20. CACHEXIA AND ANOREXIA

Published on 09/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1085 times

CHAPTER 20. CACHEXIA AND ANOREXIA
Peg Esper

DEFINITION AND INCIDENCE

Cachexia, a complex syndrome associated with metabolic changes, fat and muscle wasting, loss of appetite, and involuntary weight loss, is common with many progressive diseases. The true incidence of cachexia is difficult to determine because studies use inconsistent criteria for defining cachexia and because some studies report the incidence based on all patients with a particular disease while others include only patients with an advanced stage of the disease. It is estimated that cachexia occurs in about 80% of patients with advanced cancer, 33% of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, 20% of those with congestive heart failure, and up to 50% of patients with chronic hypoxemia associated with chronic lung disease (Anker, Ponikowski, Varney et al., 1997; Castillo-Martinez, Orea-Tejeda, Rosales et al., 2005; Davis & Dickerson, 2000; Schols, Soeters, Dingemans et al., 1993; Wanke, 2000). The complex metabolic changes associated with cachexia are characterized by increased energy expenditures that are unaffected by caloric intake. In comparison, starvation leads to energy conservation and is reversed by caloric intake. Thus, cachexia is not synonymous with starvation. Cachexia is correlated with decreased quality of life and decreased survival in all disease populations. An estimated 30% of oncology patients die due to the effects of cachexia (Illman, Corringham, Robinson et al., 2005; Strasser & Bruera, 2002).

ETIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Although the syndrome of weight loss, loss of appetite, and profound weakness has long been recognized in patients with advanced diseases, there is not yet a complete understanding of or agreement on the factors that contribute to its cause. Cancer cachexia was previously thought to be the result of excessive use of nutrients by tumors and decreased energy intake on the part of the individual. Research involving a number of wasting syndromes has now identified several overlapping mechanisms that mediate cachexia, including metabolic alterations, neurohormonal alterations, and changes in anabolic processes (Andreas, 2005; Anker, Steinborn, & Strassberg, 2004; Esper & Harb, 2005; Strasser, 2003; Wouters, Creutzbergt, & Schols, 2002).
Proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 1, interleukin 6, interferon γ, and tumor necrosis factor α are likely involved in mediating the cachexia syndrome. These substances may (1) interfere with appetite signals in the hypothalamus, causing anorexia; (2) increase the metabolic rate by inducing thermogenesis and muscle wasting; (3) interfere with lipid storage; and (4) contribute to muscle protein loss and increased energy expenditure (Davis, 2002; Illman et al., 2005; Inui, 2002, McCarthy, 2003; Strasser, 2003; Winter, 2002). Dietary supplementation does not reverse this process. Thus, the cachexia syndrome may be viewed as a chronic inflammatory condition rather than a nutritional aberration (McCarthy, 2003).
In addition to the metabolic syndrome of cachexia, there are other problems that may contribute to a decreased appetite and weight loss (Strasser, 2003; Strasser & Bruera, 2002):
▪ Alterations in oral intake (stomatitis, early satiety, nausea and vomiting, bowel obstruction, pain, etc.)
▪ Alterations in gastrointestinal absorption (autoimmune syndromes, severe diarrhea)
▪ Protein loss (ongoing drainage of pleural effusions or ascitic fluid, renal failure)
▪ Catabolic states (infections, renal failure, hyperthyroidism, congestive heart failure)
▪ Functional loss of muscle mass (prolonged bed rest, hormonal insufficiencies, aging)

ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENT

Patients must be assessed for potentially reversible causes of weight loss or lack of appetite before the diagnosis of cachexia-anorexia syndrome can be made. Consider the following factors (Ross & Alexander, 2001):
▪ Radiation or chemotherapy treatments
▪ Severe, untreated pain
▪ Constipation
▪ Adjustment disorder, depression, or cognitive failure
▪ Mechanical obstruction of alimentary canal by tumor
▪ Oral disorders such as Candida infection or poorly fitting dentures
▪ Appetite-reducing medications
Weight may be monitored using scales, although the rapidly falling numbers may be a source of distress to some patients. Appetite is a subjective experience that may be measured by using a visual analog or numerical scale. By asking a patient to indicate a number between 0 and 10, where 10 represents an excellent appetite and 0 means no appetite at all, it is possible to monitor the patient’s status and the results of interventions.

HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

A thorough history includes the following information (Montagnini & Moat, 2004):
▪ Review of current illness including treatments
▪ Review of past or concurrent illnesses such as diabetes mellitus
▪ History of weight loss
▪ Exploration of dietary and fluid intake, taste changes, food aversions and preferences
▪ Exploration of current symptom profile, including pain, nausea, dysphagia, bowel habits, fatigue
▪ Review of functional status
▪ Review of medications
▪ Psychological distress, body image
▪ Oral cavity: fungal, bacteria, or viral infection; stomatitis; mucositis; xerostomia; or direct tumor involvement
▪ Abdomen: masses, bowel sounds
▪ Skin: dehydration, areas of redness or breakdown

DIAGNOSTICS

Cachectic patients will probably show evidence of a low serum albumin level, decreased total protein levels, anemia, and increased serum triglyceride level, glucose levels, and lactic acidosis. However, these laboratory investigations are generally considered to be nonspecific, too variable, and not helpful in diagnosing or monitoring anorexia and cachexia in people with a terminal illness (Nelson & Walsh, 2002).
Depending on the stage of illness and treatment goals, it may be appropriate to monitor easily reversible problems such as electrolyte and metabolic imbalances (sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium levels). More elaborate evaluations such as the use of extensive dietary intake monitoring and skinfold thickness measurements should be reserved for clinical trials. Radiologic investigations may be helpful to rule out treatable problems such as bowel obstruction and constipation.

INTERVENTION AND TREATMENT

With the palliative care goal of improving quality of life, treatment must be aimed at treating any reversible conditions, minimizing symptoms that affect appetite, implementing measures to improve appetite, and educating patients and families about the potential benefits and limits of treatment interventions (Waller & Caroline, 2000). When patients lose weight and family members are distressed about the failing appetites of their loved ones, clinicians must understand that their responses cannot be simply to find ways to introduce more nutrients into patients. This approach has not been successful and may actually create harm (Strasser, 2003).

Preventative Measures

Preventative interventions for the metabolic syndrome of cachexia remain elusive and will ultimately hinge on a better understanding of its pathophysiological processes. Medications that interfere with the inflammatory processes induced by cytokines may hold some promise but are currently investigational. Because cachexia has been shown to have a significant effect on psychological and physiological well-being as well as survival, further research is critical.

Supportive Measures

▪ Ensure good mouth care.
▪ Maintain pleasant surroundings with small meals of favorite foods.
▪ Refer to a nutritionist, if available.
▪ Choose oral support rather than parenteral intervention.
▪ Encourage patients and families to think of food as a comfort measure. Advise offering favorite foods without worrying about nutritional value.

Enteral and Parenteral Supplemental Feeding

Enteral feeding may be considered for some patients who have an appetite but are unable to eat as a result of obstruction (e.g., patients with head and neck or esophageal cancer). Side effects of this method may include aspiration pneumonia and diarrhea.
If the underlying problems in cachexia were simply disorders in the patient’s ability to eat enough or absorb what was eaten, then total parenteral nutrition would be the answer. However, research has shown that total parenteral nutrition does not improve overall condition or function. Parenteral feeding is not typically recommended in the palliative care setting and is associated with a number of comorbidities, including infection and hepatic and renal problems (Dixon & Esper, 2002).

Pharmacological Intervention

Research into drug therapy continues, but results have been somewhat disappointing and the medications can be expensive. The following may be considered for patients who wish this intervention (Dixon & Esper, 2002; Montagnini & Moat, 2004; Strasser & Bruera, 2002):
Progestational agents: megestrol acetate, 160 to 800 mg/day orally. Although there is no clear evidence that this drug improves quality of life, research has shown that it can definitely improve appetite and can increase nonfluid weight in some patients. It is generally well tolerated but may increase the risk of thromboembolic complications, mild edema, vaginal spotting in women, and impotence in men. Progestational agents can be very expensive.
Corticosteroids: dexamethasone, starting at 4 to 8 mg/day orally. This drug has been less effective than megestrol acetate in improving appetite, and benefits may be short lasting. Side effects may include immunosuppression, weakness, and osteoporosis. However, corticosteroids are less expensive than progestational agents.
Prokinetic agents such as metoclopramide, 10 mg orally before meals, may improve gastric emptying and decrease nausea.
Cannabinoids, specifically delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (dronabinol), an active compound of marijuana, have been formulated into oral medications. The drug is marketed as Marinol in the United States and Nabilone in Canada. Cannabinoids may be better tolerated in younger patients. Altered mentation is a potential side effect. Dosages are generally 5 to 15 mg/day when taken orally. Sedation, a common side effect, can be avoided by taking the medication at night.

