time. Patients with acute MI without ST elevation often have ST-segment depression (which may be dynamic) and/or T-wave inversions. Patients with non-ST-elevation MI can usually be made pain-free with medical therapy, and cardiac catheterization is often performed within several days. However, ongoing symptoms and ECG changes refractory to medical therapy can prompt emergent invasive evaluation.

For an example of ECG changes associated with a non-ST segment elevation MI, see Figures 22-4 and 22-5.

image image

Figures 22-4 and 22-5 These ECGs are from the same patient, a vigorous 78-year-old with new chest pain that began after moderate exertion. Figure 22-4 was obtained while the patient was in an emergency room with persistent chest pain. The main finding is significant ST segment depression in the anterolateral precordial leads. The chest pain and ST segment changes resolved over the next 30 minutes (see Figure 22-5). Troponin I serum levels were mildly elevated. Because the pain was provoked by minimal exertion, with significant ECG abnormalities and abnormal troponin I, coronary angiography was performed instead of stress testing. Significant left main and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) was found, and the patient underwent successful coronary artery bypass surgery. In this example the suspicion of CAD was very strong, based on the ECG changes and clinical characteristics. However, more modest degrees of ST depression are less specific for coronary insufficiency, particularly when differences are subtle and when there is a potential alternative explanation (electrolyte imbalance, digoxin effect, or repolarization abnormality from left ventricular hypertrophy).

14 Does ST-segment elevation always indicate a myocardial infarction?

No. Other causes of ST-segment elevation are listed in Table 22-1.

TABLE 22-1 Causes of St-Segment Elevation

Acute subepicardial injury (i.e., acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) HypercalcemiaLeft ventricular hypertrophy
Early repolarization pattern Left bundle-branch block
Pericarditis Brugada syndrome
Hyperkalemia Normal variant

25 What are some of the common causes of a prolonged QT interval?

Many patients have QT prolongation from a combination of the above factors. For example, a patient with congenital long QT syndrome may have more extreme prolongation with the addition of a new drug or electrolyte abnormality. In some cases these multifactorial processes can result in life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias such as torsades de pointes (see Chapter 30).

26 A patient has a right bundle-branch block that is new compared to the ECG from 2 years ago. How should I proceed?

Although a RBBB can be caused by CAD (e.g., with a large anterior infarct destroying some of the conduction system in the interventricular septum), this is only true in a minority of RBBB patients. Such patients typically have a qR in V1 instead of an rSR′ prime because the initial r wave is lost as a consequence of the MI.

Occasionally an RBBB may be caused by congenital heart disease (such as tetralogy of Fallot), prior cardiac surgery, a cardiomyopathy, or pulmonary hypertension. History and physical examination can supplement the ECG in theses cases; and, if clinical signs of structural heart disease are noted, echocardiography may be useful.

In a minority of cases RBBB may be present in patients with significant conduction system disease. For example, some patients with coexisting hemiblock, first-degree AV block, and RBBB may be at risk for complete heart block. However, in the absence of symptoms of complete heart block (e.g., syncope or near syncope) or some ECG evidence of higher degree AV block, prophylactic pacing is not indicated.

Patients who have had (at different times) both an RBBB and an LBBB are at significant risk of complete heart block; permanent pacing is generally indicated.

For most patients with RBBB, the prognosis is excellent, and the likelihood of serious underlying heart disease is low. If the history and physical examination do not reveal any evidence of such disease, no further testing or consultation is necessary.

27 A patient has a left bundle-branch block that is new compared to the ECG from 2 years ago. How should I proceed?

In a patient with signs and symptoms of acute myocardial ischemia (e.g. chest pain, new congestive heart failure (CHF), hemodynamic instability), a new LBBB may be a sign of a new, large acute anterior MI. However, in the vast majority of cases a new LBBB is not caused by an acute MI. Sometimes a 12-lead ECG may indicate superimposed subepicardial injury in acute MI cases, but the diagnosis is more difficult than the diagnosis of an ST elevation MI without a bundle-branch block.

Even in the absence of an acute MI, an LBBB may indicate underlying structural heart disease such as a dilated cardiomyopathy or left ventricular hypertrophy. History and physical examination looking for signs and symptoms of angina, heart failure, syncope, hypertension, and valvular heart disease, are important. For elective situations echocardiography is reasonable to look for structural heart disease. Some practitioners obtain stress imaging (such as with adenosine or persantine nuclear perfusion scintigraphy) to exclude chronic ischemic heart disease as a cause of LBBB.

Overall LBBB is a less favorable prognostic sign than RBBB, even in the absence of abnormalities noted on history, physical examination, and noninvasive testing. However, the timing and necessity of any noninvasive testing depends on the patient’s clinical situation and the acuity of the surgical need. For an urgent surgical indication in a patient without other signs and symptoms of CHF or acute myocardial ischemia, it is reasonable to proceed with surgery.