19: Tendon Transfers for Ulnar Nerve Palsy

Published on 19/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 19/04/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2831 times

Procedure 19 Tendon Transfers for Ulnar Nerve Palsy

image See Video 15: Tendon Transfers for High Median and Ulnar Nerve Palsy

Examination/Imaging

Clinical Examination

image Functional deficit: The loss of function in ulnar nerve palsy results from the claw deformity, which causes an abnormal pattern of finger flexion, weak thumb key pinch, small finger abduction deformity, and loss of ring and small finger distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint flexion (Fig. 19-1). However, these problems may not be functionally disabling in all patients, and some may require correction of only one aspect. It is important to determine this and then to set a sequence for the appropriate corrective procedures. It is better to correct the lack of DIP joint flexion first, followed by transfers for restoring thumb key pinch, and finally correction of the claw deformity because it is difficult to establish appropriate intrinsic plus posture of the hand.

image Sensation: It is important to document the level of sensation in the thumb and the fingers preoperatively. Loss of sensation on the dorsoulnar aspect of the hand, which is innervated by the dorsal branch of ulnar nerve, can help differentiate a high ulnar nerve lesion (e.g., cubital tunnel compression) from a low ulnar nerve lesion (e.g., Guyon canal compression), which should have preserved sensation over the dorsal-ulnar hand (Fig. 19-7).

image Joints: To achieve a good result from the tendon transfer, patients must have good passive range of motion at the IP and the MCP joints. The most important aspect of assessment of an ulnar nerve palsy is determining whether the patient can extend the PIP joint with the examiner correcting the MCP joint hyperextension (Bouvier maneuver) (Fig. 19-8).

Full active PIP joint extension: This indicates that the extensor mechanism is competent (Fig. 19-8A). This patient only needs correction of the MCP joint hyperextension and can use the intact extensor mechanism to obtain PIP joint extension. A static or a dynamic procedure will suffice for this patient. A static procedure is preferred because it is simpler.

image Selection of motor: We use a static procedure (MCP joint volar plate advancement) for correction of the claw deformity in patients who are able to achieve full active extension of the PIP joint. In patients unable to achieve full PIP joint extension, we use a dynamic transfer and prefer the long or ring finger FDS as a motor. We prefer to use the ring finger FDS in low ulnar nerve palsy because the FDS is important for chuck grip, which is predominantly a function of the thumb and index and long fingers. In patients with high ulnar nerve palsy with a weak or absent FDP to the ring finger, the FDS remains the only flexor of the ring finger, and it is prudent to use the long finger FDS. Other motors that have been described include the extensor indicis proprius (EIP) and EDM (both have insufficient length, resulting in excessive tension of the extensor apparatus), wrist flexors (flexor carpi radialis [FCR], palmaris longus [PL]), and wrist extensors (extensor carpi radialis longus [ECRL], extensor carpi radialis brevis [ECRB]). (All need a tendon graft.) We use the ECRB lengthened with a PL tendon graft as the motor for restoring thumb pinch. Other motors that have been described include the brachioradialis, ECRL, extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), EIP, and FDS.

Procedure 1—Static Correction of Claw Deformity with an MCP Joint Volar Plate Advancement