Future Therapy

Research into the specific causes of cachexia in chronic and end-stage diseases attempts to identify those targets that contribute to the loss of lean muscle mass. One pathway under review is the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. This pathway has been linked with the muscle wasting seen in cachexia. Targets that inhibit nuclear factor-κB, such as thalidomide, resveratrol, and eicosapentaenoic acid, may prove useful (Davis, 2002; Illman et al., 2005; Tisdale, 2005). Additional studies are evaluating the use of anticytokine-targeted biologics including those that block tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (Illman et al., 2005). These studies are ongoing and further research is required.

PATIENT AND FAMILY EDUCATION

The symptoms of anorexia and cachexia can be devastating for patients and families, representing a visible sign of illness. The ability to eat is so closely associated with health and well-being that many people have great difficulty accepting that adequate nutrition is no longer possible. It is essential to explain to patients and families that most people with advanced diseases lose weight because of complex metabolic problems that cannot be changed, not because they are not eating (Waller & Caroline, 2000). Eating more or using enteral or parenteral supplements will not make a difference and may lead to more distress.

EVALUATION AND PLAN FOR FOLLOW-UP

Regular assessment and coaching of patients and families are essential to support their ability to cope. Keep both the patient and family informed to enable them to make informed decisions about trying various interventions.
CASE STUDY
Mr. B. is a 68-year-old man with metastatic hormone- refractory prostate cancer. He has not been seen for 8 weeks, as he was receiving radiation therapy for a metastatic lesion at T8 that was impinging on the spinal cord. He has undergone 4 weeks of treatment, which was completed 10 days ago.
Upon entering the examination room, the clinician notes that Mr. B. looks quite gaunt and much frailer than when last seen in clinic. His weight has decreased 30 pounds, from 196 to 166 pounds, since his last clinic visit. As part of the review of systems, Mr. B. identifies the following symptoms:
• Food “doesn’t taste right”
• Mild dysphagia and epigastric discomfort
• Low-level nausea present most of the time
• Back pain with a pain score of 4 of 10
• Difficult bowel movements [small quantities of hard stool]
• Complaint of generalized weakness and fatigue
Physical examination includes the following significant findings:
• Skin dry with poor skin turgor, erythema over the mid-back
• White patches covering the buccal mucosa
• Tenderness to palpation over the epigastric region
• Hypoactive bowel sounds
• Trace edema of the lower extremities
• No focal neurological findings
• Dexamethasone taper (currently at 0.75 mg orally twice daily)
• Oxycontin 20 mg orally every 12 hours
• Oxycodone 5 to 10 mg orally every 4 hours as needed (using approximately twice daily)
• Senokot one tablet daily orally
• Atenolol 50 mg/day orally
Mr. B. and his wife are very concerned that he has lost this much weight and they are looking for guidance. Mr. B. expresses that he is not interested in undergoing any additional treatment for his prostate cancer as he feels the radiation “took too much out of me.”
Based on a comprehensive evaluation, the clinician concludes that Mr. B.’s issues with anorexia and cachexia are multifactorial in etiology. Oral thrush is common for patients on long-term corticosteroids. It is likely that he has some lack of appetite specifically related to this condition. He may also have some mild esophagitis related to both the candidiasis and the radiation therapy he just completed. His weight loss could cause his dentures to be ill fitted (if he is using dentures). He may have some gastrointestinal irritation from the corticosteroid that causes his mild nausea. It also appears that his fluid status is suboptimal, along with his bowel management.
The clinician discusses the findings with the patient and his wife. They are encouraged to begin the following recommendations with the goal of improving Mr. B.’s physical comfort and sense of well-being:
• Nystatin suspension 5 ml (swish and swallow) three times daily for 10 days
• Omeprazole 20 mg/day orally
• Megestrol acetate (800 mg/20 ml) 20 ml/day orally
• Increase Senokot to two tablets twice daily orally
