20: Tendon Transfers for Radial Nerve Palsy

Published on 18/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3751 times

Procedure 20 Tendon Transfers for Radial Nerve Palsy

imageSee Video 16: Standard Tendon Transfer Sequence for Radial Nerve Palsy

See Video 17: Alternate Tendon Transfer Sequence for Radial Nerve Palsy When PL Is Absent

Examination/Imaging

Clinical Examination

image Functional deficit: The loss of function in radial nerve palsy results from the wrist drop deformity, which causes an inability to extend the wrist and the finger metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints and to extend and abduct the thumb (Fig. 20-1). The loss of wrist extension weakens power grip, and the loss of finger and thumb extension makes it difficult to grasp objects. It is important to differentiate radial nerve palsy (above the elbow) from posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) palsy (below the elbow). The extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) receives its innervation by a branch of the radial nerve that arises above the elbow. It is therefore spared in a lesion of the PIN, and patients can extend the wrist, although with radial deviation (Fig. 20-2).

image Sensation: Sensory loss in the areas innervated by the superficial radial nerve (anatomic snuffbox and dorsum of first web) can help differentiate a radial nerve lesion from a lesion of the PIN, which should have preserved sensation over the dorsum of the first web (Fig. 20-3).

image Joints: To get a good result from the tendon transfer, patients must have good passive range of motion at the wrist and the MCP joint. One of the common transfers uses wrist flexors for obtaining finger and thumb MCP joint extension. The excursion of wrist flexors is approximately 33 mm, whereas finger extension requires a tendon excursion of 50 mm. This difference in excursion is obtained by the natural tenodesis effect, and patients are able to obtain full finger extension when the wrist is flexed.

image Selection of motor: Our preferred motors are as follows. Patients with PIN palsy do not require a transfer for wrist extension because the ECRL is functional.

Exposures

image A 6-cm longitudinal incision is made over the volar radial aspect of the mid-forearm (Fig. 20-5). This incision is centered over the palpable musculotendinous junction of the ECRB and ECRL. The forearm fascia is divided, and the tendons of ECRB and ECRL are identified. The BR is identified radial to the ECRL and retracted ulnarly along with the ECRL. The superficial branch of the radial nerve should be identified under the BR and protected. This will bring into view the insertion of the PT (Fig. 20-6).

image A 4-cm longitudinal incision is made over the Lister tubercle (see Fig. 20-5). The extensor retinaculum is exposed and the third compartment opened to free the EPL. The EIP, EDC, and EDQM tendons are identified proximal to the extensor retinaculum.

image A 6-cm longitudinal incision is made over the volar aspect of the distal forearm beginning at the proximal wrist crease in line with the FCR (see Fig. 20-5). The tendons of the FCR and the PL are identified, taking care to protect the radial artery, the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve, and the median nerve. If the PL is absent, the FDS to the long finger is identified by deeper dissection through the same incision. The long finger is used instead of the ring finger to preserve the strength of the power grip by the ring finger. The FDS tendons to the long and ring fingers lie in a plane superficial to the FDS tendons to the index and small fingers.

Procedure

Step 5

image The FCR tendon (Fig. 20-8A) is divided at the wrist crease and mobilized up to the mid-forearm. A subcutaneous tunnel is made around the radial border of the forearm using a blunt-tipped mosquito forceps that will redirect the FCR tendon in a straight line to the previously exposed EDC tendons (Fig. 20-8B).

Evidence

Chotigavanich C. Tendon transfer for radial nerve palsy. Bull Hosp Joint Dis Orthop Inst. 1990;50:1-10.

The author reviewed 50 patients (43 with high radial nerve palsies and 7 with low palsies) who underwent FCU or long finger FDS transfer to the EDC. In all patients, the PL was transferred to the EPL, and, in 40 patients, the PT was transferred to the ECRL and ECRB. All regained useful hand function. Manual muscle testing demonstrated grade 4 or 5 wrist extension strength in 82%, finger MCP joint extension in 90%, and thumb extension in 92%. Good or excellent results were achieved by Tajima’s finger, thumb, and wrist motion criteria in 43 patients. Five cases with FCU transfer had radial wrist deviation. No problems with grip weakness were noted in patients in whom the FDS was used as a donor, but the author stressed the use of only one FDS. (Level IV evidence)

Chuinard RG, Boyes JH, Stark HH, et al. Tendon transfers for radial nerve palsy: use of superficialis tendons for digital extension. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1978;3:560-570.

The authors reviewed 22 patients who had the FDS of the long finger transferred to the EDC slips and the FDS of the ring finger transferred to the EPL and EIP. PT was transferred to the ECRL and ECRB. The FCR was inserted into the APL. They also developed a method to objectify results based on flexion and extension of the fingers and the wrist and abduction and extension of the thumb. By their assessment criteria, 16 patients (73%) achieved a good or excellent result. (Level IV evidence)

Skoll PJ, Hudson DA, de Jager W, et al. Long term results of tendon transfers for radial nerve palsy in patients with limited rehabilitation. Ann Plast Surg. 2000;45:122-126.

The authors retrospectively reviewed 22 patients who were treated for high radial nerve palsy with transfers of the FCU to the EDC, the PT to the ECRB, and the PL to the rerouted EPL. They used the FCR instead of the FCU in patients with PIN palsy. Using Chuinard’s criteria, the authors reported 19 good to excellent results for wrist extension, 20 for finger extension, 20 for thumb extension, and 21 for thumb abduction. Power grip was approximately one half that of the contralateral side. Ten of the 15 patients with the FCU transfer and 2 of the 7 patients with the FCR transfer had a wrist radial deviation posture at rest. All but 1 patient were able to perform activities of daily living. The Jebson test took an average of 1.46 times longer than was expected. Patient satisfaction was graded at 6.5 out of 10, with the most common complaints being stiffness and lack of dexterity and power. Thirteen of 17 patients who were employed before injury were able to return to their previous work. However, only 1 of the 7 heavy manual laborers returned to his preinjury occupation. (Level IV evidence)