Case 20

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1326 times

CASE 20

image
image

ANSWERS

CASE 20

Right Coronary Artery Stenosis with Approximately 80% Narrowing

1A, B, C, and D

2A

3C

4C

References

Sundaram B, Patel S, Agarwal P, et al. Anatomy and terminology for the interpretation and reporting of cardiac MDCT: part 2, CT angiography, cardiac function assessment, and noncoronary and extracardiac findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(3):584–598.

Sundaram B, Patel S, Bogot N, et al. Anatomy and terminology for the interpretation and reporting of cardiac MDCT: part 1, structured report, coronary calcium screening, and coronary artery anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(3):574–583.

Cross-Reference

Cardiac Imaging: The REQUISITES, ed 3, pp 248–261.

Comment

Imaging

This patient presented to the emergency department with atypical chest pain and was deemed to be at low to intermediate risk for coronary artery disease. The patient was triaged with triple rule-out CT angiography of the thorax to exclude coronary artery disease, pulmonary embolism, and aortic dissection. This examination revealed no pulmonary embolism or aortic dissection. Two multiplanar reformatted images of the right coronary artery showed a focal high-grade stenosis (approximately 80%) composed entirely of noncalcified plaque (Figs. A and B). Subsequently, the patient underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization, which confirmed right coronary artery stenosis. A successful balloon angioplasty with stent placement was performed with resolution of the patient’s symptoms.

Utility

Millions of people present to the emergency department annually with the complaint of chest pain. Only 20% to 25% of these patients are found to have a coronary etiology of their pain at the time of discharge. CT angiography can be used to triage these patients rapidly and diagnose important extracardiac causes of chest pain. It is ideally used in patients with a low or intermediate pretest probability of disease based on their risk factors and clinical presentation. A positive examination (i.e., coronary stenosis ≥50%) must be confirmed with diagnostic catheterization, whereas a negative examination (i.e., any stenosis <50%) needs no further testing because the lesion is unlikely to be the cause of the patient’s chest pain.