• Increase fluid intake as tolerated
• Begin small frequent feedings with a nutritional shake twice daily
• Return for a clinic appointment in 2 weeks
When Mr. B. is seen 2 weeks later, he indicates that he is feeling much better. He notes that his taste began to improve almost immediately when the nystatin was initiated. He also notes that 2 to 3 days after starting the megestrol, he found that he was actually feeling hungry again. He has gained 10 pounds since last seen in clinic and has no increased edema. He notes that the discomfort in the epigastric area has also disappeared. His bowel movements have been softer and occurring on a daily basis. He indicates that he stopped the nutritional shakes since he is eating better. His last dose of dexamethasone was 1 week ago.
On examination, his oral thrush has resolved, bowel sounds are normoactive, and skin turgor has improved. Overall, Mr. B. is more animated and appears stronger. The clinician recommends that Mr. B. discontinue the omeprazole since he is no longer taking the dexamethasone. Mr. is also told that he may stop the megestrol at this time.
REFERENCES
Andreas, S., Neurohormonal activation as a link to systemic manifestations of chronic lung disease, Chest 128 (5) ( 2005) 36183624.
Anker, S.D.; Ponikowski, P.; Varney, S.; et al., Wasting as independent risk factor for mortality in chronic heart failure, Lancet 349 (9058) ( 1997) 10501053.
Anker, S.D.; Steinborn, W.; Strassberg, S., Cardiac cachexia, Ann Med 36 (7) ( 2004) 518529.
Castillo-Martinez, L.; Orea-Tejeda, A.; Rosales, M.T.; et al., Anthropometric variables and physical activity as predictors of cardiac cachexia, Int J Cardiol 99 (2) ( 2005) 239245.
Davis, M.P., New drugs for the anorexia-cachexia syndrome, Curr Oncol Report 4 (3) ( 2002) 264274.
Davis, M.P.; Dickerson, D., Cachexia and anorexia: Cancer’s covert killer, Support Care Cancer 8 (3) ( 2000) 180187.
Dixon, S.W.; Esper, P., Anorexia, cachexia, and nutritional support, In: (Editors: Kuebler, K.K.; Esper, P.) Palliative practices from A to Z for the bedside clinician ( 2002)ONS Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 1322.
Esper, D.H.; Harb, W.A., The cancer cachexia syndrome: A review of metabolic and clinical manifestations, Nutr Clin Pract 20 (4) ( 2005) 369376.
Illman, J.; Corringham, R.; Robinson Jr., D.; et al., Are inflammatory cytokines the common link between cancer-associated cachexia and depression?J Support Oncol 3 (1) ( 2005) 3750.
Inui, A., Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: Current issues in research and management, CA: Cancer J Clin 52 (2) ( 2002) 7291.
McCarthy, D.O., Rethinking nutritional support for persons with cancer cachexia, Biol Res Nurs 5 (1) ( 2003) 317.
Montagnini, M.L.; Moat, M.E., Non-pain symptom management in palliative care, Clin Fam Pract 6 (2) ( 2004) 395396-422.
Nelson, K.A.; Walsh, D., The cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: A survey of the Prognostic Inflammatory and Nutritional Index (PINI) in advanced disease, J Pain Symptom Manage 24 (4) ( 2002) 424428.
Ross, D.D.; Alexander, C.S., Terminally ill patients: Part I—Fatigue, anorexia, cachexia, nausea and vomiting, Am Family Physician 64 (5) ( 2001) 807814.
Schols, A.M.; Soeters, P.B.; Dingemans, A.M.; et al., Prevalence and characteristics of nutritional depletion in patients with stable COPD eligible for pulmonary rehabilitation, Am Rev Respir Dis 147 (5) ( 1993) 11511156.
Strasser, F., Eating-related disorders in patients with advanced cancer, Support Care Cancer 11 (1) ( 2003) 1120.
Strasser, F.; Bruera, E.D., Update on anorexia and cachexia, Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 16 (3) ( 2002) 589617.
Tisdale, M.J., The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway as a therapeutic target for muscle wasting, J Support Oncol 3 (3) ( 2005) 209217.
Waller, A.; Caroline, N., Handbook of palliative care in cancer. 2nd ed. ( 2000)Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
Wanke, C.A., Weight loss and wasting remain common complications in individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy, Clin Infect Dis 31 (3) ( 2000) 803805.
Winter, S.M., Terminal nutrition: Framing the debate for withdrawal of nutritional support in terminally ill patients, Am J Med 109 (9) ( 2002) 723726.
Wouters, E.F.; Creutzberg, E.C.; Schols, A.M., Systemic effects of COPD, Chest 121 (Suppl 5) ( 2002) 127S130S.